"A lie gets halfway around the world before the truth has a chance to get its pants on"
- Winston Churchill
As a Conservative I have no pleasure in exposing David Cameron's deficit claims. However, as long as the party continues to talk down the economy via the blame game, confidence will not be given an opportunity to return. For it is an undeniable and inescapable economic fact: without confidence and certainty there can be no real growth.
Below are the three deficit claims - the mess. The evidence comes from the IMF, OECD, OBR, HM Treasury, ONS and even George Osborne. The claims put into context are:
CLAIM 1
The last government left the biggest debt in the developed world.
After continuously stating the UK had the biggest debt in the world George Osborne admits to the Treasury Select Committee that he did not know the UK had the lowest debt in the G7? Watch: Also, confirmed by the OECD Those who use cash terms (instead of percentages) do so to scare, mislead and give half the story.
Its common sense, in cash terms a millionaire's debt would be greater than most people. Therefore, the UK would have a higher debt and deficit than most countries because, we are the sixth largest economy. Hence, its laughable to compare UK's debt and deficit with Tuvalu's who only have a GDP/Income of £24 million whilst, the UK's income is £1.7 Trillion.
Finally, Labour in 1997 inherited a debt of 42% of GDP. By the start of the global banking crises 2008 the debt had fallen to 35% - a near 22% reduction page 6 ONS Surprisingly, a debt of 42% was not seen as a major problem and yet at 35% the sky was falling down?
CLAIM 2
Labour created the biggest deficit in the developed world by overspending.
Firstly, the much banded about 2010 deficit of over 11% is false. This is the PSNB (total borrowings) and not the actual budget deficit which was -7.7% - OBR Economic and Fiscal Outlook March 2012 page 19 table 1.2
Secondly, in 1997 Labour inherited a deficit of 3.9% of GDP (not a balanced budget ) and by 2008 it had fallen to 2.1% - a reduction of a near 50% - Impressive! Hence, it's implausible and ludicrous to claim there was overspending. The deficit was then exacerbated by the global banking crises after 2008. See HM Treasury. Note, the 1994 deficit of near 8% haaaaaah!
Thirdly, the IMF have also concluded the same. They reveal the UK experienced an increase in the deficit as result of a large loss in output/GDP caused by the global banking crisis and not even as result of the bank bailouts, fiscal stimulus and bringing forward of capital spending. It's basic economics: when output falls the deficit increases.
Finally, the large loss in output occurred because the UK like the US have the biggest financial centres and as this was a global banking crises we suffered the most. Hence, the UK had the 2nd highest deficit in the G7 (Not The World) after the US and not as a result of overspending prior to and after 2008- as the IMF concur.
CLAIM 3
Our borrowing costs are low because the markets have confidence in George Osborne's austerity plan and without it the UK will end up like Greece.
Yes, the markets have confidence in our austerity plan and that's why PIMCO the worlds largest bond holder have been warning against buying UK debt.
The real reason why our borrowing costs have fallen and remained low since 2008 is because, savings have increased. As a result, the demand and price for bonds have increased and as there is inverse relationship between the price of bonds and its yield (interest rate) the rates have fallen. Also, the markets expect the economy to remain stagnate. Which means the price for bonds will remain high and hence, our borrowing costs will also remain low.
Secondly, the UK is considered a safe heaven because, investors are reassured the Bank of England will buy up bonds in an event of any sell off - which increases the price of bonds and reduces the effective rate. Note, how rates fell across the EU recently when the ECB announced its bond buying program. Thirdly, because, we are not in the Euro we can devalue our currency to increase exports. Moreover, UK bonds are attractive because, we haven't defaulted on its debt for over 300 years.
David Cameron would like people to believe the markets lend in the same way as retail banks lend to you and I.
Overall, when the facts and figures are put into context these juvenile deficit narratives and sound bites ("mere words and no evidence") simply fail to stand up to the actual facts. The deficit myth is the grosses lie ever enforced upon the people and it has been sold by exploiting people's economic illiteracy.
So, David Cameron when are you going to apologise?
Cameron is playing the blame game to depress confidence and growth to justify austerity. Secondly, to use austerity as justification for a smaller state to gain lower taxes. Thirdly, to paint Labour as a party that can not be trusted with the country's finances again. Therefore, we Conservatives will win a second term because, people vote out of fear. The latter strategy worked the last time in office (18 years) and will work again because, in the end, elections are won and lost on economic credibility. Hence, as people believe Labour created the mess they won't be trusted again.
Finally, as the truth is the greatest enemy of the a lie I urge you to share this on Facebook, Twitter, blogs, text and email etc etc. So the truth can be discovered by all. Finally, have no doubt, people have been mislead by the use of the following strategy:
"If you tell a lie big enough and keep repeating it, people will eventually come to believe it" Joseph Goebbels
Mehdi Hasan: Bad News for the Chancellor: The IMF Seems to Want a Plan B As Well
Sheila Lawlor: Frontier Economics - Which Country Will Have the Edge?
1. Why is debt a good thing (individual or country)? It's not in my mind. You noted correctly savings are going up as people (maybe out of lost confidence) finally start shoring up and thinking about their future in a more responsible fashion. This is a great result - no more living on credit and thinking someone else will foot the bill when you retire/go bankrupt. In my opinion, we can argue all day long about the size of the debt, the fact we have it at all is gross mismanagement for a country like ours.
2. Reducing the size of the State, and as a result the amount of Tax people pay. Perfect.
These are both laudible aims by David Cameron.
For businesses the main reason to embrace debt is that it increases the potential working capital you can invest. If you are confident you can take that £50k at 10% interest and invest it to make a 20% profit then as a business it is worth doing.
A country is the same in many ways as a business, money is borrowed to create an infrastructure that will allow commerce and business to flourish and thus promote quicker growth
Individuals can take the same outlook of course but more often than not debt to the individual is all about having something sooner and thus gaining from it in non-monetary ways.
The tories are in power to look after the rich 10% of this country,and the rest of us will have to pay for it.
Bennifit's will be cut,NHS will be sold bit by bit,pensioner,s will pay more tax,the rich will get more tax breaks etc.
Under thatcher the tories scrapped our heavey industry,now they are back to put the working class back in their place,under the soles of their shoes.
Details of how Gordon Brown overspent are here. http://www.thecommentator.com/article/1635/cheering_for_gordon_brown_
http://cyberboris.wordpress.com/2012/10/26/ed-balls-blatant-fibs-on-the-deficit-revealed-by-neil-and-the-speccie-truly-shocking/ Ed Balls was forced to admit his lies over the deficit on this link, Video of Ed and Andrew Neil. If you print this comment, will be surprised!
I note neither you nor Mehdi Hasan has any comment re. his awful fib about David Cameron's reasons for opposing press law on #daybreak. I told the programme how biased its political reporting was.
I deal with the GDP question in full through the second link i gave you - since Gordon Brown was not operating at a time of dire credit crunch, it is nothing short of scandalous that when he left office there was a structural deficit of £73 billion, immigration out of control, education ruined, foreign policy disastrous, PC correctness ludicrous, etc. Re. GDP. I quote:
"This was the coalition government’s inheritance courtesy of the Labour Party. British government debt was increasing at the rate of £420 million per day, or £5,000 per second, on its way to a projected figure of almost 80 percent of GDP, a figure not seen for fifty years as Britain paid off the costs of World War Two." GDP rose to nearly 80%!!!!
The blog I wrote refers to the structural deficit, I just didn't put structural in the headline, so that is the third thing you have got wrong.
Unluckily for you, i will probably write a blog exposing you and Mehdi Hasan,and widely publicise it. If anyone knows about misleading people it is you and Mehdi Hasan.
When Are You Going to Apologise?”
Be fair. He got it off the Interweb.
“before the truth has a chance to get its pants on"
potential discovery is coming up the stairs, on the trail of flagrant infidelity.
“As a Conservative I have no pleasure”
The first reported case of trickle up austerity.
“no real growth”
Except in the illusion that, the economy with bubbles in it is best.
“The last government left the biggest debt in the developed world.”
Atop a mountain of banking sector liabilities?
“he did not know the UK had the lowest debt in the G7”
I blame the education system. Employers are always complaining that potential employees are not conversant with those basic requirements needed.
“in cash terms a millionaire's debt would”
not include a tax component. Unless all avoidance schemes had to be submitted to the authorities and sanctioned by them, before they could be offered to clients. Otherwise it’s a bit like the hunt issuing the fox an Uzi.
“Labour created the biggest deficit in the developed world by”
investing a fund of trust in hopelessly derivative concepts?
“Our borrowing costs are low because the markets”
need cheap money to gamble with, and in turn keep open the casino in which such risky business is permitted?
"If you tell a lie big enough and keep repeating it”
its going to be fine. Until the polly filler turns up.
“Joseph Goebbels”
Patron Saint of political rhetoric.
And Mr Patel essentially makes the point for Mr Cameron - the UK's tax take in the booming noughties was heavily financial services-driven, which is precisely one of the key reasons the UK should have been running significant surpluses.
Please do not follow Mr Patel's desire and forward this article to anyone. It deserves a radical re-write as I'm sure there's some good myth de-bunking to be done.
Ask Enron about off balance sheet vehicles.
it has to be false because the results are so poor compared to other nations
So we should be doing everything we can to support new start ups that have new ''exportable'' products protected by patents.
The world desalination market is worth $100 billion p.a.
According to the F.T. Saudi Arabia burns one third of it's oil production to power it's desalination needs.
The world's first practical Direct Solar Powered Desalination Plant was invented in the UK in 2010 which won a major award at the Oxford Venturefest that year. (solaqua.info)
The company that owns the patents is scratching around for a small amount of cash to fund development trials at The Solar Research Lab, Cardiff University.
The company could export £billions and employ thousands.
To date the UK Gov has not provided one single penny of support and at the same time is spending £2 billion to fund windmills in Africa.
The mind boggles....
By the ideological goal of small government is too tempting isn't it?
just a thought. Throw away ALL pre-existing rules (which probably means tax lawyers too I guess).
KISS at it's simplest.
Ermm - there was still overspending of 2.1% - just not as much overspend as previously.
"Its common sense, in cash terms a millionaire's debt would be greater than most people." - yeah - the common sense is they have a BIGGER debt. Why is that any more sensible? Because they can pay it back perhaps, or because the creditors can be scared into accepting some losses to get ANYTHING back?
Having said that - I agree with your premise, but please be careful not to fall victim to teh same faults as they do
If people really WANT change they would vote differently to the main 3 party circus that masquerades as 'democracy'.
None of the Lib-Lab-CON will ever give you a true referendum on EU membership.
None of them will stop immigration stealing your jobs and houses.
None of them will live next door to any of the 'multicultural enrichment' they often talk of.
None iof them will force big corporations to pay their fair amount of tax.
If you wanted a change, you'd change who you vote for.