Sir Stuart Rose Backs Government Work Experience Scheme

Posted: 27/02/12 06:45 GMT  |  Updated: 27/02/12 06:45 GMT   PA

Sir Stuart Rose Workfare

The former head of Marks & Spencer has defended the Government's controversial work experience scheme and accused protesters of attempting to "sabotage" it.

Sir Stuart Rose said it was "baffling" that anyone would complain about jobless youngsters being given work opportunities at a time of high youth unemployment and called on firms to support the programme.

"We're offering young people the opportunity to really understand what the workplace is about and it appears there is some plan to sabotage this, which I think is nonsense," he told Sky News.

Activist groups have been pressuring firms to quit the scheme amid accusations that it was "slave labour" because youngsters worked for nothing, while keeping their benefits.

But the former executive chairman of M&S said parents should tell their jobless children to "get stuck in" and grasp the opportunity being offered.

Sir Stuart added: "If you are drawing unemployment benefit and you are looking to get into the workplace and somebody says to you, "We'll give you some experience" and you have got a week apparently to withdraw from it if it doesn't suit you, why would you not do it?

"If I was the parent of one of these people I'd say, "Go on to it, lad, get in there, get stuck in."

The British businessman said he stacked shelves and sweep warehouses when he began his retail career as a M&S management trainee 40 years ago, describing the duties as part of working life.

"It's about getting people into the routine of working, making sure they are up in the morning, making sure they're presentable, make sure they arrive on time, make sure they know what it's like to have a properly constructed work programme, and shelf stacking is just a part of it." he added.

Sir Stuart said the notion that youngsters on the scheme are being exploited was "nonsense" adding it was "baffling" they are being led to believe so.

He said firms were apparently being "intimidated" by the campaigners, adding: "One or two have shown a little less than backbone, if I might say so.

"I think you have got to stick with it. If there are one or two issues of administration in the process that need sorting out, then let's sort it out, but it seems to me quite straightforward."

There has been growing controversy over the work experience programme in recent weeks with a series of protests by campaigners.

Supermarket giant Tesco has offered to pay youngsters on the scheme and asked ministers to remove the threat of benefit sanctions against those not completing their work experience, while a number of other companies have been reviewing their involvement.

Employment Minister Chris Grayling has defended the scheme, saying that half of those who joined it after the launch at the end of last year had now found a job, often with companies which offered them work experience.

He also claimed that firms reportedly pulling out of the programme, including supermarket giant Sainsbury's, had never formally been involved in the government initiative because they ran their own scheme.

About 100 organisations were involved in the scheme and not one had pulled out, he added

FOLLOW UK

The former head of Marks & Spencer has defended the Government's controversial work experience scheme and accused protesters of attempting to "sabotage" it. Sir Stuart Rose said it was "baffling" t...
The former head of Marks & Spencer has defended the Government's controversial work experience scheme and accused protesters of attempting to "sabotage" it. Sir Stuart Rose said it was "baffling" t...
Filed by Dina Rickman  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 61
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
Mickey Mouse 1
There are no lies or deceit on a chess board.
10:37 PM on 02/27/2012
Starting at the bottom sweeping floors? Trouble is that TV shows like X-Factor gives kids ideas that they should start at the top!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Ppenguinator
Life's too imprtant to be taken seriously.
09:43 PM on 02/27/2012
The problem I see with the scheme is that for every minimum-wage job done by an unpayed worker, a payed job is lost.
photo
casual agent
Advocate for social justice
11:53 PM on 02/27/2012
Exactly',..No ones job will be safe from now on'..Bit like a negative version of the National Lottery'.....It could be you next?...This is the price we pay for ignoring the unions maybe/
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Paul Wagland
Resistance is fertile
11:30 AM on 02/28/2012
Depends on the work involved - some jobs are not getting done by either paid or unpaid labour. Let's take litter picking as an example - not enough people currently doing it in my town. The council would have to pay out for people to do it, so a strain on public finances. If you organise teams of dole claimants to do it then it gets done for no extra cost to the taxpayer. Put them in teams, so it doesn't matter if a few people don't turn up (so they can go to last-minute job interviews or whatever) but a given weekly period of attendance (ten hours maybe) as a prerequisite for dole payment means the public gets a cleaner town for no extra cost. The key is that it's work in the public interest, not for private companies, as the public purse funds the dole. Making them work for Tesco is very obviously wrong.
07:25 PM on 02/27/2012
that's what i like about this guy, he says what he thinks, warts and all
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
08:04 PM on 02/27/2012
Its his thinking thats questionable.
lastpost
see biography
02:31 PM on 02/27/2012
"The former head of Marks & Spencer has defended the Government's controversial work experience scheme"
Whatever happened to the M&S principle of returning something substandard for a full refund?

"baffling"
There are always people looking for a better job. There are always companies with unfilled vacancies. Humm…

"If you are drawing unemployment benefit and you are looking to get into the workplace and somebody says to you, "We'll give you some experience" and you have got a week apparently to withdraw from it if it doesn't suit you, why would you not do it?"
Especially if they added: Do a good job, prove yourself, and we’ll pay you what you would have earned in company gift tokens. Following a trial period in our employ. Just look upon it as you would any bankers type bonus scheme. Plus if we continually recycle trainees, we compensate the scheme for that abuse.
01:58 PM on 02/27/2012
the only ppl making money is A4E
A4E you ask
1 they get paid when you are put on the govermants scam scheme
2, the get paid for when they put you on any placement
3 they get paid if you find a job which the scam scheme dident find you
4, the get paid when you leave the scame scam scheme ooops i mean The Work Programe
5, Finally if your still in work 26 weeks later Gues who gets paid again A4E
that is totally Bull why should the providers get paid so much
and yet we have to work for free what ever happen to min wage fair enough you gain work experiance... But whats to say these companys will not offer any job why should they when the scam scheme will provide a free work force
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
12:32 AM on 02/28/2012
These 1% Business moguls stick together, and to quote their noble leader "they are ALL in it together", that is in the business of exploiting their poorer relations in society. And unlike their poorer relations who pay their fare share of taxes, these exploiting business tycoons hide their money in offshore accounts.GREED is the only business they are ALL in together?
01:31 PM on 02/27/2012
I dont see any issues with doing what is necessary to get people off the dole queues. Longer term unemployed probably need training and experience so why do people complain?? Noone complained when we had to do 2 weeks work experience at school - I received no pay so whats the difference..... I did speak to a guy the other day who was moaning that the new rules that say he has to work 24/25hrs and not 16hrs anymore to claim tax credits was difficult because there were no extra hours due to the work experience people. My comment to him was that he had never bothered to work more than the minimum requirement for tax credits before and was only doing so now because he had to. Therefore he still just wanted to do the minimum to make a claim. The guy thinks that is OK - IT IS NOT OK - He shold have been striving to gain more work for the past few years. Just lazy good for nothing ******* that cannot be bothered to do a full weeks work.
01:03 PM on 02/27/2012
Here is the controversy we complain about the migrants getting the work that these youngsters are going for, the migrants get the work because they are reliable ( so it seems) Surely if a youngster proves his worth, as an employer rather the “devil you know than the one you do not” It seems that most youngsters in the scheme have proved themselves by the third week and are snapped up by the employers as a proven asset by the 3rd week. Who would employ someone who was late, untidy, morose and with the attitude they are employed as slaves rather than getting the foot in the door and saying look at me syndrome
01:27 PM on 02/27/2012
GET YOUR FACTS RIGHT NO COMPANY WILL EMPLOY ANY PERSON IF THEY ARE GETTING FREE LABOUR ON A SIX MONTH TURN AROUND. THIS I KNOW FOR A FACT
MY SON HAS BEEN ON THIS SCHEEM AND SO AS MANY OF HIS FRIENDS AND NOT ONE OF THEM WAS GIVEN A JOB AND NO HE IS NOT A YOB HE DOES NOT SMOKE OR DRINK. HE HAS 5 A GRADE A LEVELS HE HAS ALSO JUST GOT HIS SECURITY BADGE ALL THIS AND TWO YEARS AT COLLAGE ON A PLASTERING COURSE. THIS GOVERNMENT HAS FUC*ED UP THIS COUNTRY.
07:29 PM on 02/27/2012
looks like your computer is a bit fu##ed up as well....security badge eh....i bet he's fighting the girls off as we speak.
12:49 PM on 02/27/2012
In the past people actually paid the employer to be taken on as an apprentice - it costs employers money to train people and they are only going to take on trainees if the busines absolutely requires it .

The reality is many of the young unemployed are not interested in improving their employability - you don't see them queued up outside the lobrary at 9.00 in the mornings and learning through to closing time . Even those supposed to be learning are hardly kiling themselves , I use my local university library - its practically deserted at weekends - if your number 1 priority in life is finding a job then you wil fond one - it may take a bit of time but there is not a queue that you have to stand in line waiting " your turn " que jumping is permited - in fact it is essential .
There are over 1 milion people who have not done a days work in 10 years - by going to their local library at zero cost they could now be fluent in 5 languages - or a qualified accountant or teacher - the reality is they can't be bothered - they are happy with their lives of idleness - if they were not they would have found some way in 10 years to change things .
We all have the same 24 hours in a day - it is how we CHOOSE TO USE THEM that makes
12:43 PM on 02/27/2012
Sir Stuart Rose's comments are laughable. Clearly when he was stacking shelves he received something called a WAGE for doing so. Then he goes on to say if you do not like it after a week you can leave - what he failed to say is when you leave before the SIX weeks you lose your benefit - so people CANNOT leave without having their benifits stopped. If you asked this twerp to work for six weeks for nothing - increasing the big businesses profits - he would of course say yes he would do it - but then he's got a few million quid in the bank to fall back on - how many people claiming job seekers allowance have his kind of money. And we give this fool a knighthood - says it all really.
12:43 PM on 02/27/2012
Well if he defends this. I am not shopping there. Plenty of better alternatives!
12:49 PM on 02/27/2012
Good! One less at the check out!
12:37 PM on 02/27/2012
M&S = Money Grabbers & Slaves
12:17 PM on 02/27/2012
they should pay these people minimum wage for six months to a year and their dole then it would not be seen as slave labour.
12:12 PM on 02/27/2012
THIS MAN MUST LIKE SLAVE LABOUR. NO REAL JOBS ARE AVAILABLE AT THE END OF THE 6 MONTHS PERIOD. DO YOU THINK COMPANIES WOULD EMPLOY PEOPLE WHEN THEY CAN GET THEM FOR FREE EVERY SIX MONTHS. MY SON WAS FORCED ONTO THE SCHEEM THE COMPANY HE WAS SENT TO HAD FIVE OTHERS AS WELL AS MY SON BUT NOT ONE OF THEM WAS GIVEN A JOB. NOW THE SAME COMPANY HAS ANOTHER SIX. LETS FACE THE TRUTH ITS JUST ANOTHER WAY OF HIDING THE TRUE NUMBER OF UNEMPLOYED. IF THIS WAS A GENUINE SCHEEM TO HELP THE UNEMPLOYED THEN THEY SHOULD AT LEAST RECIVE TWICE THE AMOUNT OF UNEMPLOYMENT BENEFIT AND A FREE TRAVEL PASS BECAUSE WORKING 40+ HOURS FOR £59.00 AND HAVING TO PAY UPTO £15.00 A WEEK FOR THE PRIVALGE IS JUST A JOKE
11:47 AM on 02/27/2012
In the 1980s, my son was on work experience at a garage in London. Most of their work involved servicing and repairing commercial vehicles.
He spent most of his time on his back, under vehicles, emptying the oil tanks. This was a job none of the others wanted to do.
Needless to say, he didn't learn much.
I'm afraid the new initiative will be much the same.
01:34 PM on 02/27/2012
so he learnt something? You must expect to do teh jobs that are leased enjoyed as you learn/train etc. You dont start day 1 as CEO you know.
01:43 PM on 02/27/2012
awful spelling lol the and least...........
11:31 AM on 02/27/2012
M&S support Slavery - not very bright Stuart.
12:18 PM on 02/27/2012
ANY DECENT PERSON WOULD BOYCOT M&S FOR USING SLAVE LABOUR. £59.00 FOR A 40+ HOUR WEEK AND NOT TO MENTION THE £15.00 IT WOULD COST TO TRAVEL EVERY DAY. M&S SHOULD BE ASHAMED OF ITS SELF. BUT HEY THE DIRECTOR IS A CONSERVATIVE
01:46 PM on 02/27/2012
M&S support the unemployed would sound better and more accurate. Big companies help out the unemployed by offering a placement and they get slated. Too many moaners that know nothing in this country. Its about time they found something to occupy their time other than whining about opportunities for the unemployed. Luckily it wont make any difference to the system.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
03:04 PM on 02/27/2012
Wouldn't they be better offering young people permanent jobs? If the work is there to be done they should employ people to do it surely?