Nuclear Submarine HMS Vengeance To Receive £350m Upgrade

Posted: 26/03/2012 09:39 Updated: 26/03/2012 09:39   PA

Hmsvengeance

A £350 million contract to upgrade one of the Royal Navy's nuclear missile submarines, safeguarding up to 2,000 jobs over the next three years, will be announced by the Defence Secretary today.

Philip Hammond will unveil the deal with defence firm Babcock to refit and refuel HMS Vengeance during a visit to Devonport Dockyard in Plymouth, where the work will be carried out.

The MoD said the work on the Vanguard Class submarine will secure more than 1,000 jobs at Babcock, a further 300 at other firms in Plymouth and another 700 jobs in the industrial supply chain across the UK.

Mr Hammond will tell a press conference: "As well as securing 2,000 UK jobs, this contract will ensure the nuclear deterrent submarine fleet can continue to operate safely and effectively to maintain a continuous at sea deterrent.

"As we stabilise the defence budget we are increasingly able to commit to equipment projects to safeguard the UK's National Security.

"Devonport Dockyard is at the heart of maintaining and supporting the Royal Navy and I am pleased that such a large number of jobs will be protected.

"Our White Paper published earlier this year said we would support key sovereign capabilities in British companies that help us to protect our national security and this contract with Babcock is evidence of that commitment."

It will be the last time one of the Vanguard submarines will be refuelled. A new reactor core - the energy source that powers the 15,000 tonne vessel - will also be fitted that will last her until she is decommissioned.

The MoD said it would also include a complete overhaul of equipment on the submarine, the installation of improved missile launch equipment and upgraded computer systems.

Rear Admiral Simon Lister, director of submarines for the MoD, said: "This contract marks the final phase of what has proved to be a very successful programme of refuelling our fleet of nuclear submarines.

"The highly sophisticated nature of the work involved in the deep maintenance of these magnificent vessels is testament to the experience and skills of the workforce here in Devonport and those in the supply chain across the UK."

But there has been criticism over what has been perceived locally as a delay in signing the deal.

HMS Vengeance arrived at Devonport Naval Base on March 2 and has been tied up at the base since.

Alison Seabeck, the Labour MP for Plymouth Moor View, said the contract was "good news for Plymouth" but that there had been some "concern" among local workers after the submarine arrived without a signed contract for the refit.

"Vengeance, rather unusually, has been left sitting in dock in Plymouth waiting for the sign-off from the Secretary of State," she said.

"There was no obvious reason why, given refits are planned years in advance, that there should be a delay. I am given to understand there was further negotiation going on between Babcock and the MoD.

"I don't think it is a good way to do business and I will be interested to hear what the Secretary of State has to say when he is at Babcock."

FOLLOW UK

A £350 million contract to upgrade one of the Royal Navy's nuclear missile submarines, safeguarding up to 2,000 jobs over the next three years, will be announced by the Defence Secretary today. Ph...
A £350 million contract to upgrade one of the Royal Navy's nuclear missile submarines, safeguarding up to 2,000 jobs over the next three years, will be announced by the Defence Secretary today. Ph...
Filed by Charlie Lindlar  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 16
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Recency  | 
Popularity
11:25 PM on 03/26/2012
Babcock Directors been to "dinner at Daves" then eh?
10:31 PM on 03/26/2012
The cracks are begining to show in the coalition. Poor budget & bad decisions beginning to evolve on a regular basis.
08:54 PM on 03/26/2012
good to see our 'at sea' nuclear deterant has been tied up for a month, this government could not run a bath, too busy filling their pockets for personal gain.
09:34 PM on 03/26/2012
Our nuclear deterant is 'at sea'. Of the 4 SSBN's(Vanguard, Victorious, Vigilant & Vengance), one is allways on patrol. One is on standby readiness, One is on work-up, & one is in re-fit,(in this case Vengance).
07:50 PM on 03/26/2012
I bet the MP for Plymouth is a Tory.
06:45 PM on 03/26/2012
Obscene.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Phytoresearcher
06:29 PM on 03/26/2012
How many deserving, qualified university students could be put through a degree program in nuclear physics, and go on to develop clean, renewable, low cost energy with the amount spent to "upgrade" one nuke sub?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Norman Mitchison
05:45 PM on 03/26/2012
Makes a change. Guilty consciences?
02:36 PM on 03/26/2012
Probably the only vessel worth having that we will have left. We are paying billions for two large aircraft carriers or should I say white horses that are so expensive that if ever one of them actually is completed. It will have no planes, inadequate radar, and non-existent defensive weapons (to save money). Might as well rent it out as a billionnaires toy? At least we'd get rent money!
03:53 PM on 03/26/2012
No aircraft carrier ever goes to sea without an escort. That could range from 1 frigate to a convoy. Because of this protection there is very little requirement for a huge sonar array or defensive weapons. So I wouldn't worry too much about what you read through the press
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Phytoresearcher
06:31 PM on 03/26/2012
No requirement for on ship radar arrays on a carrier? What were you smoking when you wrote that?
06:19 PM on 03/27/2012
Yes, it's partly because of this ill-conceived project that the RN has shrunk from 35 to 19 destroyers and frigates since 1997 and now has only 7 SSNs. The "carriers at any price" brigade don't understand the importance of a balanced fleet with a reasonable number of hulls. Large aircraft carriers aren't needed for national or regional defence and security, which is the main reason for having a navy.
photo
hearthammer
If left is right and right is wrong, decide!
01:30 PM on 03/26/2012
Interesting. But where is it gonna be based after 2014? Chatham?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Edgar H
Keep the Press free!
01:30 PM on 03/26/2012
Well if the contract was sorted under Labour years ago, this sub will never get out of dry dock with out costing a fortune in delays.
07:53 PM on 03/26/2012
Precisely. The decision to build the carriers was all about jobs in a Labour stronghold.
northern git
fed up with all the political crap in life
11:33 AM on 03/26/2012
very nice too

but this may be why we cannot keep an aircraft carrier at all

shame on the |MOD