Natalie Bennett
:Jobs You Can Build a Life On: The British Economy Isn't Delivering
Stef Benstead
:The Reality of the Welfare Reform
Alice Farmer
:A real life 'Hunger Games'
Mehdi Hasan
:As a Muslim, I Struggle With the Idea Of Homosexuality - But I Oppose Homophobia
Francis FitzGibbon
:It Could be You
Occasionally, among the static noise of 24-hour news, there comes a speech that matters. Yesterday's by David Cameron, on welfare reform, was one of them.
The Government has already made good progress towards a better welfare state with the Universal Credit, Work Programme and the £26,000 benefits cap. But we now know that the Prime Minister and Conservative ministers have only just begun.
David Cameron is hitting back against the "entitlement culture", which has gravely undermined a sense of "collective responsibility" that used to be so strong. It is at the heart of the 'big society' project to rejuvenate civil society. It is also absolutely spot on. If the state constantly intervenes in our lives instead of allowing us to live as individuals and communities, taking responsibility for our own actions, then it creates a client state of automatons.
There is already a 'welfare gap' between those who choose not to work and those who work and save for their family's future. This is not because everyone on benefits is workshy but because of the perverse incentives produced by an overcomplicated system which simply isn't working.
David Cameron is entering a potentially transformative phase in his premiership. This is not the end of 'compassionate conservatism', rather it is a reaffirmation of it. Instead of the lazy assumption that poverty is a problem solved by income redistribution, we are offered a more nuanced understanding. Mr Cameron highlighted the real causes of poverty, such as drug addiction, family breakdown, poor education and debt. Most importantly, he articulated the most effective solution to the problem:
"Compassion isn't measured out in benefit cheques - it's in the chances you give people...the chance to get a job, to get on, to get that sense of achievement that only comes from doing a hard day's work for a proper day's pay.That's what our reforms are all about. Transforming lives. Helping people walk taller."
Elsewhere in the speech, the 'Wisconsin model' established during President Clinton's administration in the US offered some inspiration: it proposes a two-year time limit on benefits, and for people receiving benefits to carry out full-time community work.
Mr Cameron also spoke about how couples on benefits were having children they obviously could not afford without state support. He proposed that income support should be stopped and additional child benefit limited for families with more than three children. Tougher measures on housing were also mooted, such as lowering the housing benefit cap further and stopping it completely for under-25s.
Deeper cuts to welfare budgets should not come as a surprise. George Osborne has already announced, in last year's Autumn Statement, two more years of cuts and, in his Budget speech this year, the need for £10 billion of further savings from welfare by 2016 (to be outlined in the next Spending Review).
Political considerations are crucial. Downing Street's director of strategy, Andrew Cooper, is largely responsible for the policy - his polling research showing that the benefit cap was among the Government's more popular policies. It can prove how welfare reform is a 'wedge issue' on which both the Lib Dems and Labour are viewed as out of touch with the 'striving classes'. Tougher welfare reform has now become the centrepiece of Conservative differentiation.
David Cameron has crafted a long-term vision for welfare reform that extends beyond this Parliament and establishes the groundwork for the Conservative party's general election campaign in 2015. Undoubtedly his thinking is correct and needed but it should be some cause for concern that the coalition partners are distancing themselves to such an extent three years out from that election. The coalition needs a renewed unifying mission that goes beyond deficit reduction. A new Coalition Agreement, formulated by people such as David Laws, is what is needed now, not 'differentiation'.
Mr Cameron's speech is precisely what the Conservatives need to help them win in 2015. But it may have come a bit too early.
This article first appeared on the Egremont blog on 26 June 2012
Follow David Cowan on Twitter: www.twitter.com/david_cowan
Stephen Timms: Why the Universal Credit Project Is a Mess
Liam Byrne: The Secrecy Over Universal Credit Must Come to an End
Ryan Shorthouse: Sink or Swim?
George Chesterton: Judging by What It Says, This Government Probably Hates You
The most compassionate - and environmentally friendly - solution is to offer cardboard boxes as mandatory permanent accommodation for the under 25s. This would be introduced in public areas such as railway stations and city centers. Naturally, residents would not be allowed the use of High Street buildings, no matter how derelict, as this would be an affront to private ownership of land and the right of hard working taxpayers to enter the buy-to-let market.
Parents would thereby be freed from the burden of dependent parasite children, allowing the former to save for their retirement. Housing would be freed up for valued immigrants from the EU, who are born with a work ethic and superior genes.
To help tackle High Street closures and blighted shop fronts, cardboard housing would provide public entertainment as employment opportunities for residents. For example, food vouchers could be used by entrepreneurs to purchase ripe fruit which would then be distributed to the public to throw for a small fee. Cardboard homes also help develop private police agencies. The latter would, for example, kick residents at night and throw buckets of cold water over them, especially in winter.
Residents would be expected to learn a work ethic over a lifetime's indenture by digging holes and then filling them in again.
This didn't stay up for discussion for very long, did it? I wonder why? There are too many people who think the world owes them a living and a lot of them are living in the UK. Most of them are fit and healthy and they've never had a job in their lives. They expect other people to go out to work to earn the money to pay for the £200 billion welfare scam.
If I have "lost the plot completely" then so have the other ordinary workers who see that their neighbours living on benefits are far better off than they themselves are. I will agree that government economic policies affect us all, whether we like it or not, but some people living on benefits are taking the mickey. In 370,000 homes no adult has ever worked.
I also doubt there are people who choose not to work. Really, when you work, you really walk high.
And if that is the case, it is easier to detect all those people who have been abusing the system.
What I see is that in all countries around Europe there is a cut of welfare system, and the excuse is the crisis. But I really think that there are more options to cut, not only cutting from the welfare system.
Some middle class people have become poor because there is not job, because their savings have been spent, not because they want to be poor and not because they have decided to stop working .
One thing is that the cause of poverty is poor education. Shouldn't be easier to invest on education in these poor areas? Shouldn't those children be given more opportunities or more subjects related to their needs? Shouldn't be easier to reduce the number of children in classrooms?
Second, you say one of the causes was debt. Well, in Spain a lot of people take debts because of mortages . Now those people are unemployed (middle class people) and they are going to charities to ask for food. Third, why cutting on the welfare system? What about all those rich people who do not pay taxes thanks to the laws? What about cutting wages to politicians?