Sky News Admits To Hacking Emails Of John Darwin And Suspected Paedophile

PA/Huffington Post UK  |  By Posted: 5/04/2012 14:16 Updated: 5/04/2012 16:04

Sky News
Sky News has said that it had hacked emails belonging to members of the public on two occasions

Sky News has admitted it hacked email accounts belonging to members of the public, but has defended its actions as "responsible journalism", the BBC reports.

The hacking victims include John Darwin, who faked his death in a canoe, and his wife Anne, as well as a suspected paedophile and his partner.

In a statement Sky News said that it was "acutely aware of the tensions that can arise between the law and responsible investigative journalism.

"We stand by these actions as editorially justified and in the public interest."

The broadcaster said the evidence it discovered was handed to police and used in the successful prosecution of Darwin's wife Anne for insurance and pension fraud.

Darwin, 61, faked his own death in a canoeing accident in 2002 so his wife, 60, could claim hundreds of thousands of pounds from insurance policies and pension schemes.

Former Sky News managing editor Simon Cole agreed that North of England correspondent Gerard Tubb could hack into Darwin's Yahoo! email account.

Mr Tubb uncovered messages which cast doubt on Mrs Darwin's claim during her criminal trial that her "domineering" husband forced her to go through with the fraud plan.

The Darwins, from Seaton Carew, near Hartlepool, were jailed at Teesside Crown Court in 2008 for the swindle, which deceived the police, a coroner, financial institutions and even their sons Mark and Anthony.

Adding that it did not " take such decisions lightly or frequently" the company described its actions as built upon "finely balanced judgement."

Sky stressed that any decision must be "based on individual circumstances and must always be subjected to the proper editorial controls."

In a separate case, Mr Tubb was authorised to access the emails of a suspected paedophile and his wife, although this investigation did not result in any material being published or broadcast.

Cleveland Police said in a statement: "Cleveland Police has conducted an initial review into these matters and can confirm that inquiries are ongoing into how the emails were obtained."

The revelations come shortly after James Murdoch's announcement that he is to step down as chairman of BSkyB, of which Sky News is a subsidiary company.

FOLLOW UK

 
 
  • Comments
  • 52
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Drg40
Representative Democracy is all we have.
09:50 AM on 04/07/2012
Just think, any day now British prisons are going to be the best policed in the world with newsletters of simply amazing quality and professionalism. The governor won't need a public address system, merely pick up his mobile and he'll be speaking to the world. Every cloud has a silver lining, eh?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
hobiedan
Keep on truckin' do dah
11:07 PM on 04/06/2012
That has to be the weekest excuse for criminal activity that I have ever witnessed. Is that all you have Mr Murdoch? One perp walk coming up.
01:06 PM on 04/06/2012
It's quite clear that we british have not got the press we deserve. It's a vital tool of the people and a free press is so important to a free society that the people playing games with it and jeopardising it have a great deal to answer for.

If we introduce draconian laws designed to limit free press we are all affected, but the media have been taking advantage and we're the ones who will suffer from any backlash.
09:23 AM on 04/06/2012
They have admitted to 'hacking' these two, now, how many more are they hiding? And please, please, please don't tell me Murdoch wasn't aware this went on.
09:05 AM on 04/06/2012
No-one should hack anyone. End of! Seriously, WW3's probably going to happen because of the amount of private information, true thoughts, etc that's being uncovered by snooping trouble-makers! I predict that we shall be devolutionising ourselves by hand-writing everything & hiding it away, so no-one can hack/track info & the only way they see it is if they are holding it in thier hand and reading it!!
06:49 AM on 04/06/2012
I wonder if eamon holmes will be spouting off on this one as all sky news reported on the phone hacking 24/7,
05:17 AM on 04/06/2012
NO! It is only okay when you hack royals.
Hacking celebrities or criminals should not be tolerated.
03:14 AM on 04/06/2012
Is it justified?

No

TV channels do not get to decide who's privacy they violate.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
02:54 AM on 04/06/2012
Here we go again.

The demagogic 'journalists' always play the paedophile card when seeking popularity. This is NOT responsible, investigative journalism.

First of all, a professional journalist would never refer to someone as a 'suspected paedophile' as it is a paraphilia which has to be diagnosed by a certified psychologist. Not an unqualified 'journalist' seeking an emotive headline. Professional journalists don't need to resort to the gutter to feed their customers paranoid rhetoric.

Secondly, the 'public interest' term needs defining. I really am at a loss as to how such stories are of definitive interest to my life, as a member of this 'public' identity. Unless I start subscribing to the stereotypes of such individuals, which aren't supported by the facts.

In order for these stories to be of interest to me, I'd have to drill a hole through the top of my skull and pour bleach into it. Then maybe I'd have the kind of mind that swallows this filth.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Quinn M
Feel trickled on yet?
02:06 AM on 04/06/2012
Rupert did it all for us! Not, you know, because he wanted to make even more money.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
01:52 AM on 04/06/2012
Anyone else see the absolutely blatant and shameful pro-SKY/Murdoch rant on the SKY News press preview at 11.30? After ignoring this story all day, they invited that Harry Hill lookalike from The Times - a solid Murdoch man - who opened with a fake apology for raising the story, but then went on to give us a 10 minute rant at Anna Botting's urging on how disgraceful it was that The Guardian had even run this story. The poor woman taking the role this evening of 'faux balance' who tried to suggest it was a terrible thing for SKY News to do was then shouted down by both Harry and Anna tag-teaming her.

The press preview is often skewed with the apparent balance of having a left-winger and right-winder destroyed by having the presenter - who would normally act as a neutral moderator between the two in any other similar context - weighing in on the side of the right-winger.

But this was a low point even for them. Absolutely disgusting bias.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
wakyracir
My spaniel is watching you
01:25 AM on 04/06/2012
That's all well and good, but what about all the times they hacked peoples' private communications and either found nothing wrong or found something which they considered newsworthy (ie. titillating) enough to sell but not actually illegal? The end cannot justify the means. They broke the law and should be penalised to the fullest extent.
BTW - would Huff please change their spellchecker here to British English, as I'm fed up being told to spell things with a Z instead of an S!!!!!
photo
Gavin Saunders
we only have each other
12:31 AM on 04/06/2012
How very reassuring for the British public that the Tabloid Mogul's minions get to decide what is good for them.
09:55 PM on 04/05/2012
What a state we're in.. seriously!! A rudderless government trying to rein in the media barons, that politicians of all hues have largely created, or needed the support of..
We're reaping what we've sown in the UK
09:37 PM on 04/05/2012
As I barrister I am amazed at the front and the ignorance of Sky. There is simply no defence of 'public interest,' or 'justification' to the offence of phone hacking - if you hack into someone's e-mail accounts without authority and that comes from a warrant issued by a circuit judge - then, you have committed an offence.
I expand on this in the following article: http://www.allthatsleft.co.uk/2012/04/sky-news-has-no-defence-to-e-mail-hacking-charge/
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Drg40
Representative Democracy is all we have.
10:27 PM on 04/05/2012
But, the interesting thing is why have the self admitted criminals not been arrested? It would seem that the law is whatever Sky says it is, or is the case now that so many senior policen are under suspicion we're running out of senior policemen to arrest Murdoch's thugs We know, for example, that when the police have a valid search warrant, NI can tell the to stuff it and they do. They don't come back mob handed, the Met slink back into their kennels. Doesn't that take some explaining? Akers investigation is now taking so long that one might be drawn to the conclusion that instructions have gone out from the Home Office, via Theresa May, to kick the whole thing into the long grass and Akers with it.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
dizzies11
Right at my desk. UK.
10:40 PM on 04/05/2012
so will they arrest them ?, will a circuit judge get a warrant issued ? they now have the evidence ? No I don`t think so, after all it`s Sky News you cant do that, a rule for one, we all know the rest.