Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Helen Croydon

GET UPDATES FROM Helen Croydon
 

Fidelity Is a Fairytale

Posted: 30/08/2012 00:00

With her latest book, The New Rules: Internet Dating, Playfairs and Erotic Power, Catherine Hakim joins a growing posse of high profile monogamy-bashers. It's the latest big-splash book this year defending infidelity. All from authors who are happily married.

Alain de Botton sang the praises of adultery in How to Think More About Sex and Christopher Ryan co-wrote Sex at Dawn with his wife, in which they both challenged the myth that monogamy is innate in humans.

As I wrote on the Guaridan this week, they don't argue from cynical, embittered experience, haranguing from the cesspit of heartbreak, but with factual objectivity.

Catherine Hakim, with whom I've had the pleasure of personally sharing research and relationship anecdotes, uses endless sociological studies to demonstrate the benefits for cultures which are sympathetic to adultery and enlightening interviews of people using marital affair websites, which she claims are changing the landscape of marriage. Just last week the adult dating site maritalaffair.co.uk revealed that its active female members have doubled in the last three months.

The other pro-adultery writers are equally academic. Ryan and his wife flood their pages with colourful evolutionary theories highlighting how everything from penis sizes to porn preferences prove that monogamy just doesn't isn't the way we were meant to be.

In research for my next book, I too am questioning our obsession in finding and sticking with one exclusive life-long partner. As much as we love to feast on the Hollywood-inspired fairytale that there is a soul-mate out there who can make our dreams come true and still make us quiver between the sheets every night, my research - I'm afraid - finds more evidence of boredom, bickering and monosyllabic TV dinners than passion, princes and someone who massages your feet every night.

I'd rather not rain on the fairytale parade if I'm honest. Like the writers above, I too am in a monogamous relationship. Not because I've tied my hands behind my back to stop myself logging onto maritalaffair.co.uk but because it seems incomprehensible to want to be with anyone else. I don't see the point in monogamy unless it's from the heart, not from a pact. But then, I'm biased. It's a new relationship and I've still got the butterflies.

As much as I would like the champagne hazes and dewey-eyed gazes of a fresh lover to last forever, the occupational hazard of researching relationships is that I'm startlingly aware that romantic lustiness and long-term familiarity don't marry up well. Passion fades to friendship. Elation and mutual fascination gives way to conversations about who's taking the bins out. It's scientifically proven.

Anthropologists have studied brain scans of couples in love. The ones in the early throes of romantic love virtually dribble dopamine. Their brains, according to Dr Helen Fisher, behave exactly like someone on crack cocaine. They are obsessed and infatuated. Thankfully - for the sanity of society - couples who've been together for a bit calm down. Their brains bathe in oxytocin, they feel attached and secure and want to pack each other's lunch boxes but alas, they're unlikely to still want to snog in the back of a taxi.

It's ironic when people moralise about the demise of 'old fashioned family values' or 'traditional marriage'. The true 'traditional' approach to marital commitment had nothing to do with either ever-lasting love or fidelity. People only started to marry for love in the late 18C. Romance and fervour has ubiquitously been preserved for extramarital parties. From the beginning of civilisation to the Middle Ages marriage was a strategy to form business partnerships, expand family networks, craft political ties, strengthen a labour force or pass on wealth.

In aristocratic societies of the 12th century, adultery was considered a higher form of love. The countess of Champagne once said "true love could not exist among people you were married to." In the 16th century, the essayist Montaigne wrote that any man in love with his wife was "a man so dull no one else could love him". Many of the songs and stories told of the lower classes of the early middle ages derided marital love. It was dull and it was plain weird.

Throughout history and across cultures societies have provided systems for extramarital lovers. In Imperial China, noblemen housed harems of courtesans. In the Ottoman Empire there were seraglios of beautiful courtesans. In the East, any man of means had at least one concubine as well as a wife. In Japan married men entertained themselves with Geisha. In Europe, the Royal courts even granted powers and titles to monarchs' mistresses and any resulting children.

The modern world continues to make provisions. The French have the Cinq à sept - the two-hour window between work and home which allows lovers to rendez vous without the slightest raised eyebrow. In Japan, they have so-called 'love hotels' designed for discretion. They dispatch the keys in a vending machine and provide curtains in the car park to protect anonymity.

We all desperately want to believe in a fairytale ideal of relationships. We only have to see the vitriol stirred up at the mere suggestion that Katherine Jenkins was involved with David Beckham to get a taste of how defensive we are of it.

Now, more than at any other time, we need to adopt a more flexible approach to coupledom. Yet as the world allows for increasingly autonomous lifestyles, we tighten the reins on our spouses. We give our partners curfews, DIY lists and we arrange their diaries. We expect them to be our exclusive lover, best friend, co-parent, holiday companion and to fix the car. The job description doesn't fit with modern mores.

Does this mean a life of serial flings will make us happier? I currently prefer the depth of connection with one person but the former has its advantages too. What we do need is an adjustment to our rigid, moralised relationship settings and an admittance that as much as we don't like it, affairs won't go away.

This blog posting first appeared on The Guardian's Comment is Free.

 
 
 

Follow Helen Croydon on Twitter: www.twitter.com/Helen_Croydon

FOLLOW UK LIFESTYLE
With her latest book, The New Rules: Internet Dating, Playfairs and Erotic Power, Catherine Hakim joins a growing posse of high profile monogamy-bashers. It's the latest big-splash book this year defe...
With her latest book, The New Rules: Internet Dating, Playfairs and Erotic Power, Catherine Hakim joins a growing posse of high profile monogamy-bashers. It's the latest big-splash book this year defe...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 48
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
09:44 PM on 09/06/2012
Monogamous marriage has always been more of a myth than reality. The contemporary explosion of adultery as suggested by the success of affairs dating websites such as Undercover Lovers and Ashley Madison is just the public exposition of a marital modus operandi as old as the hills.
07:04 PM on 08/31/2012
It's always struck me that women are possessive of their man out of economic and emotional neediness, while men are possessive of their woman out of pride. Women tend to crave monogamy more, because they want security, status and stability, especially if they and their children are economically dependent on a man. Women also have difficulty in separating out what goes on in the head, the heart, and in the underwear department, whereas men can maintain a loyal and loving primary relationship while having passionate liaisons elsewhere. After a while, passionate - and certainly experimental sex - seems inappropriate within a marriage or civil partnership, so it's probably quite healthy to have "a bit on the side" now and again, providing there are ground rules that are agreed and observed, or at the very least, tacitly understood. Women certainly need to calm down about infidelity and allow their men some (but not unlimited) sexual freedom.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Sven Storm
Edit your micro-biology.
02:22 PM on 08/31/2012
People sometimes wander off the path, it doesn't always mean the relationship isn't worth persevering with.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Gods own child
Weapons legitimise a regime
12:19 PM on 08/31/2012
Too many people use the word 'love' when they really mean 'you have something that I think I need, am entitled to,must have'. At least sexual liberation of the kind above makes no bones about it's intentions, instead of using the word 'love' as a substitute for one's emotional inadequacies, in the same context as a drug addict.
11:41 AM on 08/31/2012
LOLOL....And the news is ??? How about the concept that a couple can be deeply in love, have great sex together, be completely open and honest with each other AND enjoy the occasional playtime with others, as a COUPLE ?! All bases covered :-) Oh yes, swinging, that hidden but secretly craved for solution....Give a try folks !!
12:26 PM on 08/31/2012
Craved for solution? Speak for yourself.
11:25 AM on 08/31/2012
Here's the thing....life IS mostly a struggle - from getting outa bed in the morning. If you are in any kind of relationship, then you have entered a realm of trust etc which makes your life sometimes even harder. So, we have to overcome these temptations of infidelity which at the end of each day will make you and your partner stronger. Our lives are full of cheap feel good fix's dictated in part by marketing, advertising and lazy journalists inventing stupid ideas and stories to sell and cause controversy. We all have a duty to ourselves and our partners and living by your vows or promises is the key to happy living because you'll be stronger.
11:12 AM on 08/31/2012
It is human nature to look at the opposite sex whether in a relationship or not. I believe it is ok to window shop, it doesn't mean I have to buy anything. I am one of those very lucky people who is with the same person still after 20+ years. We fight, we sulk with each other, get p*ssed off with bills, kids etc. But I think in reality as we have stayed together longer we have become more compatible, be it through complacency or simply habit some will say; but I like to think that we have grown used to all the rough edges and the commitment shown to each other has made our relationship stronger. I would however be naive and/or a liar to say that neither of us has probably had comments etc that have caused stirrings; but if you love someone then you have made a choice be it for life or as long as the relationship lasts. Infidelity is too much like hard work; as my wife says its taken 20 years to train me why start again!
06:50 PM on 08/31/2012
Yes, or indeed the same sex!
10:57 AM on 08/31/2012
In my opinion adultry does indeed have a place in a marriage, but it should not be lied about or hidden - be open about it - after all, if you have a partner who can't understand that a "little bit on the side" is natural and to be expected, then you shouldnt be with that partner anyhow, so you might as well be open and honest, and if your partenr dosent like it, clear off and find one who does. Remember, even if one has the best fillet steak for dinner every night at home, there comes a time when egg and chips somewhere else will be a nice change :-)
11:37 AM on 08/31/2012
Excellent, I will invite you and your partner (assuming your partner is a female) to my house for dinner! I will serve your partner steak and an open and honest proposition whilst you eat an egg and chips in the back room. ;o}
01:31 PM on 08/31/2012
The thing is that I don't have a partner anymore... I wonder if you can guess why not ;-)
10:54 AM on 08/31/2012
Is this action any different from the hate preachings of Abu Hanza ? what is wrong with people !!!
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Louisa Leontiades
10:49 AM on 08/31/2012
Ooh I love this type of debate. The mind has so powerfully decided that anything other than monogamy is 'wrong' because it challenges ego insecurity, that people will desperately fight with any means to prove themselves right - often using God as their closing argument. The difficulty is that non-monogamy often does happen at the end of a breakdown of a relationship, and is therefore decided upon as the 'cause'...whereas actually, it's only the symptom of the deeper issue. Read my latest book The Husband Swap, if you want a look at what happens when a couple opens their relationship. http://www.amazon.co.uk/The-Husband-Swap-ebook/dp/B008X2N9HI/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1346406364&sr=8-1
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Gods own child
Weapons legitimise a regime
05:20 PM on 08/31/2012
Louisa, I have had my comment removed after it's approval, because it may be seen as too radical and unorthodox for some of the posters atttracted to this story.
'ego insecurity', I am glad you used that term, that too is more to the point than terminology that implies that a partner has been wronged.
Cheating, how about marrying somebody but continually refusing them sex without justification, that is what I call cheating, and I know plenty of people in that position, mainly women.
If a relationship is a dead horse, why flog it? I am with you on this one(I suspect)
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Louisa Leontiades
10:11 PM on 09/01/2012
...for the only reason anyone flogs anything...because they can't let go of the dream and accept that their reality no longer serves them ;-)
10:02 AM on 08/31/2012
If you know that you are not going to be faithful then don't get into a relationship and certainly do not have children . I am 46 years old where my mother was unfaithful and watching the lies and the deceit from the age of 8 has left me with massive trust issues . Why is seen as unnatural to be faithful ,I see it as unnatural to cause hurt to another when you say that you are happy with them. I feel complete with my other half and he makes me a better person if there is something wrong with that I simply don't care.
08:34 AM on 08/31/2012
This really takes the cake as the most ridiculous article I have read in quite some time. Ive read this theme before.. monogomy is just a social construct and violates our human nature...we should embrace free love and all that. For the modern man w/ his new sense of self-absorbed narcissism and nihilistic attitude towards society, his whims are the only law. There is no God, no afterlife, no culture worth defending..nothing to live or die for.. all thats left is himself and a life dedicated to the pursuit of his own selfish desires. No wonder western civilization is in such sharp decline! The reality is that people who live in such a manner generally don't live very happy lives. The desire to procreate is inherent in our DNA.. but so is the desire commit violence and murder when we are angry.. steal when we are envious..become lazy when no efforts are required. We are preprogrammed w/ animalistic inclinations.. but what makes us human is our ability to control these primitive emotions for the higher good such as creating a stable family and raising our children in a healthy enviornment. I could go on w/ this but I may as well be talking to a brick wall.. we're doomed.
08:46 AM on 08/31/2012
Absolutely right. Civilisation is in a rapid moral decline which will ultimately bring it's end.

It is quite amzing this diatribe comes from members of a Society which profess such high religous values....clearly a smoke screen!!
This comment has been removed.
07:29 AM on 08/31/2012
Of course marriage is not a bed of roses. I should know - it's 43 years soon! I'm so glad I haven't lived a life of swapping partners every 5 years. Where's the joy in that after the first 2 years of sexual excitement? And that's if it lasts that long. Let me assure Ms Croydon that if you marry, there are long periods without sex when you're having a barney, but the making up is fantastic and however many surveys she's researched for her argument, sex at 60+ with the same person is equally as exhilerating as anything you pick up in a nightclub. Perhaps she's done this research in readiness for when the shine wears off for her and it's all a good excuse! Let me give you a bit of solid advice Ms Croydon: There is nothing like the satisfaction of having lived your life with one person, throughout its ups and downs. To have really shared your life and sorted the big problems out together and still come together again despite everything - that is satisfaction and a life well lived. I expect to have more thumbs down than up at this suggestion, understanding the current social trends. But that's my take on it all anyway. I don't want to end my life counting the sexual encounters and not remembering half the names....but each to his own.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Laatab
All The Worlds A Stage
05:49 AM on 08/31/2012
It's just wrong to be f****ing two partners, especially if ones in the dark about the other. It's not a moral issue but one of health. There is no such thing as safe sex, you can take all the precautions you like but at the end of the day theres no guarantee that there is no threat to the wellbeing of all the parties concerned. Within the confines of a marriage, where children or economic committment made separation difficult and passions have cooled, it would be much healthier for one or both partners to find a carefully chosen lover as long as they were open with each other about it and both were settled to the idea that the intimate component of their relationship was over. That must be a better solution than both seething with resentment towards each other because they feel trapped in a situation devoid of emotional and sexual fullfillment, as is the outcome to many marriages. But a pre-requisite of such an arrangment demands that all concerned to have a level of maturity that is rare in our culture.
06:53 AM on 08/31/2012
Well that's the shortest turnabout to a problem I've ever read. On the one hand you state it's wrong because there's no such thing as safe sex, and on the other you advocate a carefully chosen lover!.
Presumably the lover would be vetted, sorry bad choice of words, tested so as to be 'clean'.
Look, speaking from personal experience, most, no all 'affairs' begin with one or both parties up for it, THERE & THEN, sometimes it lasts longer, one of mine lasted 8 years, but you're correct about the reason, lack of fulfillment being the 'spur' as it were to 'wander'
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Laatab
All The Worlds A Stage
07:16 AM on 08/31/2012
Vetted as in the proper life circumstances of a potential lover would not involve victimising someone in their life certainly. You must have missed this bit "both were settled to the idea that the intimate component of their relationship was over".