Falkland Islands' Mount Pleasant Air Base Makes Territory 'Impregnable' To Argentinian Invasion

Posted: 16/03/2012 13:26 Updated: 16/03/2012 13:26

Britain would never be able to recapture the Falklands if it lost control of the island's military base, a leading military think-tank has said.

In an analysis of the defence situation in the South Atlantic published today, professor Michael Clarke, the director-general of the Royal United Services Institute (RUSI), said control of the Mount Pleasant airbase was crucial to the defence of the islands.

"The military balance around the Falklands has been transformed by the construction since 1982 of the Mount Pleasant airbase 30 miles outside Stanley, which replaced the small airstrip that existed at that time," he said.

"Mount Pleasant is a major military facility with two runways of over 4,000 meters between them. It will take military aircraft of all types and as such is a critical military asset that transforms the 'can we defend/re-take The Falklands?' equation into a simple military fact: whoever controls Mount Pleasant controls the Islands.

He added: "As long as Britain occupies the base competently, Argentina could never mount a successful invasion; if Britain ever lost Mount Pleasant to a competent occupier, its forces would never get back onto the Islands, even with twice the military assets now available."

The Royal Air Force currentl has four new Typhoon jets stationed at the base, which Clarke said were the most advanced aircraft in the region by a long way.

By comparison the Argentinean air force is still stocked with French made Mirage jets that it used during the 1982 war with Britain.

In his report Clarke concludes that any Argentinian invasion force would have to cross 400 miles of open sea and air space to get within striking distance, therefore dooming any attack to failure.

"All the advantages lie with the defenders of Mount Pleasant and 24 hours notice of attack - or even something that looks like preliminary preparations for an attack - is all that would be required to make it impregnable as long as London had the will to act," he said.

Argentina has threatened to take legal action against British companies involved in oil development in the Falkland Islands - a move described by the Foreign Office as "wholly counter-productive".

Tensions between Britain and Argentina over the sovereignty of the Falklands have risen in recent weeks as the 30th anniversary of the 1982 war approaches.

FOLLOW UK POLITICS

Britain would never be able to recapture the Falklands if it lost control of the island's military base, a leading military think-tank has said. In an analysis of the defence situation in the South...
Britain would never be able to recapture the Falklands if it lost control of the island's military base, a leading military think-tank has said. In an analysis of the defence situation in the South...
Filed by Ned Simons  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 16
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
09:26 AM on 03/17/2012
Not sure I agree with this. Even if the airfield was lost a couple of the new Type 45s could pick off any aircraft taking off from there from quite a distance away. Protect them with a few frigates and an SSN and job done.

The simple fact is that unless the UK deliberately wanted to lose the Falklands its just not going to happen. Fewer in numbers but the UK has had a quantum leap in capability since 1982.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
GingerlyColors
No will to change it, no right to criticize it
07:26 AM on 03/17/2012
I don't know how long Argentina has been laying claim to the Falkland Islands. They would have had a good opportunity to take the islands early last century when Britain was tied up in conflicts elsewhere in the Empire. Then there was World War I, when Argentina could have walked straight in and taken the islands when Britain's resources were stretched to the limit fighting Germany and it's allies. Mass media didn't exist then and no one in Britain would have noticed or cared when there was so much happening closer to home. Another opportunity arose during the Second World War soon after which the British Empire disintegrated so the loss of the Falklands 8000 miles away would have been considered small beer.
Today the Falkland Islands represent what is left of our once great Empire and we are reluctant to let them go. Argentina have missed several opportunities to take them and because of that they need to accept the status quo, although I have suggested that negotiation is possible with regards the mineral and fishing rights which extend up to 200 miles around the sparcely populated islands.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
12:19 PM on 03/17/2012
"..I have suggested that negotiation is possible with regards the mineral and fishing rights ...".

Been there. Done that.

Agreements were reached in 1995 on fishing and oil; in 2007 Argentina unilaterally walked away.
10:33 PM on 03/22/2012
I do not think Argentina would have taken the Falklands as that would have been classed as an agressive act and broke their neutrality in both world wars that we were involved in, and brought them in on the side of the germans not a good move i think.
10:22 PM on 03/16/2012
UK once invaded that little land so the Argentinians who were all Europeans went there and kill native indian population, made them second class slave so is this both little land belongs to UK and European? Both get out and give it back to slave and make them the rightful owner. This is what Lord Jesus Christ really asking because according to native Indians curse been put on those who invades their land just like America and it is written in native Indians history book for everyone to see it where they have kept it in Indians reserved land park. They call it curse of the dead?
11:00 PM on 03/16/2012
who cares what an ancient curse has to do with now, this is about the islanders' right to choose and they choose to remain British in nature and no doubt for a lot of the population, by birth. The Argies were not interested in the Falklands until the British took ownership of the islands.
10:12 PM on 03/16/2012
second try all we habe to do is nuke them or threaten to bef0re it happens they will son go away
10:10 PM on 03/16/2012
all we have to do is nuke them they will soon give ip when nukes hit there country
10:06 PM on 03/16/2012
Would Palestinians going to get thier land back because they want Palestinians rule in thier land they once owned but now Israel took it where Palestinians claiming their want to remain with Palestine not with Israel? Why Israel threatning to start war when Palestinians wants to take their land back for their Palestinians population? This is just a thought when it comes to think people like it? People of Palestine like to remain with Palestine not with Israel so why world threatning those who may help Ppalestine. Why double standard. UK,EU and US would help Israel if anyone attack Israel even Israel holding palestinians land? If Argenita find many allies like Asrael have, there would be war where Argentina would give it best to make Britain spend lot more then what been spend in 1980.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jessjesskk
Benevolent Zombie Power
10:42 AM on 03/18/2012
sorry to say but this is wholly un-understandable...
northern git
fed up with all the political crap in life
06:28 PM on 03/16/2012
If there is any doubt about the Falklands it is British with British people who want to remain British and on ritish soil.
They should be defended and defended robustly

Now is the time to put more troops there for the purpose so Argentina would know they would get a very bloody nose if they tried.

Bring all troops from Afghanistan where we are obviously not apppreciated by a treacherous host (Karzai) and enemy (Taliban) and the equally deceitful neighbours who would stab their own in the back at the sniff of money.
06:09 PM on 03/16/2012
Oh yes we would, to much involved, somehow i think it would not get that far as i think Argentina would be looking at mass casualties in its Navy,Army and Airforce, we are watching you Argentina.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Nitro24uk
05:44 PM on 03/22/2012
One of the things we need to remember is that our Armed Forces are all professional. The personnel are in the Armed Forces are all volunteers. The Argies Armed Forces are nearly all conscripts and doing national service. I am not saying that all of their forces are no good but even a bad shot can get lucky.

When I was serving, I often wondered how we would do if we had a war, well we have them and to see soldiers fixing bayonets and using them to kill is and eye opener.

I do not think the Argies will invade the Falklands again but if they are so stupid to do so, then I belive the British Forces will decimate them once again.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
04:06 PM on 03/16/2012
Would we accept this from Germany 30 years after the Second World War?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
06:40 PM on 03/16/2012
accept what expansion ? aren't the german on expansion mood too ? they want to buy off Greece . They should . its full of rocks and crooks anyway.

Now someone explain why GB insist on keeping the Falkland as a colony and then complain they are "sending help" lol!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jessjesskk
Benevolent Zombie Power
10:44 AM on 03/18/2012
- the german want all except expanding in greece... the german government realizes that they have to foot the bill for greece but i don't think you will find a more peaceful country than germany today, except maybe for switzerland.

- let's stop the BS about "colony"... we are in 2012... who are the inhabitants of the island and what do they want to do? being brit? being argentinian? being independant? their island, their decision...