It's one of the great ironies of history that the last line of defence for the greatest empire the world has ever known proved to be the Patagonian Toothfish. It's an ugly and endangered denizen of the South Atlantic that the British government relied on, in vain as it turned out, to protect our imperial reputation.
Faced with the prospect of being sued over atrocities said to have been committed in the last days of Empire, the Foreign Office turned to an obscure judgement over fishing licences around the island of South Georgia, to try to prove that responsibility for the acts of colonial governments passed to the new government at independence, rather than staying with the former Imperial power. It was shameful and the judge rightly threw it out.
So, three frail and elderly Kenyans appeared this week in the High Court, with Britain's colonial reputation on trial.
They claim to have been tortured - one says he was castrated - during the campaign against the Mau Mau rebellion in the 1950s.
The Mau Mau, it must be said, were vile. After swearing to magical oaths, they butchered children, they tortured, mutilated and murdered - mostly Africans - who would not join their movement. The Kenyan government now calls them heroes, and has a national day in October to honour them, which is a despicable re-writing of history.
But the British response to the uprising was also brutal, driven by the atavistic fears of the settlers in the so-called White Highlands, commonly regarded as the most snobbish and racist in the Empire.
Tens of thousands of Kenyans were sent to detention camps where many were subjected to torture and extreme violence. Much of this seems to have been covered up. The (Kenyan) Attorney General at the time minuted: "If we're going to sin, we must sin quietly".
Even now, the Foreign Office is trying to stop the case, arguing it happened so long ago there isn't the evidence, or surviving witnesses, for a fair trial.
Unfortunately for them, truckloads of official documents from that era have recently been uncovered. (They had been secretly stored in a government-owned manor house near Milton Keynes.)
Historians who've seen some of them say they detail systematic abuses that seem to have been known, and tacitly approved, at the highest level in London.
As a child of empire, and a long-time foreign correspondent in Africa, my first instinct is to say - hang on a minute...this is a continent where two million people have been murdered by their own governments since Independence. A continent where colonialism, for all the faults we see so clearly now, was often a brief interval of peace and efficient government, between long periods of cruel and incompetent dictatorship. Where many Africans are still actually worse off than their parents and grandparents who lived under British rule. Kenya, in particular, is one of the most corrupt countries on earth with more to worry about than a 60-year-old dirty war against murderous terrorists.
But this is moral relativism of the worst kind. We can't lecture others about human rights and try to escape responsibility for our abuse of them. It's wrong to be so ashamed of our imperial past. But it would be worse to deny justice to its innocent victims.
You can find more of my content at: The Fifth Column
Follow Michael Buerk on Twitter: www.twitter.com/TheFifthColumn
Christian Piatt: 'Christian Parenting' Ideas to Let Go Of
Mau Mau Uprising - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Mau-mau - Definition and More from the Free Merriam-Webster ...
Timeline of the Mau Mau Rebellion - African History - About.com
BBC News - Mau Mau uprising: Bloody history of Kenya conflict
BBC News - Mau Mau case: UK government accepts abuse took place
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Kitchen_Toto
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Kitchen_Toto
"Some accounts state that as many as 30 million people starved in Bengal province alone. bodies were piled high in streets. Just because some fat mill owners in Liverpool wanted to increase their profits...""
Taken from wikipedia:
The Bengal famine of 1943 (Bengali: পঞ্চাশের মন্বন্তর) struck the Bengal province of pre-partition India. Estimates are that between 1.5 and 4 million people died of starvation, malnutrition and disease..The proximate cause of the famine was a reduction in supply, with some increase in demand. The winter 1942 ‘aman’ rice crop which was already expected to be poor or indifferent was hit by a cyclone and three tidal waves in October. 450 square miles were swept by tidal waves, 400 square miles affected by floods and 3200 square miles damaged by wind and torrential rain. Reserve stocks in the hands of cultivators, consumers and dealers were destroyed. This killed 14,500 people and 190,000 cattle. A fungus hit the weakened crop and this was reported to have had an even greater effect on yield than the cyclone.It was argued that the normal carry over stocks did not exist in Bengal because 1941 was a short year and people started eating the December 1941 crop as soon as it was harvested (as they certainly did when the December 1943 crop was harvested). As a result, the good December 1941 crop did not mean the normal surplus stocks were carried over into 1943.
... on a side note, even today, people tend to believe the worst sort of rumours without bothering to check the facts....
anyway, my point was that, based on the rumours they believed true, the Indian population struck back at their hated rulers in any way they could. Same probably with the Mau Mau and every other conquered peoples.
Bottom line is, the Mau Mau and others of their ilk were in Kenya or their own native land, while the colonizers were not. The blame for any horrors therefore lies squarely on the outside occupiers. ( who after all, came for their own benefit, not some altruistic reason to help the "natives")
During that time was witness to thousands of the most horrific things in was possible for one human to inflict on another. Yes the British were sometimes brutal also when dealing with the aftermath. It's called War!
These are different times, what was done was because it was necessary for it to be done. Those same brutal acts are still being performed today, only the conquering forces are supposed to wear kid gloves when dealing with the perpetrators. Hardly true justice!
The Mau mau were victims , but their victims was simply a side note.
You know how Dresden was a war crime but the London Blitz wasn't
How the Armenian genocide wasn't but the much much lesser death toll since the birth of Israel is.
Only the other day some bloke on the Guardian wrote about how Srebrenica was all the fault of the British.
Gee, I don't mind you lot hating what you see in the mirror, but I draw the bloody line at you folks making me pay for things that happened before my parents came to live in the UK.
And, please don;t take this the wrong way, but I sure would like to know just how those "liberal apologists" are making you pay. Just curious...
It later transpired that the ammunition had actually been left behind by the Kenyan army and not the British. Which is why when the same person brought a case up against the British army for so called rapes committed against Kenyan women rather than paying out (As is the army way) they checked each and every case and guess what not one penny was paid out when it transpired Day was telling lies.
White people born in Africa are Africans, Just like the thousand's of Indians born in Africa but kicked out by the blacks for being richer than they.
'The life of a historical writer isn't easy. If they tell the truth, they provoke men. If they write what is false, they offend The Almighty'.
On reflection, our school history books merely recorded the butchery of men by their fellow men. Well, that's how it seems to me now at the extremity of old age when I read these old & tattered books - which I'm still loathe to dump.