Michael Gove: Children Can Be Successful Regardless Of Background

PA/The Huffington Post UK  |  By Posted: 10/05/2012 11:40 Updated: 10/05/2012 11:40

Michael Gove
Gove said that schools are changing children's lives every day

Education minister Michael Gove attacked a culture of low expectations which says poor children cannot be successful because of their background on Thursday.

Schools can change a child's destiny and many are proving this through hard work and good teaching, he said.

He launched a stinging assault on union leaders and local councils, accusing them of putting their own interests ahead of those of children.

Gove said: "Despite the evidence that other nations are closing the gap between rich and poor through great state schooling, some in this country still argue that pupil achievement is overwhelmingly dictated by socio-economic factors.

"They say that deprivation means destiny - that schools are essentially impotent in the face of overwhelming force of circumstance - and that we can't expect children to succeed if they have been born into poverty, disability or disadvantage."

Gove, addressing private school heads at a conference at Brighton College, said he did not accept this, and that there are a growing number of schools "proving that deprivation need not be destiny - that with the right teaching and the right values they can outperform everyone's expectations".

Research has suggested there are more than 440 secondary schools where the average GCSE point score for children on free school meals - a key measure of poverty - is higher than the national average for all children.

"What they share is an unwavering, unapologetic focus on standards," the minister said.

"Led by inspirational heads and teachers, every day these schools are proving the pessimists and fatalists wrong."

Gove's attack comes weeks after a union leader warned that UK schools are segregated along class lines, leaving the poorest children struggling to achieve against poverty and deprivation.

Dr Mary Bousted said stratified schools are "toxic" for deprived youngsters as it means they fail to learn important qualities such as aspiration and effort from richer classmates.

The general secretary of the Association of Teachers and Lecturers told its annual conference last month that it is the coalition Government's "dirty little secret" that their education cuts and reforms are making the lives of the poorest children tougher.

She raised concerns that schools are held up as the scapegoat for educational failure, accusing ministers and Ofsted of "seeking to wash their hands, like Pontius Pilate" of the problem.

FOLLOW UK EDUCATION

 
 
  • Comments
  • 10
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Vapula
Failure is not an option
09:45 PM on 05/13/2012
Gove, I think you need an education.
08:17 PM on 05/13/2012
Yes, they CAN...MAY they? I think not.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
werba
08:00 PM on 05/13/2012
Yes, there was a time when they could succeed - no matter what their background. It was when we had grammar schools open to all, solely on the grounds of academic merit.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
britalia56
06:46 PM on 05/13/2012
this blokes a genius, another joker in camerons pack.
07:08 PM on 05/10/2012
Firstly the coalition should remember that they will not win the next election on the strength of their social engineering proclivities no matter how many they produce. The main interest of the public is restoring lost growth and wealth. Social engineering is no substitute for 90+% of the public.
How much real world experience do our clones really have? Have they ever seen how some disadvantaged mothers treat their children. They only talk down to them and rarely if ever read to them and subject them to constant criticism. Middle class mothers talk to their children read to them and encourage them. Teachers have a far bigger job with disadvantaged children of overcoming negative programming. Middle class children can start school up to two year ahead and even in poorly performing schools will be more ahead by 11.
For details on disadvantaged children see Frank Fields poverty and life chances site and links within at http://www.frankfield.com/campaigns/poverty-and-life-changes.aspx
One of his messages is that earlier action is needed because children's minds are well formed at 3.
06:15 PM on 05/10/2012
Yes they can succeed but it requires high levels of effort, ambition and support from family, school and your social circle.
Contrast that with a child that grows up in a wealthy family who have all the right contacts and a head start in life, this child will be able to succeed with very little effort because they already have a head start and all the support they need to be successful.
Yes there are a few children who succeed in spite of their difficult backgrounds but they are a small minority compared with the children of the rich.
04:32 PM on 05/10/2012
Yes poor children can succeed. Provided that their family's and peers provide a positive psychological environment. Within my family being intelligent and educated is a negative and threatening thing. Alcoholism and "non-hippie" drugs are boys being boys. Basically the most positive genetic qualities are shunned. Females, children considered not to be pretty enough, artistic, those who seek a better life are pushed aside for the sporting, partying strapping examples of what is deemed normal men. Fortunately our bloodline is dying out as the preferred tend to die before their mid-fifty's.
Wealthier more educated family's invest in their children and sad to say involve children in an extremely unhealthy competition. Granted this is from where I was raised and my observations in life (I had a connection to the academic art community).
thephuqqer
not the chicken plucker.
04:10 PM on 05/10/2012
..........................'they can succeed'.................but it's far better, and easier, if you happen to have a silver spoon handy.
lastpost
see biography
02:05 PM on 05/10/2012
"Children Can Be Successful Regardless Of Background"
Plus, they’ll love the climate in Oz.

"Schools can change a child's destiny"
Despite continual government interference? We’ve done the police, immigration control, and the NHS. What can we "improve" next?

"other nations are closing the gap between rich and poor through great state schooling"
Other nations have competent leaders. Draw a Venn diagram, and colour in the in-congruent contributory factor.

"They say that deprivation means destiny"
They say there’s a reason for this mess. We got you, Babe.

"the right values"
Imposition of the Christhere paradigm perhaps?

"the average GCSE point score for children on free school meals - a key measure of poverty - is higher than the national average for all children."
Ergo. Put all children on free school meals. Simples.

"every day these schools are proving the pessimists and fatalists wrong."
Just wait ‘til these youngsters get out into the real world, where there’s no work for them. That’ll be their real education. Well, it’ll certainly teach them a lesson, that’s for sure.

"The general secretary of the Association of Teachers and Lecturers told its annual conference last month that"
Government needs to go back to school, as their sums don’t add up.

“Government's "dirty little secret"
Worse still, they won’t show their workings.

"seeking to wash their hands, like Pontius Pilate"
Prior to completely reversing a decision on what plane to buy and fly.
photo
mmartini54
Roll on 2015!
12:43 PM on 05/10/2012
YES OF COURSE Mr. Gove - nobody says otherwise!! Nobody!! Of course children from deprived backgrounds can and should achieve! Many already do, against the odds! Their schools are giving them a massive leg up in life! But to listen to you, the state sector is all about engaged in denying them opportunity, just because we're all - apparently - LAZY and FECKLESS.

Gee, give it a rest, man! Exactly WHO is saying that "deprivation means destiny"? Nobody, that's who!

What you're doing here, as usual, is setting up a straw man where none exists. Making out that you're engaged in a crusade against 'vested interests' (never really specifying what these are), so that you look like you've got your finger on the pulse to your audience of private school heads. Playing to your audience, in fact. Like a good politician does.

But a good politician doesn't necessarily mean a good Education Secretary. You've alienated the majority of the profession, just so that you can play to the gallery. You've politicised education in this country to a ridiculous degree. What we need is co-operation and collaboration from your department, not lectures, denigration and sound bites aimed at the media.