Anyone who follows British politics could not have failed to notice the re-emergence of Tony Blair in recent months. He has hit the headlines for defending the Games, for speaking out on the West's ignorance to Islamic extremism and for his take on the hysteria over bankers.
From the Sunday morning politics shows to bouncing around the Olympic Park faster than Usain Bolt, he's literally popping up left, right and centre.
This is all part of a strategy for Blair to "re-engage" with British politics, developed by his new Director of Communications, Rachel Grant.
The timing is no accident. Blair and his team are acutely aware that the feel-good factor of the Olympics provides an invaluable opportunity to remind the public that it was his government that brought the Games to London in the first place.
The announcement that he will take on a formal role advising Labour on sport, and on the Olympic legacy more generally, provides a perfect launch pad for future roles. Rumours of a Shadow Cabinet post are clearly ridiculous but you can fully expect Blair to be given more high-profile roles in the run up to the next election.
Despite overwhelmingly negative press coverage, there is room for Blair to make an impact. A Guardian / ICM poll at the end of July found that Labour would only dip three points if Blair was to return as leader - a remarkable statistic given the amount of baggage that he now carries.
It is hardly surprising that Blair wants to be more pro-active; at 59, he clearly feels that he has more to offer. In the post-war period up to Blair, the average age of Prime Ministerial retirement has been 64. Only John Major (54) and Ted Heath (58) left office whilst in their 50s, having achieved only one general election victory each.
For a man who won three and defined his political generation, that leaves a lot of spare time.
Aside from the publication of his memoirs, Blair has largely - and wisely - kept out of domestic politics up to this point. Much of his focus has been on the establishment of his faith foundation and on international affairs. He has spoken at length on Libya and Syria and has notched up close to one hundred trips to the Middle East since his appointment as the UN, EU, United States and Russia's special envoy.
Blair has also taken full advantage of one of the few perks of being a former leader in the modern age and earned himself a bit of extra pocket money. He banks upwards of £200,000 a go on the lecture circuit and his business ventures allegedly make him around £20 million a year. Whilst that figure is almost certainly a wild exaggeration, it is clear that the Blair's are not struggling financially.
Enough time has now passed since Blair left office for him to re-engage with domestic politics and the Olympics have provided the perfect backdrop. Anyone expecting the most gifted politician of his generation to quietly enjoy his retirement will be sorely disappointed.
Follow Antony Timlin on Twitter: www.twitter.com/AntonyTimlin
I'm a bit sick of being told that Tony has 'much to offer' I have much to offer. Bob Diamond has much to offer. Nadine Dorries has much to offer. The HIV virus has much to offer.
He should then have to answer for harbouring our enemies and paying their Legal costs to fight to remain in the UK while plotting to murder us in our beds and as we make our way to work. Tony Blairs Human Rights Bill have completely negated mine.
This blight on British politics should be consigned to the dustbin. The mistakes he made has caused the death of thousands of innocent people and cost our country billions of pounds. He should be held to account.
Politicians must see there is a line in the sand and a price to be paid when he or any PM oversteps the mark. Tony's legacy? a generation of children who were poorly educated to the point they are unemployable. Where did the money go....bombs and ammunition. Whose cause did it serve? That remains to be seen. Does anybody out there know wo is running Iraq today?
And war to Iraq.
I don't believe that poll.
So poor Tony had no choice but to go to war with Iraq. A novel idea.
and your spot on he did bring the games to London and it was his government that put the money in to our schools for sport,
and there was I thinking his government had turned all the school sports grounds into car parks.
I see no shi*s.
“an invaluable opportunity to remind the public that it was his government that brought the Games to London”
and Armageddon to Iraq. All because glaring questions were neither asked nor answered. Hands up, who wants more.
“Labour would only dip three points if Blair was to return as leader”
Do they have three points to spare?
“he clearly feels that he has more to offer.”
If its answers bring it on. Otherwise, why bother? If there is a resilient world-view in there somewhere, wouldn’t it do the world good if it was out in the open? If there isn’t, wouldn’t the same apply?
“He has spoken at length.”
Unfortunately, technology waits on no one. Once it might have been possible to pontificate without fear of contradiction. That luxury is now like nostalgia, a thing of the past.
We have heard statements concerning the ever present need for debate, immediately contradicted by the avoidance of queries. Either the time has come to test understandings fully, or else we dare not discuss matters too intimately for fear of revealing the reasoning flaws.
"Enough time has now passed"
for the dust to have settled. Or is it a case of out of sight, out of mind? There’s only one way to find out.
Fanned & faved