Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Jai Breitnauer

GET UPDATES FROM Jai Breitnauer
 

The Coalition's Lost Generation

Posted: 28/05/2012 01:00

This government claimed to be pro-family, yet they're attacking them at every turn - and my son's generation won't thank them for it.

When a friend asked recently if I would be blogging about 'maternity leave', I wasn't sure what she was talking about. Did she mean my passionate belief that men should be allowed extended paternity leave without all the red tape they currently have to wade through? Was she referring to my campaign for the higher rate of maternity allowance to be available to all, regardless of earnings? "No," she said. "I mean, the government plans to reduce maternity leave to 18 weeks?"

WHAT?!

When did they sneak that one in? The quiet erosion of parental support under the coalition has not gone as unnoticed as Cleg-Ron would like, but this hadn't registered on my radar at all, and it took me a while to understand what their plans meant.

The way things stand, you're entitled to 52 weeks leave - that's 12 months people - and for nine months of that almost everyone is entitled to the higher rate maternity pay, which has just been increased to around £135 a week. I say everyone because, if you earn less than £135 a week, haven't kept your N.I up to date or, like me, you didn't realise that you physically had to return your small earnings exemption certificate (actually paying National Insurance isn't enough to cancel it, apparently) then you are only entitled to the lower rate (£27 a week in my case). You are also entitled to share your leave with your partner (if you receive the higher rate. Grrr...) as part of the new paternity leave arrangements announced last year.

The new plans are being introduced under the guise of a better sharing arrangement for dads, grandparents etc. But if they go ahead it means new mums will be legally entitled to just four and a half months off with their baby, and any further leave will be under negotiation with their employer, and potentially unpaid.

If your heart rate isn't already elevated and you haven't started penning a letter to your MP, then you're probably not a parent and are either not planning on becoming one or haven't really considered it yet. But let me tell you, as mum to two boys under four, this leaves me cold. It's contradictory to everything we've been taught about parenting.

For a start, the NHS recommends you breastfeed exclusively until your baby is six months old. No solids, no formula. So, in order to do that, new mums will have to turn up to work armed with breast pumps and bottles. Employers will have to make space for them to privately express, provide a fridge to store the milk in, and take the hit on the time they have to spend doing it during their working day. Apart from it being a pain in the bum, it's contradictory advice and really not very good for the economy.

Secondly, sleep deprivation. Not many babies sleep through at four months - I still breast feed our 10 month old twice or more in the night. If, after four and a half months, you feel obliged to return to work, or have to for financial reasons, I can guarantee you won't be very productive.

Thirdly, there is debt. With tax credits being cut and Sure Start centres, which provide free activities, losing funding, it's already pretty expensive to be a parent. If you chose not to return to work and therefore lose your job, or at least have to take leave unpaid, then your only choice might be a loan - perhaps from an unreputable source - causing no end of problems for your family in the future.

Finally, I want to know what the government expect us to do with all these babies while we are working? They've withdrawn funding for Sure Start centres, reducing the number of nursery spaces for children under two, creating child care chaos across the country. I've had my son, now 10 months old, on the waiting list for a local nursery since I was four months pregnant, and they can't offer me a space until at least April 2013! The system is already flooded with desperate parents accepting low standard childcare options - unregulated and expensive nannies, family members who might be very young, very old and untrained, 'childminders' who may not have the correct documentation but parents are so desperate they don't ask...

The government should be nurturing the next generation, but instead they're cutting them off at every turn. No more CTF, cuts to tax credits and child support, reduction in funding to Sure Start Centres, and now they're taking their mummy's away too. Shame on you, Nick and Dave, not just for making these devastating changes, but for continuing to claim family still matters to you.

For more information check out the Working Families 'Six Months for Mums' campaign.

 

Follow Jai Breitnauer on Twitter: www.twitter.com/2wheeledtoddler

FOLLOW UK POLITICS
This government claimed to be pro-family, yet they're attacking them at every turn - and my son's generation won't thank them for it. When a friend asked recently if I would be blogging about 'matern...
This government claimed to be pro-family, yet they're attacking them at every turn - and my son's generation won't thank them for it. When a friend asked recently if I would be blogging about 'matern...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 8
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
09:57 PM on 06/11/2012
Here in the USA, women are lucky to get 8 weeks maternity leave. My older sister only got 7 weeks, my best friend is getting 6 weeks. And, as for myself: my husband and I are choosing for me to stay home until our baby(ies) are in school (age 5). Day care is another mortgage here. It doesn't make sense for me to work, just to pay for day care when I would rather watch my own baby anyhow. I know it may seem like you have it bad, but trust me. USA has it worse.
01:50 PM on 06/10/2012
*backwards step, that of course should read below...
01:49 PM on 06/10/2012
I'm sorry but I just don't believe this article. You haven't provided a shred of evidence or reference to this. There is no other evidence of this on the internet that I can find. I am the first person to speak out against the Coalition, I cannot stand the Conservatives, and I think some of the cuts they have made that affect families are appalling. But I just cannot believe that something like this could slip through the media net. The Guardian article you linked makes no mention of it. The link you pasted at the end doesn't lead anywhere. A decision like this would have the country up in arms, and there is no way on earth the mainstream media would have let it go so quietly. And to be honest, I don't think this country (yes, even the God-awful coalition) would take such a drastic backwards sake - simply because they would not get away with it. You should write for the Daily Mail... your talents for fabrication would go down well at their HQ I'm sure.
02:08 AM on 06/06/2012
I'm wondering, Jai, whether you've actually read the consultation document (you can find it here: http://c561635.r35.cf2.rackcdn.com/11-699-consultation-modern-workplaces.pdf). It looks pretty clear that if a woman chooses, she will be able to take the full twelve months maternity leave, with nine months paid, as previously.

"We therefore propose that the period classified as maternity leave and pay becomes 18 weeks, and that the remaining weeks currently available to mothers be reclassified as parental leave shared between both parents. However, if parents so choose, mothers will be able to retain access to exactly the same amount of statutory leave as they have now by combining maternity and parental leave." (Bolding mine.)

You say that 'any further leave will be under negotiation with their employer, and potentially unpaid.' Again, this isn't what's in the proposals, which clearly state that the overall, maternity + shared parental leave paid entitlement will be nine months, the same as at the moment. As for negotiation, this is to allow parents, if they wish, to take their entitlement in blocks - if they don't, the default would be to have it as a continuous stretch, just like now.

I know that an article attacking teh awful Coalition is great for HuffPost's page clicks, but this is a complete misrepresentation of the government's position. This is a great leap forward for gender equality, giving families greater flexibility about how they use parental leave. Give them some credit.
11:52 PM on 06/02/2012
As far as child care goes there are more options than nurseries. Registered childminders are fully trained and I believe a better place for very young children than a large institutional setting. Registered childminders also tend to be good value for money and often more flexible than a nursery. Many are registered for childcare vouchers and are also suitable for claiming childcare costs via tax credits.
photo
vividrick
I came, I saw...I had a cup of tea!
12:22 PM on 05/28/2012
Good article. This policy stinks of 'decisions now & ask questions later'. Why aren't the Coalition female politicians speaking louder about the importance of Motherhood?
10:26 AM on 05/28/2012
Ridiculous. A step in completely the wrong direction. I personally think Norway gets it right most of the time especially with regards to maternity and paternity leave. All of society benefits from this, not just the families.
10:18 AM on 05/28/2012
It's an attack on women too as really it amounts to an attempt to force mothers out of work.