The new year brought with it the news that rail fares are going up even more in the UK, even surpassing the increase to average incomes. Considering what you get for the amount of money you pay for a rail journey in this country and considering how essential it is that we encourage people to use public transportation, this rise in fares is something we need to rail against.
In a recent article in the New Yorker, Elizabeth Kolbert wrote about the importance of carbon tax on petrol as a way of helping to curb car usage and of eventually having an impact on climate change. The extreme weather we've been seeing lately is proof - if we needed any more - that we must start taking climate change seriously.
Kolbert, who is always sensible on environmental issues, has a point about petrol tax. But I'd like to propose a few other things as well, and this ties in to the issue of rail fares.
First of all, let's lower the cost of using public transportation, as a way of encouraging people to use trains and buses rather than their own cars and taxis. At the moment, rail fares are prohibitively high. For example, I live in Norwich and have to go to London fairly regularly for work. This is just a two-hour journey and yet can cost more than £100 for a return ticket. You can get a cheaper ticket if you book in plenty of time and choose the exact (usually off-peak) times you want to travel, but whether you're travelling for work or for pleasure, you often don't know exactly when you're going to be coming back. It makes absolutely no sense to insist that people specify times or risk paying two or more times as much in fares. Also, for £100 in other countries, you can get much further than the 120 miles between Norwich and London.
Besides lowering the cost, adding additional routes so that it's easier for people to take public transportation would be helpful. Great Britain is a small island nation and it shouldn't be that difficult to get from one place to another. And yet, it often is a challenge that requires multiple transfers and long waiting times and delayed or cancelled services. No wonder people jump in their cars rather than hop on trains or buses. As well as assisting people so they could get from point A to point B and saving on exhaust fumes from cars, having more routes would help ease traffic, which in turn could make people's road rage and stress levels go down.
And, finally, having dedicated biking lanes on roads - as you see in many northern European countries - would encourage more people to ride their bikes since it would be safer and simpler to bike to work or to run errands. And having more bike racks at bus and train stations would ensure that people could ride there instead of taking their cars, thereby getting exercising while also benefitting the environment.
In short, it wouldn't take that much to train our sights on improving public transportation, and it would have many knock-on effects. But it seems as though railroad companies and others involved have gone off the rails here. To really start combatting climate change and to get people to use public transportation more often, fares need to be much lower. Politicians need to set in motion the policies that will help the environment, and this includes encouraging people to use buses, trains, and bicycles more than cars.
As the new year starts, let's train our sights on improving public transportation.
Follow B.J. Epstein on Twitter: www.twitter.com/bjepstein
Neil Clark: Why We Can't Afford a Privatised Railway
National Rail Enquiries - Fare Finder
Cheap train tickets, get UK train times & fares | thetrainline
Rail fare structure 'not ideal', admits transport minister - The Guardian
Travel in Europe: Buy Rail Tickets & Passes - Rail Europe
Rail Fares Are 'Not That Expensive' Says Lib-Dem Minister Norman Baker Amid ...
Rail Fares: Anger As Commuters Face More Hikes
Your view: Rail fares rise as new prices come in
To our rulers, privatisation is the key to looting the exchequer, service is secondary, if at all.
Next it will be the police, with 'hello, Hargreaves and Allen crime solving, can I have your insurance number please? what is it a burglary?, oh, a murder, I'm sorry your not covered'.
Our country and our laws are all being sold to the looters.
Did you mean public transport? Surely we haven't indulged in transportation for over a century when the last convicts were sent to Australia.
Maybe you could move closer to work, and not commute so far.
A lot of people have been priced out of car-ownership, and rely on public transport being affordable as there is no alternative.
I'm not generally in favour of nationalisation, but I'd argue the re-nationalising the railways would be preferable to the farce we have now.
Yes, you can get taxpayers who don't use the railway to subsidise your journeys. Are you under some delusion that state run enterprises are more efficient and cheaper to run than privately run enterprises?
As to the choice between public and private ownership, one important factor is the nature of the market. Monopoly businesses - like providing the train journey from Norwich to London - are best run by the state. Just about every rail service in Europe beats the present British system and all are state run. Makes you think! (Or perhaps not in your case.)
Essentially, the private sector is good at some things, but really shouldn't be trusted with monopolies. Private companies are designed to maximise profit, that is why business exists and there's nothing necessarily wrong with that, but it doesn't fit with a mandate to provide public services.
A subsidised monopoly is just the biggest cash-cow a private company could ever hope for.