Abortion Spot Checks: Care Quality Commission Cancelled Hospital Inspections To Cut Costs

PA/Huffington Post UK  |  Posted: 5/04/2012 07:24 Updated: 5/04/2012 11:01

Hospital Inspection
Hospital inspections were cut by Lansley's request abortion spot checks

Health Secretary Andrew Lansley's spot checks on abortion clinics resulted in the Care Quality Commission cutting the number of inspections of hospitals and care homes as a result, it has been revealed.

The chairwoman of the health regulator wrote to the Department of Health, saying that the abortion investigation meant that 580 other inspections were "foregone" and that the total cost would be about £1 million.

The revelations are likely to fuel further accusations that the government is using abortions as a political issue. The British Pregnancy Advisory Service told The Huffington Post UK that the government is engaging in political manoeuvring over the issue of abortion by giving details of illegal activity to the press before providers or the police.

Lansley is said to have been "shocked" by the letter from the health regulator, saying that the CQC had not asked for more money to continue with its other responsibilities, but could have had it if it had done so.

According to the Daily Telegraph, Dame Jo Williams wrote on 23 March: "Such a request at short notice entails operation's management time in planning the visits, cancelling pre-planned inspections as well as the compliance inspector's time in carrying out the visits and drafting the reports.

"Add to this the anticipated enforcement activity that will inevitably arise and it is clear that this has a considerable impact on our capacity to deliver our annual targets."

Shadow Health Secretary Andy Burnham told the BBC Today programme that he found it hard not to draw the conclusion that Lansley was trying to get on the "front foot" whilst the unpopular health reforms were going through parliament.

He told Radio Four that though there were genuine concerns raised over the way some abortion clinics were operating, there were also questions over the way Lansley carried out the checks.

"It's clear from the letter that the CQC has serious misgivings about the way in which the spot checks were carried out" he told the BBC.

He also suggested that by carrying out the spot checks, Andrew Lansley was "chasing headlines".

Burnham pointed to the way that Andrew Lansley communicated the findings of the spot checks to a newspaper before the results were published by the independent regulator. By doing that Burham said that many clinics were alerted to the inspection, thus skewing the results.

BPAS told The Huffington Post UK they were upset that they had not been personally informed of the serious allegations, especially at a time when abortion providers already feel "under attack".

"There are so many ways he could improve provision for women. He's suddenly ordered these raids on clinics. It's so worrying because you expect it from Nadine Dorries but for the Secretary of State to start using abortion in this way it can only go one way and we've seen that in the States."

Describing the abortion inspections as a "witch hunt" they stressed that "this appears to be a very big political statement and that is just really, really frightening for providers.

"When you start using that kind of language ... then you attract extremists."

Last Friday, pro-life campaigners, 40 Days For Life, met with a noisy counter protest from pro-choice activists outside BPAS headquarters in central London.

Commenting afterwards, Alan Hopes, the Auxiliary Bishop of Westminster, who attended the prayer vigil said he was there to stand up against the “culture of death”.

“The large number of people who attended the prayer vigil shows that increasing numbers are opposed to our society’s culture of death and are horrified that in 2010 almost 190,000 abortions took place in England and Wales.”

Kate Smurthwaite, vice chair of pro-choice group Abortion Rights, said she was concerned about a mainstream bishop supporting an "extremist" group.

The government announced last month that the investigation had shown that some doctors were breaking the law by "pre-signing" abortion consent forms.

Spot checks at more than 250 abortion clinics found evidence of blank forms being signed in anticipation of patients seeking a termination.

The law states that, except in emergencies, two doctors must agree for a woman to have an abortion.

Although doctors do not have to see the woman in person, they must certify that they are aware of her circumstances and why she wants to go ahead with the procedure.

Nurses, counsellors and other healthcare professionals can assess the woman before the forms are signed.

Of more than 250 clinics investigated, it was thought 15% to 20% might be breaking the law.

Conservative MP Nadine Dorries called for the 1967 Abortion Act to be brought back before parliament after the revelations, "and redrafted to deal with the number of illegal abortions which take place every day".

A Department of Health spokeswoman said: "The CQC's statutory duty is to uphold the law.

"The CQC was one of the organisations who warned us of this issue at the time, and agreed with us that a programme of inspections should take place as a proportionate response to the serious allegations being made.

"We would expect the CQC, like any good regulator, to be able to prioritise its inspections and are told that in this case they did so, so that no patients were placed at risk.

"The CQC has around 900 inspectors, only some of whom were involved in these inspections, the vast majority of which were completed within four days."

FOLLOW UK POLITICS

Health Secretary Andrew Lansley's spot checks on abortion clinics resulted in the Care Quality Commission cutting the number of inspections of hospitals and care homes as a result, it has been reveale...
Health Secretary Andrew Lansley's spot checks on abortion clinics resulted in the Care Quality Commission cutting the number of inspections of hospitals and care homes as a result, it has been reveale...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 8
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
02:58 PM on 04/05/2012
Coarcleman - good to see you thinking seriously about these interesting questions. The current culture of death pervading British and much of Western society will be looked back on with incredulity by future generations - how could we abort a fifth of all children conceived? What possible justification could there have been for such wrong to have been perpetrated by a so-called civilised society? Whose morality was being applied?

These are the questions the abortion industry do not want asked - they hide under a cloak of "choice" - hence the smoke-screen of indignation that the government should "dare" to interfere with their business by sending in the CQC!
01:39 PM on 04/05/2012
never claimed to know all the answers. think this brings up several interesting questions though.
11:29 AM on 04/05/2012
Damn right wingers interfering again and making everyone else suffer as a result! This is the reality of their skewed logic, they put real human lives at risk instead of letting trained medical staff get on with the job.
01:10 PM on 04/05/2012
'He who knows all the answers has probably misunderstood the questions in the first place'.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
09:32 AM on 04/05/2012
If the head of CQC is finding it so difficul to carry out a legitiimate role of her organisation - in this case ensuring that abortion mills obey the law - perhaps she should resign.

Abortion is only allowed in the UK under strictly defined conditions under the Abortion Act. Otherwise it remains illegal under the Offenses Against the Persons Act.

An important role of the law is to protect the weak against the stronger in society. If this role is undermined, we allow the horrors such as Nazi Germany's holocaust - or the horrors of 200,000 unborn babies being killed per year in the UK.

They need protection from the foisting on them of the morality of the abortion industry and its supporters - this is truly a very important role of the law.

This link is to a picture of a baby in the womb (not distressing, just beautiful) of gestational age 5 months. Over 1000 British babies per year are killed when more developed than this:
http://www.orwelltoday.com/babyub.jpg
01:18 PM on 04/05/2012
Pro veritate - whilst it is correct that abortions should only be carried out as legally permitted under the 1967 Act this is currently being used by anti abortionists to try to undermine the existing law and the rights of women to have control over their own bodies .

Under the current law no woman is forced to give birth if they feel it would damage their physical or mental health or their is foetal abnormality ..

Comparisons with the German Holocaust are absurd - these acts were perpertrated against people, living persons - a foetus is not a person in English Law and has no legal rights as a person - you become in law a person at birth when you sustain a seperate existence from the host female .

And it has nothing to do with " morality " which is a matter of individual choice , it is a matter of law - plenty of activities many consider " immoral " are perfectly legal - eg gambling, drinking alcohol, eating meat, tobacco , divorce, contraception , cutting your hair - there is an endless list of supposed " moralities " ..

No woman " morally " opposed to abortion is forced to have one - all woman are offered that as a legal choice ( subject to the Act ) .

Over 80% of women regard freedom of choice as a right - there is a small l minority who wish to impose their views on others
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
02:42 PM on 04/05/2012
You are correct - abortions may only be carried out as permitted under the 1967 Act.

You are incorrect about the existing law - it does NOT give women the right to demand an abortion if they wish to, in order to have control over their own bodies.

Nor is it correct that under current law women can “choose” to abort their child “if they feel it would damage their physical or mental health or there is an abnormality” ... the law permits two doctors to make the determination and if they so determine, abortion is allowed. The law is being misapplied, though - hence the need for the CQC to enforce it. Babies are being aborted by an industry determined to ignore the law.

Again you are very wrong when you say an unborn child has no legal rights – please check your facts, and read the Offences Against the Person Act

Neither is "morality " a matter of individual choice – it is an absolute. Something is either right or wrong. Killing the defenceless is wrong. It can conceivably be a “lesser wrong”, but such instances would be vanishingly rare

Just because a claimed 80% of women regard freedom of choice as a right does not mean that their freedom should allow them to kill their children. Where is the choice of the baby in this? Who is imposing their morality on these children?