Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Jolyon Rubinstein

GET UPDATES FROM Jolyon Rubinstein
 

Could the Phone-Hacking Scandal Just be the Beginning?

Posted: 10/07/11 15:44 BST

It seems that criminal activities like phone hacking and bribery have been (as many have posited for years) a regular practice at NOTW. But I don't think that the NOTW is the only actor in this saga. Far from being the sole player it may well just be the first domino to fall. As outrageous as this whole drama has been, wouldn't it be reassuring if it started and ended with a single NI title?

If only it were that simple.

The need to sell-sell-sell coupled with the British public's insatiable appetite for tittle-tattle leads me to believe that this is just the beginning of revelations that will rock newspapers, magazine titles and anyone involved in 'news' to their collective core.

What are we going to do if we discover that the practices that have resulted in so much public revulsion have, in fact, been endemic in all tabloid newsrooms and in their glossy celebrity-filled counterparts?

For many years now I have thought that many popular British glossy magazines are becoming even more trash filled and unscrupulous than the tabloids, and in this belief I know I am not alone.

These magazines have, to my mind, almost become a law unto themselves, selling 'classy-trash' to the addicted masses who identify more with the salacious gossip they provide than anything that 'traditional' media does. Well, you don't get much about X-Factor in the Guardian and the Telegraph, do you? In some strange way they have captured and bottled celebrity, and convinced all who buy them that they are better off knowing the sordid details than not.

What's to say that the next couple of weeks won't reveal that hacking email and facebook accounts, even tracking the GPS signals from smart phones has also been common practice? According to a tech-savvy friend of mine, this all is very easy to do if you know how, and according to my friend, private investigators do...

Until this week a culture of impunity existed. Until this week we thought these practices where 'below' our press. Until this week we thought, with good reason, that common sense prevailed.

We were wrong.
So if the Millie Dowler hack scandal happened, if the hack scandals of the 7/7 victims and the dead of our two wars in Afghanistan and Iraq happened then, I'm sorry to say I am left wondering, what else has been going on? I bet we learn that the perpetrators of these actions have taken it further. I bet they just thought, 'why not'?

Why not clone email accounts and wait for juicy details to come through? Why not spy on facebook chats, private messages and photos? Why not even track your targets whereabouts by locking onto their smart phones' GPS signals?
If I am proved right over the coming weeks and months and in fact what we are dealing with is not simply NOTW, but the majority of the tabloid and 'glossy' press, then we must seriously start thinking about what criminal charges can and should be brought to ensure that this really does become a watershed moment in the history of the British press.

Independent judicial reviews must examine the whole of the industry. Do we really think that NOTW is a one off, acting alone amongst its competition? Hugh Grant, on BBC's Question Time, raised the spectre of the phenomenon being far broader than anyone has previously wanted to admit. And why don't we want to deal with that reality yet? Because when we do, we are going to have to deal with the fundamental question of regulation and standards authorities becoming realities in the tabloid realms.

I can't believe I'm writing this, but I'm starting to think that might be just what we need. I love you 'freedom of speech', but people have been taking the piss for too long, and it's all gone to pot.

 

Follow Jolyon Rubinstein on Twitter: www.twitter.com/@jolyonblirt

 
 
  • Comments
  • 14
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
09:55 AM on 07/11/2011
Happy to say I have NEVER bought the NotW - it is clear to me that the editors through this period of rampant phone hacking knew what was being done - why would a "private investigator" be hacking this eclectic group of targets if he wasn't commissioned to do so. He was being paid an annual "retainer" of some £100k ($160k) - working in the media as I do, that's a hell of a lot of money to be paid to a freelance. If Rebekah Wade DIDN'T know what it was for, Murdoch should sack her for negligence.

Back to the point of your blog tho Jolyon - we have plenty of laws protecting privacy here in the UK. That the police knew those laws were being broken and did nothing about it, whilst receiving payments or perhaps promises of future employment from those responsible is the REAL scandal.

This stories still got some legs...
09:30 AM on 07/11/2011
It's easier to pass a hack through the eye of a needle than it is to get a British newspaper to investigate just how Ombudsman Services:Property rips off the consumer.
12:11 AM on 07/11/2011
If exposing a truth was so important, it would be done via the Internet which is essentially lawless. Journalists - sorry, hacks - make money from their tales and so they should, with their editors, take the blame for moral unpleasantness. Reporters should report, journalists should write about a situation, but newspapers have forgotten news to predicate opinions and gossip to please the buying public. Perhaps that might change but I am not holding my breathe.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
08:04 PM on 07/10/2011
journalists.need.to.be.licensed,like.members.of.many.other.professions.

self-regulation.has.failed.monumentally.

licensing.and.accreditation.is.long.overdue
07:31 PM on 07/10/2011
The restriction on press freedom that the writer recommends is the last thing we want as a result of all this. Phone hacking, etc, is illegal anyway, and we don't need another legal instrument to somehow make those kind of practices less likely. It wouldn't. Restrictions on the press would only inhibit journalists such as those on Private Eye and the Guardian who broke this story.
07:12 PM on 07/10/2011
This could be a useful link.
http://lordashcroft.com/pdf/WhatPricePrivacyFoIAreply.pdf
06:30 PM on 07/10/2011
There needs to be a new ombudsman to oversee the press, with clearly defined regulations enforced by law. Also I think that Political editorials should be kept in solely political publications clearly defined as such, for people who are motivated to purchase those types of material.
Or the page Headed 'this is a Political Statement From Mr X on Behalf of Mr Y.'
01:44 PM on 07/10/2011
I'm convinced the NotW cannot be the only paper doing this - I used to work for another big media group and I know of at least 1 instance when e-mails were removed completely from the system (the instruction to do it came from on high).
09:49 AM on 07/10/2011
Try this. If you have a Facebook account, email, from your own, non-Facebook email account, someone you haven't emailed for several months. A few days later, check your Facebook. See if the person is listed is someone you might 'friend'. I found that several people were prompted as potential 'friends', by Facebook. My email provider insisted my email account had not and could not have been hacked. But I'm not so sure.
09:25 AM on 07/10/2011
Jolyon. I entirely agree with you . The most obvious candidate is the stablemate of the Notw is it not?
06:51 AM on 07/10/2011
It is a thorny issue BUT no-one, not even the press, should be free to break the laws of the land. If a regulatory body provides a channel for the investigation of these intrusions with serious infractions passed to the police then it would be a good thing indeed.
photo
Gavin Saunders
we only have each other
12:54 PM on 07/10/2011
*especially not the press

To my mind, given the power they can and have exerted, they should be prosecuted more severely than a private citizen.
05:25 PM on 07/11/2011
'Yes, but' department - let's remember some laws, some countries, some times - Nazi Germany, Saudi Arabia, Ethiopia and many many other examples - those mentioned are just the first three that happened to float unbidden into my head. Even in the UK today there are some laws which are only fit to be broken! (Don't ask me which!) That's not to say that I don't VERY largely agree with grapesofroath!
03:38 AM on 07/10/2011
Freedom of speech has never justified invasions of privacy, and fighting back against invasions of privacy doesn't mean abandoning support for free speech. It is entirely possible and appropriate to fight for both privacy and free speech.