Ed Miliband and Ed Balls recently attempted to make some headway on the key issue of economic growth by asserting that they may not be able to reverse Coalition cuts after 2015, whilst also promoting their five point plan for jobs and growth.
However, with the budget due in just over a month, on March 21st, a more effective tactic to gain economic credibility would be to propose a fully costed alternative. Here are 10 proposals for inclusion in an alternative:
1. Investing in the economy
Will Straw at IPPR has led calls for a British Investment Bank to be introduced to get the economy moving. Funding should be diverted to diversify and modernise the economy, focussing on key growth areas such as green energy, robotics, science and technology. £15 billion upfront with a further £4 billion annually would give it real teeth.
2. Cutting spending on war and nuclear weapons
Greenpeace estimates that renewing the Trident nuclear weapons programme could cost as much as £97 billion over 30 years, including upfront procurement costs of potentially £15-20 billion. This should be scrapped. In total, the Institute of Economic Affairs believes the defence budget can be cut by £17 billion per year.
3. Putting more money in people's pockets
The Citizen's Income Trust advocates paying everyone an unconditional 'Citizens Income', which would provide greater financial security and save around £10 billion per year. Increasing the Personal Allowance to £12,000 per year would put an extra £800 in the pockets of working people and the Adam Smith Institute believes that this will cost an extra £15 billion. The potentially cost-neutral move to a lower rate of VAT is part of Labour's five point plan, and this will increase economic activity as well as helping the lowest paid, who spend a higher proportion of their wages.
4. Making the tax system more transparent
Income tax and National Insurance should be merged, which the TaxPayers Alliance believes could save businesses administrative costs of £450 million. Any change to these must be carefully managed to ensure fairness. Income tax returns should become public documents, creating much greater insight into how the very wealthy manage their finances to evade and avoid paying their fair share.
5. Promoting responsible business practices
Spending £3 billion per year encouraging socially responsible organisations, such as energy co-operatives and childcare mutuals, can bring economic and social benefits. Introducing shared maternity-paternity leave would be an important step towards greater equality, and would cost around £30 million. Tax breaks could be offered to organisations like the Charity Bank who pay their lowest earners a minimum percentage of what the highest paid employee receives, as this produces knock on societal benefits.
6. Tackling fraud and undesirable business practices
The Tax Justice Network estimates that tax evasion costs £109 billion per year. If tougher penalties were introduced, which led to a modest reduction (of perhaps 3 per cent), this would result in £3 billion being saved in the first year. Higher fines for anti-competitive practices should be introduced, and the Office of Fair Trading is currently pursuing an increase in this to 30 per cent of total revenues. Taxpayer subsidies worth £88 million to private schools should also be scrapped. Internationally, the viability of introducing a worldwide financial transaction tax (Robin Hood Tax) and a unitary business tax should be actively sought.
7. Creating more apprenticeships for young people
Ed Miliband has advocated awarding government contracts to firms offering apprenticeships, which could make a substantial difference given that state spending represents around half of UK GDP. Introducing this policy wouldn't cost the public purse anything.
8. Initiating a major house-building programme
There are about four million people on housing waiting lists. Spending £10 billion on a major house building programme would help reduce this, whilst also creating jobs and investing in infrastructure. Ministry of Defence land could be used to build many of the homes on. Potentially, current social housing tenants could then either rent or buy these new homes for cost price (not market value), freeing up their existing housing for others in need.
9. Focussing on untaxed wealth
Housing bubbles in recent times have resulted in mountains of untaxed wealth. The long discussed Mansion Tax should be introduced on homes worth more than £2 million to reclaim some of this. The Institute for Fiscal Studies believes that this can raise £1.7 billion per year. The viability of a land value tax should be pursued and implemented if it is found that this could fairly take over from existing property taxes.
10. Incentivising responsible behaviour
Introducing an alcohol unit tax in England could bring in an additional £700 million, as well as reducing health costs and inequalities. Cleaning up chewing gum costs in the region of £150 million per year and MPs have called for a levy, which at 10p per piece could raise £100 million. The economic and social merits of personalised carbon credits and the regulation of illegal substances should be thoroughly analysed.
The proposals are cost neutral, with the upfront £15 billion of a British Investment Bank offset by the saving in upfront procurement costs from scrapping the Trident nuclear programme. The remaining amounts are annual, with just under £33 billion brought in, largely from savings in the defence budget and by introducing the Citizens Income. Around £32 billion would be spent largely on increasing the Personal Allowance and building thousands of new homes.
By setting out in detail new tax and spending policies, this will enhance the public's perception of the economic competence of the Labour top team. Ed Miliband has seen an upturn in fortunes recently and the budget represents an opportunity to put down a real marker.
Follow Mike Morgan-Giles on Twitter: www.twitter.com/mgonthemike
Iain Anderson: One Nation Ed - Has He Grabbed it Away From the Tories Forever?
Labour economics - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
LABOUR: Review of Labour Economics and Industrial Relations ...
Politics Weekly podcast: Labour's economic alternative | Politics ...
However, a History Lesson.
1992. Yes, I know that it was well before New Labour, and even whatever it is Call-Me-Ed is calling your party these days (NotNulabAnymore or something ? Or is it The BandWagonners ?)
It wasn't Kinnochio and The Sheffield Rally that cost your party that Election.
It was John Smith and "The Shadow Budget".
Call-Me-Dave was clever enough not to go down that route. Did not leave himself and Osbourne subject to being hoist on their own petard. Sensibly (for Tories) said " Lets wait and see just how deep the cack that Labour are leaving us in is".
Shadow Budget away all you want. Its meaningless words, meaningless promises, may sound groovy, funky, buzzy.
Meaningless until Labour is in power. Don't be holding your breath.
............................................ Top1% ..................... Bottom50% ......................... Top50to25%
individualsIncomes .... $380,354 &over ........... under $ 33,084 ............. from $33,048 to $67,280
GroupsAGIinMillions .... $1,685,472 ............... $1,074,514 .......................... $1,673,932
GroupsTaxPaid ............. $392,149 .................... $27,873 .............................. $113,025 millioms
Tax/AGI=RatePaid .......... 23.27% ...................... 2.594% ................................... 6.75%
TimesTaxLargerThan50%s .. 14.07 times larger ...... = so is 0 .......................... 4.05 times larger
TimesIncomeLargerThan50%s .1.5686timesOr56.86% higher ..= ..1.5579timesOr55.79%higher
DollarsTaxPaid %higher 1,307%higher .................. = ......................................... 305%higher
TaxRatePaid is?TimesLarger than Bottom50%'s TaxRate or whatPercentHigher?
... Answer8.969times larger or797%higherRate ..... = .. 2.602timesLarger or 160.2%higherRate
Note: Top1%'sTaxPaid is3.4696times larger thanTop50to25%'sTaxPaid or246.96%higher while effectiveTaxrate Top1%pays23.27% is 3.477times more or244.7%higher than Top50to25%'s rate paid of6.75%. Top1%'sincome is only1.00689timesMoreThan or just0.689%higherThan Top50to25%'sIncome. What is not fare whenRichTop1%pay3.4696times more income tax than theMiddleClassMembers in theTop50to25%'s incomesWhenTheirIncome isLessThan7tenths of1percentHigher?
PresidentObama's 30% is11.565times moreThan, or1,056.5%higher thanBottom50%'s 2.594%taxratePaid. MathShows President claims11.565timesHigherTaxRate is what's fair when income is only1.5686times higher. OrWhen yourIncome isLessThan57%higher payingTaxes atRateOver1thousand pecentHigher isFair, justUnder800percent higher isn'tFare. If nextPayCheck IncreasedBy57%&IncreaseAmount withheld for IncomeTax by over1,000% (over11.5more dollars withheld),than no one would view that asFAIR.
President's claim "the Rich don't pay their fair share!" is divorced from allFACTS &allFUNDAMENTAL HONESTY!
Source: http://www.irs.gov/taxstats/indtaxstats/article/0,,id=96679,00.html
See: 08in05tr.xls click first '1986-2008' for document
Let me share what the form you "plan" needs to take;
We must raise the top income tax rates to 50% over a million, 90% over a billion. Ike had higher rates.
We must close the fed, by issuing greenbacks and phasing out fractional reserve. Watch "the money masters"
The bankster extorted 26T$ from the FED, this must be returned and the bankster prosecuted for the great fraud in human history. Restore Glass-Steagall and charge a transaction fee to kill derivatives.
End the wars, cut the military costs by 90% so we are just the largest military in the world.
Cut all the subsidies to fossils and nukes. Nukes get 500M$ per reactor per year and coal gets more, plus wars for oil. This is wrong.
Plow all that and more into rooftop solar, offshore wind, underwater turbines, efficiency and waste bio char bio fuels.
That's 24/7, forever, clean safe, cheaper than nukes, carbon land and water negative.
Restore free education and any required room and board for all citizens. With automation and tech, no one needs go hungry homeless, or without access to education. Sweden, Germany and Holland are example we must learn from.
Outlaw all contributions ans the bribery they are, publicly finance elections with free equal prime time for everyone on the ballot.
1. when thinking about raising tax, always take into consideration the fact that behaviour change in response to the tax, meaning that no tax raises as much as anticipated
2. while, conceptually, I like the mansion tax, it is quite disconcerting to call for government to "tax the bubble", while the role of a government should be to avoid the formation of bubbles...
the rest is too small to make any difference anyway.