Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Lee Brown

GET UPDATES FROM Lee Brown
 

Ecuador's Lessons for Europe's Corridors of Power

Posted: 18/02/2013 19:39

Government after government across Europe has been thrown out since the great recession began to drive back living standards. Whether on the centre-left, such as Gordon Brown and Zapatero, or on the right with Berlusconi and Sarkozy, political rejection has started to look inevitable.

But Rafael Correa's massive re-election win in Ecuador yesterday was a reminder to his European counterparts that political defeat is no iron law of politics. Correa's first term in office began just as the global economic crisis kicked in. Yet he has just been re-elected with nearly 60% of the vote and a 30 point lead over his main rival, a margin any European leader can only dream of.

So what lessons should politicians in Europe draw from this development in South America?

Firstly, Correa's growing popularity has been driven by his rejection of austerity. Posed as the only option in Europe, Correa has dismissed this 'suicide pact' in favour of economic stimulus favoured by Nobel Prize winning economist Joseph Stiglitz and Paul Krugman. The outcome is clear: stagnation in Europe and strong economic growth in Ecuador, averaging 4.35% over the past five years.

The boost to the economy has been based on massive investment in the country's long neglected infrastructure. Public investment increased six-fold between 2006 and 2012 and is now Latin America's highest. The logic will be obvious to those travelling to work on Britain's packed and delayed trains or unable to even get onto a housing waiting list.

But how did Ecuador find the money? Again, Rafael Correa challenged the consensus approach so dominating Europe. Instead of kowtowing, Correa stood up to the international financiers by renegotiating the country's stifling national debt. As Correa himself explained:

"The cost of the external debt was one of the greatest obstacles to Ecuador's development. At one time, servicing the debt consumed 40 per cent of the budget, three times what was spent on the social sphere--education, health and so on".

Today the opposite is true. There are clear lessons for politicians in Greece, Spain and Ireland.

Whilst the coalition government in Britain talks, but rarely acts, about tax avoidance by Starbucks and Amazon, in Ecuador taxes are now actually being collected from the banana magnates and other major companies who long believed that such payments were simply not their responsibility. The introduction of a more progressive tax system, based on the simple principle that those who have more pay more, has enabled Ecuador to double its tax revenue in the past five years.

A second key lesson from Ecuador is that economic growth is not enough - its benefits must be shared. The shocking revelation that, in the US, the top 1% captured as much as 93 percent of the nation's current economic recovery is only an extreme version of a thirty year pattern in Western economies, where the 'haves' become the 'have mores'.

The Occupy Movements that brought the issue of the top 1% to international prominence undoubtedly have a soul mate in Rafael Correa. Growth in Ecuador has created a much more equal wealth distribution. The ratio between the richest and the poorest households has shrunk. One million Ecuadorian households have escaped the grind of daily poverty and 450,000 children have been taken out of child labour. Free education, including at university level, and free healthcare are now guaranteed and are strengthening social integration.

An important policy in achieving greater equality has been a restriction on companies paying dividends until workers receive a living wage. Is there any reason why Ed Miliband's stated support for a state living wage could not replicate this success?

Ecuador also demonstrates that the environmental and social crisis many countries face do not have to be put on the back burner until the economic crisis is resolved. Cameron's recent remarks that "There are series of areas - social legislation, employment legislation, environmental legislation - where Europe has gone far too far" underlines how the recession is being used as a cloak to drive back long fought for rights.

Rafael Correa has taken a different approach based on the totally sensible view that enhancing social inclusion is popular with the majority of voters.

Correa's first major change was a new constitution, approved by referendum, which emphasised human rights and social inclusion. The constitution outlawed discrimination against LGBT communities including through recognition of same-sex unions and associated rights on taxation, social security and inheritance. Disability rights have shot up the political agenda, led by a wheelchair-using vice president, with radical measures including a law that compels companies to set aside 4 per cent of jobs for people with disabilities. Multi-culturalism is celebrated and gender-sensitive budgeting is being used to narrow inequality gaps.

Ecuador has broke new ground too in genuinely prioritizing sustainable development. It is the first country in the world to guarantee rights to nature in its constitution. Ambitious environmental policies are seeking to turn this into a reality, with the Yasuni Initiative perhaps the most significant attempt. Through this, Ecuador will waive its right to exploit large oil deposits in one of the world's most biologically rich areas of rainforest. In return it is seeking contributions from the international community, of less than half the market value of the oil, to invest in renewable energy projects that will transform the energy mix whilst respecting the rights of the indigenous people in this precious area.

Anyone challenging Europe's current policy consensus with the ideas that saw Rafael Correa re-elected so convincingly would be told that this is unrealistic as, in the words of Liam Byrne, the money has run out. But given that Rafael Correa has overseen all of this in South America's third poorest country, it's clear that there is something missing in Europe its not economic resources but political will.

 

Follow Lee Brown on Twitter: www.twitter.com/leejamesbrown

FOLLOW UK POLITICS
Government after government across Europe has been thrown out since the great recession began to drive back living standards. Whether on the centre-left, such as Gordon Brown and Zapatero, or on the r...
Government after government across Europe has been thrown out since the great recession began to drive back living standards. Whether on the centre-left, such as Gordon Brown and Zapatero, or on the r...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 19
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Recency  | 
Popularity
09:20 AM on 03/06/2013
Gotta love socialism-sympathizing journalists who describe reneging on promises backed by a country's full faith and credit as 'not kowtowing' and defaulting as 'renegotiating.'

Responsibility is so 'anti-revolution,' after all.
04:14 PM on 03/01/2013
It's true that his policies are driven to accomplish positive and necessary goals, but the path used to accomplish them are flat mistaken. The government has reformed public procurment laws in order to supposedly accelerate its work but not only has not accomplished that, in 6 years not one major project is nearly done, and has casted out serious doubts about the transparency and quality of its projects, corruption seems to be spreading out in every public contract in the country. It is nice to talk about the plans which in most part I support, but other thing is to see in reallity what has really bin achieved. It is easy for this government to show results, when prior governments where in one hand very inefficient, and on the other hand did not have the money this government has had. Roads are better, but by themselves they do not take us anywhere. The economic sectors that are growing are construction and energy. This is because there are more burocrats earning more money (thanks to oil revenues) that buy new houses. They want to keep up this model with the miming industry by destroying the amazon forrest. I argue that there is still a lot of corruption, and this government is still very mediocre.
Justice has been conquered by this man who know dictates who's is innocent and who is guilty, never in the history of our country has the judicial branch been so dependent on one man and his advisors.
11:37 PM on 03/02/2013
You seem to be from Ecuador, and you are making negative comments about your government in an article of a United Kingdom newspaper... What is wrong with you?. You don't like when people from other parts of the world give compliments to the government in your country? You don't like when someone compares your country with european countries, saying that it has a lot to teach to them?

Try to be a proud Ecuadorian, have more self esteem, remember that Ecuador is South America's third poorest country, and is still trying to give lessons to the developed world.
06:17 PM on 02/28/2013
Correa's 'campaign' against abuse of power by the powerful media and press owners (I would say that he does not attack good honest journalists ) has to be analyzed in the context of this country. I think his battle is sound because during the 'feriado bancario' lots of people lost their money and the powerful press was an accomplice of this huge violation of the private property. At that time powerful mass media was owned by people engaged with bankers and obviously didn't condemn it energically. Many people committed suicide because of the 'feriado', I don't think Ecuadorians either have to forget or be permissive with this abuse. The press and the media must demonstrate that they behave according to good journalism ethics and so far some are not even willing to start changing.
04:38 AM on 02/28/2013
Great article, Rafael Correa is changing Ecuador for good. He is a president who is making history. Before, Ecuador was politically unstable, it was a mess!. Since Correa ecuadorians have stability and economic growth. And concerning to the media issue, now journalist are more responsible in giving a news. It was very commun before, that only by rumors they accuse on TV without any responsibility.
09:59 PM on 02/27/2013
One thing that is worth to mention.. i am from, and living in Ecuador, and i think one of the biggest reasons of his reelection is the lack of decent candidates.. 3 of them youngs, out of nowhere that nobody knew, and with the same speech (increase economy.. better lifestyle etc etc) but the government is already doing that so .. why trust in others.. 2 of them are complete jokes.. 1 (alvaro noboa) goes from town to town giving matresses and electrodomestics saying he was sent from god .. the other (lucio gutierres) is a former president that ran out of the country when the people rebel agains his poor government.. another is owner of a bank.. that was involved in the 90's crisis ... so tell me.. with those candidates.. would you vote for other ?
10:05 PM on 02/28/2013
Well my good countryman, decent candidates for president of a country are very but very rare in all the world, you could ask that to any european, Correa is a really different kind of pressident, that is really doing things to improve his country, that is why people keep choosing him, and that is why a lot people in the world is talking about him, people that without Correa would not even know that Ecuador exists.
03:36 PM on 02/27/2013
Although President Correa has many accomplishments, he is in many ways radically different from what you would consider a democratic leader that should be emulated by Europe and the U.S.
First of all, he has used all his power to crush any opposition, even silencing journalists and columnists (like yourself), who wrote against him. In which first world country does a presidential candidate write to an editor's newspaper to complain about a cartoon that offends him, and demands (stating the law) that his letter be published??
I applaud President´s Correa dedication to the poor, and his quest for social justice, but at what cost? He has taken serious actions that have weakened democracy in our country (not to mention that the political campaign was completely unequal, even the OEA´s commission stated so in their report). Citizens now are more frightened to express their opinion (if it is against the government), or to randomly protest. By now, in Ecuador the "Occupy Wall Street" members would have had a dedicated TV production (that all media would have been forced to transmit) that would discredit them, or even in prison for rebellion or conspiracy.
Just yesterday he signed a decree to control prices of many consumer goods, so he is arbitrarily regulating markets now.
What type of democracy can it be if he has been President since 2007, and will be at least until 2017?
06:47 PM on 02/28/2013
Have you ever heard that in modern Iceland there is no democracy? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/President_of_Iceland
I don't think that the time spend by a leader in presidency is necessarily correlated to lack of democracy.
The elected president in Iceland has already more than 15 years in power.
09:33 PM on 02/28/2013
Correa has never silenced any journalist, there is not even one case of a journalist in jail, the only journalist considered persecuted, is because he published an editorial acusing him of ordering military to attack civilians, which was false and then Correa demanded him for defamation, and the journalist was found guilty and even then Correa forgave him and the newspaper from paying anything.
In fact all the private media in the country is against him, they publish all kind of news articles and editorials saying horrible things about him and everyone related to the goverment, any law or initiative proposed is highly criticised by the private media, whose owners are the richest families in the country.
Believe me all TV productions are made to explain the people what are the politicians talking about, every saturday he dedicates time to explain what is the government doing, giving Phd. economics classes to all the people and expressing his opinion about critics.
The decree to control the prices is a way to help the local farmers to know what is the price that they should be selling their products, but even though the local farmers are not obligated to follow those prices. And this initiative was used by many other right wing governments in Ecuador and it was never criticised.
08:23 PM on 02/26/2013
Although everything is true, it is just a part of it. The article does not mention the total dependency of Ecuador's economy to oil revenues, if at any point the oil prices go below US 80 the economy would probably collapse. His policies have not bin directed to correct this dependancy. The Constitution is now being challenged by the same President who wishes to push back its guarantees and gain more power. The Yassuni initiative is almost dead, and the rights given to nature are comfortable in paper but not in reality. The country is relying in new discovered mining resources in order to finance populist policies that would assure his continuity in power.
09:54 PM on 02/28/2013
Well in my country the income from oil revenues represents 32% of the total income, and the stadistic is decreasing since 3 years ago, it was even higher with the right wing governments. His policies have been directed to correct this dependancy with succesful results. The constitution is being challenged to regulate private media and prevent the bankers and politics to own any kind of media, it is also being challenged to give more rights to the working class and reduce the poverty a lot faster by taking out some privileges to the bankers and great corporations. The Yasunie initiative just received 34.5 millions of euros from Germany last week, and long before that 2 great laboratories are being constructed near yasuni to investigate its wildlife, the project is far from being dead. The country now have a completely renewed transport system, a huge hydroelectric plant is about to be finished, along an international electric network, that will make the country an electric provider for the countries in the region. Also the new governement objetives are to boost the diversification of the production.

It is amazing how now a lot of people from all over the world is looking at my country, whether to criticise or to applaud its president, its really incredible, because I can swear that 10 years ago, most of them did not even know that Ecuador existed.
02:46 AM on 03/01/2013
The changes in Ecuador are already a fact, specially for less opportunity people. The change in the production matrix is based in the knowledge. Since Correa is in the power, almost 5000 students have had the opportunity to study in the best universities of the world with full scholarships where as the last 5 governments only gave 300 scholarships. All these people when come back will be the base of the knowledge change which is needed in Ecuador. On the other hand, Ecuador is developing a huge challeging project calle YACHAY. This project will be a big research center where currently a lot of people and countries are supporting with money or human resources as scientists. You mentioned the oil prices, but if we had continued with the oil´s contracts where the international private or public companies took all the money and for the Ecuador´s government give only the scraps, we currently do not have the development indicators.
08:12 PM on 02/26/2013
I am from Ecuador and the things that are circulating on the internet about the president Rafael Correa, are not all of them truth. His popularity is not because he is doing things right, I wish the president of my country could be one as JOSE MUJICA from Uruguay. He is really an example of an honest guy, that even being the president of his nation, he is the simplest man you can find there. The popularity of Rafael Correa is because he had a good strategy along his political participations. He knew the weaknesses of all the political parties here in Ecuador; and the best of all, he knew and applied the Roman concept of DIVIDE ET IMPERA, divide and you will conquer. He is like Hugo Chavez, he thinks that some ecuadorians are good and some ecuadorians are bad. Basically, the good ones are the poor, and the bad ones are the rich ones (not all rich people are bad as well as not all poor people are good). With this kind of idea you cannot build a society, at least one that can last. In his government, I can tell you that some things improve a lot, but this is because he knows that he has to do this kind of things in order to maintain his power and his position as president. Still, there is a lot of corruption in Ecuador.
09:20 PM on 02/26/2013
You have a emotional reaction. It is very normal in Latin america.
04:15 PM on 02/28/2013
Stereotyping Latin Americans as over-reacting emotionally whilst giving no opinion or counterargument yourself?
You fail much worse than Rodrigo.
06:28 PM on 02/28/2013
I think that summarizing Correa's speech and thoughts to terms of good a bad citizens, and use the useless 'argument' that he is like Chavez is a way to oversimplified (at childish levels) what Correa is condemning. When he speaks about 'rich' people he is not referring to any or all rich people, he actually is talking about the 'elite' that was clearly eluding taxes, exploiting workers (without receiving social security benefits), violating the law, etc. Again, the analysis has to be done in the context of the country.
08:50 PM on 02/19/2013
great to hear about a part of the world where life is getting for most of the people. And their politics is not a coincidence!
photo
novelist2000
veritas non olet
03:35 AM on 02/19/2013
Interesting. And apparently he studied economics in the US and Belgium, but has drawn different conclusions from what was/is taught there.

With fascination I observe how Latin America is moving forward and leaves their 57 varieties of mess behind.