Syria Crisis: Britain Has 'No Plans' To Arm Rebels, Says William Hague

William Hague

First Posted: 9/02/2012 19:31 Updated: 10/02/2012 07:56   PA

Britain has no plans to arm Syrian rebels trying to overthrow President Bashar Assad, the foreign secretary said today.

William Hague insisted the UK had no intention of getting involved in the conflict inside Syria, where Assad's opponents are facing violent reprisals from the regime.

He would not guarantee that Britain would not become involved in military action, but stressed: "We are clearly not planning military intervention."

Amid speculation that the UK could assist the rebels with weapons or other equipment, Mr Hague told Sky News: "Britain is not engaged in that and we haven't done that in any of the conflicts or we certainly don't have any plans to do such.

"We are intensifying our contacts with opposition groups, opposition groups mainly outside Syria.

"We're also increasing our support for organisations that get food and medical supplies in to people so badly affected by this situation."

Asked whether Britain could help the opposition with communications or body armour, he added: "No, our plans at the moment are to intensify our diplomatic work which is what we are doing with the Arab League, with our partners at the United Nations Security Council, to help with food and medical supplies, to work with the opposition outside Syria.

"These are the things we're doing, there is a lot the United Kingdom can do on all those fronts but we're not engaged in conflict within Syria."

Earlier, David Cameron pledged to maintain the pressure on Bashar Assad and his government and Britain's ambassador to Syria hit out at the regime's "shocking" violence against its own people.

Simon Collis described seeing security forces beat 40 peaceful protesters in the centre of the capital.

In a blog on the Foreign Office website, Mr Collis - who was recalled from Damascus for consultations earlier this week - wrote: "They made no provocative chants and advocated no violence. They simply held up pictures of their friends and family members that had been held in detention for months or years without trial. It was a scene of dignified and peaceful protest.

"After 10 minutes, the regime had had enough. Plain-clothed security forces moved in en masse. We stood and watched as they beat innocent civilians with sticks and batons."

Mr Collis went on: "Without context, it can be hard to make sense of YouTube images shot on a mobile phone.

"It can be hard to understand why a man with a family in a town in Syria would decide to take up arms against his government.

"It can be hard to believe that over 5,000 people have been killed in 10 months, or that torture is a regular occurrence in prisons, children brutalised and tanks and mortars used by the army against its own citizens.

"If I hadn't seen for myself what the Syrian regime has done I would be asking these questions too.

"But I have. And it is too shocking to ignore."

Speaking at an international gathering in Sweden, Mr Cameron said he was determined to see the "toughest possible response" to the brutality.

"It really is appalling, the scenes of destruction in Homs, and it is quite clear that this is a regime hell-bent on killing, murdering and maiming its own citizens," he said.

"Which is why we need to take the toughest possible response we can - a tough response at the United Nations, which we have, and I was very disappointed obviously by the Russian and Chinese veto.

"We also need to work with the opposition to try and help shape their future and assist them in whatever way we can.

"And we also need to put together the strongest possible contact group of like-minded nations.

"We will continue the pressure upon this regime."

The Syrian army has reportedly launched fresh mortar and rocket attacks in Homs, killing scores of people, as the government continues a push aimed at crushing rebel forces.

The city has been a leading focus of unrest in the 11-month uprising against Assad.

UN chief Ban Ki-moon has condemned the "appalling brutality" of the onslaught.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST UK

Britain has no plans to arm Syrian rebels trying to overthrow President Bashar Assad, the foreign secretary said today. William Hague insisted the UK had no intention of getting involved in the con...
Britain has no plans to arm Syrian rebels trying to overthrow President Bashar Assad, the foreign secretary said today. William Hague insisted the UK had no intention of getting involved in the con...
Filed by Ned Simons  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 22
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Seaniebhoy
08:01 PM on 02/10/2012
Why not...afterall it worked out ever so well for the Americans when they armed the Afghan rebels during the 80's....right?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mokgee
Sabu.Satsang, Samsara, Solitude...
10:25 AM on 02/10/2012
Don't worry William, you are far too late as always in European politics, not Britain, any more. The Russians and Chinese, are way ahead of you as usual.......Be very careful with the Falklands problem, the world is spoiling for a fight.......
07:59 AM on 02/10/2012
I see the Billiard ball is at it again. Hague is nothing short of an ongoing disaster as foreign secretary. What right would we or that other interfearing idiot Obama have to start arming the rebles in syria? They always start off by say we have no plans to do it, weeks later they are doing exactly the opposite. Trouble making fools the lot of them. Learn to keep your big ugly noses out of other countries affairs and there will be less wars and less expence for the poor tax payer.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
06:12 AM on 02/10/2012
Let the Arab nations sort out their own problems we have enough problems of our own.
photo
MsBubblyBlonde
Sassy,brassy,kiss my assy.
09:40 AM on 02/10/2012
Well said Drum,because trust me the Arab nations would not give a toss about us if we were in need.
05:43 AM on 02/10/2012
Wait a minute . Which reason the syrian gov can have to kill randomly childrens, famillies and innocent people, when they need to kill these rebels walking on the street with kalashnikovs. But a rebel has enough reasons to kill civilians. If there is enough blood the community international will react on his favor putting pressure on Assad et Russia, ain't ? I'am sure our gov give too much credit to these reportscoming from so-called "pro-democratic peacefull protesters"!
photo
novelist2000
veritas non olet
05:18 AM on 02/10/2012
I would certainly hope so, that Britain does not send any weapons.You can exchange people at the top but that doesn't change much, or has Mubarak's departure turned Egypt into a paradise? 'The Shah must go' we heard for years, then he did go and is Iran a better place? We must remove Saddam and all will be well in Iraq.........

I counted 11 (eleven) religions in Syria, and given the fact that religion is the most important thing in their lives and someone from another religion is always inferior and an enemy, the violence is so entreched that it will all go on, until another strongman emerges.

The conflict must burn itself out, and prolonging it through sending arms is really quite criminal.

These countries have an added problem through that unshakeable tradition of having everyone in the street on Friday nights. Any spark ignites so easily. It must burn itself out until people develop war fatigue, only then will there be peace. Assad or not Assad is not the question.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Norman Mitchison
01:06 AM on 02/10/2012
We have`nt got enough for our own troops let alone arming other nations. Let the US do it.
11:10 PM on 02/09/2012
Rebel fighters? They could become peaceful fighters by having peaceful march on the street everyday until Assad goes away without having to kill many innocents. So called freedom fighters can help everyone else in proccess. Expecting other nations to come and free them by blowing up their country is madness and it does not make sense at all. They are the one who would pay for rebuilding cost, building cost and war cost because nothing comes free we all know it?

To change government, if one nation have to go through all this like Libiya, it is better to have democracy just to vote and run nation like so many on planet, it is not going to end corruption and criminal government filled with gangsters. This is what democracy government have where ever there is an democracy.

In some countries where is a democracy, when they take uneducated voters to vote, they pay day wage and food money and make them vote for their party. Those with black money and mafia gangs, they wins because money buys everything. What is the different between communist, socialist, capitalist, and democracy is nothing? Illuminatis always find a way to take poor people wages and their kids?
10:11 PM on 02/09/2012
Arm them?
Where is the profit in that?
majdf18148
I have nothing to declare but my curiosity
10:00 PM on 02/09/2012
Given how long it took to arm our own troops in Iraq and Afghanistan properly I can't say I am surprised! Anyway, arm them with what? An immigration visa, a benefits booklet? The US will take the first steps aided and abetted by Turkey. Bet my bottom dollar!
photo
MsBubblyBlonde
Sassy,brassy,kiss my assy.
09:43 AM on 02/10/2012
Majdf18148=== sadly there might be more truth than you realise in your words "arm them with what? An immigratio­n visa, a benefits booklet? ". I am anticipating our lily livered government to accept more than our fair share of asylum seekers from Syria.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Michaelxx
09:27 PM on 02/09/2012
which means our government will.
09:00 PM on 02/09/2012
No plans, we're just going to do it (as always).
photo
MsBubblyBlonde
Sassy,brassy,kiss my assy.
09:45 AM on 02/10/2012
Probably...risk our soldiers lives for countries that will always be high risk war zones. Let the Arabs sort themselves out,they have more than enough money to do so.
But that wouldn't be deemed as p.c would it?
08:06 PM on 02/09/2012
Really all these issues kicking off in the World, many of which could be forseen, and yet we see draconian defence cuts.

Time UK governments stopped taking on commitments or funded the forces properly. Same mistake with successive Governments since the fall of the Berlin wall. The World really isnt that different a place post cold war, if anything its actually more dangerous.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
08:00 PM on 02/09/2012
Britian has no plans to do anything, becauce the poor Syrians don't have enough oil to worry about. Come on Hague, what is the difference between what is going on in Syria , and what was happening in Libya, stopping us fron interveving?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
09:16 PM on 02/09/2012
TOO TRUE...
08:14 AM on 02/10/2012
so its ok to let these people die? without help from any country. we are murderers. shame on the world.
photo
MsBubblyBlonde
Sassy,brassy,kiss my assy.
09:48 AM on 02/10/2012
So you think by adding more innocent people(our soldiers) into the situation it will stop these countries from fighting?We can't fight everyones battles for them, we can't afford to fight our own.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
01:18 PM on 02/10/2012
If you had bothered to read my post before mouthing off, you would have read that
I asked Hague why we weren't intervening! I personally see no difference between what is happening in Homs, and what we intervened to stop in Benghazi. I think we should be helping, but we probably won't!