Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
James Dyson

GET UPDATES FROM James Dyson
 

In Support of the Start-up

Posted: 25/03/12 22:40 BST

"You've got two minutes."
"You'll never sell a vacuum cleaner without a bag."
"This project is dead from the neck up."

A heap of nos and nevers as I pitched my newly designed vacuum to old-fashioned industry execs. I wish I could say my story was unusual. Many inventors, small business owners and entrepreneurs start with an idea and fight to keep it alive. And the biggest fight is funding.

For much of the West, weakened economies, regulatory red tape, and bureaucratic bickering has hindered job growth. This has come at the expense of the small business owner. Perhaps the biggest missed opportunity.

Small businesses are the backbone of the US economy. As America's largest employer, they represent 53% of US workers. But, little has been done to nurture this low hanging fruit. In fact, the US has seen a 23% decline in small-business startups in the past few years.

It must become easier for small business owners to hire, invest and expand. Legislation has just been passed by the US Congress that will help jumpstart small businesses.

The JOBS Act contains a series of measures designed to make capital more readily available to small businesses. As I know well, a startup will stall without the funds needed to invest and grow. My company wouldn't exist without a sizeable loan. More accurately, a local bank manager who took up my cause. I was £600,000 in debt before my idea became real.

Twenty years on from that chorus of nos and we're up to 3,600 jobs. New technology is fuelled by new minds. We brought on 200 engineers in the UK last year and we're looking to add another 200 in 2012. Add that to ambitious recruitment plans around the world, including the US.

Other British companies are following a similar pattern, and the UK is adding jobs at the fastest pace since June 2011. Job growth is off to a similar clip in the US, and the legislation would help level the playing field for small businesses. By making it easier for small businesses to do business, they'll hire more workers, grow more quickly, and ultimately help strengthen the economy.

Addressing the opportunity for small business growth is a step in the right direction, but it can't be the only fix. With only regulatory reform, we risk businesses stock piling capital for a rainy day, rather than investing in the research and development that will drive the economy forward.

In the UK, I've advocated for R&D tax credits to help ease the financial burden felt by many startups. And it's working. Small businesses often operate at a loss for the first few years. Tax credits allow these small businesses to make investments in workers, infrastructure or equipment - the freedom to build new ideas along with bottom line.

These aren't tax breaks, they're not loans or grants. Companies must commit their own resources to projects that support research and development, and that still involves a healthy level of risk. Companies that invest in R&D drive economic growth with the most valuable commodity - intellectual property.

Without financial incentives, US startups will seek support abroad. An electric vehicle startup, Bright Automotive, had plans to create 300 manufacturing jobs in the US. Blaming bureaucratic hold-ups, it withdrew its loan application to the Department of Energy's Advanced Technology Vehicle Manufacturing program. Instead, the maker of a plug-in electric vehicle says it may develop its technology in China.

Losing homegrown invention to foreign investors is a real threat. Worse still, a startup fails altogether, and the promise of new technology along with it. The JOBS Act will drive investment in small businesses, which in turn will spur new ideas.

 
FOLLOW UK
"You've got two minutes." "You'll never sell a vacuum cleaner without a bag." "This project is dead from the neck up." A heap of nos and nevers as I pitched my newly designed vacuum to old-fashioned ...
"You've got two minutes." "You'll never sell a vacuum cleaner without a bag." "This project is dead from the neck up." A heap of nos and nevers as I pitched my newly designed vacuum to old-fashioned ...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 7
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
06:05 PM on 04/01/2012
Britain has failed to invest in refining and petrochemicals which provide the feed-stock for downstream industries which make so many things we use. You moved production to China. If we had a government-directed investment policy in exploiting our oil we could create many tens of thousands of high value jobs.

The required investment level from the government would be two or three billion per annum with the government going into joint ventures as junior partner.

We can afford war after war, reducing taxes on the rich, paying to keep millions unemployed. But invest in our only major natural resource industry? No.
lastpost
see biography
01:42 PM on 03/26/2012
"the biggest fight is funding."
Isn’t that why taxpayers have invested so heavily in banks Jim? So that solvent, they can perform the function for which they were designed. Rather than laying the world to waste, like an out of control carpetbag-less cyclone.

"bureaucratic bickering has hindered job growth."
I think you may find that not knowing what endeavour humanity is actually engaged in, acts as far far greater impediment to progress.

"little has been done to nurture this low hanging fruit."
Maybe because those with power were more self-absorbed in slash and burn policies. Than the future prospects of those whose jobs they exported.

"New technology is fuelled by new minds."
But serfs don’t engineer many start-ups.

"the UK is adding jobs at the fastest pace since June 2011."
Soon even the most morbidly obese, will be able to waddle that ever shorter walk from one burger bar to the next.

"hire more workers, grow more quickly, and ultimately help strengthen the economy."
But to what ultimate end? See you back here, right where we started, all too soon.

"the maker of a plug-in electric vehicle says it may develop its technology in China."
Far sighted indeed. Since their customer base is likely to be right outside their factory door.

"spur new ideas"
by flogging the dead horse that is current day democracy?
10:19 AM on 03/26/2012
I'm never completely sure about the locus or motivation of James Dyson on economic policy. He has much put himself about as a populist advisor to UK Governments on economic and industrial policy etc. Meantime of course, having moved most of his manufacturing plant out of the UK. Now here he is in the UK edition of Huffington, seemingly seeking to advise the USA on what to - and citing what the UK has done so that the USA can better its competitive position (at the expense of the UK?). Maybe he is just an agnostic, flighty global nomad?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jacksdad41
Quant Je Puis
10:46 AM on 03/26/2012
"flighty global nomad" - like it @edward - good post
11:17 PM on 03/25/2012
was it not in the seventies that Thatcher closed down manufacturing in Great Britten and turned it in to Great Benefits
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jacksdad41
Quant Je Puis
12:56 AM on 03/26/2012
Well you were almost right there @rupertbear - she didnt become PM till 1979 so she would have to go some - think if you check the history books you will find the 70's were wrecked by strikes, 3 day week, Miners, British Leyland but hey, why spoil the truth when you can blame Thatcher for everything from the fall or the Roman empire to the latest world economic crash - its all Maggies fault. And you may wish to learn how Britain is spelt, presuming you live in the UK (thats the United Kingdom).
On topic Mr Dyson - I dont believe a word you say after you moved your manufacturing operation out of the UK - despicable - "In support of the starup"? Yup, you showed real support for your UK employees didnt you??
03:24 PM on 03/26/2012
While it's true that UK manufacturing output took a knock in the early 1980s, by 1990 it was back to its peak pre-Thatcher level and it continued to grow from that point. Manufacturing employment is down, due to greater efficiencies spurred on by higher salaries, but output remains strong.