Christopher Jefferies, Wrongly Accused Of Jo Yeates Murder, Blasts UK Press

Posted: 18/03/2012 12:13 Updated: 18/03/2012 13:28   PA

Christopher Jeffries

Christopher Jefferies, the man wrongly arrested by police in the hunt for the murderer of Joanna Yeates, has given a graphic account of how he was vilified by the press.

The retired teacher, who was Miss Yeates's landlord, was libelled by eight newspapers following his arrest on suspicion of her murder.

Police later exonerated Mr Jefferies and he then successfully sued eight newspapers for libel.

Two national newspapers, The Sun and The Mirror, were prosecuted for contempt of court for their reporting of the episode.

The former Clifton College teacher described how some of the newspapers painted him as a "dark, macabre, sinister villain" having mistakenly believed that because he had been arrested on suspicion of murder he must be the killer.

He also lambasted some of the reporting of the murder inquiry as "lazy and casually inaccurate".

Mr Jefferies said: "The press seemed determined to believe both; that the person who had been arrested was the genuine murderer and to portray me in a dark and lurid a light as possible.

"We're talking about the tabloid press here so just to be a sexual predator isn't quite spicy enough.

"The papers seemed to want it in every possible way. Low and behold you don't just have a sexual predator but you have a bisexual predator and all sorts of fantastic rumours were latched onto that I would hold pupils hands while reading poetry, obviously with sinister sexual motives.

"To complete the character assassination it was alleged that I was fascinated by death because I happened to have shown on a couple of occasions a particularly important documentary about the liberation of Auschwitz.

"Here you have me, this dark, macabre, sinister villain. And that certainly wasn't the whole of it.

"Jo was always the landscape architect, to reinforce a career cut short. On the other hand, the caricature of me was a lewd figure, a peeping Tom that repeatedly spied on tenants and a loner because I happened to live alone.

"Even those papers couldn't entirely ignore the fact that a lot of people actually said some quite nice things about me, although tended to be buried and not given much prominence in the articles."

Mr Jefferies was speaking at the Benn Debate, organised by the Bristol branch of the National Union of Journalists in conjunction with the Bristol Festival of Ideas and two charities, MediaAct and MediaWise.

"Mine was an extreme case but by no means unique," he said.

"One of the things that did strike me was how extraordinarily lazy and casually inaccurate the reporting was on almost every level: the fact the police were supposed to be ripping up the floorboards when the flats in question had solid floors and there wasn't a floorboard in sight.

"Often the relationship between the press and the police can be mutually beneficial. Because of the nature of the reporting in this case in no doubt served to encourage the police in their belief that they may have caught the actual murderer.

"Certainly it was quite striking that during the interrogation of me while I was in custody the police were particularly interested in some of these fantastical stories that were being reported."

Mr Jefferies, who has twice appeared before the Leveson Inquiry into press standards, is currently taking legal action against Avon and Somerset Police for wrongful arrest.

One member of the audience asked him why he had remained on bail for some time after Vincent Tabak was charged with Miss Yeates's murder.

"I think Vincent Tabak was charged around the January 20. I wasn't officially released from police bail until early March," Mr Jefferies said.

"Whether that is unprecedented I don't know. I'm sure it's highly unusual.

"All I can do is give you the explanation that the police gave me which was that they wanted to be absolutely certain that if somebody was to come along on some future date and say: Oh well, we do actually think that this man was in some way involved in the disappearance and murder of Jo Yeates. We want to be 100% certain we can say: No we have investigated every possible line of accusation and we are satisfied there is no truth in what you are alleging."

Mr Jefferies was asked if he accepted that explanation, and he replied: "Well I am not sure I can answer that question because there is still ongoing legal action between myself and Avon and Somerset Police."

Sat alongside Mr Jefferies at Friday night's event at the Arnolfini arts centre was Lord Hunt, chairman of the Press Complaints Commission, Thais Porthilho-Shrimpton, co-ordinator of the Hacked Off campaign, Richard Peppiatt, a former Daily Star reporter, Mike Norton, editor of the Bristol Evening Post, and Steve Brodie, a journalist with BBC Points West.

Donnacha DeLong, president of the National Union of Journalists, chaired the event.

FOLLOW UK

Christopher Jefferies, the man wrongly arrested by police in the hunt for the murderer of Joanna Yeates, has given a graphic account of how he was vilified by the press. The retired teacher, who wa...
Christopher Jefferies, the man wrongly arrested by police in the hunt for the murderer of Joanna Yeates, has given a graphic account of how he was vilified by the press. The retired teacher, who wa...
Filed by Chris Wimpress  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 37
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
09:56 AM on 03/19/2012
This man`s vilification was normal practice by the tabloids.They put themselves forward as judge, jury and executioner and they often come up with the totally wrong scenario because they ignore the true facts of a case in order to come up with a story that will sell newspapers.It`s deplorable to ruin someone`s life,but it doesn`t bother them one iota.The two men convicted of the Stephen Lawrence murder were similarly vilified by the press prior to their trial and it was impossible for them to receive a fair trial as a result of press coverage.People who read the newspapers would think that these two people were guilty and that justice was served 19 years after the crime was committed when they were sentenced.That is not the case and these people were only found guilty because of a newspaper witch hunt and political correctness.If there is any justice,they will be released following an appeal.
photo
adabar
The future is bright...
11:31 AM on 03/19/2012
Whilst your assertion is true about the tabloid vilification of the men in Steven Lawrence's case, I find it curious that you would want to suggest that they were not guilty now that hard evidence has been unearthed to support their conviction. It is most worrying that you should imply that they have now been convicted solely because of what the press has written about them. The weight of the law must fall on criminals of any colour, race or creed. They should not get away with their crimes. I am also glad that the double jeopardy law was quashed to allow justice to be served and the racist handling of the case by the racist police men have been highlighted. May they all get their just desserts. By all means, start the protest to stop press prosecution of criminal cases but to want to suggest that those men are not guilty because the press prosecuted them first is wrong!
12:19 PM on 03/19/2012
My point is that these two men were vilified by the press and did not receive a fair trial;I do not say that "they have now been convicted solely because of what the press has written".I have read all of the case details and the McPherson report on the Stephen Lawrence killing.While it is an obnoxious crime that any fair minded person would find repulsive,I am not talking about race or crooked policemen,that is irrelevant here.I do not know who committed the murder of Mr Lawrence but there is much evidence that the conviction of the two men was an unsafe one and the reporting of the case in the press was a disgrace and meant that a fair trial was impossible.These men were convicted on DNA exidence 18 years after the crime was committed.The DNA samples were almost invisible to the naked eye and contamination was a strong possibility.This is nothing to do with racism which you mention,it is about justice and the two men convicted did not receive a fair trial or justice in my opinion.There was a press witch hunt against the two people convicted,one of whom had previously ruled out as a suspect by the police.On the evidence available they should not have been convicted and I believe that an appeal will overturn the conviction.It is better to let 100 guilty men go free than to convict one innocent man.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
wendle
09:24 AM on 03/19/2012
The media, Police. BBC. ITV and the Internet should never be permitted to name any one in any crime untill that person has been found guilt, and that is when a judge and jury pronounce them guilty. Innocent people have had their lives and their families lives destroyed by media setting them selves up as judge and jury. They will do anything to line their pockets, Most of them are liers and will hound the life out of people just to get a head of each other t any cost, I bet you can count a true honest journalist on one hand.
08:25 AM on 03/19/2012
Good on Mr Jefferies for speaking out. Based on what we always suspected but now know as fact - he is absolutely accurate. The tabloid press have often been "lazy and casually inaccurate" and one suspects on many occasions purposely so.

The fact that some police may have been caught apparently taking some investigatory cues from what the tabloid press print is shocking.

It is time the British kicked their addiction to tabloid press - it cheapens the society.
01:33 AM on 03/19/2012
Police think anyone who is not part of the police or is a criminal.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Norman Mitchison
12:14 AM on 03/19/2012
Seeing how journalists were present it is a change to read an accurate report.....if it is.
12:04 AM on 03/19/2012
Very simple - if the police don't release the nane of those arrested then the press cant villify them .


The police should simply say " a person has been arrested in connection with our inquiries and will be put before the Courts in due course " - If that person is not the right person they can be quietly released with no harm done .

And if they are subsequently charged then they go before the courts and are remanded for trial and at that point the name, sex, address etc becomes public and the Judge can ban the press from publishing any detals until trial if it is felt desireable in any particular circumstances
11:41 PM on 03/18/2012
Oh..... Comments are allowed on this....
Many made comments at the time, influenced by what they had read here & elsewhere, here being the online media.
Mr Jefferies haircut at the time was, apparrently, justification for his guilt & judicial execution.
Or so they would have us believe.
I hope Mr Jefferies enjoys spending the money.
photo
Gavin Saunders
we only have each other
11:15 PM on 03/18/2012
It's hard to fathom that even with hacking, spying and dobbing the sucm press still have to invent and embellish.

If there are not enough newsworthy happenings then surely there need not be so many of these rags in existence; society suffers for the sake of enriching a few proprietors. We have all been conned.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
10:46 PM on 03/21/2012
Gav. The press and the telly are powerful tools. they will continue to be quoted as "evidence" in the present and the future. its because of the press and now the telly that we absorb so many nasty stereotypes . The public will not be informed about a specific murder unless there is a "spin".
Examples
The Joanna Yates . being blond and blue eyed garners a specific type of sympathy for the deceased.As horrible as her murder was it has been covered extensively for six long months almost every week.
- The knife crimes , even if the actual death has not been caused by one . the mere fact that we see a pic of black teen with a hoodie and read the story will make everyone detest the child. Sensationalism will work once and that's it.
-If An asian girl has been killed , the press will first look for clues about arranged marriages.

In this country people die every minute in all sorts of circumstances.
08:03 PM on 03/18/2012
what this guy went through was nothing compared to what Colin Stagg went through.In Stagg's case the police were convinced he was guilty by the opinion of a "profiler",even though he was later proved to be totally innocent,but because of how this was reported,he was vilified for years,and hardly was it mentioned by the press when he was found to be innocent.
photo
winfl55
Truth, justice and the American way.
07:31 PM on 03/18/2012
There are people who will believe he is still guilty. Such is the burden that is carried by many wrongly accused. Police also will make things know before there is any confirmation in their eyes of guilt because they want to project the image of eficiency. It would be difficult to say how many there are in his situation, but I am still convinced the right people are convicted in most all cases. Tabloid press has also done some things that bring awareness, but should always be brought to account for bad and damaging reporting. If they do help ruin a life, then they should provide that person with compensation for a long part of the rest of his life, and convicted of any crime they committed.
photo
Gavin Saunders
we only have each other
11:20 PM on 03/18/2012
That the tabloids don't make amends voluntarily gives you their measure.
07:12 PM on 03/18/2012
Inaccuracies and bias reporting? the BBC is number one. the corporation's news coverage reminds me of "Zimbabwe Broadcasting Corporation"
06:52 PM on 03/18/2012
I well remember a multitude of comments on these pages all basically wanting to hang, draw and quarter the guy.
Good job the mob didn't get their way!!!!
04:13 PM on 03/18/2012
Too many people believe everything they read in the papers and see on the news. It should be remembered that all the reported "facts" are heavily edited,slanted and nowhere near the truth most of the time whilst many facts that are relevant are simply ignored or left out of reports. My advice NEVER believe what you read in newspapers and take everything you see on tv news programmes with a big pinch of salt.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
sjjb
05:00 PM on 03/18/2012
i agree with that as you say too many do thik everything they read must be true just how many lives have been ruined because of this?
12:36 AM on 03/19/2012
And that includes internet news boards
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
sjjb
02:36 PM on 03/18/2012
the problem is what is printed is what many think is true and this man has had to change his life because of this even having to change how he looked as people thought he looked evil because the press said this was the person,never judge a book by the cover
02:30 PM on 03/18/2012
Fair play to Mr Jefferies for saying how it was -i think it strange though with hindsight that Tabak who turned out to be the murderer was never targeted by the press like Mr Jefferies and they both lived in the same building as Jo !-my suspicion is that the police wanted Mr Jefferies to be spotlighted while they looked at Tabak quietly.
12:38 AM on 03/19/2012
Remember, "Dog bites man" does not sell newspapers but "Man bites dog" does