Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Dr. Sohom Das

GET UPDATES FROM Dr. Sohom Das
 

Personality Disorder - What Is it, and What Does Diagnosis Mean?

Posted: 17/01/2012 23:00

"The meeting of two personalities is like the contact of two chemical substances; if there is any reaction, both are transformed." - Carl Jung

Know somebody that you just cannot get on with? Does their behaviour irritate and confuse you? Are they generally a massive pain in the distal digestive tract? There is always the possibility that they have a personality disorder. If, however, everybody you know seems like this...maybe you do!

So, what is a personality disorder?

Good question.

The ICD 10 (the Bible of psychiatry favoured in the UK) defines it as: "[a condition that comprises] deeply ingrained and enduring behavioural patterns, manifesting themselves as inflexible responses to a broad range of personal and social situations. They represent either extreme or severe deviations from the way the average individual in a given culture perceives, thinks, feels, and particularly relates to others. Such behaviour patterns tend to be stable and to encompass multiple domains of behaviour and psychological functioning. They are frequently, but not always, associated with various degrees of subjective distress and problems in social functioning and performance."

Sorry. I dozed off then. What did you say?

Yeah, fair enough. It's a bit wordy, isn't it? For the layman - in essence, a personality disorder is when a person has deeply ingrained, pervasive flaws in their personality. It develops from adolescence, and to varying extents, it is there for life. It affects almost all aspects of their lives and relationships. It can lead to repeated problems at work, and turbulent, strained interactions with friends, partners and relatives. The sufferer may lack insight, but the "average individual" (ICD 10's words, not mine) would find severe faults in their character. Usually, people close to the sufferers suffer themselves. They may avoid contact, or may only have difficult, fractious interactions.

So, is it a mental illness?

Absolutely not! Whereas a mental illness is a change in somebody's normal state, personality disorders are ingrained. They dwell in the very fibre of that person's essence. Potentially mental illnesses can be reversed (though rarely cured) with medication, therapy and care. Ideally with a combination. A tablet that can change a person's personality is about is feasible as a tablet that can solve world poverty. Co-morbid anxiety or depression might be relieved by medication, but the personality disorder itself will always be there. Therapy and time might help sufferers mellow out. I'm sure that age has also mellowed out many an anarchistic punk rocker, or a moody sarcastic goth into...your average, tubby, middle-aged bank manager.

Is it really that important?

Is what?

The distinction between mental illness and personality disorder.

Absolutely. Without it, psychiatrists such as myself could be inadvertently medicating, treating, and even more egregiously, detaining somebody for the wrong reasons. Many times in my career, I've seen people incorrectly being treated for depression, anxiety, and even schizophrenia when they had a personality disorder. However, it was not necessarily incompetence that led to misdiagnosis - inevitably symptoms relating to feelings, emotions, reactions, beliefs, thoughts and behaviours, can be extremely difficult to assess, especially if the patient is particularly agitated, pugnacious or deceitful. You'd be surprised at how many people fake symptoms of psychosis for medication or for hospitalisation. It can take months, even years, of observation and assessments to reach the final corollary of a diagnosis of personality disorder.

Treating somebody for a mental illness, when they actually have a personality disorder, not only gives doctor and patient false hopes and unrealistic expectations, but wastes valuable time that could have been used in therapy, teaching the patient how to adapt their behaviour for their own benefit, as well as for the benefit of people close to them.

Sounds like a diagnosis of personality disorder is pretty serious

Yep. Sadly, the label of "personality disorder" can be used by lazy or inexperienced health-care professionals as an alternative moniker for "difficult patient" when communicating with other lazy or inexperienced health-care professionals. This can lead to people assuming that people with personality disorders are demanding, aggressive, malingering, or time wasting. It can lead to patients who are in crisis to be ignored or discharged prematurely.

One could argue that the label is detrimental to the person's health. My view is that it can be, potentially, but not if it is discussed and explained to the patient, the condition is monitored, and treatment is offered. Treatment should never be forced, but always offered - it is morally wrong to insist somebody needs to change who they are. The exception to this would be life-threatening situations, such as a high risk of suicide.

Despite this, to my surprise I found out that the diagnosis of personality disorder can actually be enlightening and useful for some people. I remember seeing a young woman as an outpatient when I worked in Australia. She had a very chaotic and turbulent lifestyle, and frequent explosive altercations with family members. She would drink excessively, and cut herself. Over several hours, she described her life story, previous stressors, and current problems. She became quite animated and angry when discussing certain topics, including her intense dissatisfaction with the medical profession for repeatedly fobbing her off.

I must admit, at times I was scared. Fascinated, but scared. At the end of the consultation, after undertaking a thorough assessment using a personality measurement tool, I gave her my tentative diagnosis - reiterating of course, that I couldn't confirm my conjecture in one meeting, and that it would have to be reassessed over a long period of time.

I timorously told her that I thought she had Borderline Personality Disorder (whose features include impulsivity, fear of abandonment, chronically low mood, a feeling of emptiness, unclear identity and unstable relationships). She was a...feisty person (when I say feisty, I actually mean intimidating), but surprisingly, she seemed grateful for the diagnosis and explanation. She was relieved. Firstly that she had a recognised disorder, and that she was "not the only one". Secondly, that she did not have schizophrenia, which had ruined the life of her cousin.

"I have an unfortunate personality" - Orson Welles

You ain't the only one, Orson. It is estimated that 10% of the population has a personality disorder (usually younger people, and more often male than female), though the truth is, many more people may never be diagnosed. There are several defined types (nine or 10, depending on which classification system you use), that all have very different characteristics. Aggression and confrontational attitudes are present in very few, though these are the ones that tend to come to the attention of psychiatric services e.g. Borderline Personality Disorder. This is because sufferers are more likely to have symptoms and behaviours that are relevant to mental health interventions - i.e. self harm, an explosive temper and a low mood.

In comparison, people with Narcissistic Personality Disorder (whose features include a grandiosity, and lack of empathy, as well as the need for admiration) are far less likely to want or need help.

Antisocial Personality Disorder (whose features include a callous lack of concern for others, irresponsibility, aggression, and a disregard for others' rights) is very common in the prison population (about 10 times higher than the rest of society), and in my line of work - Forensic Psychiatry.

The different types of personality disorder are beyond the scope of this blog entry, but I may write another one about them if people are interested.

Is it the person's fault?

Now that is a tricky question, which I cannot answer with confidence, or without awkwardness.

Sorry.

That's okay. I don't think there's a straight answer. A person with a personality disorder is in full control of their actions and behaviours, just like the rest of us. Of course they are - their personality disorder is them. Somebody with a mental illness may not have full responsibility of their actions, if they are particularly unwell at the time. For example, somebody with schizophrenia may be out of touch with reality, or somebody with severe depression might lose their motivation or their judgement.

However, people do not choose to have a personality disorder, and they cannot simply just "snap out of it". So I guess they cannot control the way they are, but they can control what they do.

This guy at work is really obnoxious and argumentative. I bet he's got a personality disorder.

Now hold your horses. I appreciate your zealous absorption of this information. But let's be clear.

The majority of people who are unpopular, fractious, irritating and impulsive do not have a personality disorder. This diagnosis is especially unlikely if they get on with others, without rubbing them up the wrong way. It is also rarely compatible with a high level of functioning. Although there are tools (personality inventories) and other indications in somebody's background (e.g. a childhood of emotional privation) it's very easy to misdiagnose.

Psychologists and psychiatrists should only make such a diagnosis after a thorough assessment. This isn't because we like to feel intellectually superior, and utilise our jargon. Okay, maybe it is a tiny bit.

But mainly, it's down to experience. Even a person who veraciously reads textbooks (or perhaps an informative, well written, concise blog) cannot acquire the nuances of sensing how a personality disordered person makes them feel (known as "transference").
So, all you Armchair Psychiatrists; beware. Only by seeing and assessing hundreds of normal people, and dozens of people with a personality disorder, can a professional recognise the latter with confidence.

Help does exist, and people do improve.

So, you never know, with encouragement and guidance, that person you loathe could potentially become your best friend...

 
"The meeting of two personalities is like the contact of two chemical substances; if there is any reaction, both are transformed." - Carl Jung Know somebody that you just cannot get on with? Does the...
"The meeting of two personalities is like the contact of two chemical substances; if there is any reaction, both are transformed." - Carl Jung Know somebody that you just cannot get on with? Does the...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 9
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
07:07 PM on 01/19/2012
Jeez - some people need to lighten up.
I also have a diagnosis of Borderline Personality Disorder. I don't find this article offensive at all. Maybe it generalises a bit, but at the end if the day - it's a short blog, not a text book chapter. On the other hand, at least it does give the average person who is ignorant about personality disorders a little insight. It also manages to handle quite a serious topic with some humour. I'd rather have people reading and talking about my disorder than not thinking about it at all.
I don't think the author has said it can't be changed. I think he's saying it's deeply ingrained and is difficult to change. He has mentioned therapy. Maybe he could do another piece going into a bit more detaill about this.
Anyway - I showed it to my colleague at work, and they found it helpful. Maybe people need to look at the bigger picture, instead of feeling he's only saying negative things about them.
03:16 PM on 01/19/2012
As a person with Borderline Personality Disorder, I find this article highly offensive. For a start, many people I know with this diagnosis are vibrant individuals with a wide social network and a great many friends. I myself had many people who found it hard to even believe my diagnosis due to my ability to compartmentalise. I appreciate that the very nature of your work means you will see people at their worst however putting this sort of information in the public domain only perpetuates such narrow views.
I also object to the implication that the Personality Disorder will 'always be there' and the best hope is to 'mellow out with age' After much hard work and therapy I now feel that while my emotional responses may still be heightened at times and my initial instincts are still to respond in a self destructive way I have finally learnt to choose another option. This would not have happened had I just waited for 'age to mellow me out.'

Comparing people with this diagnosis to 'anarchistic punk rockers' or 'moody sarcastic goths' is both insulting and trivialising.

Although this article does make some good points, in attempting to be light hearted it seems to be arrogant and mocking, with no insight or attempt to explain the extreme distress experienced at all times by sufferers or to mention the traumatic, invalidating and disruptive past that seems to be a major characteristic in the development of this condition.
11:57 AM on 01/19/2012
I disagree with some of the criticisms below. I think this article is well-written and informative as well as being light-hearted.
I am a psychiatric nurse who has seen many people with personality disorders - and it IS exactly that - a disorder of the personality - the clue's in the title!
I think Dr Das is highlighting the fact that diagnosing a PD can be harmful because poeple can get stereotyped, he's not stereotyping them himself! He's talked about offering them help instead of only labelling them.
I work in a Psych ward, and although it is a small minority, I have seen about 3 or 4 people in 2011, who did 'fake' symptoms to get drugs or a roof over their head. It does happen.
I take offence to people who are automatically anti-psychiatry, like some of you below, who always try to argue against psychiatrists, nurses and other professionals in the field. I wonder whether you'd change your minds after seeing the gratitude of some patients who we help to get better, some of whom were so unwell at first, even in the most difficult of conditions. It's very hard work.
08:50 PM on 01/18/2012
This sort of shallow article, lumping together all personality disorders, using / quoting emotive, judgmental terms such as 'pervasive flaws in their personality' and 'severe faults in their character' says more about the attitude of the writer than it does about the many individuals struggling to cope with the widely differing manifestations of such conditions.

'You'd be surprised at how many people fake symptoms of psychosis for medication or for hospitalisation.' Having a personality disorder does not grant immunity from other disorders / mental health conditions. Psychosis under stress (eg in the kind of mental / emotional crisis that could lead to hospital admission / assessment) is a known symptom of BPD. Accusing patients of 'faking' rather than acknowledging that incorrect diagnosis was made is just another example of the medical establishment's outdated stigmatisation (blame the patient attitude) towards those with PD.

'...their personality disorder is them' - I find this comment particularly offensive. Nobody is merely a condition or disorder, no matter what the disorder, the patient is still a person, a human being and by that definition very much more than a disorder. I certainly would not wish to be treated by any doctor who did not understand this .
07:11 PM on 01/19/2012
I think if he said "They are the personality disorder" it would be offensive, coz like you said, it suggests that we (I've been diagnosed with BPD too) are nothing but an illness. However, saying "their personality disorder is them", I think means that our PDs are part and parcel of what we are.
Just my opinion...
09:30 PM on 01/19/2012
Hi, thanks for your reply. I think we will have to agree to disagree regarding his exact meaning, unless the author would like to clarify that. Can't say I find the article positive, it's not something I personally would use to teach people about the condition, I would rather people had accurate, less biased info. There is nothing wrong in humour in a blog, but I'm not sure it's appropriate from a doctor in relation to a condition which apart from all the things he lists can also make people very vulnerable. It seems more the 'laugh at' than 'laugh with' type of humour. He mentions 'transference' which makes me wonder what kind of therapy he uses, some older psychoanalytical types are apparently not considered beneficial for BPD so I agree it would be interesting to hear more about that from him.
11:49 AM on 01/18/2012
Evidence of subjectivity in diagnosis could be found by making cross-cultural comparisons. For example, if the Italians have a lower incidence of Narcissistic Personality Disorder because they have a higher tolerance of, well, narcissism. Such evidence would show, that at the edges of diagnosis, definitions are culture-bound.

Consider populations with similar traits put together. Football hooligans in sports arenas. Do symptoms of social personality disorder increase in this group environment?

What about prisoners? You have a population with good reason to be angry (getting nicked and banged up). They will comprise many individuals who tend toward the anti-social, evidenced by decision to commit criminal acts. Put them together in a boring routinized environment and watch them what? Develop anti-social personality disorder?

It all seems rough and ready instrumentalism, by which I mean it provides an analytic process which enables action to be taken with justification, mainly action to protect society which helps us to conclude that it is a scientific process. Is it any more scientific than what went on in Soviet psychiatric hospitals?

What if a change of environment effected a great improvement? Would this show a cure or that prior environment was prime cause? If environment is causal might the disorder be a social as well as an individual phenomenon?
photo
Crisdean Wulver
We've got our priorities screwed up.
05:40 AM on 01/18/2012
There are two prominent female psychologists here in America (I forget their names) who work with people with various "personality disorders," like obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) and attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD).

They claim that these various "disorders" come with certain advantages. A person with ADHD is constantly shifting their attention from one thing to another. In a tribal society they would probably be good hunters and warriors because they are tuned in to minute changes in their immediate environment.

People with OCD, on the other hand, give long and extended thought to problems. They daydream a lot. They can completely tune out their environment and scarcely be aware of it. It probably wouldn't be a good idea for them to lead a war party, but they would probably be good at long-range strategy.

In short, these things are now considered to be disorders because contemporary society makes different demands on us from tribal societies. Our ancient biological programming doesn't always fit contemporary circumstances.