Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Jenny Jones AM

GET UPDATES FROM Jenny Jones AM
 

Call to End Junk Food Sponsors From Future Sporting Events

Posted: 13/07/2012 00:00

High Olympic ideals of promoting sport and healthy living seem completely at odds with Big Macs, chicken nuggets, fries, sugar rich milkshakes and coke drinks. Yet McDonalds and Coca Cola, through sponsorship deals, will be the only food and soft-drink brands advertised at the London 2012 Games, at both game venues and through TV broadcasts to billions of worldwide viewers, including children.

A growing body of organisations, including the London Assembly and eminent voices in the medical profession, who understand the extent and cost of childhood obesity, are calling for companies whose products are associated with obesity, such as high fat, high calorific and sugar filled drinks, to be excluded from sponsorship of sporting events. This call could mark the start of a process similar to that of the tobacco advertising and sponsorship ban in the early 90s. This was also preceded by the medical profession highlighting health problems with calls for stricter laws on the sale and advertising of tobacco products.

Allowing such brands to sponsor international sporting events subliminally links these brands with health, athletes and sporting achievement. Opponents believe this undermines public health campaigns and sets efforts to promote healthy diets back by years. At the UEFA's Euro 2012 McDonalds adverts showed children that they had sponsored walking onto the pitch hand in hand with their football heroes. This advert was clearly targeted at children and designed to cajole brand loyalty. According to the McDonald's website this is part of their work to 'promote sport and physical activity'.

Restrictions on advertising foods high in fat, salt and sugar already exist on children's television and even Walt Disney recently announced a ban on fast food adverts on its television shows (once contractual commitments end). Yet, just as children watched UEFA's Euro 2012 and its ads, the London 2012 Games will offer no protection to children from such brand targeting. It is disappointing that the International Olympic Committee, responsible for the summer and winter Olympics/Paralympics, just extended McDonalds' and Coca Cola's sponsorship deals until 2020, which means the 2014 winter games in Sochi, the 2016 Olympics in Rio de Janeiro, the 2018 winter Games in Pyeongchang and the 2020 Olympics will have their imprint.

On 20 June 2012, at a full London Assembly meeting, a motion which I proposed, calling for a ban on sponsorship of future Olympic and Paralympic Games by companies which produce high calorie food and drink was agreed. The motion urged the Olympic movement to adopt strict criteria for sponsorship of Games which would exclude companies associated with products linked to childhood obesity, urged the Mayor of London Boris Johnson to encourage the organisers of future major sporting events in London (such as the London 2017 World Athletics Championships) to adopt a similar approach, and urged the Government to consider introducing restrictions on advertising and exclusive marketing at major sporting events by such food and drink companies.

A London Assembly report 'Tipping the Scales' estimated that almost a quarter of a million, or one in five children in London, are obese, and based on current trends predicted that half of children will be obese or overweight by 2020. It also found that children most at risk of becoming overweight or obese came from areas of deprivation.

Such concerns are not just limited to academic, public health and some political circles. Which Magazine [June 2012] found that 64% of UK adults they surveyed agreed that sponsors such as McDonalds and Coca Cola undermine the healthy ethos of the Olympics; 60% thought it encourages unhealthy eating and that it makes it harder to tackle obesity and poor diet.

Amir Khan, the youngest British Olympic boxing medalist at the 2004 Athens Olympics, referring to the 1,500 capacity cathedral like McDonalds in the Olympic village, and the largest in the world, said: "The Olympics are a great opportunity to show young people what types of food they need in different aspects of their life. I think this is a mistake"

Professor Terence Stephenson the vice chair of the Academy of Royal Medical Colleges, in April 2012 stated that the Government's voluntary approach of trusting the food industry to cut calories and advise people on healthy diets was inherently flawed and is failing to tackle obesity. He said: "It's very sad that an event [referring to the Olympics] that celebrates the very best of athletic achievements should be sponsored by companies contributing to the obesity problem and unhealthy habits".

With the scale and cost of treating obesity mushrooming, bodies responsible for public health such as the Government, Mayor of London and regulators can no longer turn a blind eye to this blatant marketing of junk food to children. It's time to show leadership and exercise a duty of care to those who are already overweight, obese, or belong to high risk groups who are disproportionately found in the most deprived communities with diets that are frequently limited to unhealthy and highly processed food. Challenging UEFA, IOC and other sporting bodies over their sponsorship deals with companies associated with products linked to childhood obesity is a fundamental and urgently needed step towards curbing the obesity epidemic.

 

Follow Jenny Jones AM on Twitter: www.twitter.com/GreenJennyJones

FOLLOW UK POLITICS
High Olympic ideals of promoting sport and healthy living seem completely at odds with Big Macs, chicken nuggets, fries, sugar rich milkshakes and coke drinks. Yet McDonalds and Coca Cola, through spo...
High Olympic ideals of promoting sport and healthy living seem completely at odds with Big Macs, chicken nuggets, fries, sugar rich milkshakes and coke drinks. Yet McDonalds and Coca Cola, through spo...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 51
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Nic the wonder puppy
When life throws lemons, throw them back
04:35 PM on 07/16/2012
What? what's next, beer, BBQ, big fat cigars ?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
honeynutcornflakes
your micro-bio is empty
12:33 AM on 07/16/2012
advertising is evidently a very powerful tool that companies use to promote their products. for this reason, these techniques should not be used to advocate vices like unhealthy food or drink, or drugs like alcohol and cigarettes. people don't need to be told to indulge in these things, why is it still happening?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Miserable Swine
10:01 PM on 07/15/2012
Health option at Southsea Common (Portsmouth) torch business:
http://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=250186285098402&set=a.123357641114601.22214.100003210988948&type=1&theater
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Thismortalcoil
Science is the poetry of reality
07:46 PM on 07/15/2012
A simple McDonalds meal of a quarter pounder with cheese and fries with a milkshake and a Mcflurry amounts to a whopping 1605 calories. That's 5 more calories than the recommended calories for a child for a whole day, in just one meal!

This is one of the reasons why McDonalds should not be allowed to sponsor sporting events - it's encouraging children to think that incredibly high calorie food is normal.

No wonder one in five children are obese if their parents actually think eating like this is ok.
photo
novelist2000
veritas non olet
06:24 AM on 07/15/2012
I would not be confident that you could have as many sporting events as we have without that kind of sponsorship. Tobacco and alcohol were outed, now this?

I have a much better idea. Let's look at Chinese wisdom, gradualism, small steps. Can we outlaw it or better still get a voluntary committment not to include fizzy drinks in the food package? Let people ask for them and pay seperately. You may find, that some people get one to share. Reduction in sugar and artificial sweetener consumption should be a step in the right direction. Coca Cola and Pepsi have other product lines, they should agree on this issue of health.
08:51 PM on 07/14/2012
There is absolutely nothing wrong with McDonalds food, if eaten in moderation as part of a well balanced diet! McDonalds have several healthy options, not just beefburgers in a bun, explore the menu! The problem mainly lies with the fact that far too many "mums/dads" can't cook! Domestic science should not have been dropped from the school curriculum! Of the ones that can cook a variety of nutritious meals often are too busy working to make sure the end of the month does not run out before their money
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Paul Wagland
Resistance is fertile
07:28 PM on 07/15/2012
"There is absolutely nothing wrong with McDonalds food, if eaten in moderation as part of a well balanced diet!" other than the massive destruction of virgin rainforest...

"McDonalds have several healthy options" and of course most of us go there for a salad (22% of your salt RDA).

"Domestic science should not have been dropped from the school curriculum!" Agreed, but not relevant to the advertising issue.

"Of the ones that can cook a variety of nutritious meals often are too busy working", because cooking at home is so terribly expensive? Even a microwave meal is more healthy than a burger, and it takes less time to prepare.
06:29 PM on 07/14/2012
It is not the state's business to concern itself with legitimate businesses sponsoring people playing silly games. What is, however, of more concern is the state involving itself in the whole bloated corrupt spectacle. Let people play games, let people eat chips, but let the government keep out of it all. Give us back our city, get rid of the Soviet-era "olympic lanes" and let them be treated like any other hobby.
02:23 PM on 07/14/2012
Look, these companies make a lot of money. They use some of that money to sponsor things. If you want to ban them, do you honestly think health food shops, veggie restaurants and the Green party are going to make up the shortfall.

A few years ago strident trendies stopped 'junk food' chains from sponsoring kid's TV. The result was devastating. No further Sat morning kids TV for ITV, meant BBC could shut up shop. What turns up on CBBC and CITV are mainly American cartoons. No one came in to make up the shortfall in costs. And yet the obesity of kids is still a problem and MacDonald's, Coke and other 'junk food' brands are still going and still making huge profits.

If you want to piously ban 'junk food' brands, you'd better have a healthy sponsor with as much cash to burn in the wings, or make up the shortfall yourself. Or do you live on such a pure, moral high ground that you don't care if other people's jobs get axed?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Paul Wagland
Resistance is fertile
07:22 PM on 07/15/2012
So you're ok with the idea that McDonald's (the world's biggest toy distributor) funded kids tv in order to get the company message across? Essentially that they bought their way into kids' heads, regardless of the parents' wishes?

If a ban on junk food adverts makes kids' tv less appealing, that strikes me as win-win.

That said, how did the ban affect the non-commercial BBC exactly?
08:30 PM on 07/13/2012
Well written Jenny "from the London Assembly Block" Jones (@GreenJennyJones )

One of the biggest disappointment this week was on #Newsnight where, Olympic role model and gold medal winner, James Cracknell sided with Coke-Donalds inc. The poor Dr. who did the report had to fight him, a very weak host Gavin Esler, and a supporter for the trans fat industry.

The Olympics, like FIFA, is cartel driven; with numerous illegal practices. Due to their closed door policies, they are very difficult to infiltrate, with our good cause concerns.

It's well known that secret lobbying money gets gifted to these guys...We are behind you all the way. We do not need the £s from the calorie companies; our children are already being hypnotised by their calorie giving products with unwanted pounds of another kind.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Thismortalcoil
Science is the poetry of reality
06:29 PM on 07/13/2012
The tragic thing is that there are people who genuinely believe they are treating their kids when they take them to McDonalds.

It's no coincidence that most of these people are from deprived communities and have never had the opportunity to learn what constitutes a balanced meal.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
SGillLondonUK
UNDIVIDED UNCONQUERED
06:57 PM on 07/15/2012
I am not going to sit here and say that McDonalds food is healthy or unhealthy. But what i can say is making patronising remarks does nothing to address the issues of obesity.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Thismortalcoil
Science is the poetry of reality
07:48 PM on 07/15/2012
Er, did you read the bit in the feature where it pointed out "A London Assembly report 'Tipping the Scales' estimated that almost a quarter of a million, or one in five children in London, are obese, and based on current trends predicted that half of children will be obese or overweight by 2020. It also found that children most at risk of becoming overweight or obese came from areas of deprivation."
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Nathan0316
TrueBlueTory Age quod agis
03:40 PM on 07/13/2012
I completely agree with this and have said the same thing on a number of occasions. VISA, UPS, The National Lottery, P&G (suntan lotion, talcum powder and moisturising creams, all part of an Olympic athletes training), all of these firms I have no problem supporting the Games but McDonald's? Coca-Cola? How many Olympians do you think scarf down Big Mac and Coke as part of their training regime? Not many, would be my guess...

And on a not-unrelated note, we live in a very strange country when one of the biggest problems poor children face is being fat!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
SGillLondonUK
UNDIVIDED UNCONQUERED
07:00 PM on 07/15/2012
I think one of the biggest problems we have in this country is the amount of people who think they can judge other people because they dont approve of their lifestyles
02:34 PM on 07/13/2012
Which would be a dish more indicative of the UK at the moment, Fish and Chips or Chicken Tikka Masala?
12:58 PM on 07/13/2012
Jenny, while I agree with your argument I feel that in the face of corporate pressure it's a lost cause. So why not opt for the situationalist answer? Burger eating contests, sugary soft-drink drinking contest, cigarette smoking contests, impaling the person caught with a non-sponsored product, etc. I know it sounds atrocious but I'm sure you'd find plenty of sponsors for it.
lastpost
see biography
12:34 PM on 07/13/2012
"Olympic ideals"
How about some Tee shirts, with an alternative to the evolutionary ape-to-android progression on? These could show an athlete’s altering silhouette, on a sequentially increasing fast food diet. Normal. One days fast food diet per week. Two days fast food diet per week, and so on.

"calling for companies whose products are associated with obesity"
to investigate ways of ameliorating those effects by altering content or adulterating the culprit additives.

"undermines public health"
Fracking for the physique. Pump in a load of gloop, but don’t factor for the outcome.

"children most at risk of becoming overweight or obese came from areas of deprivation."
Maybe Jamie could devise some fast food meals that would turn this problem completely around. Imagine the trade such outlets could generate, if they were providing a healthy and an economical product.

"The Olympics are a great opportunity"
"Faster, Higher, Stronger" might become, “Trimmer, Taller, Tougher”.

"this blatant marketing of junk food to children"
is killing the customer for short term gain. Is that really best long term business practice?
09:54 AM on 07/13/2012
I do agree its a bit of an oxymoron to have fast food avertising at the world's biggest sporting event.
That said, however, there are providing a huge amount of funding towards the games that would have to be found elsewhere. McDonalds is a huge brand name, I doubt believe it would have any impact on the obesity levels whether they advertised at the Olympics or not, so why not get some of their money and put it to some good.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Paul Wagland
Resistance is fertile
07:14 PM on 07/15/2012
Because they will make more from the Olympics than they spend. Otherwise they wouldn't be sponsors.