Jamaican PM Portia Simpson Miller 'Would Accept' British Apology For Slavery


First Posted: 6/03/2012 06:34 Updated: 6/03/2012 06:38   PA

Jamaica's prime minister has said she would accept a British apology over the evils of slavery ahead of Prince Harry's visit to the Caribbean island.

Portia Simpson Miller, who plans to replace the Queen as head of state with a Jamaican, stated that the practice was "wicked and brutal" and no race should have been subjected to it.

The leader of the Caribbean country, which celebrates 50 years of independence from Britain during 2012, also said its people should take "full charge of our destiny" and sever ties with the British monarchy.

In an interview with the BBC Ms Simpson Miller said: "No race should have been subjected to what out ancestors were subjected to.

"If Britain wishes to apologise, fine with us, no problem at all."

Tens of thousands of Africans were shipped to Jamaica from the 17th to early 19th centuries to work on plantations that made their British owners incredibly wealthy.

But the newly elected politician said she was not calling for any form of compensation from Britain.

She repeated her famous Jamaican patois phrase delivered during her inauguration speech at the start of the year that "I think time come" over proposed changes to who was the country's head of state.

Simpson Miller, who will today have lunch with Harry who is on a Diamond Jubilee tour of the Caribbean, said: "We came on a long journey, from slavery to adult suffrage to our independence.

"We are a nation where our maturity is now saying we should look to a form of government which at this time would take full charge of our destiny."

The Jamaican leader suggested her plans were not a personal attack on the monarch but fundamental changes that were necessary for the nation's development.

She said: "It's not about getting rid of the Queen, who could get rid of the Queen. She's a wonderful, beautiful lady - such a warm and wonderful person.

"In terms of our history we have some things to do, it's not disrespect to the Queen, she can visit at any time."

Jamaica's prime minister stressed that her administration was looking at the issue "seriously" but she would not be drawn on a timescale for the major constitutional change.

"I don't know how long this will take I don't want to say a year or two years," the politician said.

But she added a conciliatory note that Jamaica would still be a friend to the Queen if she wanted to return to its shores.

"Even if the Queen does not remain head of state, the Queen at any time will be welcome to visit."

FOLLOW HUFFPOST UK

Filed by Michael Rundle  |  Report Corrections
 
 
  • Comments
  • 152
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (5 total)
02:49 PM on 03/07/2012
Inequality in Jamaica and those consumed with lawlessness, crime, violence, and the "blame other countries and people" dilemma contribute to the countries continued climb into pergatory and decay. So, Portia needs to focus on those issues and while she is doing so, she should also asks the Jamaicans who harass foreigners who visit the island to cease this disgusting behavior. Additionally, Portia does not speak for all Jamaicans. She speaks for those she represents, which is the Jamaican Parliament and the members of her Cabinet. No one represents the people of Jamaica or Jamaica would have been a more prosperous country.

For those who are writing about Jamaicans in the future, please do so based on experience and address the issue to some Jamaicans, not all. Generalization is derogatory to all people and it is also where your sense of credibility cease to exists.
02:48 PM on 03/07/2012
First, let me say that there are some imbeciles posting on this site. Let us get one thing clear--Portia Simpson does not speak for all Jamaicans, so do not go attacking all Jamaicans. Portia Simpson seems to be very misled and uneducated about historical facts and about how Jamaica fell into disrepair. Jamaica's struggles are directly link to its leaders, not the Queen. So, she obviouly needs to return to the "idea" board and not embarass herself any further in the public eye. There are more pressing matters in Jamaica to worry about (crime, violence, poverty, extremely bad roads throughout most of the island, poorly paid workers, hunger, corruption in politics including at the highest levels, lack of rights for gays, violence against gays, women, and children, no rights or accommodations for individuals with diabilities, human rights violations, inadequate or no health programs to address the needs of children, youths, and families, lack of educational and national program to deal with mental health issues, and I can go on....). Instead of trying to get the most ignorant and uneducated Jamaicans to become consumed with matters of State that they do not comprehend (because many of them most likely are unable to identify their name on paper), focus on the issues listed. The Queen does not prevent Jamaica from making progress. Politicians in Jamaica who use their positions to become rich while in office prevent progress in Jamaica.
09:54 AM on 03/07/2012
Although britain did much to abolish the slave trade, we are all content to purchase consumer goods from India, Pakistan and China etc, the fruits of slave labour - just a thought. I think ethical foreign policy is on the "back burner".
10:19 PM on 03/06/2012
Suggest this woamn reads "White Gold: The Extraordinary Story of Thomas Pellow and North Africa’s One Million European Slaves" by Giles Milton...
07:24 PM on 03/06/2012
Jamaicans refuse to be controlled by anyone especially Europeans. Respects only the GOD who created them in His own image. Whoever don't like or respect that, go jump off a cliff.
07:22 PM on 03/06/2012
It wasn't my ancestors who were making slaves out of black Africans. They were too busy being exploited down the mines and in the cotton mills of Lancashire. In the 19th century British merchant seamen stood a one in five chance of being killed at work and an even greater chance of being maimed in which case their families starved or went to the workhouse. Personally, I would have preferred being a black man on a plantation in Jamaica to being an ordinary worker in some evil factory in this country. Perhaps Cameron should apologise to us for the way his class treated ours before embarking upon another hand-wringing, masochistic, wet liberal apology to a former colony.
07:10 PM on 03/06/2012
Britain abolished slavery in the British Empire on the 25th March 1807. This was less than 18 months after the Battle of Trafalgar and then established patrols off the African coast to stop and arrest slaving vessels and by 1865, nearly 150,000 people had been freed by anti-slavery operations. I do think we owe anyone a apology! Maybe a bit of thanks for preventing this vile trade from carrying on would be appreciated?
08:11 PM on 03/06/2012
Please excuse the historical correction, but it was the slave trade that was abolished in 1807, not slavery. That had to wait until 1833. Admitedly it was done in the British Empire peacefully by act of parliament. Unlike the United States that had to wait another three decades to do so rather more violently.

As you say, perhaps Ms. Miller should be given a lesson about the Royal West Africa Squadron.
.
08:28 PM on 03/06/2012
As long as you dont want an apology from Britain for starting that as well
photo
gimmeanamethen
saying it like it is
06:45 PM on 03/06/2012
the only apology that should be given is to the british people for leaving the back door open to allow us to be over run by modern day invaders.
06:45 PM on 03/06/2012
What have WE got to apologize for? What happened two or three hundred years ago happened, it's over and done with, we weren't there and people thought differently all over the world then, INCLUDING BLACK SLAVE MERCHANTS who used to get black people to sell to Arab slave traders as recently as the 1950s ( I was on anti slavery patrol in the Persian Gulf on a Royal Navy destroyer then and we stopped several dhows with evidence of chained people on board) so ALL black people should get over it and move on, it's done with.
06:37 PM on 03/06/2012
An apology is to say you're sorry for something you have done. Modern Britain has not practiced slavery. For David Cameron to issue an apology it would be at best meaningless, at worst dishonest. Should we ask the Italians to apologise for invading Britain? Or the French for 1066?

Slavery was practiced everywhere at the time. Every country. Every empire. It was widespread in African countries before the British arrived. It was blacks trading blacks. If we were to attempt a counter-factual history, where Britain never had an empire, it is likely that the Jamaican people would have probably have been part of the slave trade for a longer time period.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Nathan0316
TrueBlueTory Age quod agis
06:28 PM on 03/06/2012
205 years have passed since Britain abolished slavery. Stop trying to distract your people's eyes away from the rampant crime, dire poverty and total lack of prospects to better themselves by talking about things that are far in the past, and do something to help your people now.

But then, that would mean admitting that your nation has become a shambles since you gained independence, wouldn't it?
06:27 PM on 03/06/2012
Maybe we should be asking for apologies from the Norwegians and Italians for their part in the Viking and Roman invasions. It all adds up to the same thing.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
NoWhineZone
05:24 PM on 03/06/2012
Europeans will never apologize for anything. They were making excuses for slavery before it started, during slavery and the day after it ceased. They pretend like it happened 500 years ago when their are people alive today in the western hemisphere who knew ex-slaves. Justice is not in them.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
David Brown1949
Not waving but drowning.
05:36 PM on 03/06/2012
Making excuses before slavery started? Please explain.
06:55 PM on 03/06/2012
i think you have misspelt your username, take out the "No" and that would be you to a T
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Ramkshrestha
Welcome to Nepal - the birthplace of Buddha
05:06 PM on 03/06/2012
This is not diplomatic bargain?
04:51 PM on 03/06/2012
As a Jamaican I oppose to this women plan for Jamaica, she keeps taking about removing the queen as the head of states. She has not mentioned anything about creating jobs for the Jamaican people. If she starts creating jobs in Jamaica maybe my family will stop calling me for money every week.