NHS Reforms: Labour Strategists Privately Believe Changes Will Ultimately Benefit Them

Burnham Miliband Nhs Reform

The Huffington Post UK   First Posted: 8/02/2012 08:15 Updated: 8/02/2012 09:37

Labour are privately playing down their battle against NHS reforms as the Health and Social Care Bill returns to the Lords, with some in the party believing they should give the government enough rope to hang themselves, party sources have told the Huffington Post UK.

Although the party line hasn't changed and shadow ministers are still calling on the government to drop the Bill, senior party workers behind the scenes are assessing whether the reforms will cause the coalition to lose the next election.

The party have warned Wednesday "won't be a big day", and sources in the Lords have indicated they are more concerned about the "toxic" sections in the bill focusing on competition and surrounding NHS regulator monitor, which will be debated at the end of the month.

Privately some Labour strategists are assessing whether the party will ultimately gain if the reforms go through and the NHS is plunged into chaos because of the shake-up. A party source close to the front bench told HuffPost there was an ethical dilemma between principles and politics.

Another source said the resignation or reshuffling of Andrew Lansley would be bad for Labour, because he was rapidly becoming a totemic hate figure in the health service.

These rumblings behind the scenes in the party run contrary to the official line from shadow health secretary Andy Burnham, who highlighted the problem of the competition in the NHS on Wednesday, and warned the reforms risked creating a health service that was "demoralised, destabilised and fearful of the future."

He told BBC Radio 4's Today programme he thought the bill could be defeated. "This bill will damage the national health service.. We should drop the bill."

As Labour back away from the attack, health secretary Andrew Lansley is under renewed pressure. On Tuesday after a Number 10 source was quoted in the Times saying the prime minister wanted to see Lansley "taken out and shot" a Downing Street spokeswoman insisted the health secretary continued to enjoy David Cameron's "full support", despite mounting criticisms of his planned NHS reforms and press speculation about his future in the Cabinet.

According to reports on Wednesday morning the prime minister will throw his support behind the bill.

On Sunday Ed Miliband called for a cross-party alliance against the bill, saying there were just "three months to save the NHS".

Last week the government tabled amendments to the NHS reforms, in an attempt to shore up support before the plans go back to the Lords next week. The changes mean that the secretary of state will be accountable for the health service "beyond doubt" and will, alongside the NHS commissioning board and clinical comissioning groups, have to report on progress in tackling health inequalities.

But despite the changes, the majority of health professionals oppose the bill. On Wednesday morning representatives from the Royal College of Nursing, BMA, Royal College of Midwives and Chartered Society of Physiotherapy wrote to the Guardian calling for the bill to be dropped.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST UK POLITICS

Labour are privately playing down their battle against NHS reforms as the Health and Social Care Bill returns to the Lords, with some in the party believing they should give the government enough rope...
Labour are privately playing down their battle against NHS reforms as the Health and Social Care Bill returns to the Lords, with some in the party believing they should give the government enough rope...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 8
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
06:22 PM on 02/08/2012
Closing the coalition is the last thing the UK needs and three month deadlines are not the responsibility of anyone party. The NHS is something Andrew Landsley has no control over, so I understand why this three month measure has been implemented, however they fail to impress me politically either of them. I do wish them well though, because this does need sorting out in the most democratic way possible privatisation by stealth is good for those who can afford Bupa but the NHS is a necessity here in UK.
http://www.stirringtroubleinternationally.com/2011/01/18/a-cynical-glance-around-the-world-of-organised-lootings-dodgy-sainthoods-and-privatisations-by-stealth/
03:39 PM on 02/08/2012
It begs the question are these people actual socialists or an infiltration of tories pretending to be.
northern git
fed up with all the political crap in life
04:30 PM on 02/08/2012
don't think any of them know what they are


they would like to be popular but that is a pipe dream

all I can think is they are so out of touch with reality they could not find their way home (well they do have three or more to choose from)
northern git
fed up with all the political crap in life
01:14 PM on 02/08/2012
Didn't Tony Blair say something about having a limited time to save something in three month?

and wasn't that the NHS/

God having Ed Millipede trying to emulate blurry Blair

now that is scary

maybe three months to save us from him
12:31 PM on 02/08/2012
So Labour care more about winning the next election than the well being of people. It seems Labour are no better than the coalition.
This comment has been removed.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
09:54 AM on 02/08/2012
a sketch of The Lansley NHS riots:
http://macdunlop.wordpress.com/2012/02/07/the-lansley-gang-and-the-nhs-riots/