Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Eleanor Besley

GET UPDATES FROM Eleanor Besley
 

Is Cycling the Future for More of us in the Capital?

Posted: 30/04/2012 00:00

Even a year ago none of us could really have imagined that the final debate before London's mayoral elections would be focussed on making our capital city safer for cycling.

It's a really exciting time for those of us who like to get around on two wheels, but potentially even more exciting for many people who'd really like to but find our roads too scary.

Even if you don't cycle, and don't think you'll ever give it a go, what the candidates are discussing on Monday will have a major impact on the London we live in.

Take 20mph speed limits in residential areas. I'm about to become a parent, and I'd love my son to have the freedom to play outside his house. Sadly, too many of us are bringing up children on dangerous streets where traffic moves quickly, and our children aren't having all the fun we had back in the day, going outside and playing with our friends - be it cycling to the park, playing football (not really one I did a lot of!) or simply just messing around outside our homes.

Lower speeds could change all that, making our communities safer places for people first, not cars. Four of the leading candidates are talking about doing just that. Today they'll be saying, quite rightly, that safer streets will encourage more people to get out on the bikes as traffic moves more slowly, but it'll have a wider effect, too.

More people feeling able to cycle around will keep Londoners fitter, healthier and it'll cut pollution. In central London pollution levels are on the rise, more than twice the number of people killed each year in road traffic accidents are killed by pollution from cars. Do we want a London where we breathe in harmful gases as a matter of course everyday?

The debate comes amid a great deal of controversy caused by the owner of Addison Lee Cabs, a minicab firm. He wrote in his organisation's magazine implying that accidents involving cyclists were the fault of the cyclist themselves, and that those on bikes should "get trained and pay up" if they want to use London's roads.

His main point was that his firm, and other minicabs, should be able to use bus lanes, as black cabs currently do. It poses an interesting question, if minicabs can use the lanes then they will basically become another lane of traffic. At the moment, with a lack of separate cycle lanes in London, bus lanes are one of the few areas where cyclists feel a bit safer.

Ken Livingstone (Labour) and Jenny Jones (Green) are promising to fund even more greenways across the capital, routes on quiet back roads or traffic-free paths. The existing routes are making a big difference, not just in numbers cycling, but who is. 42% of greenway journeys are made by women, a huge increase compared to the proportion of women cycling on the rest of London's busy roads.

The great news is that some of the candidates are focussing on just that issue, too. While the 'Boris Bikes' have had a fantastic impact on cycling in London, they do seem to be a toy for middle-aged men in suits. Is that how cycling should be, or is getting around on two wheels something for everyone? It's one of the key issues Jenny Jones tackles in her recent blog - which really goes into detail on how to make London much more of a cycling city.

She also talks about London's outer boroughs, which is where most Londoners live. We want to support our local shops, high streets and communities, and policies than encourage cycling can do all this, too. She is joined by Brian Paddick (Lib Dem) in realising that the space that we live in and travel through is of huge importance. I know I'm more likely to visit a high street which is a pleasant place to be, where I can bump into friends and have a chat, or sit outside a café, rather than one which is just a road. I'll probably buy more things, too!

Who knows what the deciding factors will be this afternoon, or what some of the questions will be? Will Boris's cycle safety record really count against him? Will the fact that Ken doesn't cycle hurt his chances? Ultimately, this debate is positive; it means that all the candidates have to think long-term about cycling in London. And the policies of the successful candidate will have an impact on all our lives.

 

Follow Eleanor Besley on Twitter: www.twitter.com/Eleanorbesley

FOLLOW UK
Even a year ago none of us could really have imagined that the final debate before London's mayoral elections would be focussed on making our capital city safer for cycling. It's a really exciting ti...
Even a year ago none of us could really have imagined that the final debate before London's mayoral elections would be focussed on making our capital city safer for cycling. It's a really exciting ti...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 10
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Recency  | 
Popularity
12:05 PM on 05/02/2012
I'm always hearing the complaint that Boris Bikes are being used by men in suits as if that somehow makes them less useful. But presumably those men in suits were formerly on the tube or in a cab. So the bikes have reduced congestion and pollution; why does the social profile of those using them matter? In fact, the richer the rider, probably the more likely they are to use a more polluting form of transport, such as a cab or fast car. Or is it simple class envy: "he wears a suit so I don't want him to benefit from this scheme"?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
04:03 PM on 05/01/2012
Make cyclists have registration and tax and insurance, must wear ridiculous colours or expensive leathers. Make cyclists pay their way.
11:46 AM on 04/30/2012
The Emotional claptrap around motoring in and around London is subversive and a distraction from real issues, already existing are countless roads with 20mph speed restrictions thats good the green lobby say, but without policing are they worth the cost of the signage ? Large parts of central London already have green cycle lanes that cyclists do not use so what is there purpose ? Why do cyclists consider they are beyond the law run red lights and stop signs ride on and off pavements and even have now a right to ride the wrong way down one way streets ? at the end of this anti car lobby are some extremely short sighted emotional blackmailers, sad really in a democracy but what about the disabled drivers who for what ever reason cannot manage the public transport system or ride bicycles ?
12:01 PM on 04/30/2012
Where to start? Why is it that, unlike almost any other group, people like Geoff here think it appropriate to characterise the majority by the behaviour of the minority? Are you a motorist Geoff? Can't stand motorists myself, think they are above the law, mounting pavements, killing pedestrians, running red lights.... Do you see how illogical your argument is?

On some roads in London, cyclists have been given the legal right to cycle against one-way traffic - This is not a right they "consider" they have. This is a right they have.

I'm amazed that you manage to condemn cyclists for their apparent "emotional blackmail" in the same sentence in which you say "but what about the disabled drivers".

The reason large parts of the cycling infrastructure in London is not used by cyclists is that it is completely inadequate and in some cases downright dangerous.
04:29 PM on 04/30/2012
well said, cyclists should be forced to pay for the privelieges they take without concern forothers; there are few real green ecocyclists, most are just hard up workrs trying to make ends meet and the rest are nothing but trouble when it comes to road safety
05:27 PM on 04/30/2012
"cyclists should be forced to pay for the privelieges they take without concern forothers (sic)"

What does that even mean? What priveleges does one take by choosing to cycle? I already pay income tax to fund the roads that cyclists are meant to share with motorised traffic.... if that's what you mean...
07:38 AM on 04/30/2012
Though a great idea, the wet climate would make
it a non starter for most.
Woman would have to change their clothes at work,
as all clothing is not suitable for cycling.
Do you really want to cycle to work on a windy wet dark
winters morning, just stating the hard facts.
wes
12:00 PM on 04/30/2012
Have you seen how many people cycle in the snow in Copenhagen? And how many of those people journey in work clothes - no hi viz, no helmets?
09:07 PM on 04/30/2012
hi briseglace.
You can never compare London to Copenhagen they
are one of the most friendly cycle cities in the world.
Over thirty per cent, commute too work ect.
huge swathes of cycle lanes, safe also.
no comparison, too London.
wes
10:54 PM on 04/29/2012
Lower speeds can also give the illusion of safety.

There are thousands of residential roads in London which should have walls built across them half-way down making two cul-de-sacs. No through roads are much safer.

All local buses and delivery vans could and should be electric.