Katie Holmes is an attractive woman. Fact. So logic would suggest that her need for Photoshop is minimal. Which is why we're confused by her cover shot for the October issue of Russia's Harper's Bazaar. Of course we can't be certain that she's been digitally manipulated - but we're pretty sure that she doesn't normally look like this...
What do you think?
See some more definite Photoshop fails:
Still unsure? Compare and contrast with these photos of Katie:
Also on MyDaily: