Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Brian John Spencer

GET UPDATES FROM Brian John Spencer
 

The Problem With Being as Much British as Irish

Posted: 15/11/2012 17:36

As weekends go the weekend past was a strange one for me. On the Saturday I was filled with an immense pride as I wore my Ireland rugby jersey and cheered for the men in green. Then on the Sunday I was filled with a profound sense of duty as I paid remembrance to all the men and women who made the ultimate sacrifice in the fight against tyranny.

That's rather self-contradictory though isn't it? Cheering on the Irish one day, and then the British the next. Certainly it would seem a strange proposition to many people. Britain and Ireland are dichotomous, mutually exclusive, polar opposites after all, aren't they? Well, to some people they are, but not to me.

I was born in Northern Ireland and raised as a protestant who cherishes both his Irishness and Britishness. I have an Irish passport and a British one and to me the duality of my identity is perfectly normal, rational and one that sets me and others apart. I love the pluralism of it. Any time I go abroad I'm happy to tell my hosts that I'm as much British as Irish and to explain the politics of it all.

Growing up in a middle class family in Northern I embraced the Northern Ireland way of life: one that is shaped by British and Irish culture in equal measure. At school we learnt about our unique constitutional status and the unique events which shaped our local history. Then at weekends I immersed myself in the Irish rugby scene and supported the men in green with a great enthusiasm.

However in the context of the events of the weekend past there was one thing that made me feel uncomfortable with the duality of my loyalties. There is a problem with being as much British as Irish: for some people the proposal is utter nonsense. There are many people in Northern Ireland and Ireland who detest a proposal that one can be as much British as Irish.

These are people who detest and fight against the very idea. These are people who reject with every ounce of their person hood that any part of Ireland could be part of the United Kingdom. This is in spite of the popular will of the people. Many of these people have a deep-rooted insatiable hatred and unnatural revulsion for everything related to Britain. Poppies included.

The extent of the anti-Britain sentiment borders on hard-line militancy. Not an armed militancy but a rampant intellectual militancy - an intellectual militancy that is driven by the sole goal of ridding Ireland from every last trace of Britain. Even though there is no popular will for Northern Ireland to leave Britain, Sinn Fein is dedicated to just such a goal.

Sinn Fein is motivated by a diluted form of Marxism and the socialist and collectivist policies that brought misery to millions under Soviet Rule. They reject free-trade and the capitalist system. This is a party that is motivated and mobilised by past grievances. A reactionary party that harps back to an Ireland that never truly existed - a nostalgic view shaped by the rose-tinted, romanticism of Irish poets.

Sinn Fein are not an inclusive forward thinking party that wishes to unite people together in harmony. For a party that once murdered and now serves left-wing socialist Irish Republicans, how could people like me ever be made to feel comfortable in a country with Sinn Fein in the ascendency? This isn't a party that wants to build a dynamic open economy or encourage the ideas of the individual. It's a party that opposes much that the West cherishes.

The Sinn Fein historical narrative is a dangerous and selective one. It is one that preaches that Ireland is an island, entire of itself. An island that should be untouched by time, man, evolution or change. An island that should have remained detached from the rest of history's events - including Britain's role in shaping the modern Western world. The party's isolationist mentality is rather fittingly reflected in the Irish translation of Sinn Fein: "We Alone."

But history tells a different story: the island of Ireland has been shaped by centuries of in and out-migration. Ireland has been shaped by the inflow of people from all over Europe: French Normans, Spanish, East Europeans, Scandinavians, Scottish, Cambro-Normans, Anglo-Saxons, Jutes, Celts, Danes, English and many more.

It is these people, their practices and customs that have made Ireland what it is today. And so equally, we are as much heirs to these people and their loyalties as an ambiguous concept of "true Irishness". There is no such thing as "true Irishness". Irish are a melting pot of religions, tastes, colours and outlooks.

Irish cultural lineage does not emanate from one strand; Irish heritage is not homogenous, nor is its modern day culture. But Sinn Fein says it is and that it should be. But ultimately the future of Ireland needs to reflect its pluralist past and make up. It needs to be tolerant, inclusive, ambitious and outward looking. However these ideals are opposite to Sinn Fein.

I'm a proud Brit, proud of my British heritage. But I'm also a proud Irishman, proud of my Irish heritage that goes back a great many years. But I cannot align myself in any way to a people, a politics, a government or a country that casts Britain as a perverse imperialist. I cannot for a moment understand the unyielding hostility to Britain, a country that brought liberty and democracy to much of the world.

At the end of the day I don't know what sort of Ireland Sinn Fein remember or want to bring back because before British rule Ireland wasn't even a country - it was a clan-based, war torn island. It was Britain that first united Ireland and brought it into the modern world as a structured and functioning society.

And don't get me started on how Ireland has been run since it gained independence in 1922. The Mahon Tribunal, the AIB-debacle and the fact that Ireland is the most indebted developed country in the world is only but a sample of Irish folly in governance. Can we not embrace our multi-cultural Ireland?
A country cannot be led or influenced by an isolationist, reactionary protest party who will not cease until Ireland is alone.

Sinn Fein is guided by reactionary ideology; it is a protest party, not a party that can deliver a functioning and all-inclusive government. As the Irish Left Review said here, "A United Ireland remains the objective (of Sinn Fein), everything else is a tactic." It's a bit like the UKIP situation; what would happen if the UK left Europe?

I'm no foreigner in the land I was born, Ireland, no matter how much Sinn Fein wants to make me feel that I am. My beliefs, principles and ideals are not alien to being Irish. Ambition, tolerance, looking to the future and open mindedness are the true ideals of any Western democracy. And so long as so many Irish people follow Sinn Fein Ireland is going down a dangerous unfriendly, closed, poisonous and hostile path.

For any Northern Ireland protestant feeling out of place in Ireland you should read the words of Belfast's famous poet John Hewitt. He made it clear that any Northern Ireland Protestant or hardworking immigrant has as much right to call themselves Irish:

This is my country; my grandfather came here
and raised his walls, and fenced the tangled waste,
And gave his years and strength into the earth
My father also, now their white bones lime,
the ebb and flow have made us one with this.

 

Follow Brian John Spencer on Twitter: www.twitter.com/@brianjohnspenc

FOLLOW UK CULTURE
 
 
  • Comments
  • 6
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
22:25 on 06/01/2013
As a northern irish protestant I detest the DUP and UUP just as much as I detest sinn fein. I feel sad that I feel so unsure of my national identity and that I don't share the same cultural heritage as my catholic friends. However thanks to integrated education, things are starting to change slowly for the younger generation. I feel neither british nor irish so I usually adopt northern irish as my nationality. As long as i live i will never vote for a sectarian party and that goes for both unionist and nationalist parties. The only party i can vote for in good conscience is the alliance party. The alliance party may not be perfect but they are the only sensible party. While "religion" still dominates which party people vote for, we're screwed.
23:33 on 16/11/2012
The condescending dismissive approach that Brian makes towards the aspirations of Irish nationalists for United Ireland highlight comes across as belligerent. Northern Ireland was not founded through some benign democratic process. No border commission was allowed to complete the previously agreed upon straw polls to allow the people of the various localities across the North to democratically decide whether they joined Southern Ireland or remained part of the British Empire. On independence Britain even denied the people in Southern Ireland the right to democratically establish a democratic republic. Instead our democratically elected parliamentarians were forced to swear an Oath of allegiance to the Head of a foreign based Caste-system if they were to sit in parliament. Also our dominion state was under a British chosen governor general. This article offers one person's opinion. This underhand backbiting against the Republic of Ireland's because of the current economic crisis is something I have heard on many occasions from Unionist commentators on different blogs and forums. In my daily work I see a lot of peoples lives are being ruined and families torn apart by this economic depression. I dislike the idea that anyone could take perverse pleasure from this deadly games of wealthy insulated imperial political dynasties across Europe.
00:02 on 17/11/2012
Apologies if my comments appear nonsensical at times, As my response war too long for one comment I was copying and pasting and mixed up some sentences
23:32 on 16/11/2012
While this article provides interesting insights into a unionist perspectives to me as an Irish person from Dublin it also highlights depending on the individual either the inherent inability or belligerent unwillingness of many Unionists to understand the Irish Nationalist perspective. From my perspective as an Irish Nationalist symbols that Brian alludes to such as the poppy appear steeped in British bellicose pomp. While I do not find the wearing of the poppy in anyway offensive I can on the other hand understand the perspective of other Nationalists who do. To me, in the UK the poppy appears to be hijacked by those of a more bellicose tradition. The military parades that occur come across as more celebratory as apposed to being genuinely commemorative of the mass slaughter of World War 1. They ultimately fail to address the central theme that in World War 1 primarily these men weren't giving their lives for freedom, rather they gave their lives as pawns. A fact that Brian and many others may not be aware of is the fact that in 1913 prior to the outbreak of war thousands of Irish workers in Dublin had been blacklisted by factory owners for striking over terrible pay and conditions and that these people were forced into joining the British military as a means to putting food on the table for their children and families. Their lives short using them as mere cannon fodder on the battlefield.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Seaniebhoy
21:56 on 16/11/2012
Cheered on the Rugby, but did you ever visit a GAA match?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Seaniebhoy
21:56 on 16/11/2012
Sorry, but what a total pile of auld rubbish. Nationalists vote for Nationalist parties because parties like the DUP and UUP go ape over anything Irish...proposals for isirsh language has been met with insults; The DUP have defended people like Torrens Knight, during marching season Unionists place Paramilitary flags in Nationalist neighborhoods, and defend the Orange Order and its behavior (remember Paisey and his little victory jig...after the 3 Quinn boys were burned to death). Yes fewer Irish people want to leave the UK; but I doubt they will ever stop voting SF because Unionist parties just don't speak for Nationalist and never will judging by the quotes coming out of Stormont.