Syria: Uneasy Ceasefire Reported After Days Of Intense Violence

Huffington Post UK  |  By Posted: 12/04/2012 06:18 Updated: 12/04/2012 08:54

Syriameadow

An uneasy ceasefire in Syria was reportedly in place on Thursday morning after a week of intense violence in which hundreds of people are said to have been killed by government troops.

The ceasefire, brokered by UN and Arab League envoy Kofi Annan, went into operation at dawn.

"An hour after the ultimatum expired, the situation is calm in all regions," Rami Abdel Rahman, chairman of the London-based Syrian Human Rights Observatory, told the AFP news agency.

But the regime had not moved its tanks and other forces out of civilian areas, which was also a condition of Annan's six-point plan for a planned cessation in violence.

Activists reported isolated outbreaks of violence, but no casualties.

The Avaaz network said that four separate violations of the ceasefire had been recorded.

It said that shelling was recorded after the deadline in the Al Zalah area of the Damascus suburbs. Shells were also said to have fallen on a mountain close to Hama and onto residential neighbourhoods in the city.

It also reported that machine-gun fire was also heard in Hama.

However it said that it could not independently verify the claims, and said no injuries or deaths had been reported.

Above: Syrian foreign minister Jihad Makdissi


Syrian foreign minister Jihad Makdissi told BBC Radio 4's Today programme that President Assad's government had no intention of breaking the ceasefire and had already made several military drawbacks.

He said: "There is no reason to break the ceasefire at all. What is important is everybody should abide by the terms of calm."

"It is not about President Assad.... the realistic prospect is it is up to Syrians themselves to decide. Anybody who wants to change the regime in Syria, they should not be forcing this, they should do it through democratic channels.

"I'm not saying we don't have problems in Syria. What I am saying is the way out is evolution and not armed confrontation."

Makdissi said there could be no pre-conditions, such as the departure of President Assad, on any process.

In an interview with the BBC David Cameron urged Russia and China to join the world in "tightening the noose" around the Syrian regime.

The PM said Bashar Assad's "deliberate flouting" of the latest peace plan showed that further action was needed.

Cameron said: "I feel an immense sense of frustration because the world has come together behind this Kofi Annan plan.

"This is a plan, remember, that is not just backed by those of us who have been pushing for action on Syria, it's also backed by China and Russia. And yet Assad is deliberately flouting it.

"Now is the time to say to the Russians and Chinese, look at the man we are dealing with, look at the appalling way he is behaving. We need to go back to the UN and tighten the pressure, tighten the noose."

Foreign Secretary William Hague said: "If there isn’t a ceasefire or the ceasefire is not upheld in the coming days then in the view of the United Kingdom we will want to return to the Security Council in a new attempt to obtain a resolution."

Above: a soldier from the Free Syrian Army


Meanwhile the United States said Syria's promise to respect the ceasefire had "little if any credibility".

On Wednesday President Assad's regime said it would honour the ceasefire while remaining on alert for violence by the opposition.

"After our armed forces completed successful operations in combating the criminal acts of the armed terrorist groups and enforced the state's rule over its territory, it has been decided to stop these operations from Thursday morning," said state TV, quoting a ministry official.

It added its forces would be on "stand-by" to counter any new threats.

Earlier Annan, acting as special envoy for the United Nations and the Arab League, said the government had given him assurances they would keep their side of the ceasefire deal.

"If everyone respects it I think by six in the morning on Thursday we shall see improved conditions on the ground," Annan said after meeting Iranian foreign minister Ali Akbar Salehi in Tehran.

Activists said at least 11 people had been killed in Homs on Wednesday.

More than 1,000 people have been killed in Syria in little over a week, activists said. The UN estimates more than 9,000 people have been killed since the start of the uprising in March 2011.

FOLLOW UK

 
 
  • Comments
  • 10
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Recency  | 
Popularity
09:26 PM on 04/12/2012
All we know it is that they will not stop until they invade Syria as they have done with Lybia and Iraq. Nobody knows for sure who is shooting who, what we know it is that enough mistakes were committed in those other countries and it seems that we have not learnt the lesson or maybe our governments did and want to mislead us once again.
As long as Syria has the support of China and Russia, I am afraid that the UK and USA will have to hold their breath.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mfa11e
Tell the truth ,regardless
03:58 PM on 04/12/2012
So,all we know for sure is Syrian troops are firing on "rebel" Syrians,women and children are being killed .We have seen tanks blasting at mosques ( so much for the sanctuary offered in religeous buildings) no mullahs have condemned the shelling of a mosque,so must be acceptable.We have seen Kofi Annan rattled when asked what were the UN actually doing,he wouldnt respond to direct questions relating to civilains being shot at across the Turkish border by Syrian troops.As far as I can see the UN and Kofi Annan are as much use as a chocolate fireguard.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Norman Mitchison
03:53 PM on 04/12/2012
Have`nt we enough problems in this country without Hague and Cameron meddling in Syrias.
04:21 PM on 04/12/2012
Yes, look what has happened in Iraq and Libya. Now there are different factions in opposition. Afganistan will be the same. Will Syria be any different? It's Iran we need to watch! We are wasting our time,money, and above all our military sons in these futile operations.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
valar84
02:16 PM on 04/12/2012
Coverage of Syria is confusing to me. The impression the articles leave is that the Syrian Army is bombarding and shooting at civilians, unarmed protesters... but then the article ends with a photo of a "soldier from the Free Syrian Army".

I have no sympathy for Al-Assad, but it feels like propaganda, like the media is trying to prepare public opinion for war in Syria. It feels like I am being lied to by selective reporting of facts, like how maybe the Opposition is armed and resisting violently, and that the reason "civilian areas" are bombed is that the Opposition soldiers are in these areas and shoot at the government forces if they come near them.
01:51 PM on 04/12/2012
DON'T HOLD YOUR BREATH!!
11:47 AM on 04/12/2012
Jihad Makdissi is not the Syrian foreign minister, he's the spokesman of the Syrian Ministry of Foreign Affairs. The man pictured above IS the foreign minister, Walid Al-moualem, who wasn't being interviewed here. Sloppy.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
dd35-scot
11:17 AM on 04/12/2012
I think the time has now come for everyone to open their eye's and stand up to our governments.Stop believing the rubbish being told by NATO.Start doing the research yourselves rather than watching the X Factor etc.If we dont then we are going to see the whole of the Middle East and consequently the world go up in thousands of mushroom clouds.
Here is a start.........http://www.intifada-palestine.com/2011/11/lies-and-truth-about-syria/
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
10:11 AM on 04/12/2012
The US and its allies clearly don't want this to work.

Sending Annan on a "mission impossible" they clearly never expected to succeed, while promising money and arms to the "rebels" at the same time...

"An hour after the ultimatum expired, the situation is calm in all regions," says the chairman of the London-based Syrian Human Rights Observatory

Yet Cameron says Assad is "deliberate flouting" the peace plan and is now calling on the so-called international community to "tighten the noose".
09:41 AM on 04/12/2012
quote from above article...

......" But the regime had not moved its tanks and other forces out of civilian areas, which was also a condition of Annan's six-point plan for a planned cessation in violence.....".

So what would one expect other than the troops remain in the areas they are covering.

Can it be really expected they move back to barracks, thereby leaving the areas to fall into the hands of the very people they have been trying to winkle out. That would be an utter disgrace for ANY armed force, after clearing out the insurrectionists, to simply walk away, more or less handing the areas back to them, as soon as their backs are turned.

I have to wonder at times how the minds of some journalists work, in making such nonsense statements.