Andrew Lansley Accused Of Covering Up Risks Of NHS Reforms

Lansley

The Huffington Post UK   First Posted: 22/02/2012 13:38 Updated: 22/02/2012 15:30

Andrew Lansley has been accused of covering up the risks posed by his NHS reforms by refusing to publish an internal Department of Health assessment.

The information commissioner ruled last November that the document should be published as there was a "very strong public interest" in the information given the extensive changes due to be made to the health service as a result of the government's Health and Social Care Bill.

However Lansley appealed the ruling, arguing it would make civil servants and ministers scared to discuss the pros and cons of different policies in the future.

Labour hopes to force a vote on the issue following a Commons debate on Wednesday afternoon. Shadow health secretary Andy Burnham told MPs there was a "conspiracy of silence". Several Labour backbenchers chipped in with cries of "what are you hiding?".

"What are the precise risks he [Lansley] and the prime minister are taking with the NHS, how serious are those risks, and doesn't the public have a right to know?" he said.

"Instead members of this House have been asked to approve the most far reaching reorganization to this country's best loved institution by a government that hasn't had the courtesy to give them the fullest possible assessment of their potential impact."

But the government has accused Burnham of refusing to publish a risk assessment when he was health secretary in the last Labour government.

Speaking during prime minister's questions, David Cameron said this showed Ed Miliband was a "rank opportunist" and that Labour was "not fit to run opposition and not fit for government".

Miliband said the troubled NHS Bill was fast becoming the prime minister's "poll tax". There are suggestions that the NHS is starting to cost the Tories electoral support, with an ICM/Guardian poll on Monday showing Labour had gained ground.

Lansley told the Commons on Wednesday afternoon that if high level risk assessments were published then they would become "bland and anodine" as civil servants would be afraid to include anything too controversial. "They would cease to be of practical value," he said. "The publication of a risk register takes away and distracts form the purpose it is intended to support."

And he noted they were by their nature "devils advocate" documents that did not detail the positive impacts of any policies. He said Labour should read the impact assessment of the Bill as that looked at both the good and bad parts of the legislation.

Downing Street pointed towards Burnham's refusal to publish a risk register in 2009 following a Freedom of Information request. He said at the time: "Putting the risk register in the public domain would be likely to reduce the detail and utility of its contents."

"This would inhibit the free and frank exchange of views about significant risks and their management, and inhibit the provision of advice to ministers."

But Burnham told the Commons that he had turned down a request to publish the full departmental risk register not a specific one dealing with an individual piece of legislation, which was a different thing.

Fifteen Lib Dems have also signed an Early Day Motion calling on the government to publish the information, including Duncan Hames, a parliamentary aide to energy secretary Ed Davey. Downing Street has said it expects all PPS to vote against the Labour motion.

Community Charge Chaos
1  of  5
PLAY
FULLSCREEN
ZOOM
SHARE THIS SLIDE 
Margaret Thatcher's decision to impose a "community charge" in her third term as Prime Minister provoked quite a storm of opposition among the public.

The charge, commonly known as the "poll tax", was a flat-rate local tax. Critics argued that it didn't take account of people's ability to pay and was an attack aimed at the working class.

The opposition made itself heard - with a series of disturbances and marches - that culminated in a demonstration on Saturday 31st March 1990.

The demonstration quickly turned violent as police struggled to combat protesters and stop them from rampaging.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST UK POLITICS

Andrew Lansley has been accused of covering up the risks posed by his NHS reforms by refusing to publish an internal Department of Health assessment. The information commissioner ruled last Novembe...
Andrew Lansley has been accused of covering up the risks posed by his NHS reforms by refusing to publish an internal Department of Health assessment. The information commissioner ruled last Novembe...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 70
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
09:51 PM on 02/23/2012
The Doctors think it stinks as do the nurses, patients, and the small proportion of the LibDems who still posses a spine. And the report will obviously say the same thing.
So who apart from the tories and their mates dying to get their greedy snouts in the NHS trough thinks its a good idea?
04:07 PM on 02/23/2012
Sorry that information is strictly classified because he knows its not ever going to be in the general publics interest. Only for the eyes of the greedy bloodsucking shareholders. LOL! In fact everything that was in the manifesto was a total and utter lie! What surprise1 Not!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Norman Mitchison
12:57 PM on 02/23/2012
That is one of my theories dashed...there were 15 (yes,15!) Libdems in the Commons at one time! (this is intended as a sarcastic comment)
12:51 PM on 02/23/2012
Simple advice for Mr Lansley; this horse has bolted, the accusation that you are hiding something by not publishing a risk document, even going to Court to get their backing for non-publication, will stick! Publish and be damned, show you are open, and prove you have nothing to hide.....or have you? See what I mean about mud sticking, unless you are open?
Another point - especially as your manifesto made no mention of radical NHS reform, especially as there was no public discussion of your 'hidden' (?) plans, especially as a number of medical groups and associations are openly in disagreement.........should the public not have a right to see this risk analysis?
11:32 AM on 02/23/2012
The real risk lies in not reforming the NHS. If reform does not result in getting more for less we could end up with it being completely unaffordable, whichever political party is in power.
11:09 AM on 02/23/2012
What did Prime Minister CaMORON say when he was campaigning for the job? "There will, unlike the last administration, be COMPLETE transparancy in future." Or words to that effect!!
10:09 AM on 02/23/2012
What is going on,all information should be put in the public domain whatever the government,the public who pay for all this through taxes.
Their is now an idea that the tories are running scared over this bill,call me dave meeting people who support the bill but will not meet the health professionals who disagree with the bill.
What a way to carry on call me dave has invested so much in backing the bill & backing lansley that he dare not fail
09:57 AM on 02/23/2012
Private patients will get priority over nhs patients inhospitals and GP's will no longer treat those patients which cost more to treat.
09:41 AM on 02/23/2012
Lets hope the high court rules in favour of publishing the report and the lib/dems come to thier senses to oppose all of the bill. This is a massive attack on us by a unelected government made up of the conservatives and the puddle lib/dems. undemocratic or what!!
photo
casual agent
Advocate for social justice
11:37 AM on 02/23/2012
Too right Neil'...They'll pay for their treachery..They are trying to suppress the truth by threatening to take action against the Whistle Blowers'..If Lansley' has nothing to hide(Which I Doubt?)...He would have nothing to fear by publishing the Risk Assessment'..Mmm...Yes they have something to hide...Don't they?
01:00 PM on 02/23/2012
Accept this is the way we are governed - not told all the important information, kept in the dark, information manipulated {by all parties}, incompetent politicians making life-changing decisions for others eg pensions, welfare reform, ESA, NHS - etc - or do something about it! Radical change is necessary, including in virtually all public sector run organisations, but we have entrusted that to people who in the main have never run a business, often never had a 'proper' job, and have had theior way of life informed by ....exposure to the public sector....civil servants, local authorities, etc ....They do not know HOW to effect change, and they blunder from one crisis to another. We need a completely new way of being governed.
09:27 AM on 02/23/2012
If it's such a marvellous bloody scheme and going to benefit us all greatly why won't they publish and give us all an idea of what we have got to look forward to ?
09:19 AM on 02/23/2012
The Tories are committed to privatising the Health Service. They always have been. These so called reforms are merely a step along that road.
photo
casual agent
Advocate for social justice
11:40 AM on 02/23/2012
Yes'...Its' called Tory Dogma'..Money and Jealousy'...Nothing to do with patient care'...But are we surprised?...NO..!!
01:08 AM on 02/23/2012
Of course they are hiding things-it's obvious their "reforms" will destroy the NHS. ALL they are interested in is handing our NHS over to their private healthcare mates, some of which donate to the tory party. Make no mistake-this health, or should I say ill-health, bill is about greed and nothing else. This is why they are not interested in the advice of numerous healthcare professionals who oppose this. It's no use trying to argue with them-they already know the damage it will cause, but they dont care. They want to privatise it. This bill needs scrapping urgently. I hoping not all the libdems have sold their souls-for they could really put a spanner in the works. OUR NHS must not be stolen from us and handed over to profiteers!
photo
casual agent
Advocate for social justice
11:47 AM on 02/23/2012
I agree'...They tried to do this when Thatcher' and Major' were in power'...But more stealther than the blatant'Desperate way they are doing it now...Mr Miliband is right about one thing anyway'...This could be CaMorons' Poll Tax'....Watch out for more cival unrest?
12:48 PM on 02/23/2012
Easy to stop, Labour MUST state that the NHS will be re-nationalised, and the privateers will lose their money.
I know who the public will support.
04:15 PM on 02/23/2012
But will Labour change it back if it is privatized. Its like saying we should change, gas, electricity, bt, and water back. Its highly unlikely. Once its done, its done. There will be no going back. Just foreign countries owning our greatest assets. And they really were. The only thing that has been deprivatized is part of the railway and the government IS making money from it. Too many people believed the propaganda back then and thats why he did not get a majority this time, even despite Labours bad bits because most people knew this would happen.
12:35 AM on 02/23/2012
Lansley told the Commons on Wednesday afternoon that if high level risk assessments were published then they would become "bland and anodine" as civil servants would be afraid to include anything too controversial. "

A risk assessment should be factual, if it becomes bland and anodine then it has been tampered with which negates the whole point of the risk assessment, why the reluctance to publish?
12:21 AM on 02/23/2012
The so called poll tax would actually have been a much fairer system where everybody pays and everybody benefits from all or some of the services on offer. Why should a single person living in a property subsidise, for example, six people living in another?

For Miliband to use the poll tax to denounce the NHS bill shows he cares little for fairness!
08:31 AM on 02/23/2012
It is widely accepted that bringing in the poll tax was the undoing of Margaret Thatcher because a majority of the country hated it, I think Miliband was likening the NHS bill to the poll tax for that reason.
11:33 AM on 02/23/2012
I'm sure he was! But just because some people don't like a government proposal, that is not necessarily good reason to ditch it. And I don't remember the whole country coming out against the poll tax!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Dombeyandson
12:00 AM on 02/23/2012
Thought Cameron was in favour of open government with his Big Society ideas where we work for nothing and he gets paid. Now it seems the very service which is ours by right is under risk fo being curtailed especially to those less well off even though they too pay National Insurance and 18 different taxes all to the central fund whereby the government is able to throw it around like a man with no arms provided it goes overseas and to people who have no right to be hear. The Preservatives believe we - no they should make profit from anything which has any concept of social benefit. The benefit of course is prepaid in order to receive it free at point of delivery however it behoves the Preservatives to sell the idea that the scroungers are putting out their hands and have no right to any service especially as the Preservatives think they are financing it. They cannot wait to cut the NHS in to little profit centres ripe for selling to the highest private bidder. A ready made business or businesses we have paid for. Lansley is an abomination to democracy and his legal obligaitons of which he cannot wait to be free