Economic growth is flatlining, unemployment is rising and inflation has hit five per cent. Up and down the country people are worried about their jobs and their falling living standards. And instead of taking action to fix the economy, the Conservative Prime Minister is bogged down by squabbling from his own MPs demanding a referendum on our membership of the European Union.
This all sounds too familiar. Last time the Conservatives were in power, they tore themselves to pieces over the Maastricht Treaty while the economy crumbled around them. It seems as if the early 1990s are back.
The Labour leader, Ed Miliband, could have played politics with this issue and teamed up with the Tory Eurosceptics, but he is a responsible opposition leader. He will lead Labour MPs in standing up for the national interest and rejecting this motion.
In contrast, Cameron has shown weak and irresponsible leadership. Instead of telling the truth about Britain's interests in Europe, he chose to pander to the anti-European wing of his own party in opposition. He won support in the leadership election by cutting ties with moderate Conservatives in the European Parliament and forming an alliance with people Nick Clegg famously described as "nutters, anti-semites and homophobes".
Not once in his time in opposition did Cameron make the pragmatic, pro-European argument he now is making in Government. He has recently repeatedly stressed that our membership of the European Union is in our national interest.
Any serious political leader, when faced with the realities of Government, will recognise that Britain's interests lie firmly in playing a leading role in the EU. Not only do the majority of our exports go to the other 26 member states, but our banks are also heavily exposed to their continental counterparts.
Britain is not in the Eurozone, but is certainly affected by instability there and its collapse would have dire consequences for jobs, businesses and banks.
Were we not in the EU, we would still be affected by its decisions but we would no longer have any say in those decisions. Leaving the EU would drastically reduce our influence in Europe and the world, not enhance it. The government's economic strategy is based to a large extent on export led growth. To cut ourselves off from our largest export market would be an act of extreme ideological folly for which the British people would pay a dreadful price.
There are many areas in which the EU needs reform, such as the Common Agricultural Policy. The single market should be further extended to provide more opportunities for British businesses and jobs. The only way to advocate those reforms is as an active member, not shouting across the Channel as an outsider. By questioning our membership, the Tories are weakening our ability to secure change.
John Major's failure to show leadership over the Maastricht rebels came to define his premiership and he never recovered. Cameron now faces a similar fight with many of his backbenchers and possibly some of his ministers, who want to vote for a referendum on Monday.
Cameron's opportunism in opposition has now left him exposed to his right flank who are already exasperated by what they see as an agenda too heavily influenced by the Liberal Democrats.
By fanning the flames of Euroscepticism in opposition, instead of tackling it head on, Cameron's rhetoric is coming back to haunt him. If he had shown some leadership in opposition, he wouldn't now be in this position.
The Prime Minister is wasting precious time attempting to heal the divisions in his party on Europe. Instead he should be focussing on getting our economy growing again and getting people back to work.
EU referendum: party poopers | Editorial | Comment is free | The ...
New Statesman - When Clegg supported an EU referendum
And Emma, try listening to your constituents, also try thinking back to when we traded worldwide through our merchant fleet, the largest on the planet, now, a few dozen boats, not ships, boats, and guess what, this fleet employed a lot of people, now, theres still a lot of trade done across the oceans, most of it in fact, all on board ships of other nationalities, European nations too, but not the UK, our jobs were sacrificed for Europe's benefits, Cheap Polish coal imports closed our pits, another 1/4 million unemployed, our car industries, closed, benefitting France, Germany and Japan, god knows how many we put on the dole there and you think Europe is a good thing, possibly for banks and foreign businesses here, but, for the people, Europe has been and continues to be a disaster. Referendum now.
we quickly discover the glaring discrepancies in political claims. The British government have as much say in Europe, as the British people have in British government. Referendum? Wot referendum. We live in a republic, ruled by a minority unaccountable to the majority in regard to the policies pursued. When representative of the people can be cowed by the party system, to whom is their true allegiance being denied? The jig is up. Live with it.
These Tories who have engineered this, should hang their heads in shame!
I expand on this in the following article:
http://www.allthatsleft.co.uk/2011/10/should-we-have-a-referendum-on-the-eu/
Why does she think that if the UK left the EU we'd be 'cut off'' from our biggest export market? Most countries in the world are not EU members, yet mysteriously manage to trade with EU countries.
There is no hope of reforming the CAP by staying in the EU and being an active member. On that issue, far better to leave the EU and announce a cheap food policy. By opening our markets to exports from Africa we'd transform Africa and cut prices for every household - a massive change for the better reminiscent of the C19 repeal of the Corn Laws.
More generally, this vapid effort suggests that the writer has no idea about how 'influence' in international affairs is won and delivered. Being in the EU does have benefits, but it also has costs in terms of how our influence is deployed. Likewise leaving the EU and attempting an independent foreign policy. Let's stop sloganising and start thinking hard about these complex choices.
The current EU model is doomed. Something quite different will replace it. There's nothing wrong in principle in calling for an urgent national debate on these questions.
Hmm, are you using the royal 'We' here Emma? I don't remember ever having had a say in EU decisions. The last time the British public did was thirty odd years ago.
If that's not enough of a say then neither are parliamentary elections: maybe we should have a referendum on every single decision the government makes too?