Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Brad Linzy

GET UPDATES FROM Brad Linzy
 

By Snubbing Ron Paul, the RNC May Have Cost Romney the Election

Posted: 31/08/2012 00:00

If you've been watching the news about the Republican National Convention (RNC) in Tampa, Florida, allow me to offer you a perspective you may not hear every day - that of an American Ron Paul Republican.

I am a Precinct Committeeman in my local Republican Party (RP), which is a low-level party office. For the last six years I have been a Ron Paul supporter. For those politically homeless Americans who value civil liberties, scepticism of war, and social liberalism of the so-called 'left', yet want the smaller government, reduced spending, and sound money often preached about from the 'right', Ron Paul and his libertarian, classical liberal philosophy has offered a welcoming home.

Unlike in the UK, where you have viable alternatives to the two prevailing parties (I am particularly enamoured with the Monster Raving Loony Party), the Republicans and Democrats in America have created high petition thresholds for ballot access that make it next to impossible for third parties to compete. Until the 1970s, the RP was largely the party of "Peace and Prosperity". It championed individual liberties and freedom from state control. The Evangelical Christian neo-conservative movements came later.

I watched every Republican debate in 2008 and cheered for an unassuming man with strange beliefs about ending the Federal Reserve and bringing our troops home from not only Iraq and Afghanistan, but the roughly 900 other American bases around the world. I cheered while he openly challenged and contradicted eight years of Bush-era missteps, warned of coming economic calamity (which indeed came) and made his rivals on the Republican stage look like stooges by comparison.

I was so inspired by what this man was saying, I decided to get involved in politics. I ran for a delegate spot at my state's Republican Convention so I would have a chance to voice my concerns over the direction of the Party.

The way conventions work has been a source of confusion even for Americans. In short, conventions are a way for a large organisation to conduct business and give all members a say. Each state holds a convention, which is made up of delegates from each county and precinct. The delegates are elected by their Republican neighbours in their precinct. This is a fair process because it supposedly champions activism and ensures the higher ups play by the rules. Ron Paul supporters have used Conventions and rules to their advantage. Through diligent organization we've been able to offset his lack of media exposure by flooding the Conventions in each State.

The Indiana Republican Convention in 2008 was the first time I witnessed how party officials work to stamp out grassroots efforts. On the eve of the convention, against its own rules, a backroom committee made it so delegates could not nominate the people we wanted to become national delegates from the floor. All we could do was vote on their pre-chosen slate of delegates, people hand-picked by the party establishment to carry out their bidding without question. This was done specifically to thwart the Ron Paul grassroots.

Fast forward to 2012... The same shenanigans have occurred this election cycle at state conventions around the country. Ron Paul supporters who have followed all the rules to become duly elected delegates to represent the other Republicans in the conventions have seen their delegate status challenged and many have been arbitrarily removed by high party officials in the name of presenting a "united front" for the cameras. The Republican National Committee has violated its own rules on numerous occasions in this effort to quell dissent.

In a blatant attempt to prevent Paul supporters from entering his name into nomination in Tampa, a motion was made to change the threshold a candidate needs to be officially nominated from five states (a number in which Paul had a plurality) to eight states. They also arbitrarily removed 10 duly elected delegates from the state of Maine, all Paul supporters, and installed 10 new delegates of Romney's choosing ensuring that state could not make a motion to nominate him. There are videos circulating the net right now that show that motion and vote along with several other instances where the chairman refused to hear calls for "division" of the house, which is essentially a call for a paper ballot or roll call vote.

There are even reports from Ron Paul delegates at the convention they are being forced to first sign an agreement concocted by the Romney team saying they will not oppose anything to collect their credentials to enter the convention. Other reports charge that states in which Paul had a majority of delegates found their modes of transport to the convention were running late or were redirected.

I am convinced the efforts put forward by party insiders to quiet grassroots activism will ultimately be its downfall. Even if you don't agree with Ron Paul, it cannot be denied he has inspired a generation of young Americans to become active in politics, and in the RP. His campaigns have been beset on all sides by media obfuscation and party roadblocks, yet he has commanded the most fervent and loyal following of any American political candidate for decades outside Barack Obama. While Paul routinely spoke to overflow capacity crowds of four, six, and eight thousand supporters, Romney had embarrassing turnouts where he had to reposition cameras in empty stadiums to create the illusion he had support.

In my home state of Indiana, Ron Paul spent no money or time campaigning, yet still mustered about 16% or 100,000 votes in the primary. This result was about average for the country. The problem for Romney is that 16% of hardcore Republican voters could easily cost him the election. Ron Paul could exacerbate his problems with four simple words: "I endorse Gary Johnson," who is the Libertarian Party (LP) candidate for President.

The LP is the third largest political party in America after the Democrats and Republicans. They have traditionally found themselves on the margins of the American political conversation, but in this age of anger over ballooning debt and government bailouts, the LP has never been more popular. Many of its supporters are disgusted former Republicans. With the margins of victory in most states for Presidential candidates under 3%, a lot rides on how marginal groups like independent voters and libertarians swing. The antics at the RNC may have just sealed Romney's fate. By spitting in the faces of the Ron Paul delegation, the Romney people have burned the very bridges they should have been reinforcing, and they have proven to many of us we were right in not supporting him in the first place.

 
FOLLOW UK POLITICS
If you've been watching the news about the Republican National Convention (RNC) in Tampa, Florida, allow me to offer you a perspective you may not hear every day - that of an American Ron Paul Republi...
If you've been watching the news about the Republican National Convention (RNC) in Tampa, Florida, allow me to offer you a perspective you may not hear every day - that of an American Ron Paul Republi...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 123
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3  Next ›  Last »  (3 total)
10:35 AM on 09/05/2012
If I were cynical I'd conclude that handing the win to Obama was the plan in the first place.
Both Obama and Romney are 1% r's, neither even pretend to support the Constitution or the
people. Maybe the plan all along was to split the Republicans and hand Obama another
4 years to finish the job of wrecking this country for the globalists. If I were cynical..
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jabbaciv
So it goes.
12:53 PM on 09/04/2012
The Republicans have decided they're going to lose this election, so instead they're solidifying their positions for 2016. Snubbing and marginalizing the RP supporters is part of this.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
stephan67
Eternity and a day
06:13 PM on 09/01/2012
Fraud !
01:25 PM on 09/01/2012
It sounds like sour grapes to me, none of the republicans look any better than the rest, for starters not one of them gave the impression they where going to do anything for the 67 million Americans on food stamps?
04:18 PM on 09/01/2012
If you think that, then you simply didn't listen to Ron Paul and you have failed to understand the fundamental tenants of libertarianism, but even as such, with the welfare state being antithetical to the ultimate goals of libertarianism, Ron Paul said plainly the last things he wanted to cut were the programs for the poor in this country. His whole plan involved cutting military expenditures and foreign aid and wasteful Washington bureaucracy, NOT aid for the American poor. He said this repeatedly, and it can be viewed in his comprehensive plan to cut $1 trillion from the budget year one.

Ron Paul wanted to bring ALL our troops home, which would have immediately benefited the poor since it's mostly the poor who serve in the military. Imagine all those families having their head of household back home. He wanted sound money unfettered by the whims of the Federal Reserve Board, which only causes inflation and steals the wealth of all Americans, especially those on fixed incomes.

My suggestion to you...revisit your premises, ignore the meaningless "R" after his name, drop the partisan knee jerk rhetoric, and actually listen to what this man was saying. He would have been the greatest President of the last 150 years.
05:47 PM on 09/01/2012
You support Ron, some of you supported Trump!
03:33 AM on 09/01/2012
I'm a Democrat here as well, but seriously--what did the Republicans think would happen if they allowed Ron Paul's supporters to have a voice in the convention? Romney already had the numbers to lock up the nomination, so he wasn't at risk of losing that, but by forcing a schism with a very vocal, and fairly strong/energetic group in his party they may have lost out on some powerful future voices for their party.
06:35 PM on 09/01/2012
Very true. There was a substantial shift to Gary Johnson running through the Ron Paul support sites by the end of that day.
08:24 AM on 09/15/2012
There were actually many covert Ron Paul delegates. If there were the possibility to go to a second vote, things may have turned out very differently. Romney really didn't have the numbers and that is why they were so scared to let the Paul people speak.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Shawn Murphy
03:18 AM on 09/01/2012
And the Republican's graduate from Rocket Scientists to Rocket Surgeons...
11:29 PM on 08/31/2012
Did anyone else see the new video that circulating YouTube showing where John Boehner's speaking and taking the vote on the new rule change, and he's reading from a teleprompter that actually has written on it "the aye's have it"?

Go to YouTube and search for "Teleprompted Convention"... It's absolutely unreal. The whole thing was blatantly scripted, even the result of the voice vote.
02:57 AM on 09/01/2012
I saw it. Total deceit.
03:16 AM on 09/01/2012
I just saw that. I'd like to say I'm surprised, but absolutely none of the underhanded tactics that either side does shocks me anymore.
07:39 PM on 08/31/2012
Romney better hope so, but I sure won't be voting for him and I'm libertarian.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Mr Charlie
Gravity is only a theory.
07:23 PM on 08/31/2012
They should all write in Ron Paul's name instead of voting for Romney. That'll show 'em!
03:03 AM on 09/01/2012
Not a wise choice. Ron Paul write-ins will be discarded. Ron Paul supporters are now supporting Gary Johnson who shares Ron Paul's values and beliefs. In 2008, Gary Johnson said he would most want to have Ron Paul on his ticket out of all the other candidates running. Ron Paul cannot win, no matter what is done. The RNC destroyed his chances deliberately. Since Gary is running on the libertarian ticket, the RNC can't touch him. There will be more ballot watchers, and more people voting with paper ballots to reduce the frequency of voter fraud. Gary Johnson can win with the support of the independents, the Libertarians and a few democrats and republicans who are not happy with their party's choices.
08:21 AM on 09/15/2012
Actually, Johnson said that this year.
photo
Leigh49
Hey, you, get off of my cloud
07:09 PM on 08/31/2012
All these Libertarians will vote for Romney. Don't believe they won't.
03:04 AM on 09/01/2012
No they won't.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
rdrioane
05:04 AM on 09/01/2012
You don't know Libertarians.
photo
Leigh49
Hey, you, get off of my cloud
09:04 PM on 09/01/2012
Isn't Clint Eastwood one?
photo
Leigh49
Hey, you, get off of my cloud
07:06 PM on 08/31/2012
No one is stopping Paul from running as a third party except Paul. So wah wah.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Nathan0316
TrueBlueTory Age quod agis
06:30 PM on 08/31/2012
I have been saying for a while now that the USA needs a third-party that can compete on the national scene. Perhaps after this election, especially if the Ron Paul supporters voted for Gary Johnson (or simply stayed home in November), that wish may come true.
03:09 AM on 09/01/2012
The Ron Paul supporters and Gary Johnson supporters will be out in full force. And for those of you who don't like Obama or Romney, join us. You will be glad you did. Staying home is not an option.
05:58 PM on 08/31/2012
Write in RON PAUL 2012 !!!
03:11 AM on 09/01/2012
You cannot write him in. In most states, write in candidates ballots get tossed and don't count. That would be a wasted vote. Educate yourself before you say this kind of stuff expecially if you were a Ron Paul supporter. Ron Paul would be elated if Gary Johnson won the presidency.
11:39 PM on 09/01/2012
I think you're going to be surprised when Ron Paul appears on Leno Tuesday night. As I have said tirelessly, RON PAUL 2012 !!!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
TXconfidnz
Schpelling Bea Regect
05:33 PM on 08/31/2012
Even though I almost completely disagree with Ron Paul, he'd have been a MUCH better and honest candidate than Romney. And if foreign war policy was the only issue facing this nation, Ron Paul would have gotten my vote.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
GuyCybershy
05:35 PM on 08/31/2012
If we can't get control of our military spending and change to a more humble foreign policy then nothing else we do will matter.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
TXconfidnz
Schpelling Bea Regect
05:59 PM on 08/31/2012
I won't go as far to say that "nothing else we do will matter" but I do agree about defense spending and foreign policy.  We are spending WAY to much money for an empire that has been crumbling since the '80s and we have our hands in WAY too many countries' cookie jars.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Shawn Murphy
03:21 AM on 09/01/2012
Ditto, only I'd say take half the defense spending for 4 years and apply it to revamping our educational system, Country-wide headstart, training teachers, paying teachers better, and watch our country take off for the next 2 decades.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
03:38 PM on 08/31/2012
What the republicans did to the Ron Paul supporters was terrible and wrong but what they're trying to do to them in future elections is even more wrong. Even as a democrat, I think we must stand up and say NO! It is unamerican to gin the process like this, unamerican to deny people their vote and their voice.