Scottish Independence: Alex Salmond Says Campaign Will Begin In May

Refendum Date Scottish Independence

First Posted: 4/03/2012 15:07 Updated: 4/03/2012 15:27   PA

The Scottish independence campaign will be launched in May more than two years before the yes campaign's preferred date, First Minister Alex Salmond said today.

Mr Salmond, who won an unprecedented majority in the Scottish Parliament last year, said it would not be run only by the SNP but would feature a "broad-based" range of supporters, including unions and employers.

In an interview with the BBC's Sunday Politics programme, Mr Salmond said he wanted a long campaign, with the referendum in autumn 2014, to ensure voters in Scotland had answers to all the open questions about the implications of the decision.

He said opponents of independence seemed to agree on nothing but the need to say no and pledged his party would be able to answer all voters' questions.

Mr Salmond said: "The people who seem to argue for a no seem to be in no fit position to argue their case. They don't even know what their case is.

"I think it is important when we come to the referendum in 2014 people will have an exact proposition on independence, which I pledge to give. All of the questions (will be) answered to people's satisfaction.

"I think we will win the referendum. In fact, so confident are we about winning the referendum, shortly after the local elections in Scotland in May and when the final position on the Scottish Government's consultation, which is I think May 11, then the yes campaign will be launched.

"That won't just be the Scottish National Party. That will be a broad-based campaign with civic Scotland, job creators of Scotland, with the unions of Scotland, a variety of people coming together to enunciate the case for Scotland.

"There will be a positive approach which will contrast very markedly with the opponents united only in their negativity."

Mr Salmond was pressed during the interview on the economics of such a move and what keeping the pound would mean for a newly independent Scotland.

He said the SNP would be promoting a new "sterling area" which would involved a fiscal stability pact, meaning limits on borrowing.
The First Minister told the programme: "Your fiscal room for manoeuvre is limited in the modern world anyway.

"Let's say your stability pact said over the long term your borrowing should not exceed 3% of GDP. I would argue that is no more than the fiscal discipline a sensible country would have in any case.

"There would have to be a stability pact which would have criteria on what they could borrow."

Mr Salmond explained his change in position on whether Scotland should join the euro, saying the "facts have changed, so my view has changed".

A monetary union between the UK and Scotland would operate well because the two economies were already closely matched, Mr Salmond said, unlike some of the economies within the troubled eurozone.

He said a newly independent Scotland would be a successor state to the European Union and would not have to apply for new membership from scratch.

The SNP leader said documents published by his Government on the issue were consistent with legal advice from the Scottish Government's law officers but said it was not the practice of either the UK or Scottish Government to release legal advice.

Meanwhile, Scottish Liberal Democrat leader Willie Rennie rounded off his party's spring conference with an attack on Mr Salmond who he accused of spending too much time with "billionaires".

Mr Rennie said the First Minister prefers to court the rich and powerful, naming media mogul Rupert Murdoch, US tycoon Donald Trump and Stagecoach founder Brian Souter.

In the final speech of the three-day conference in Inverness, Mr Rennie appealed to the SNP leader to spend more time with the "dispossessed" instead.

He said: "Our First Minister prefers to court the rich and powerful rather than the dispossessed and the vulnerable.

"Giggling on the golf course with Donald Trump who denies climate change. Up the back of the bus with Brian Souter, the man who denies gay people equality in our Scotland. And now he's got Rupert Murdoch on speed dial, inviting him round for fireside chats at Bute House."

He continued: "Rupert, Brian and Donald: the would-be midwives of independent Scotland.

"It's too much time with billionaires, not enough time with the dispossessed and vulnerable."

FOLLOW HUFFPOST UK POLITICS

The Scottish independence campaign will be launched in May more than two years before the yes campaign's preferred date, First Minister Alex Salmond said today. Mr Salmond, who won an unprecedented...
The Scottish independence campaign will be launched in May more than two years before the yes campaign's preferred date, First Minister Alex Salmond said today. Mr Salmond, who won an unprecedented...
Filed by Sara C Nelson  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 115
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
09:23 AM on 03/07/2012
An awful lot of ill informed drivel being spouted from a lot of our friends and neighbours south of the border. May I suggest you read the Scottish government's white paper published in 2009 covering the outcome of the national converstation it conducted after coming to power in 2007 regarding the options for an independent Scotland:

http://www.scotland.gov.uk/publications/2009/11/26155932/0
photo
tc-byrne
Victoria Concordia Crescit
06:14 PM on 03/05/2012
So here you go Scotland, a 2yr positive campaign on why you should be Independant, tad early but there's many question to be asked and many positive anwsers to be given.
the Scottish nationalist will run a positve campaign, the Scottish unionist are in no fit position to argue thier case,
So one half of Scotland are positive, and the other half have no idea,
good start, Please!!
08:10 AM on 03/13/2012
the snp are negative rebels, the unionists positve about their future as a United Kingdom...good start Scotland.
photo
tc-byrne
Victoria Concordia Crescit
08:40 AM on 03/13/2012
emillio11; I see my sarcasm is not lost on you, all this is political spin but i cant see how salmond can turn 1/4mil unemployed and rising into a positive, and who is going to lead a unionist campaign, the unionist will aways be seen as negative by the snp as there against there point of veiw but i think the scots are getting a bit tired of that old chestnut.
the snp just attack all the time laying the blame elsewhere in time that will be seen as negative, the unionist will have to turn that to there advantage but i dont think there's any need to rush.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
cynic123
11:02 AM on 03/05/2012
Question Who gets the Queen? Us or them ? please please your god let them have her and her family.
09:31 AM on 03/07/2012
cynic123 HM Queen Elizabeth II of England was also invested as Her Grace Queen Elizabeth I Queen of Scots.
For 104 years before the Treaty of Union 1707 independent sovereign nations Scotland and England both shared the same monarchs. After the United Kingdom is dissolved independent sovereign nations England and Scotland will still share the same monarch just as Canada Australia New Zealend and about another dozen independent sovereign nations do at present. Sorry.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
cynic123
10:58 AM on 03/05/2012
This is good news. I have been working on designing a new flag and hope to make my fortune. I have a nice flag idea for Schotland and a nice idea fo the rest of Britain.If the country get behind this idea and run comptitions on Blue peter it will take the light off what the government are up to. The idea of Scotland going will make work for the unemployed. Such as passports, boarder agences, policeing, etc etc etc. Now if we can get Wales to do likewise then that will bring in even more work. The severn bridges can have gates on both sides, again more boarder controls etc etc etc it all looks like a fantastic idea. Mind you I do think SalmondHas read the book "The man who would be king". A llI can say about him is Scotland bewere of this man.
09:40 AM on 03/07/2012
Sorry to burst your bubble but Scotland has two flags already the Scottish Lion Rampant and the Saltire or St Andrews cross, just about the oldest national flag in existance. Those will do fine to be going on with, but thankyou for your concern.

The Irish Republic sees no need for the border controls you imagine so I think your fortress England might be a non-starter.

Not only is Salmond familiar with Mr Kipling's exceedingly good book he has seen the film and is on first name terms with leading man of the title, himself an avowed Scottish nationalist.
This comment has been removed.
10:05 AM on 03/05/2012
ALEX SALMOND RESPONSIBLE FOR AN INDIPENDENT SCOTLAND AND DESTROYING BRITAIN , TOGETHER WE ARE STRONG SEPERATE WE WILL BE WEAKER.
10:12 AM on 03/05/2012
In what way would we be stronger together? Please please tell us, because this is the question we keep asking, and we keep waiting for an answer.
This comment has been removed.
photo
ScottishScript
"I am not a number, I am a person!"
11:49 AM on 03/05/2012
However using your caps lock does not make for a stronger argument.
07:23 PM on 03/13/2012
eye catching though paddy.
08:55 AM on 03/05/2012
Will this mean that they all the supporters will retreat back over the border? If this goes ahead then border controls should be established (rebuild Hadrians wall? )

They should not expect nor get any financial support from the British taxpayer - we are supporting enough foreigners at home and abroad.
And the first people to be deported back there should be Alex Salmon & family. They don't like it here - then they have the same choice as all of the other moaning foreigners. Take a leaf out of the Aussie book - You are free to "Go back to where you came from."
09:01 AM on 03/05/2012
ok, so you're going for Fortress England, which seems kind of insular, and er, was it not revealed just last week that there have been all sorts of people managing to arrive in the UK through a leaky channel tunnel? Hmm. Also, if you do choose to rebuild Hadrian's wall you better check first how a big chunk of the people in Northumberland feel about that.
And Why would it be necessary to deport someone who is not in England?
And why do you take this attitude anyway, why do you find it impossible to say, "Go on Scotland, follow your dream, we'll encourage you to achieve it in whatever way we can", like any good neighbour would. But then maybe you're not interested in being a good neighbour.
08:10 AM on 03/05/2012
The Caledonian cry is "Its Scotlands Oil" Well it is not, it is North Sea Oil that by international treaty is farmed in the sections allocated to the UK, and thats the key, UK and not Scotalnd. Not sure why just because it is brought ashore in Scotland, they should, Mugabe style" claim it as their own! What most people forget is that, the exchequer raises £38 billion in revenue from Alba, and they cost £78 billion either from their own allocated budget, or direct cots from Westminster..I think we the British taxpayer will be better placed without them! And sail on the new Act of Union of 2017!
08:29 AM on 03/05/2012
OK, or could it be that most of the oil lies in what would be the territorial waters of the independent Scotland.
Also, you should perhaps be made aware that according to the recently published GERS report (from the Westminster government), it is revealed that Scotland, with 8.3% of the UK population generates 9.4% of the UK resources and receives 9.3% of the funding.
08:45 AM on 03/05/2012
It could very well be but it is not, it is in international waters that have been allocated by interntaional treaty! Perhaps you should get the facts right! Ah, and here we go, the cry of the nationalist drooling over reports from Westminster. It is simple maths and I have given you the xchequer figires. But the cash generators are already in flight south. The Government has already spanked the Scots in clydeside by giving the two new RFA ships to Korea. The Hi tech in places like Glenrothes will ship south, and all of the UK government departmenst will migrate very quickly..it looks like Swanny, up paddle no! Act of Union 1017!
10:12 AM on 03/05/2012
I understand what you are saying...it is a thought that we could be better off as an english nation without the scots but that is not so. We get and give so much to each other as a people that to put the clocks back to a time that we were still fighting each other is way beyond ridiculous and futile. They(scots) would struggle because suddenly they are a nation of a few million with more scots living away from Scotland than in it. We suddenly lose a lot of prestige within the rest of the world because we could not even beat a toad of a man like Salmond with his rebel's ideology. He is not alone and the SNP are not the true voice of the people in Scotland. Salmond needs to see the light and act in the best interests of everyone in Scotland not just a small bunch of fanatics puporting to represent an electorate which they don't. United we stand divided they fall.
11:56 AM on 03/06/2012
"...to put the clocks back to a time that we were still fighting each other is way beyond ridiculous..."

"We suddenly lose a lot of prestige within the rest of the world because we could not even beat a toad of a man like Salmond...."

What is it about being a True Brit that you cannot think in terms of co-operation with other states? What is all this about "fighting" and "beating" people? A post-imperial sense of identity long past its sell-by date?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Vapula
Failure is not an option
04:57 AM on 03/05/2012
It's a pity the English don't run an Independence campaign because then the Scots wouldn't have a choice they would be out of the Union.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Allyb999
09:41 AM on 03/05/2012
No, no, no, Vapula when will you learn if England run an Independence campaign, and was successful it would be England who would be leaving the union not Scotland. England has no rights to chuck any other country out of the union.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
DanielSC
03:43 AM on 03/05/2012
I will need to do some research on this; I am not sure what the geopolitical/financial/national interests would be in this. Please feel free to enlighten me.
photo
ScottishScript
"I am not a number, I am a person!"
12:02 PM on 03/05/2012
Best you enlighten yourself so as to avoid suspect information. However I might point out the behaviour of British politicians over the issue and you can draw your own conclusions.

Most of the English and unionist Scots on these boards will tell you England will be better off without Scotland and Scotland worse off etc.. However, every politician in the London based parties screams otherwise. So ask yourself this.

Surely if England benefits from Scotland's leaving the union, why don't they not send us on our merry way? Why does a Tory Prime minister with just 1 MP north of the border say he will fight to his last breath to save the union? That in itself represents a red flag in this debate does it not?

The pro unionist posters here say we should go, but pro unionist politicians are desperate for us to stay. Does this not strongly suggest those who post here telling Scotland to leave are bereft of some very important data on the subject? Something the politicians AND nationalists DO know?

Solve that little puzzle and you're half way there to understanding what's at stake.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
DanielSC
08:48 PM on 03/05/2012
Thanks for the information. I am pretty big onto researching things and making my own conclusions, but getting opinions of people who are closer to the issue certainly helps me get started. I appreciate the read and have been monitoring the news feeds. I hope things end up for the best. Take care.
This comment has been removed.
10:39 PM on 03/04/2012
I trust Mr Salmond is not depending on oil to finance an independent Scotland - if he is he has his sums wrong . Production peaked in 2000 at just under 5 million barrels a day and is now down to 2 million and falling 7% a year .- by 2020 it will be under a milion barrels a day

But the decomissiong costs of circa 5000 wells and 10000 kilometers miles of undersea piping will amount to £131 billion over the next 20 years so the taxable profit of the oil produced will be negligible as the oil companies offset decomissioning costs against tax .

And in UK terms oil represents 1% of current UK GDP ( finance is 10% manufacturing 11% ) so the effect of " Scottish Oil " is now negligible - Alex Salmond needed to be starting in 1980 - not 2014 .
10:43 PM on 03/04/2012
And as the cost of oil keeps rising the remaining amount will become more value, not to mention that the North Atlantic will be starting to come onstream.
11:12 PM on 03/04/2012
sparrowlad - Yes but what matters is the profit level - North Sea oil is hugely expensive to produce and most of the profit will be needed to finance the enormous end-loaded decomissioning costs leaving little if anything for nett tax take - that is why BP got out of their Forties Field in 2003 .

So unless huge new finds are made in areas with more economic production costs ( and none have been ) or oil hits $200 a barrel there is not going to be much spare cash for Mr Salmond to collect in taxes on the oil company producers - he is ( or will be assuming independence in 2015 ) 35 years and 50 billion barrels of highly profitable oil too late .

Still there is always whisky and farmed salmon and tourism - the Greeks manage on ouzo, farmed sea bass and tourism so you should do as well as they do - and if you join the Euro they will give you billions - like the Greeks you won't even have to bother with collecting taxes - and Edinburgh Castle unlike the Parthenon already has a roof on it .
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Gilbert McLardy
02:34 AM on 03/05/2012
Obviously you are quoting from some scaremongering clown in Westminster. A number of years back, I was invited along with a number of other small business people to the opening of a new hotel on the south west of Scotland, that hotel group built and opened that hotel and others along the west of Scotland, simply because of the oil down the west coast, in deep water but it is there. Three years ago I was staying a few days in London and by chance, sat down next to a gentleman born in Africa and working within his countries oil business. This person already knew all about Scottish Oil Fields, he explained that with new techniques of retrieving the oil and with large deposits on the west coast, Scotland should have plenty of oil for the foreseeable future.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Vapula
Failure is not an option
04:59 AM on 03/05/2012
Just go ... please. England doesn't want or need you.
12:59 AM on 03/06/2012
I'm quoting from an Oil Industry Geological Analysis of oil in Scottish waters much of which was involving Aberdeen University specialists -.

No new large finds have ben made in 10 years - Scotland has fallen from the world's 6th largest oil producer in 1999 to 18th in the world in 2011 - production has more than halved in 10 years fromm 5 million barrels a day in 2000 to 2 milion in 2011 and is falling an average of 7.2 % a year .

And 10 years of exploration of the Atlantic West coast has yielded nothing to date - so unless new finds are made the decline will continue .

BP concluded in 2003 that there was no economic benefit in further driling in Scottish waters and sold teir interests in the Forties Field

In addition there are £131 Billion of decommissioning costs to be paid so once you deduct these plus the high cost of production there will be little profit for any Scottish Government to tax - Mr Salmond certainly can rely on oil to finance independence unless another Forties Field is found - he is 35 years and 50 billion barrels late - he should have made in move in 1980
10:23 PM on 03/04/2012
Rennie's words are even more risable when you realise that he went on to say that the Lib Dems were happy to have a discussion with the SNP after a No vote in the referendum. About what? He won't say, forgetting that for decades the Liberals/Lib Dems have been telling the Scottish voters that they want a federal UK. Why can't they say that now and break away from the Tories and Labour? Have they not thought the idea through despite advocating it for ages? Are they not up to it? Surely not.......
This comment has been removed.
10:22 PM on 03/04/2012
Thie scotish people have given alex Salmon the majority to lead them into the lions den,
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
10:31 PM on 03/04/2012
Or out of it.. depending on your point of view :-)
photo
ScottishScript
"I am not a number, I am a person!"
12:05 PM on 03/05/2012
Well we have only one lion for Scotland and there's three for England, so that suggests the 'den' you speak of lies south of the border.
12:56 AM on 03/06/2012
your analogies really are pathetic sometimes...you should get out more and try reading one or two non biased newspapers like the Daily Mail.