Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Wendy Wason

GET UPDATES FROM Wendy Wason
 

To C or not to C

Posted: 02/11/11 00:00

This week the NHS has decided that if you want a C-Section you can have one. There have been a variety of responses to this. The first article I came across on the internet was in the Daily Mail - I know I should know better but I got sucked in. The headline mentioned the "Madness of a Caesarean Section on demand". The article then went on to mention that the "too posh to push brigade" had won. Won? My blood started to simmer. I am getting a bit sick of these natural-birth Nazis.

The NHS has re-evaluated their stance on C-sections. These are on the increase in both the UK and the rest of the world. I refuse to believe it's because all because us C-section gals think it's an "easy option" or the "vanity choice". How on earth could anyone think that slicing through the stomach and layers of muscle beneath as an easy option?

The NHS was created in 1948. As science advances, surely our attitudes should too. We are having bigger babies now. Our nutrition and knowledge of it is far superior to what it was in 1948. We don't breed with people from the same village anymore, we breed with people from different countries and continents so it is perfectly acceptable to assume that our babies will be much larger (and healthier) than those we might have had in years gone by. Whilst pregnancy and birth is not an illness, medical intervention may be necessary more now than it ever has been.

What really winds me up is the smugness of mothers who give birth naturally and seem to think if you have had a C-section you somehow opted out. It's not the case. I don't believe anyone would rather have an extra five days in hospital and be sliced open and that's not even factoring in the extended recovery time.

As a mother I know how difficult everything is. If we begin with conception and end when the baby is - say five - there can be a struggle at every single step. Conception, pregnancy and birth, breast-feeding, weaning and potty-training - none of it is easy. It is hard and we agonise and worry. We do our best. Mothers give each other the hardest time and we should really be more supportive.

I asked a friend with a 10-year-old if she had breast-fed him as a baby and she came out with a list of excuses and apologies as to why she couldn't breast-feed. Jeez! Come on. Your child is a perfectly healthy 10-year old. Why do we feel this awful guilt? Mothers whose kids won't eat vegetables are judged and then we get the supermodel Gisele saying: "My kid thinks broccoli is a dessert". Oh please do go and boil your empty head. You are not helping Gisele.

Reading articles about how terrible C-sections are for the welfare of children make me so sad. After I had my daughter - by emergency section - I read a piece about how more criminals were born by Caesarean and I sobbed my heart out.

It has also been claimed that mothers who give birth by C-section find it more difficult to bond with their babies. I have three kids, all born by C-section and I have bonded with them all. I adore them and did from the moment we met. I think it's about time our attitudes fell in line with the medical profession.

The NHS has accepted that it needs to give mothers a choice of birth options and a natural birth may not be the best one. If nature is so important to the natural-birth Nazis, what is their stance on IVF? If they are so obsessed about doing things the natural way, is this going to come into play as an argument? I believe every woman has the right to become a mother, however she needs to do that. An IVF baby doesn't make you any less of a mother and I'd like to think a C-section doesn't make you a bad one.

And please don't quote Macbeth at me in this argument. My children were not "untimely ripped", they were born. A play written in 1606 holds no place in an argument about what is preferential to the survival of a mother and a baby in 2011.

I'm delighted that we have birth options and that the NHS are moving with the times. I hope this change in their attitudes will pave the way for mothers to be less judgemental on exactly how their babies entered the world. Surely what we are all aiming for is a healthy mother and a healthy baby? Who am I to tell you what is best for you? Do what you have to do. I'm not judging and neither will your baby.

 

Follow Wendy Wason on Twitter: www.twitter.com/Wendy_Wason

 
 
  • Comments
  • 8
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
sharmaine73
I Love Music!..and Giraffes (Clearly)
22:00 on 04/11/2011
I had a C-section. So glad I did.
19:21 on 04/11/2011
Wendy, I agree that women should have the choice in which manner they give birth. But have you ever thought that us.... "Natural birth Nazis" had to fight for the right for our natural child birth. Many doctors have never seen a natural child birth or know what a natural birth is supposed to look like . MDs want to give you pitocin, and epidural because thats what they know as "normal". I was told by my fist OBGYN that I would need a C-section. When we moved to a different practice my new doctor was confused as to why my previous MD would even suggest such a thing. I had no complications with my pregnancy or labor. So before you say anything about "giving the right to choose your birth" maybe you should do a little reasearch on what the other options are and how easy it is to attain them. I don't care how anyone else gives birth. Your body, your baby. But when it comes to my body and my baby I also want the right to choose not to have drugs and not feel pressured by medical staff to speed up my labor and delivery. If I need intervention, I will accept it. But as long as the baby and I are healthy keep your drugs and your scalpels to yourself.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
sharmaine73
I Love Music!..and Giraffes (Clearly)
22:26 on 04/11/2011
No I don't believe you natural birth "Nazi's" had to fight for the right for natural birth. Not at all. Not one bit. It's the most ridiculous thing I have ever heard in my life.

Sounds like you had your baby exactly the way you wanted, but you could have just as easily had your children at home with mid-wife or even at the hospital with a mid-wife, or at home by YOURSELF. There is no law that says you have to give birth in a hospital.

If you want a natural child birth then go all the way and do it like your great great grandmother did it; at home, in the family bed, with the old mid-wife that birthed everybody in town. No epidural. No episiotomy...go ahead and let it tear open down there instead of having a nice Dr. there to give you a local anesthetic and snipping it nice and neatly for you so it can be sewn up later and heal properly. Have fun using the bathroom after the by the way.

And if the baby is too big who cares, right? The "natural" way is to go ahead and let the babies shoulder dislocate or break so you can feel like a real woman because you gave birth the "natural" way. Many more women and infants used to die in childbirth before modern medicine came along.

You can refuse medical care. So save the over-drama.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Wendy Wason
16:15 on 07/11/2011
What makes you think I didn't "fight for the right" to have a natural birth? I also take issue with you telling me to "do my research". I explored every option available to me with the births for all three of my children. A doctor friend recently told me of a situation where they were losing both mother and baby and the mother was still refusing a c-section. They considered sectioning the mother as she clearly wasnt making the best decision for both of them. No woman should feel THAT level of pressure to give birth naturally. My point is that it shouldn't be an issue over how we give birth, although you seem to feel very clever that you gave birth naturally so well done you.
01:05 on 17/11/2011
Is that last comment really necessary? If your point is that it shouldn't be an issue over how we give birth, then why is it that you felt it necessary to make a dig at someone who chose to go the natural route?

And I agree with her comments regarding the lack of choice for women who would like to try and give birth as naturally as possible -- without any unnecessary medical intervention -- we very rarely have that option in a hospital environment. My first doctor told me flat out, that if I wasn't able to give birth within a certain span of time, she would perform a c-section.

I immediately found another doctor, one who let me get on with the business of birthing, which happens in its own good time. As long as the mother and baby can handle it, I say leave them alone. There's no need to insist on drugs and surgery when there is no medical need for it, and sadly, most doctors now push for both even though it's unnecessary.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
newshoundmama
My bite's worse than my bark
22:58 on 02/11/2011
I spent 51.5 hours in labour, with my first, including hard labour. He wasn't being born, and I had to have a C-section. Had we lived in a time in which C-sections weren't an option, at least one (and probably both) of us would have been dead. I had the second baby by planned C-section because both my doctor and I agreed trying to have him naturally would probably only delay the inevitable­, and exhaust me in the process. So, I 've done it all; labour, extensive pushing , c-section, c-section on demand, and I don't have to take anyone's smugness, thank you very much. My decisions (the ones Mother Nature didn't pre-empt) were made by me and my doctors, and no one has any business second-gue­ssing them. I will, add, however, that having had one C-section already, my second C-section reduced the chances of my suffering a uterine rupture. That's a risk I don't have to take, and I certainly don't owe it the Judgementa­l Mommies Brigade to take it so they can feel good inside their simple narrow little minds.
13:42 on 02/11/2011
Thank you for pointing out the contradictions and the hyprocrisy that surrounds this subject. I'm so sick of this 'natural birth is best' argument! If I'd had my first naturally, we'd both have died. It's that simple. So when the second one came along, I opted for a c-section because that's what I knew. In both cases, it took ages for my body to recover. None of my friends or family judged my actions, and everyone was supportive. I'm very glad to hear that I'm not the only one. It may not be something that everyone wants, but by god, I'm glad that we're being given the choice finally. It's just a wee bit ironic that it's happened now I'm of an age when I can't really have more kids...
12:08 on 02/11/2011
Selfish I know, but seeing the way my male friends take on that 1000-yard stare whenever they talk about their natural birthing experiences, makes me feel like had a lucky escape when my wife had to have an emergency C-Section.