Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Rachel Reeves

GET UPDATES FROM Rachel Reeves
 

George Osborne Should Use This Budget to Correct His Mistakes

Posted: 20/03/2012 23:00

Ed Miliband, Ed Balls and I have set two tests for George Osborne's budget today. First, will it get our economy moving - delivering the jobs and growth we need to get the deficit down? And second, will it be fair to families on low and middle incomes now bearing the heaviest burden of Osborne's spending cuts and tax rises?

We need a plan for jobs and growth because the Chancellor's decision to cut too far and too fast has backfired. The government's complacency about the ability of the private sector to fill the gaping void left by public sector cuts has meant a flatlining economy and opportunities for recovery squandered.

Stalling growth and rising unemployment means weaker tax receipts and a growing benefits bill - so Osborne is now on course to borrow £158 billion more than he said he would, meaning more tax rises and spending cuts, and extending his deficit reduction timetable two years into the next parliament.

And far from ensuring that the costs of his economic failure are borne by those with the broadest shoulders, Osborne has loaded the heaviest burden onto working families with children, with those on middle and low incomes suffering the most. The squeeze is set to continue this year - analysis by the Institute for Fiscal Studies (IFS) shows that families with children will be, on average, £530 worse off as a result of changes due to come into force next month.

George Osborne should use this Budget to correct his mistakes and rectify these injustices.

To help hard-pressed households and get our economy moving again, we favour a temporary VAT cut, which would be worth £450 to the average family with children at the same time as cancelling the effect of the increase in fuel duty planned for August this year. Increasing the personal tax allowance would be better than doing nothing - but as the IFS confirmed last week, this wouldn't help pensioners or those on the lowest incomes.

We'd also bring forward new infrastructure investment, which could create jobs now, boost the beleaguered construction industry, as well as laying the foundations for our economic future. But the steps taken so far by government to get work on these vital projects underway amount to far too little, far too late.

Other measures to boost jobs and growth include a further cut in VAT to 5% on home repairs, improvements and maintenance and a national insurance holiday for small firms taking on extra workers. And with bank bonuses still high we should repeat Labour's bank bonus tax to fund the building of 25,000 new affordable homes and the creation of 100,000 new jobs for young people.

While a plan for jobs is vital to get the deficit down, so are tough choices on tax, spending and pay. We can't duck that reality. But that means our values and priorities matter all the more. We want the Chancellor to do more to help families currently bearing an unfair share of the burden.

So we say he should reverse cuts to tax credits next month, and cancel planned changes to rules on working hours that would leave some low paid couples with children better off quitting work. These changes could be paid for by a clampdown on the avoidance of stamp duty on properties worth over £1 million, and by reversing a pension tax relief boost the Chancellor has given to people on incomes of more than £150,000.

We are also calling for an urgent rethink of changes to child benefit due to come in next January that would mean a single mum, or family where mum or dad stays at home, on £43,000 would lose all their child benefit, while a dual earner household on £84,000 could keep all of theirs.

We've said we'll support the Chancellor on a mansion tax if its purpose is to ease the squeeze on low and middle incomes. And we have been consistent in calling for tougher action to reduce tax evasion and avoidance. But a tax cut for the top 1% on incomes of £150,000 a year cannot be the priority when small businesses are struggling, living standards for the majority are falling, and the number of young people unemployed is still rising.

In tough times like these we need to prioritise jobs, growth, and fairness for families - those are Labour's priorities, and I believe they are also the priorities of the British people.

 

Follow Rachel Reeves on Twitter: www.twitter.com/rachelreevesmp

Ed Miliband, Ed Balls and I have set two tests for George Osborne's budget today. First, will it get our economy moving - delivering the jobs and growth we need to get the deficit down? And second, wi...
Ed Miliband, Ed Balls and I have set two tests for George Osborne's budget today. First, will it get our economy moving - delivering the jobs and growth we need to get the deficit down? And second, wi...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 22
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
08:14 PM on 03/22/2012
Ed Balls, -clown has no plan on the UK economy. Ed Balls, -clown is treating people like fools. Thanks to Ed Miliband , Yvette Cooper and Ed Balls, the hardworking people are still getting poorer. ‘’Thanks to Yvette Cooper and Ed Balls,- clown, UK economy, is increasingly unfair not just for those at the bottom but for many of those in the middle as well." Yvette Cooper and Ed Balls, the mess they have got us into.
05:08 PM on 03/21/2012
Rachel Reeves has a bloody nerve! She's clearly (and conveniently) forgotten that it was her party that got the country into the mess that Osborne is now trying to clear up.
09:32 PM on 03/21/2012
Spot on, Marben!

Labour Party members these days haven't read their George Orwell and assume we know nothing about Doublespeak.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ccraiglamont
Sometimes funny, other times...not!
02:48 PM on 03/21/2012
Osborne should use this budget to correct his mistakes???????????? Really Rachel, he has to use his Budgets to correct YOUR parties mistakes!
09:32 PM on 03/21/2012
Spot on!

It's nice to see the Labour Thought-Police haven't got to everyone yet!
08:16 PM on 03/22/2012
‘’No wonder Labour left the nation's finances in such a mess when Yvette Cooper and Ed Balls,- clown, put party political plotting above the national interest."Yvette Cooper and Ed Balls, they tried destroyed the UK economy.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
famullar
12:34 PM on 03/21/2012
Obviously taxation is a contentious issue. governments have been terrified of making any radical decisions because of the debacle of the poll tax two decades ago. Margaret Thatcher's premiership was destroyed because this tax was widely perceived as being unfair, leading to riots and widespread non-payment. As a result whenever anyone suggests a far-reaching shake up to the tax system, governments find every reason under the sun not to attempt it.as they're always happy to attempt new and untried policies when it comes to other areas of British life, such as the NHS and the welfare state. Without radical thinking, we wouldn't have either of those two institutions. Adam Smith in his general principles of taxation laid out several questions that every government should ask themselves before drawing up a budget. Is the tax fair? Can it be collected regularly? In the last few years a range of new ideas have been suggested including the Robin Hood tax, the mansion tax, abolishing VAT, the land tax and several dozen others. I'm not saying that any of these are necessarily the solution to our problems, just that governments without proper study too often dismiss them out of hand, simply because they're radical and radical equals bad. If we have to pay tax, then let's have tax policy based on reasoned argument and evidence rather than assumptions and dogma When is the end, we have no idea it just does not work I thank you Firozali A.Mulla DBA
lastpost
see biography
12:19 PM on 03/21/2012
"George Osborne Should Use This Budget To Correct His Mistakes."
Any group that squanders potential NHS funds sending out un-requested information to tax payers. When a simple slider screen on the interweb could do the job for practically nothing. Is beyond all hope. What’s needed is not answers to the questions they want to provide. But answers to those questions the people want to ask. Through a transparency site. Where 'why are you wasting our taxes on this or that' could be revealed. Even if never responded to.

"I believe they are also the priorities of the British people."
But we’ll never really know. Because republics got out in the guise of democracies, don’t actually function like that.
08:16 PM on 03/22/2012
Ed Balls is nonsense. Labour, under Yvette Cooper and Ed Balls, overspending left the UK with the largest structural deficit in the G20.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ccraiglamont
Sometimes funny, other times...not!
12:17 PM on 03/21/2012
Rachel, perhaps you could tell us how you contributed to the collapse of the nations finances when Labour were in power for over a decade? Tell us how you created an electorate of Public service workers, benefit scroungers and the likes? Maybe you could tell us why you created a culture whereupon unemployment paid more than working? Or.... how we were dragged into wars in Iraq and Afghanistan at HUGE cost to the public finances?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
OH72
03:16 PM on 03/21/2012
Oh dear. You truly believe that the Tories wouldn't have toppled over themselves making sure the whole of the British armed forces arrive in Iraq before the first GI sets sight on that land? That you have little more than the usual slander about benefit scroungers (ever heard of the concept of statistical significance? No? Thought so) speaks volumes.

But probably you take great pride in selling your country to the highest bidder. Problem is: When they move on to greener pastures, there'll be no one left to drag you out of the gutter.
12:00 PM on 03/21/2012
I don't know who is making these statements but I’m just wondering where were they till now. We the poor people need you to start some sort of protest to stop these morons in government. This is a very small handful the minority of people, telling the majority of people, the very people who has to pay for the mistakes made by this government the banks and developers. By that I mean it's the working person whose money is being used to heat the place where these gobs go to eat, debate, ect. Can you imagine how much it takes to heat No 10, the house of commons, the offices where those who come up with stupid ideas work, plus all other places the government and their agents for example council offices, do their dirty deeds from.
So I must say to the person who wrote this story or quoted someone else, they have a great deal of common sense, and knows what side their bread is buttered on.
The following statement/paragraph is so well put/wrote; it speaks for so many peoples plight today.
Osborne has loaded the heaviest burden onto working families with children, with those on middle and low incomes suffering the most. The squeeze is set to continue this year - analysis by the Institute for Fiscal Studies (IFS) shows that families with children will be, on average, £530 worse off as a result of changes due to come into force next month.
11:47 AM on 03/21/2012
"George Osborne Should Use This Budget to Correct His Mistakes"


Amazing headline from Labour ? What a laugh. Poor old George Osborne is still having to contend with correcting all the mistakes of his predecessors, Darling and Brown, and their advisers at the time, Miliband, Balls and Co.
11:32 AM on 03/21/2012
Ed Miliband, Ed Balls and I have set two tests for George Osborne's budget today. First, will it get our economy moving - delivering the jobs and growth we need to get the deficit down?
And second, will it be fair to families on low and middle incomes now bearing the heaviest burden of Osborne's spending cuts and tax rises?
Do you believe in Miracles if so then this government will never deliver? The above statement is made by either a poor person, or by someone who may have money, but has tons of common sense.
Now I don't know if the paragraph is from Rachel Reeves who seems to write the story perhaps? Or maybe she is quoting from someone else who knows what hard times are.
Nevertheless as I said the statement couldn't be truer, especially the second paragraph/question.
I must say someone knows and feels for those of us who fall into the second paragraph/question. Thanks to whomever it is who is, that is thinking along them lines.
There is a child in our house who is just 3 months old, and it’s disgraceful that the child has to live without heating as we cannot afford it, and I’m sure I’m speaking for 1.000s of people here.
12:06 PM on 03/21/2012
Unfortunately the last government spent and spent money it didn't have. So we have massive debt that is still costing you and me millions of pounds in daily interest charges. (And yes, the article is clearly written by Labour politicians many of whom had 13 years in power to do all the things they now say should be done !) You only have to look at Greece, and Portugal and Italy and Spain to see what happens if you don't drastically reduce that debt fast. You end up with even greater debt and get to a point when no-one will lend you any money at all. That's why it's tough..
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
12:35 AM on 03/22/2012
The last government under the leadership of Tony Blair continued the policies of the previous Tory government and that is why we are in this massive debt. As for the myth that we've had a Labour party for the last 13 years, don't make me laugh(Blair aka the Joker) was a Tory pretending to be a socialist and destroyed the values of the real labour party. It's 30 years of Tory rule that's got us to this point, destroying a civilized society, but that's what happens when trash with cash rule the ROOST?
10:27 AM on 03/21/2012
Wow! Economic advice from the Labour Party, the government that took us from a stable bouyant economy to the worst crisis in modern times...
11:43 AM on 03/21/2012
And had 13 years in power to be able to have done all the things that they now say should be done !
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
OH72
03:23 PM on 03/21/2012
Hilarious. Remind us again who publicly declared decades ago that selling the country's infrastructure off was sound economic advice. But yes, probably those who saw for it that what's left of British manufacturing is foreign-owned are highly qualified to grandstand and lecture about economy, as if their own buddies in the City, NOT Labour were the ones who brought about the financial crisis.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
11:06 PM on 03/22/2012
Spot on, and the City rogues have had 30 years to destroy what was once a civilized socialist infrastructure(ever since 1979 when Thatcher the Snatcher) stole the milk from the primary school children just like the pigs in Orwell's Animal Farm. New Labour were actually New Tory in disguise, that's after all why there was no distinction between their policies, as every real labour supporter knows in Britain?