On Monday Dominic Mohan was recalled to the Leveson inquiry where he defended Page 3 as a "British institution". Unfortunately he missed the all important word 'was'- it was a British institution - and not a particularly good one at that.
Platform 51 commissioned a nationally representative poll over the weekend which showed that almost twice as many women would support a ban on topless pictures of female models appearing in daily newspapers as would oppose it. In a country where many people feel uneasy with the word 'ban', these results are certainly striking.
The word and the question can conjure up ideas of banning all pictures of naked women in national newspapers even when they may be justified in the context of an article such as a feature on how to check for breast cancer. Those who oppose Page 3 are unlikely to be concerned with this - what people are concerned about are images presenting women as nothing more than sex objects.
It is easy to assume that it's just women who feel uncomfortable with Page 3, but that isn't the case - almost a third of men said they would support a ban too.
One of the charges levelled against those who oppose Page 3 is that they are being prudish or don't get that's it's just a bit of harmless fun. Strikingly, when Clare Short dared to first raised the issue of a ban on Page 3, 25 years ago, The Sun's response to her concerns was to accuse her of being "fat and jealous."
Thankfully these results suggest that things have moved on since then. It is in fact the group in society that is usually considered to be the least prudish and uptight that shows strong opposition to Page 3 and would go as far as banning it; the research shows that many more young people, both men and women in the 18-24 age group are in favour of a ban than 45-54 year olds.
From our work with women and girls in Platform 51 centres, we know that provocative, titillating images of women like those on Page 3 can make them uncomfortable, negatively affect their self-esteem, limit their aspirations and expectations and can have an impact on how some men treat them. We know from working with younger girls and women that these images can have a big impact on them growing up.
There is also a concern that children have access to these images unfiltered and unmediated and the impact this has on how girls view themselves, and how boys view girls. Whilst there are organisations like Platform 51 who support girls and women to build their confidence and self-esteem, it would be easier if these images were not there in the first place.
These serious objections to Page 3 are perhaps well rehearsed. But what our polling shows is that many people, far from viewing 'institutions' like Page 3 as harmless fun, in fact see Page 3 as an outdated 'institution' which is, frankly, a bit embarrassing and needs to be consigned to the dustbin of history.
Follow Rebecca Gill on Twitter: www.twitter.com/Platform51
Sam Blackledge: People Still Care About Newspapers
Why is the left so obsessed with claiming it loves freedom of speech yet spends more time trying to ban things it doesn't like?
Would images of topless men also be banned? The legislation would not be gender specific would it, so they wouldn't be able to put pictures of male swimmers in the paper.
Perhaps a better debate might be why so many 14 year old Muslim girls go missing in Bradford only to turn up back in England 3 years later married to a goat herder from Kabul, funny the left don't seem to bothered about that.
Supporting free speech and freedom of the press means also supporting the right of those views you don't approve of to be freely expressed.
Still, just because some of us don't like it I don't think that we should legislate what other people can and can't print or buy, so long as it between consenting adults.
We have legislation to stop graffiti, tax avoidance, sex crimes, speeding - yet there are people who would like the right to do all of these things. It's about making society better.
If you want to live in a society that allows freedom of speech, it also means that you can't use the "this is offensive" argument to legislate your own views. It doesn't matter whether you like it or not.
You also present me with a false dichotomy, allowing Mr Murdoch to make a profit and not treating women as objects are not mutually exclusive positions.
The Sun, even if we don't like it (and for the record, I DON'T), can print whatever they want in their paper. You and I don't have to buy it, and I for one never have or will.
There will come a time when page 3 no longer sells newspapers and isn't supported by the readership - and at that time it will fade into oblivion. A 'ban' is ridiculous.
Tell that to British gun owners.
Is that all right?