Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Antony Timlin

GET UPDATES FROM Antony Timlin
 

Blair Aiming for Gold in Olympic Revival

Posted: 08/08/2012 00:00

Anyone who follows British politics could not have failed to notice the re-emergence of Tony Blair in recent months. He has hit the headlines for defending the Games, for speaking out on the West's ignorance to Islamic extremism and for his take on the hysteria over bankers.

From the Sunday morning politics shows to bouncing around the Olympic Park faster than Usain Bolt, he's literally popping up left, right and centre.

This is all part of a strategy for Blair to "re-engage" with British politics, developed by his new Director of Communications, Rachel Grant.

The timing is no accident. Blair and his team are acutely aware that the feel-good factor of the Olympics provides an invaluable opportunity to remind the public that it was his government that brought the Games to London in the first place.

The announcement that he will take on a formal role advising Labour on sport, and on the Olympic legacy more generally, provides a perfect launch pad for future roles. Rumours of a Shadow Cabinet post are clearly ridiculous but you can fully expect Blair to be given more high-profile roles in the run up to the next election.

Despite overwhelmingly negative press coverage, there is room for Blair to make an impact. A Guardian / ICM poll at the end of July found that Labour would only dip three points if Blair was to return as leader - a remarkable statistic given the amount of baggage that he now carries.

It is hardly surprising that Blair wants to be more pro-active; at 59, he clearly feels that he has more to offer. In the post-war period up to Blair, the average age of Prime Ministerial retirement has been 64. Only John Major (54) and Ted Heath (58) left office whilst in their 50s, having achieved only one general election victory each.

For a man who won three and defined his political generation, that leaves a lot of spare time.

Aside from the publication of his memoirs, Blair has largely - and wisely - kept out of domestic politics up to this point. Much of his focus has been on the establishment of his faith foundation and on international affairs. He has spoken at length on Libya and Syria and has notched up close to one hundred trips to the Middle East since his appointment as the UN, EU, United States and Russia's special envoy.

Blair has also taken full advantage of one of the few perks of being a former leader in the modern age and earned himself a bit of extra pocket money. He banks upwards of £200,000 a go on the lecture circuit and his business ventures allegedly make him around £20 million a year. Whilst that figure is almost certainly a wild exaggeration, it is clear that the Blair's are not struggling financially.

Enough time has now passed since Blair left office for him to re-engage with domestic politics and the Olympics have provided the perfect backdrop. Anyone expecting the most gifted politician of his generation to quietly enjoy his retirement will be sorely disappointed.

 

Follow Antony Timlin on Twitter: www.twitter.com/AntonyTimlin

FOLLOW UK POLITICS
Anyone who follows British politics could not have failed to notice the re-emergence of Tony Blair in recent months. He has hit the headlines for defending the Games, for speaking out on the West's ig...
Anyone who follows British politics could not have failed to notice the re-emergence of Tony Blair in recent months. He has hit the headlines for defending the Games, for speaking out on the West's ig...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 29
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Neil Christiansen
Dogs never bite me. Just humans
05:35 on 12/08/2012
If dear Mr Miliband wants to be the next PM, I would suggest to him that he stays very distant from our Tony; it wouldn't gain him many votes, but there again, he could lose a huge number. I wonder what he'd do if he had to make a choice between Blair & Clegg? ( & had to take one or the other). Now there's a frying-pan/fire choice.

I'm a bit sick of being told that Tony has 'much to offer' I have much to offer. Bob Diamond has much to offer. Nadine Dorries has much to offer. The HIV virus has much to offer.
11:09 on 09/08/2012
It would be fair to say Blair splits the country: those who think he's a nine-bob note with the luck of Old Nick and those - well, those who don't. I do. He is undoubtedly a one-off given his extreme facility to say nothing at great length and authoritatively, but then being a one-off is not necessarily a Good Thing: Stalin, Jeffrey Archer, Richard Branson and Popeye were or are other one-offs. I don't know a great deal about psychology but I have read that all grear liars have an uncanny ability to believe their own bullshit so that to them what they are saying is not a lie at all and so they are not lying. I feel that sums up Blair and explains why it seems impossible for him to feel embarrassed or shame. I don't wish him ill, just that sooner rather than later he is brought over his role in the invasion of Iraq (I notice the current - Tory - Attorney General has ruled the publication of the relevant Cabinet minutes should be postponed. Why exactly?). Bringing Blair to book is not just an abstract exercise - several thousand US and British servicemen died as a result of Blair's vanity (as I see) to say nothing of so far hundreds of thousands of Iraqis. Re-engage in politics? I bloody well hope not. There will be those who disagree but then there are also those who still believe the Moon is made of cheese.
20:25 on 09/08/2012
Split you make it sound even, when in reality the majority would have him back now, you sick party people you can stick with boris!
21:44 on 09/08/2012
I disagree: I suspect the majority of British now have the measure of Blair, whose main focus now seems to have been the greater glory of Tony Blair. As for 'you sick party people you can stick with boris!' I haven't a clue what you're on about. Can you elucidate?
08:25 on 09/08/2012
Gifted Politician????...what are these gifts.....dishonesty.....spin.....peddling delusions....the advocacy of greed and venality....yes exactly the gifts that we need....hey ho....so it goes
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Laatab
All The Worlds A Stage
05:11 on 09/08/2012
The only way Blair can serve the public interest would be to stand trial!
14:08 on 10/08/2012
Absolutely. Obviously for taking us to war when it was not our borders that were being threatened. Insulting our terrific Armed forces, expecting soldiers to buy their own kit. They should all sue TB personally for 'out of pocket expenses' and compensation for those who lost limbs, but are not adequately compensated for the destruction of their lives. He has earned a fortune touring the US with his re-written history of the first decade of the 21st century. Let him spend it on the men and women he berayed.

He should then have to answer for harbouring our enemies and paying their Legal costs to fight to remain in the UK while plotting to murder us in our beds and as we make our way to work. Tony Blairs Human Rights Bill have completely negated mine.

This blight on British politics should be consigned to the dustbin. The mistakes he made has caused the death of thousands of innocent people and cost our country billions of pounds. He should be held to account.

Politicians must see there is a line in the sand and a price to be paid when he or any PM oversteps the mark. Tony's legacy? a generation of children who were poorly educated to the point they are unemployable. Where did the money go....bombs and ammunition. Whose cause did it serve? That remains to be seen. Does anybody out there know wo is running Iraq today?
photo
Catriona
Wha daur meddle wi me?
19:05 on 08/08/2012
"The timing is no accident. Blair and his team are acutely aware that the feel-good factor of the Olympics provides an invaluable opportunity to remind the public that it was his government that brought the Games to London in the first place."

And war to Iraq.

I don't believe that poll.
22:44 on 08/08/2012
Surely the Iraq war was a carry on from Majors Government, the fact the sick party couldn't finish it is hardly Tony's fault, and your spot on he did bring the games to London and it was his government that put the money in to our schools for sport, I for one will be glad if he comes back. Well done and thanks for the best Olympics in the last 70 years!
photo
Catriona
Wha daur meddle wi me?
23:09 on 08/08/2012
His government bankrupted the country.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Sue Harvey
06:01 on 09/08/2012
Surely the Iraq war was a carry on from Majors Government.

So poor Tony had no choice but to go to war with Iraq. A novel idea.

and your spot on he did bring the games to London and it was his government that put the money in to our schools for sport,

and there was I thinking his government had turned all the school sports grounds into car parks.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
godsamyth
18:34 on 08/08/2012
going on those that were close to Bliar while he was in office I wonder if his Director of Communications has an Israeli passport
15:44 on 12/08/2012
I thought Alastair was a Scottish name.....
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
godsamyth
17:30 on 12/08/2012
it should have been obvious if you had read the article i was refering to Rachael Grant
lastpost
see biography
13:46 on 08/08/2012
“his take on the hysteria over bankers”
I see no shi*s.

“an invaluable opportunity to remind the public that it was his government that brought the Games to London”
and Armageddon to Iraq. All because glaring questions were neither asked nor answered. Hands up, who wants more.

“Labour would only dip three points if Blair was to return as leader”
Do they have three points to spare?

“he clearly feels that he has more to offer.”
If its answers bring it on. Otherwise, why bother? If there is a resilient world-view in there somewhere, wouldn’t it do the world good if it was out in the open? If there isn’t, wouldn’t the same apply?

“He has spoken at length.”
Unfortunately, technology waits on no one. Once it might have been possible to pontificate without fear of contradiction. That luxury is now like nostalgia, a thing of the past.
We have heard statements concerning the ever present need for debate, immediately contradicted by the avoidance of queries. Either the time has come to test understandings fully, or else we dare not discuss matters too intimately for fear of revealing the reasoning flaws.

"Enough time has now passed"
for the dust to have settled. Or is it a case of out of sight, out of mind? There’s only one way to find out.
photo
Catriona
Wha daur meddle wi me?
19:03 on 08/08/2012
We're not Americans. We have LONG memories.

Fanned & faved