Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Peter G Tatchell

GET UPDATES FROM Peter G Tatchell
 

Commonwealth Chief Condemns Homophobia But Where's the Action?

Posted: 05/03/2012 00:00

Commonwealth secretary general, Kamalesh Sharma, speaking to the UN Human Rights Council in Geneva, has reiterated that homophobia is incompatible with Commonwealth values. He condemned sexual orientation "discrimination or stigmatisation."

Mr Sharma's said: "The Commonwealth is a leader in adding to global value through this collective striving for human rights. The Affirmation introduced a shared commitment on human rights '...for all without discrimination on any grounds...'

"Discrimination on the grounds of sexual orientation is an area of concern on which we have given the perspective of Commonwealth values in various fora, including in this Council.

"Our position continues to be that we oppose discrimination or stigmatisation on any grounds, including those of sexual orientation. It is for member states to address incompatibilities between Commonwealth values and mostly inherited national laws in these areas."

These words send a signal from the Commonwealth leadership that victimisation on the grounds of sexuality is unacceptable. It's good to hear this commitment to lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender (LGBT) human rights voiced at the UN.

I lobbied the secretary general in advance of his UN speech, urging him to speak out in support of LGBT human rights. Mr Sharma did not fail us. This is the fourth time he has condemned homophobia in the last year. In May 2011, he became the first Commonwealth Secretary General to publicly criticise sexual orientation discrimination. Bravo!

That's the positive upside. What about the downside?

Compared to the extensive, hard-hitting statements on LGBT human rights made by other international leaders, such as Hillary Clinton and the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights, Navi Pillay, Mr Sharma's criticisms of homophobia were very brief and general. He did not rebuke the more than 40 Commonwealth countries that continue to persecute LGBT people. His speech made no mention of transphobia and the need for protection against discrimination based on gender identity.

Most seriously, the Secretary General seemed to be taking a hands-off attitude towards member states that persecute LGBT people; suggesting that it should be left to the persecutors to stop their persecution. This is hardly satisfactory.

Pressure from the Commonwealth leadership needs to be exerted on the homophobic regimes in member nations such as Uganda, Zimbabwe, Malawi, Nigeria and Cameroon. A bit of naming and shaming might help; as would Commonwealth support for the courageous activists and organisations in these countries that defend LGBT human rights. Being a citizen of the global south (India), Mr Sharma is well placed to do this, without facing accusations of western diktat or interference.

His cautious approach is not justified. None of his previous statements against homophobia provoked a backlash. This ought to give the secretary general encouragement to be bolder in his support for beleaguered LGBT communities.

At last year's Commonwealth Summit in Perth, Australia, the Commonwealth Ministerial Action Group (CMAG) was tasked with tackling persistent human rights abuses by member states. There is no doubt that persistent homophobic abuses are happening in more than 40 Commonwealth countries. Yet, so far, CMAG has given no indication that it intends to act in defence of LGBT human rights.

Of the 54 Commonwealth nations, most are former British colonies and 80% have retained the draconian colonial-era homophobic laws that criminalise homosexuality.

The penalties for same-sex relations include 25 years jail in Trinidad and Tobago and 20 years plus flogging in Malaysia. Six Commonwealth countries stipulate life imprisonment: Sierra Leone, Tanzania, Pakistan, Uganda, Bangladesh and Guyana. In parts of Nigeria and Pakistan, same-sex relationships can be punishable by death.

Commonwealth states account for more than half of the countries in the world that still outlaw homosexuality. This defies the Commonwealth's ostensible commitment to equality and human rights.

Together with groups like Justice for Gay Africans and the Kaleidoscope Trust, the Peter Tatchell Foundation is campaigning against all human rights violations in Commonwealth countries, including homophobia and transphobia. We are working to secure adherence to universal human rights by the 54 member states.

Too many Commonwealth countries not only violate LGBT human rights. They also sanction state executions, censorship, torture, detention without trial and restrictions on free speech and the right to protest - as well as officially-endorsed discrimination based on ethnicity, gender, sexuality and religion or belief.

This has to change. Commonwealth countries have a duty to adhere to Commonwealth values and abide by the international human rights laws they have signed and pledged to uphold.

* Peter Tatchell is the Director of the Peter Tatchell Foundation. More information here:

http://petertatchellfoundation.org

 
FOLLOW UK
 
 
  • Comments
  • 18
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
GingerlyColors
No will to change it, no right to criticize it
13:08 on 11/03/2012
Like the European Union and the Council of Europe membership of the Commonwealth of Nations should be dependant on upholding basic human rights including the removal of threat of arrest and prosecution for homosexuality. Countries which criminalize homosexuality on pain of death should immediately commute the sentences for anybody awaiting execution for homosexuality or face immediate expulsion from the Commonwealth. Other countries that outlaw gay sex should be given five years to repeal their laws or face expulsion too.
Glasgow will be hosting the 2014 Commonwealth Games. This will give countries two years to repeal or at least make a serious effort to do so, such laws or expect not to participate in the Games. Remember how South Africa was out in the wilderness for decades because of Apartheid?
Of the 54 Commonwealth countries only 12 do not criminalize gays. Should the status quo remain then sadly the Commonwealth end up going the same way as the British Empire which preceeded it but such a move will be an evil necessity.
17:10 on 06/03/2012
Seems to me that the one person to really strike home this message is HM The Queen.
photo
PeterTatchell
Human rights campaigner
00:18 on 06/03/2012
Kamalesh Sharma has done more than any other Commonwealth Secretary General to promote LGBT rights and oppose homophobic persecution. But he could do more - and I hope he will. The Foreign Ministers of all Commonwealth countries have a collective responsibility to do more too. William Hague should be making a bigger effort to encourage unified Commonwealth action against all human rights abusing member states.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
GingerlyColors
No will to change it, no right to criticize it
13:16 on 11/03/2012
It is sad that some Commonwealth countries, most notoriously Uganda, are tightening up their homophobic laws. It also seems sad that many of those laws are a hangover from when Britain imposed such legislation on those countries in the 19th Century. I note that the only Commomwealth countries in central and south America, Beleize and Guyana are also the only places on mainland America to criminalize gays. As for Jamaica, Portia Simpson, their new Prime Minister said that she may review their laws which makes Jamaica the most homophobic country in the Western Hemisphere (except Mauritania where they still have the death penelty although there has been no executions for over 20 years).
photo
skipptown
Olives take up too much room in such a little glas
20:22 on 05/03/2012
In the cases of five British Territorial Caribbean nations, Turks and Caicos, Anguilla, the Caymans, Montserrat and the British Virgin Islands, for years those nations' legislatures had stubbornly refused to change their laws relating to same-sex behaviour, which included punishment by death; however, a British Order in Council did finally nullify them at the start of the new millennium. A decade later, gay citizens in every Commonwealth country deserve the same respect for humanity and commitment to action.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Thismortalcoil
Science is the poetry of reality
20:16 on 05/03/2012
The fact that these countries have signed and pledged to uphold international human rights laws surely gives Sharma grounds to name and shame the countries who are committing the worst violations.
jhNY
Mercy.
18:12 on 05/03/2012
Sad really, when a bunch of the folks under rule of The Empire actually take the trouble to internalize what's been helpfully supplied them by the religious arm, and don't have the good sense to reject it when the home country abandons its old beliefs.
16:54 on 05/03/2012
thank god that we have such a dedicated person as peter in this country, someone who works non stop to call attention to injustice and appaling attitude in this and other countries. thank you so very much mr.tatchell
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
11:39 on 05/03/2012
"Commonwealth states account for more than half of the countries in the world that still outlaw homosexuality."

I was so shocked when I hit that sentence. Shocked and embarrassed. Why didn't I know this?

Such laws would block a country's accession to the European Union, but would not get a country kicked out of the British Commonwealth? Utterly shameful.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Kevin Mcilroy
13:41 on 05/03/2012
While it is wrong that these laws remain on the statute books of the countries in question I think kicking them out of the Commonwealth would not do any good - at least while they are in the Commonwealth the majority can try to convince them of the error of their ways..... remember it isn't that long ago that homosexuality was illegal in this country
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
13:46 on 05/03/2012
Homosexuality has been legal in this country (despite inequality) for five years short of half a century. So how long must we wait before insisting that other commonwealth countries follow the same path? 75 years? 100?