Vitamin A ‘Could Prevent Skin Cancer' Say Experts

Vitamin A Skin Cancer

The Huffington Post UK   First Posted: 2/03/2012 13:04 Updated: 2/03/2012 13:08

Taking daily vitamin A supplements could protect against deadly melanoma skin cancer, scientists claim.

According to researchers from the Kaiser Permanente Northern California Division of Research, a compound found in vitamin A, (Retinol), is vital for protecting against skin cancer.

Retinol is part of a family of chemical compounds known as retinoids and penetrates the outer layers of the skin and repairs damage to the lower layers, where collagen and elastin are found.

Acid found in Retinol, encourages skin cells to function normally and increases regular cell renewal. It is also widely praised for its anti-ageing properties.

Expert dermatologists analysed the skin cancer risk in 69,635 men and women aged between 50 and 76 who took a daily vitamin A supplement, either through a pill form or as food supplements.

Researchers discovered that those who took the supplements, in particular retinol, were 60% less likely to develop melanoma skin cancer, the deadliest form, than those who took no supplements. Participants who took higher does of more than 1,200mg a day, increased their prevention against the cancer by 74%.

Interestingly, researchers found no link between foods containing vitamin A (like eggs, liver and milk) and a reduced risk of skin cancer, as well as another powerful compound that the body turns into vitamin A (carotenoids).

Carotenoids, commonly found in bright coloured vegetables like carrots and tomatoes, are said to improve the immune system and contain powerful antioxidants.

Researchers discovered that vitamin A retinol supplements had the biggest impact on women.

Dr. Maryam Asgari, a dermatologist from the study, said, as reported on the Daily Mail: “Our data suggests a possible interaction between supplemental retinol use and the anatomic site of melanoma, with sun-exposed sites showing a stronger protective effect than sun-protected sites.”

However, a leading cancer charity has warned people against bulk buying retinol supplements.

Claire Knight, senior health information officer at Cancer Research UK, told The Huffington Post: “We don’t recommend people start taking retinol supplements based on this study, particularly as high doses can be toxic.

“The result was based on a very small number of people with melanoma, and the authors didn’t account for other important factors that influence the risk of skin cancer, such as the number of moles a person has.

"And crucially, when the authors looked at whether a particular dose was linked to risk, the link between retinol and melanoma disappeared.

“The good news is that you can reduce the risk of skin cancer by enjoying the sun safely – use shade, clothing and at least SPF 15 sunscreen to help protect your skin from sunburn.”

In the UK, more than 11,700 people are diagnosed with skin cancer and it claims 2,070 lives a year.

Recently it was discovered that a twice-daily skin cancer drug ‘doubled the survival time’ in patients. Scientists also revealed that a new, non-surgical skin cancer ‘radioactive paint’ cream could be available in two years. This cream promises to cure skin cancer after just two hours of treatment.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST UK LIFESTYLE

Taking daily vitamin A supplements could protect against deadly melanoma skin cancer, scientists claim. According to researchers from the Kaiser Permanente Northern California Division of Research,...
Taking daily vitamin A supplements could protect against deadly melanoma skin cancer, scientists claim. According to researchers from the Kaiser Permanente Northern California Division of Research,...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 22
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
12:44 AM on 03/24/2012
I have been using a vitamin a/retinol and peptide creme on a basal cell on my upper lip. It has almost disappeared. While I plan on going to the dermatologist (it takes forever to get an appointment), this near removal of this worrisome lesion from the use of this cream is making the wait a lot easier. Maybe there IS something to this.
04:20 AM on 03/03/2012
I have always been convinced that artificial sweeteners such as saccerine are a major cause of skin cancer. Enjoy that 'diet' drink.
08:28 PM on 03/02/2012
I'm sorry to say that this is the sort of rubish that stopped me donating to Cancer Research. They only seem to come out with a lot of, maybe's, it could, we think and it might, and when they do come up with something that seems as though at may work to some degree, it is always years away yet,or too expensive to actually be given to the patients that desperatly need them. A more cynical person might think that if a cure for cancer were to be found, an awful lot of people would lose millions in grant money. Most of what they come out with my Nan has already told me years ago.. My heart goes out to all those suffering from this wicked disease, who, on an almost daily basis, read headlines about the latest breakthrough only to read on that it is still 10 or more years away, they should keep it to themselves until they are sure it works, and it is ready to market.
12:53 PM on 03/03/2012
Elimentary, as you might say to Watson, cancer is a money-making racket.
02:54 PM on 03/03/2012
a growth industry.
04:44 PM on 03/02/2012
Whats new we were giving vitamin A to white kids in Africa in the sixties as a sun protection along with milking salve.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
onionboy
Blessed are the Cheese Makers
04:44 PM on 03/02/2012
Alternatively, you can eat a medium-size carrot, half a canteloupe, a cup of spinach or pumpkin, or a medium-size sweet potato...and get the same amount of Vitamin A (plus other nutrients) as found in this study. I've never understood the allure of taking a pill to get a substance that you can get so easily as part of your diet.
03:20 PM on 03/02/2012
Vit A (retinal) and precursors such as retinol, are very effective experimental mutagens, women of reproductive age are not advised to take excess. Real excess, even of some natural sources such as bear-liver can kill. I also remember reading an inquest on a dead health freak (male for once!) who did for himself with carrot-juice.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Bradley Scott Roon
not left or right: think for yourself
03:13 PM on 03/02/2012
And let's not forget to eat unprocessed foods. They have more nutrition in them and are thus going to help you get all the ingredients you need to make a YOU. If the whole system works better, the whole system works better. Of course now any non organic food is likely to contain GMOs, and they are toxic. Standard foods have lots of residues in them - i've read 760 pounds of pesticide per acre for strawberries. Carrots almost as high. Any food with Roundup/glyphosate? GUARANTEED bad nutrition in addition to being carcinogenic, an endocrine disruptor, and a mutagen. (deformed children and animals in Argentina where villages are oversprayed while mothers are pregnant. Some monsters there)
In fact the FDA allows roundup residue in your food to now be 0.20 ppm. To make that make sense, the accepted glyphosate residue level in food prior to GMOs was 0.08 ppm because at 0.10 ppm the LDL50 tests indicate that most people will develop central nervous system damage. GMO crops need and hold more toxins. Thus they couldn't be sold at previous residue levels. Thus allowing twice the level that is likely to cause nerve damage in you. Can anyone say ADHD? Autism contribution? We don't know.
We don know that cetacean tumor biopsies show pesticides and herbicides in every tumor.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
onionboy
Blessed are the Cheese Makers
04:41 PM on 03/02/2012
Supplements ARE processed foods. If people want vitamin A they are better off eating spinach, canteloupe. carrots, etc. There's no reason to take a pill if you can get the exact same stuff from diet.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Bradley Scott Roon
not left or right: think for yourself
05:25 PM on 03/02/2012
Yes, but in this country the soil is so deficient from crop mining that you are not likely to get all the 70 plus minerals you need if you do not supplement, and that's assuming organic. Which many of us cannot afford.
Of course CFAO animals are unhealthy and 70% of the cereal crops in this country feed them, not people. If 70% of the land were turned into grass fed beef we'd get better EFA's, the fats would help us, and the protein would be better. Rotate pastures and follow with chickens after 3 days and the chickens eat the insect larvae with the grasses and undigested grain, have incredibly healthy eggs and meat, till the soil w/o compaction, and keep cows, fields and chickens all healthier. Other rotations are obviously possible.
Familiar w/Joel Salatin? Watch the video FRESH on the Mercola website - free until Saturday. Inspiring. His neighbor specializes in raising beef and even uses animal based feeds to increase his production. Neighbor makes about $150.00/acre. Joel makes about 3 grand/acre through rotation, multiple cropping, and rebuilding the soil.
I may be your choir, dude, and the comment you responded to did mention eating foods as opposed to supplements.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Kehlan Sutai Inigan
09:10 AM on 03/03/2012
Just to put some of that into perspective, ppm is parts per million. Hence 0.2ppm is still a very tiny amount. The limit of detection for glyphosate is 0.01ppm (you can't detect it below that amount). Now, this chemical is a herbicide. Its is not sprayed directly on the crop, it would kill it. Its used on the surrounding grounds to keep weeds down. There are also very strict harvest intervals (the amount of time that must lapse between spraying and harvest). In the UK, suppliers send products for residue testing before sending the food to the customers. If you were to look at the results you'd find that its very rare that glyphosate is detected.
You state tht standard foods have lots of residues on them, they have some, yes and i tiny amounts but nothing like the levels you quote. As for your comments about GMO's I'm afraid that is simply not true. One thing the major supermarkets are united on is banning the use of GMO's. Every single supplier has to sign an undertaking which is legally binding and that undertaking clearly bans GMO's. So please, if you must scaremonger, get your facts right.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Bradley Scott Roon
not left or right: think for yourself
05:07 PM on 03/03/2012
Satellite died so i can't see what i wrote prior.

In the US we seldom test food for toxins. Even when they are tested there is no complete battery of tests to determine what toxin is present. That is exacerbated in foreign produce and foods. At best only about 20% of pesticides of all three classes are detectable. (plant, insect, & disease pests) When tests are performed, they do not test all of the toxins that they CAN detect, and glyphosate is very difficult to detect.
When the avg California strawberry comes from a field that has 670 # of pesticide/acre you can't assure us that there is no toxicity. When cetacean autopsies show that EVERY SINGLE CANCEROUS TUMOR HAS PESTICIDES AND HERBICIDES IN THEIR CANCERS you can't tell me that the diluted and partially broken down toxins in the ocean are more concentrated than those recently sprayed on a field. Spray sprays. It is not a laboratory application with clear separation. Applications done in California fog have been proven to migrate up to 5 miles from point of application. So yes, a farmer stopped his toxin application for harvest, but has unknown application right as they pick.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Bradley Scott Roon
not left or right: think for yourself
05:14 PM on 03/03/2012
As a builder i can assure you that the real world is not as sanitary as the theoretical world of the intellectual, professional lab/drawing board/office worker. And the real world ALWAYS trumps ag theory. Look at how GMOs have failed miserably and dangerously on every single point which they were alleged to be a solution. Weeding, pests, non-contamination, mutation of animal and plant species (including human) poor nutrition and fake proteins, carcinogenicity, proliferation of intestinal lining cells, spontaneous death in crop and GMO consuming animals.
The Sudden Death Syndrome, SDS, now is killing GMO munching livestock at an alarming rate, to the point at which some locations in the US are having difficulty maintaining herd size in milk cattle. Granted, milk cows are pretty inbred and have a roughly 10 - 15% sterility rate. Unless they are "treated" w/rBST. Then they have a 45% sterility rate. Now with the vastly increased rate of still birth from GMO grain fed cows, things are near crisis.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Bradley Scott Roon
not left or right: think for yourself
03:06 PM on 03/02/2012
This is news? I've known this for over 20 years! How about the vitamin D? You don't want the synthetic kind, the best is YOURS made from the sun, and it helps against multiple types of cancers. Worried about skin cancer? Then get some sun. If you don't overdo it and gradually increase your exposure you don't need to end up looking like a walnut, and will naturally make the D3.
Most don't know that skin cancer was virtually unknown in the US until the late 50's when petro skin lotions came on the market. When sunscreen hit (anything more than SPF 8 blocks D3 formation) the market skin cancer rates jumped 500%. Two reasons, some people thought they were protected, but were only protected against one UV type. 2nd reason: in 1931 Dr Warburg proved that cancer takes place (turns out always) in a low oxygen environment. When you prevent your skin from breathing, no O2 can get in, no waste products eliminated. Hey, that's what pores do. That makes a perfect cancer breeding ground.
11:03 PM on 03/03/2012
Very informative. Thank you!!
Syllogizer
Barely Left of Pobedonostsev
08:58 PM on 04/30/2012
Not that informative. A natural tan does not block nearly as much UV as a sunblock does. And I have to doubt his clima about skin cancer rates jumping 500%.