Attorney General Dominic Grieve Warns Twitter Users: The Internet Is Not Law-Free

PA  |  Posted: 11/05/2012 17:57 Updated: 11/05/2012 17:57   PA

Twitter Suicide
Grieve decided not to prosecute footballer Joey Barton for a series of online comments about John Terry ahead of his trial

Users of Twitter and other social media sites were warned by the Government's most senior law officer not to believe the internet was a law-free arena.

Attorney General Dominic Grieve issued the caution amid a slew of high-profile court cases involving postings made on the micro-blogging site.

A student who mocked football star Fabrice Muamba on Twitter after he collapsed with a heart attack was jailed for 56 days after admitting a racially aggravated public order offence

Another message, by a blogger who invited followers to put excrement through a local councillor's letterbox, led to a community sentence of 80 hours of unpaid work.

And 17 arrests have been made in connection with the alleged naming on Twitter of the victim in footballer Ched Evans's rape case.

Mr Grieve told BBC Radio 1's Newsbeat: "If somebody goes down to the pub with printed sheets of paper and hands it out, that's no different than if somebody goes and does a tweet.

"The idea that you have immunity because you're an anonymous tweeter is a big mistake."

He went on: "I don't want to take action but if I think it is necessary to prevent crime, such as racially aggravated harassment, then I won't hesitate to do it."

Mr Grieve decided not to prosecute footballer Joey Barton for a series of online comments about John Terry ahead of his trial, insisting they would not jeopardise the case.

FOLLOW UK

Users of Twitter and other social media sites were warned by the Government's most senior law officer not to believe the internet was a law-free arena. Attorney General Dominic Grieve issued the ca...
Users of Twitter and other social media sites were warned by the Government's most senior law officer not to believe the internet was a law-free arena. Attorney General Dominic Grieve issued the ca...
Filed by Dina Rickman  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 12
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
13:47 on 14/05/2012
Freedom of Speech only seems to apply when people like what you are saying regardless of whether its the truth or not.
I don't condone racism at all but, ever wonder if its other races that get priority over you, in your own country? (a rhetorical question of course, please don't chuck me in the slammer)
God forbid you show any discontent towards that matter, out comes the overplayed "race card"
17:16 on 12/05/2012
I hoper nobody is smoking and Tweeting; there are only two crimes taken seriously in this country--smoking and racism.:)
20:30 on 12/05/2012
Thousands of people have and are suffering daily from institutional, overt, unwitting and subtle racism. Racism dehumanises a person and could be liken in effect to rape. I'm pleased that the government and the police, in some areas, are taking racism seriously. But it will take effective education to stem the damage through preventative measures.
22:27 on 12/05/2012
Yawn, yawn, double yawn. Brainwashing is complete in some cases, isn't it?
17:02 on 12/05/2012
The Internet is not Law Free, Emm, easier said than done, because the Internet clearly is World - Wide, (you know that www; bit ).

So therefore, just how long is the arm of British Justice, and does it have some kind of automatic jurisdiction to cover the WHOLE World issuing Writs to everyone Worldwide, for something that someone said's that should be silenced, or censored within the UK.

If NOT, then just what is the Attorney General talking about.
16:58 on 12/05/2012
If the offenders had written the offensive material from another country on a server that is in another country rather than the UK, then basically there is balls all legally that the English law could do about it otherwise they would be prosecuting everyone in the world who has said derogatory things about anybody or anything.
15:21 on 12/05/2012
I think the people in charge of the justice system should concentrate on more important issues such as giving a proper punishment for the serious crimes.A life sentence for murder should mean life not a few years.Have they got nothing else to do other than looking at peoples comments on the internet,obviously not.
20:38 on 12/05/2012
Racism can have the equivalent of a life sentence of mental trauma, unfulfilled potential and reduced quality of life on the victim.
00:31 on 12/05/2012
i wonder what would have happened had a brit tweeted something about that italian footballer who died of heart failure a few days after muambas incident. reality is i had never heard of muamba before his heart stopped but i wanted him to live and he did and i was happy. BUT i didnt know who he was before hand, so who cares what I want or think, good or bad.
00:28 on 12/05/2012
a person can say anything under their breath,in private or only in their own mind. should that be legal? maybe not.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MrAnon
15:09 on 12/05/2012
Maybe it is, maybe it isn't, but in either case there's not a damn thing anyone can do about it. The law or society can only force people to ACT in a certain way and the law is good only if you can CATCH or PROVE that someone did something illegal. But no power in the world can force a person to hold certain beliefs or have a certain opinion.
This comment has been removed.
20:44 on 12/05/2012
Recently I was in a board meeting giving a report. Someone made a nasty comment "under their breath". I didn't even look at him and I said nothing. I won't be reporting it as I know one or two others heard it. Is that under breath comment legal?