Prince Of Wales Slams 'Fashionable' Buildings

Prince Charles

First Posted: 2/02/2012 13:44 Updated: 2/02/2012 13:52   PA

The Prince of Wales has criticised modern buildings for their "fashionable" designs which quickly date and the "environmentally unfriendly" materials used to construct them.

In a lecture to the country's leading civil engineers, Charles told them that glass, steel and concrete are not sustainably produced.

London's skyline is dominated by buildings featuring these materials, including the Gherkin in the City and the Shard in Southwark - which will become Europe's tallest building when it is completed later this year.

Speaking at an event hosted by the Institute of Civil Engineers (Ice) and planning firm Halcrow, the Prince said: "We build in a short-term manner, creating neither durability nor, for that matter, beauty; thus generating instead a maintenance burden rather than an asset for generations that will follow us.

"Buildings are still too often constructed out of materials that are deeply environmentally unfriendly. Glass, steel, concrete surely all fall into that category because of the embodied energy in their production - especially if they are incorporated into designs that are very much 'in the moment'."

Charles, speaking at the central London headquarters of Ice, added: "I'm afraid, if a building is of a fashionable design today, it almost inevitably condemns it very quickly to becoming unfashionable - tired-looking, outdated, no longer 'contemporary'.

"And so, within 30 or 40 years, sometimes less, they are ripe for demolition and replacement."

The Prince is well-known as a champion of traditional architectural styles over modernist designs and has tried to implement his ideas in his model village, Poundbury in Dorset.

A planning application for a modernist steel and glass development for London's Chelsea Barracks site was dropped by the developer after Charles wrote privately to the company's chairman expressing his concern about what he later described as the "insane" plans.

The letter was the Prince's most outspoken criticism since he described a proposed extension for the National Gallery as "a monstrous carbuncle" in the 1980s, which resulted in the plan being changed.

Charles gave the example of a "natural house" that his Prince's Foundation for Building Community is helping to construct from a range of sustainable products, as an alternative to "energy- guzzling glass boxes" which quickly become unfashionable.

It has a "contemporary yet timeless feel", features insulating and cooling clay blocks and clay tiles, and wool is used to insulate the roof.
The Prince said the building "does not wear its green credentials like a collection of 'eco-bling'."

He also praised the way civil engineers had already begun to work more sustainably.

"Your thinking is creating better systems of supply chains that reduce the carbon impact of new buildings, and indeed, the retrofitting of existing structures," he said.

But he went on to say there was a challenge for the civil engineering industry - to be concerned "not only with how a project might work from a technical point of view, but also how such technology sits within the public realm and how it will affect the communities it touches".

Charles ended by suggesting that the preamble to Ice's Royal Charter, which states that civil engineering is "the art of directing the great sources of power in nature for the use and convenience of man", could be revised.

He said it could expand "a little on the meaning of that word 'art' and, rather than 'directing nature's powers', understand them properly so that we work according to their underlying patterns of behaviour".

"It is, after all, those patterns that sustain nature's precious gifts. And it is surely beholden upon us as never before to preserve those precious gifts for the generations who follow us."

FOLLOW HUFFPOST UK CULTURE

The Prince of Wales has criticised modern buildings for their "fashionable" designs which quickly date and the "environmentally unfriendly" materials used to construct them. In a lecture to the cou...
The Prince of Wales has criticised modern buildings for their "fashionable" designs which quickly date and the "environmentally unfriendly" materials used to construct them. In a lecture to the cou...
Filed by Sam Parker  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 15
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
photo
mmartini54
Roll on 2015!
04:50 on 03/02/2012
I wish he would follow his admirable mother's example and keep his asinine opinions to himself. He may not like buildings like the Gherkin, but plenty of other people do. He exerts undue pressure on organisations 'behind the scenes' (letter writing, chiefly) and loves to meddle in their affairs in pursuit of his own reactonary agenda. His stance on GM food is typically ignorant, anti science and prompted by his tree hugging views, which are now passe and middle aged.

I lost any vestige of respect I had for him when he announced he wanted to become "defender of faiths" rather than "defender of THE faith". I'm an atheist and think the whole faith thing absurd, but this shift in position alone shows how clueless and out of touch this guy is. I am a royalist for now, but when Liz goes I think that will change pretty quick - he's too agenda driven for a public servant, and can't keep from meddling.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
04:27 on 03/02/2012
For many years, I thought of Prince Charles and royalty in general as a somewhat frivolous anachronism. Part of that casual attitude came from my roots--American and Scottish.

Then, I read of Queen Elizabeth's hands-on work during WWII to help the British military, and I thought, "That's notable. Her work was well beyond a photo op."

About ten years ago, I read of Prince Charles having a farm which grows organically and is a big part of the community. Then I thought, "He is setting a good example."

A couple of years ago, I read of the Prince's attitude toward GMOs (genetically modified organisms) in agriculture when he said, "GMOs are the worst environmental catastrophe of the past century."

At that point, I knew that he's doing a lot more than having photos taken at polo games or on the riviera. He's making an important contribution, and I'm glad he has a large audience.

I agree with his opinions on architecture as well. It seems to me he's doing a lot of proper thinking and production.
photo
HamletsMill
All Myth is Astronomy
00:12 on 03/02/2012
"The Prince is well-known as a champion of traditional architectural styles over modernist designs and has tried to implement his ideas in his model village, Poundbury in Dorset."

We used to have a girl in my neighborhood growing up nick named "Poundbury"... Just say'in.
21:09 on 02/02/2012
As always when he talks about architecture, Charles proves he has exactly the dead aesthetic sensibility you would expect from someone of his upbringing. His sense of self-worth as a human being is entirely based on his embodiment of a dead, useless tradition: the hereditary monarchy. He is constitutionally incapable of appreciating any form of modernism because if he did he would see the absurdity of the life he was born into. The most hideous building in London Is Buckingham Palace, not because it looks like a grey, faceless barrack block (although it does), but because its form expresses the grim determination with which the Windsors hold on to their unearned and undeserved wealth and privilege.
21:30 on 03/02/2012
However, his views on sustainability are worth listening to.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Paul Wagland
Resistance is fertile
18:32 on 02/02/2012
Not sure why the comments about London's skyline were added in paragraph three. I doubt the prince (even with his tenuous grasp of architectural technology) would suggest skyscrapers should be constructed from clay bricks, rather than glass and steel.

More to the point, if he's against steel and concrete then he's effectively limiting himself to four or five storeys. And I'd give good odds that a five storey steel frame has less embodied energy than a five-storey masonry wall.
18:09 on 02/02/2012
When built, every house that he owns was absolutely in fashion, and modern.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/wales/6170836.stm

http://www.offtolondon.com/clarencehouse.html

http://www.adventure001.com/order_form1.asp?ActId=1681
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Paul Wagland
Resistance is fertile
18:27 on 02/02/2012
The Houses of Parliament were widely despised at the time of building. Now a national monument.
18:37 on 02/02/2012
Yes, that's true. I wish he could find it possible to admire ONE modern building. Personally, I like the gherkin.
16:31 on 02/02/2012
modern architecture is all complete crap - we are a black mark in the book of art history
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Ppenguinator
Life's too imprtant to be taken seriously.
21:30 on 02/02/2012
People have said that throughout history.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
baydolphins
Gone crazy...back soon
15:52 on 02/02/2012
agree with him completely, more for esthetic reasons than for environmental ones
15:55 on 02/02/2012
I agree with Prince Charles too . . and I have found the modern architects are more interested in winning awards . . and ignore form and function . . . . and form and function are essential to those who work and/or live in these buildings
This comment has been removed.