Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Jack Peters

GET UPDATES FROM Jack Peters
 

Is the Mainstream Media Playing an Adequate Role in Informing us on Financial Responsibility?

Posted: 28/11/11 23:00

Allow me to introduce myself. I'm 30 years old, I'm a teacher, I'm single, I have no dependants, and I'm not a home-owner.

I'm currently sat comfortably in a coffee house drinking a latte with hazelnut shot. I'm not sure if I'm sat too comfortably though, because outside the steamed up window of the coffee shop there's financial meltdown, contagion and talk of a 'lost generation'.

Should I be preparing financially during times of austerity, and if so, how?

I suppose the other question is what place does economics have in a lifestyle section of a magazine?

In times of recession and with the 'fall of Capitalism' nigh there will be some seismic shifts in life as we know it.

It affects our health and well-being, our choice of leisure and lifestyle and our willingness and ability to purchase organic or super-foods instead of cheap, processed crap...or in my case, coffee.

Should I prepare for change in my lifestyle by reading JK Galbraith's The Great Crash, 1929 as a precautionary tale from history, or Bear Grylls' Born Survivor?

I'm serious, because the media sources are questionable and I'm being bombarded left, right and centre by different political and economic messages.

Before 2006, when I had just graduated, everybody was extolling the virtues of using property as an investment tool with 100% mortgages whilst behind closed doors racking up debt on various credit and store cards.

Their legacy - an economy built on sandy foundations which is now in imminent danger of collapsing. It's not their fault though. People simply regurgitated what the mainstream media informed them, trusted what financial experts advised them and followed what political party mantras told them to do.

Why? Because we're meant to. That is the role of these institutions in society. They are in a position of trust. So this takes me back to the questionable role of the media, financial institutions and governments whom we are supposed to rely on.

In the halcyon days it seemed high street debt was available everywhere and encouraged by the government to prop up the economy. Buy now pay later.

Sarah Beeney et al were on to something, telling us all of the secretly kept tricks of the property trade. Things could only get better.

However, a few months ago on BBC Breakfast News the whole nation nearly choked on their cornflakes as 'financial expert' Alessio Rastani candidly told us, with savour, that the markets and economy were doomed and that our pensions and savings would be wiped out.

Two contrasting messages over time, but what remained the same was the supposed financial expertise and credentials of their sources used. It took the Daily Mail, of all papers, to be the bastion of truth and investigative journalism by revealing Rastani as a charlatan who lived in his girlfriend's semi-detached in Bexley Heath. Hardly the stuff of Wall Street.

So can we rely on these sources of information to survive the recession any more? Should I really be using my suggested alternative reading instead?

The media are apocalyptic on the economic outlook but the financial institutions are bullish.

The government are putting together rescue packages and telling me everything's under control but impartial ratings agencies are downgrading sovereign debt.

I'm being cajoled by adverts to keep on spending but these same companies advertising are announcing store closures and mass redundancies. Has the house band been instructed to carry on playing or is it like the grade two hurricane which was predicted for New York being categorised down to a tropical storm? Can't we just consolidate all this conflicting information into one simple message?

So back to my original question. What should I be doing to prepare and reduce the effects of the recession?

When I go to the coffee shop should I downgrade from a vente to a grande? Should I abandon the coffee shop altogether as an excessive pleasure and drink granulated coffee at home?

Heaven forbid, should I be resorting to that powdery substitute - chicory? Because any hardship or contagion beyond chicory I just can't contemplate or comprehend.

 

Follow Jack Peters on Twitter: www.twitter.com/tweetsandmaytal

Allow me to introduce myself. I'm 30 years old, I'm a teacher, I'm single, I have no dependants, and I'm not a home-owner. I'm currently sat comfortably in a coffee house drinking a latte with hazel...
Allow me to introduce myself. I'm 30 years old, I'm a teacher, I'm single, I have no dependants, and I'm not a home-owner. I'm currently sat comfortably in a coffee house drinking a latte with hazel...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 7
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Recency  | 
Popularity
12:25 on 29/11/2011
Jack, we all know where it will end. We will endure and 'suffer' until the whole circus is back on the road. We have (us older ones) lived through this before and we will see it again. We are a 'consumer' society and that is how it will always be. It is hard to say 'no' to those little treats and rewards for all our 'hardship'.
We consume too much and we waste too much, even the 'emerging' economies do not learn from our mistakes - more cars and TV's please.
Until we are strong enough to be happy with fewer 'comforts' no amount of credit will do.
Great question, keep it up, you have probably only got another 70-80 years to go!
passivsolar.wordpress.com
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Jack Peters
01:01 on 30/11/2011
Thank you for your sage advice. No-one but the most fervent doom monger would suggest otherwise to the 'circus being back on the road'. However, I recall the beginning of the 'credit crunch' when older heads reassured me it would last no longer than Russia's currency default and the 'Dot Com bubble'. Despite their inevitabilities, in preparation we still need to be advised to what extent we'll suffer and approximately how long we'll have to endure though.
09:46 on 29/11/2011
Thank you, Jack for picking up on a question I've been asking myself for quite a while now. Due to my professional background in information research and also personal interest, I've been reading newspapers, online journals and whatsoever influenced by every possible political wing. Well, since they all contradict each other - like you observed - and leave us with no clue whatsoever I think your approach of looking at it from a more pratical point of view might actually be the right thing. Of course that would also mean that many journalist would be out of a job if everyone did it. But for now, maybe we should go back to drinking coffee at home and stock up on cloth and soap - as my great-great-grandmother used to put it. Just to be on the save side for whatever may head in our direction... Because we just can't tell by now...
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Jack Peters
00:34 on 30/11/2011
Well after today's statement the word on every financial commentator's lips will be austerity for the next 5 to 6 years. The bond markets need to be kept assured though. Austerity is such a pretty sounding word for 700,000 public sector workers and 2 million currently unemployed people sat at home staring into the financial abyss, fending off final reminders or wondering how they'll keep up with their mortgage repayments. Politicians always use such words but never describe the human and social costs it embodies. I shall be listening to your grand-mother's advice by the looks of it.
13:07 on 30/11/2011
After spending another morning with apolyptical news from the financial sector, I agree with you - again. I guess we both have observed that "austerity" is a favourite word to those who will never have to worry about it. That's what makes it so easy to say. As an university graduate currently working in the public service sector, I know the financial abyss pretty well. Austerity has been a "good" friend of mine so far...