Falklands - David Cameron Reveals Security Chiefs Discussed Argentina Tensions

Falkland Islands

The Huffington Post UK   First Posted: 18/01/12 15:10 GMT Updated: 18/01/12 16:02 GMT

David Cameron has accused Argentina of "colonialism" in the wake of rising tensions over the Falkland Islands and insisted he will ensure the defence of the islands is "in order".

The prime minister, who was responding to a question in the House of Commons, also confirmed that the relationship with Argentina was discussed at length by the National Security Council (NSC) on Tuesday.

Cameron told MPs: "We support the Falkland Islanders' right to self-determination, and what the Argentinians have been saying recently, I would argue is actually far more like colonialism because these people want to remain British.

"I'm determined we should make sure that our defences and everything else is in order, which is why the National Security Council discussed this issue yesterday."

According to the Falklands' representative in the UK, Sukey Cameron, relations with Argentina have deteriorated markedly over the past year or so. A trade embargo by various South American countries - called for by the Argentine government - came into force earlier this month.

Under the terms of the embargo, vessels carrying the Falklands' flag are banned from docking in the ports of several South American nations, in a move the Falklands' government says is designed to stifle their economy.

This was followed by the Falklands refusing to allow an Argentine ship clearance to dock at the islands yesterday. The Falklands' government claimed it refused permission for the ship to land because some of those on board were suffering from the Norovirus vomiting bug.

Tensions have also risen with the increasing likelihood of vast oil reserves being found in the Falklands territory but [Sukey] Cameron, insists relations have been deteriorating for several years.

"The oil is an added excuse for them to raise the pressure," she said. "I don't think it's the cause, it's just an added excuse.

"This started last year with the presidential decree that made any ship transiting through Argentine waters to the Falklands to apply for a permit from the Argentine government to do so.

"What that did was put ship owners and charters off operating in the area. So whilst there have been no incidents or arrests as far as we're aware, the mere fact that they were threatening to arrest vessels that didn't have permits was enough to have an impact."

It is considered unsual for the NSC to meet to discuss a single issue, with Downing Street sources suggesting it sent out a "very strong signal" to the Argentine government.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST UK POLITICS

David Cameron has accused Argentina of "colonialism" in the wake of rising tensions over the Falkland Islands and insisted he will ensure the defence of the islands is "in order". The prime minist...
David Cameron has accused Argentina of "colonialism" in the wake of rising tensions over the Falkland Islands and insisted he will ensure the defence of the islands is "in order". The prime minist...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 607
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (9 total)
01:59 PM on 01/19/2012
When the Argies invade the Falklands again where is Camoron going to get the armed forces to protect the islands as he is in the process of sacking most of them.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
11:50 PM on 01/19/2012
"...where is Camoron going to get the armed forces to protect the islands..."

They're already there.
01:08 PM on 01/19/2012
And guess who is at the back door once again waiting for large contracts for military hardware ,yes like 1940 when they sold us overpriced weapons when we were alone , and finished paying in 2000 .The US . like when the falklands war was on they supported us and were secretly having talks with the junta about if our war went pearshaped .it wasnt reagan but the cia and they are the ones who rule usa .
08:46 AM on 01/19/2012
Someone should go to Argentina and show them which way up our flag is suposed to fly...especially before the set light to it.
06:53 AM on 01/19/2012
Oh and the president?prime minister of the argies is more popular today as was margaret in the falklands campaign? food for thought, propaganda machine??
06:50 AM on 01/19/2012
I think some people are missing the point, gordon brown when in power stated the oil in the falklands would get the uk economy out of the ?hite its in, now ive owned shares in the drilling campaign since 1996 in the falklands, and reading reports on forums and rns, from companies drilling there is shed loads of it?? hence Libya? hence iraq, hence nothing being done in syria, hence the falklands, G,O,D, stands for Guns, Oil, and Drugs?????what makes the world go around.
wsdave
Abusive or Insulting? I won't be responding.
05:22 AM on 01/19/2012
I'm a U.S.er, and we don't get much of an education about the rest of the world (but you folks probably already know that). I read the Wiki, and not that I don't trust it (because user generated content is NEVER wrong: No, really) but I'm hoping you guys can confirm or deny.

It looks like the islands' history is one of, well, folks leaving. A lot. For 200 years.

Seems like the first permanent settlement that DIDN'T leave was the Brits in 1832, and they've been there ever since.

If this is true, why did Argentina think they had a claim?
06:00 AM on 01/19/2012
I suppose that the map of the world says it all. The Argies see the Malvinas as part of their own sphere of incfuence. We took the islands when there were fortunes to be made from whaling and back then, and i suppose it is still true today, might is right and we had the most powerful navy.

I think Argentina realises we do not have the capability now to sent a task force to kick them out like we did 30 years ago. We simply do not have carrier capability now and the whole thing is complicated still further by the possible oil reserves off the Falklands coast.

If Argentina went for another military occupation Britain may have to capitulate as it is highly unlikely our European and American allies would get involved with military assistance and quite rightly so but I suspect that both would push for a diplomatic solution and put a lot of pressure behind the scenes due to the oli reserves.
photo
AlanDente
Noses: made to hold glasses
12:25 PM on 01/19/2012
It's nice to read a comment by someone that's actually read about the history of the issue, regardless of whether you think you've got a decent global education, with an attitude like that you'll generally do ok.

It's a valid question. I think (personally) the Argentinians can spot a winning cause when they see one. Everyone hates colonialism. A lot of states aren't overly fond of the British. And there's money to be made if there's oil at the Falklands. So there's 3 'reasons' to press a claim.

Obviously, they have to conveniently ignore the fact that:
1. The islands lie approx. 300 nautical miles off their coastline (though it varies according to which islands you are looking at!), and therefore out of their territorial waters (they're not in Argentinian territory)
2. They never really had much of a settlement there, and the one that was there was not supported and so was forced to leave by the British navy (but then again, that was pretty much how the World worked back then!).
3. They are essentially insisting that a group of people be forced out of their homes and never allowed back to their land, unless they accept their rule. Which is pretty much exactly the 'colonialist' approach they claim to hate.
09:17 PM on 01/19/2012
Think you have led a very sheltered life, I have had many a headline of mine used in the Sun etc, because I wrote about events be4 they happened, so very confident about my views!
09:21 PM on 01/19/2012
You ought to look to the future, not dwell on the past! Hindsight is rather dull!!
04:19 AM on 01/19/2012
Think its time the ambassador was recalled.
This comment has been removed.
03:30 AM on 01/19/2012
If something starts, throw some of the negative comments off here at them!
This comment has been removed.
This comment has been removed.
This comment has been removed.
01:13 AM on 01/19/2012
Let me guess, we'll have to ask europe if its okay to protect the Falklands and they'll tell us that it'll breach the Argies human rights if we do!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
MarxEngelsLeninTrotsky
Einstein: Socialism is the way forward.
01:34 AM on 01/19/2012
Would probably need to ask the French if we can borrow their Aircraft carrier. They will tell us to get ****** and with good reason.
02:20 AM on 01/19/2012
The idea of asking the French for the use of their aircraft carriers is amusing, itseems that they have all sorts of problems wih getting them outof port.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jacksdad41
Quant Je Puis
10:16 AM on 01/19/2012
Why would we need an aircraft carrier, we have no fixed wing or VTOL - carriers are a massive liability - the garrison down there plus a sub on station with one on the way down can level the Argentine Navy and Air force before they crank their engines. Have a giggle at the Argentinian "Navy" http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_ships_of_the_Argentine_Navy
The "Air force" is even weaker
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Argentine_Air_Force
They are not and have no plans to strengthen either (lack of money), seems like we could send the Victory down there as the Flagship - It would be all over bar the shouting by the time she got there.
01:04 AM on 01/19/2012
London-to-Birmingham high speed train we can do without - The Military we can't!
This comment has been removed.