Chuka Umunna
:Ed's Google Speech and What It Means for Responsible Capitalism
Jack Butler
:Miliband Talks the Talk on Tax Avoidance - But Can Anyone Walk the Walk
Jemma Wayne
:Time to Stop Laughing at Farage's Bad Jokes
Duncan Weldon
:Chancellor Should Heed IMF Advice and Increase Infrastructure Spending Now
Alistair Darling
:Salmond's Default Position Bankrupts His Credibility
The rebels' ability to strike at the heart of the Syrian regime's feared security apparatus, to battle its troops in Damascus and take control of border crossings, in a coordinated, well-planned and executed campaign, shows that Assad is doomed.
The 'Damascus Volcano' has not only left the regime reeling, but it is highlighting the self-defeating futility of two aspects of realpolitik - callous, cynical power-politics from Russia (and to an extent, Beijing) and the defeatism of the West. Only a dose of pragmatic idealism can now prevent the volcano sparking an inferno in Syria and beyond.
The immediate risk is that the audacity of the rebels will provoke an escalation in brutality from regime lieutenants who calculate that defeat will bring them the fate of Colonel Gaddafi, Saddam Hussein, or Slobodan Milošević. Given that they are now bewildered, desperate and murderous in equal measure, possess chemical weapons and are led by a man whose father slaughtered 20,000 in 1982, the stakes could not be higher, most importantly of all for civilians.
Moscow's calculation that the mere provision of a diplomatic shield would prevent Western intervention and gift Assad both the time and military resources necessary to crush dissent has proven to be as misguided as Soviet leaders' attempts to contain popular uprisings in the late 20th century.
The old realist calculus that power buys influence is being undermined, for had they truly countenanced political reform and transition to a post-Assad era, Russia's chances of securing its strategic military and economic interests in Syria would have been far higher. Those leading the post-Assad Syria won't forget who supplied the shells and tanks which killed so many of their comrades-in-arms and civilians.
Neither will the West's refusal to countenance any form of military assistance have gone unnoticed by the rebels. The West sacrificed Syrian civilians' human rights to liberty, life and limb on the altar of realpolitik, claiming variously that military intervention would not work because of the great potency of Syria's military, and that UN Security Council endorsement is the ultimate arbiter of legality and morality.
The rebel's advances have shown that the best diplomatic and military minds from Whitehall to Washington were incompetent at best, or disingenuous at worst in overstating the tenacity of the Assad regime. Given that the rancid, brittle underbelly of this dictatorship is now exposed for all to see, we now have one final chance to use our superior military power to help the rebels secure victory.
As for the UN, its well-meaning efforts are a case study in how impotence flows from the sum of the parts of the dis-united nations which comprise the international non-community. Despite this, it is the UN which, in a best case scenario, could steer Syria towards a peaceful future and away from the oblivion of sectarian conflict. The ghosts of previous interventions such as Bosnia, Iraq and Afghanistan, and non-interventions such Darfur and Rwanda, must be laid to rest.
The pro-and anti-Assad UN Security Council members must now swallow their pride and unite around a UN-sanctioned plan which would: deter Assad from any Hama-style atrocity or the use of WMDs; authorise military force to assist the rebels in hastening the regime's demise (following an ultimatum to the regime); and promise not a UN talking-shop, but an action-oriented conference attended by all regional and UNSC powers, to establish a temporary UN 'mandate' over Syria, enforced by UN-authorised troops (preferably including the troops of nearby nations).
Good-willed people of the world must pressurise their governments to countenance such measures so that we defeat the defeatism and curtail the cynicism that has been on display as our leaders have deferred to the worst aspects of realism in international affairs.
Follow John Slinger on Twitter: www.twitter.com/JohnSlinger
Alex MacDonald: We Condemn Assad's Crime... While Giving His Main Dealer a Warm Welcome
John Wight: Echoes of Sykes Picot as Syrian Conflict Deepens
Eric Kaufmann: Numbers Count: Why Religious Population Growth Underpins the Islamist Surge
For all the costernation, over how things have been progressing in Syria, even in the face of the mass civilian casualties, this affair has gone about about as well as most folks could've expected.
Yes, the Syrian opposition forces were able to coordinate a major attack against Assad's forces in Damascus; that still does nothing to resolve the issue of there being countless different groups and set, all claiming to be fighting for the liberation of Syria. All one need do is look at the failed efforts at providing direct aid to the "rebel cause".
Just like Libya, Syria, too, will have to go through it's own process, of figuring out what will be for Syrians after Assad.
All the West can do, IMO, is provide support whenever deemed appropriate by the Syrians, stand at the ready, to prevent any efforts even hinting at ethnic cleansing, and allow the Syrian themselves, to coalesce around a defiantly Syrian system that all parties, though not overjoyed with, will be able to support.
It's going to be messy, but that's the only way.
The stench of Anglo hypocrisy hangs over this sanctimonious piece, while his countrymen down the road in the Foreign Ministry meet with expatriate terrorists and plot the overthrow of a regime still getting 40% of the vote in Syria, military killings notwithstanding. The ‘old realist perspective’ is the cynical one Slinger still holds: Russia has consistently applied - see Mr Churkin's interview on RT - the welfare of the Syrian people, a consideration utterly absent from the comical puppet-master Hague and his shadowy handlers sending in the killers.
When Syria is drenched on blood like Iraq, will Slinger find new rationalisations to justify it? No doubt - paid by the poisoned word!
It was not actually his father. It was his uncle. He lives next door to you.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/middleeast/syria/8571164/Syrias-Butcher-of-Hama-living-in-10-million-Mayfair-townhouse.html
"The West sacrificed Syrian civilians' human rights to liberty, life and limb on the altar of realpolitik, claiming variously that military intervention would not work because of the great potency of Syria's military, and that UN Security Council endorsement is the ultimate arbiter of legality and morality."
You subcontracted that to Saudi Arabia and Qatar. That they are going to bring human rights and democracy to Syria fits into the absurdity of this whole situation. (I actually believe they are bringing armed Islamic supremacists who will threaten and murder Christians, Alawaites, secularists, moderates, etc. because the US and Britain have made an unholy alliance with Al Qaeda.)
What are the new governments going to look like, will the military step in, will they be "hard-line" Islamic states that ally themselves with Iran, these are all questions that have yet to be answered.
For what it is worth I feel we have to establish friendly relations with these new governments, no matter what their views, provided they are democratically elected.
---------------------------------------------------
Russia and China are responding to the 'callous, cynical power-politics' of the West, reflected in U.S. expansionism across the Middle East and the invasions of Iraq and Afghanistan.
Two wrongs do not make right. But it is two wrongs we have here.
Also:
Western refusal to allow Iran to attend talks is unhelpful. Isolation of Iran is not good.
Western rejection of Russian arguments that all sides in Syria should seek a peace is not helpful. The Ba'ath have wide support.
And your statement that ''the West's refusal to countenance any form of military assistance'' will dismay the rebels ignores the reality that the West is complicit in the arming of the rebels by Gulf States.
Your racy, militaristic, jingoistic idealism is so reminiscent of the insanity that swept New Labour and led to supporting the corporatist fascist Bush into invading Iraq.