Osborne: No New Borrowing In 2012 Budget

Osborne Budget 2012 Tax Borrowing

The Huffington Post UK   First Posted: 26/02/2012 10:33 Updated: 26/02/2012 11:52

Chancellor George Osborne has warned that any tax cuts in next month's 2012 Budget would have to come from further cuts in public spending, insisting that there would be no further borrowing by the coalition.

The chancellor's comments are unlikely to provide much comfort to Nick Clegg, who has called for the process to raise the tax threshold for low earners to be speeded up.

Speaking to Dermot Murnaghan on Sky News, Osborne said of Clegg's wish: "He knows as I do, as the country knows, that any tax cut would have to be paid for. There'd have to be a tax rise or a cut in spending elsewhere."

Osborne would not be drawn on claims that the Lib Dems were pushing for a mansion tax on large and expensive properties, but said: "We are a coalition, and the budget will be a coalition budget, when it comes."

He said they were "looking closely" at loopholes which allow wealthy people to avoid paying much of their stamp duty, and would assess the tax returns recently competed by those paying the 50p rate. There are claims from Tories that the 50p rate brings in very little revenue to the Treasury, but damages the economy because it makes the UK seem anti-business.

Osborne insisted: "We are taking measures including cutting business tax," claiming that foreign ministers had noticed that Britain had become an "attractive place for investment."

Osborne also said that the G20 would not be pumping any more money from the International Monetary Fund (IMF) into the Eurozone, because they hadn't so far seen the "colour of eurozone money."

Speaking from the G20 finance ministers' summit in Mexico, the Chancellor said : "While at this G20 conference there are a lot of things to discuss, I don't think you're going to see any extra resources committed here because eurozone countries have not committed additional resources themselves, and I think that quid pro quo will be clearly established here in Mexico City."

The Budget will be delivered on Wednesday the 21st of March.

Labour deputy leader Harriet Harman said Mr Osborne was "still on Plan A" and called on him to use the Budget to take action to stimulate growth.

"We want to see the Government producing a Budget for jobs and growth that will actually stimulate the economy. We think the best tax measure for doing that would be a cut in VAT," she told the Murnaghan programme.

"They really do need to step forward and stimulate the economy. It is not growing. If you can't grow the economy, you can't reduce the deficit."

FOLLOW HUFFPOST UK POLITICS

Chancellor George Osborne has warned that any tax cuts in next month's 2012 Budget would have to come from further cuts in public spending, insisting that there would be no further borrowing by the co...
Chancellor George Osborne has warned that any tax cuts in next month's 2012 Budget would have to come from further cuts in public spending, insisting that there would be no further borrowing by the co...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 83
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
01:19 AM on 03/05/2012
I would never dream of inciting violence but that fella has got a remarkably punchable face. Smugness personified. I'd like to leave these shores but eveywhere else is just the same.
northern git
fed up with all the political crap in life
04:08 PM on 02/28/2012
If we have to stop excessive pay and pay on results we ought to start looking at parliament
Cameron Clegg and Milliband cost us over £1600 a day

yes a A DAY

And Brown cost us still £750 a day

even Boris J reaps in £1500 a day

all these sums are fundamentally anti business

the people are the ones that are shafted every time a politician opens his mouth
03:27 PM on 02/27/2012
bet u find plenty to give abroad
Craigzz
God must like pinball
05:19 AM on 02/27/2012
Well, for those with a mortgage, you've never had it so good, so Osborne should increase taxes that will affect them and try to help the saver and the worst off, so increase tax on those who have a mortgage, why should these people gain from the current situation, while others lose.
Richard Britton
British Socialist Global Realist
02:44 PM on 02/27/2012
apart from pay freezes, benefit cuts, inflation, job insecurity, tripled tuition fees for your kids to go to uni we've never had it so good
12:33 AM on 02/27/2012
Quote -- " If you can't grow the economy, you can't reduce the deficit."
-------------------------------

Where will the growth come from?
northern git
fed up with all the political crap in life
04:20 PM on 02/28/2012
Cutting MP's pay for starters

MP's - they have to be the worst return on investment ever.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mickbono
huff is crap
10:26 PM on 02/26/2012
huff you stink keep omiting comments telling the truth
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
Mickey Mouse 1
There are no lies or deceit on a chess board.
08:59 PM on 02/26/2012
I guess the government will not be giving any more of our money to Argentina and India?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mickbono
huff is crap
10:16 PM on 02/26/2012
or india or pakistan or somalia or any arab state ,but i wont hold my breath
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
Mickey Mouse 1
There are no lies or deceit on a chess board.
10:34 PM on 02/26/2012
The amount of money given in foreign aid is a drop in the ocean compared to the amount given in welfare benefits. Its all about image and votes.
northern git
fed up with all the political crap in life
04:21 PM on 02/28/2012
It will go in their own pockets!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


not in ours
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
Mickey Mouse 1
There are no lies or deceit on a chess board.
08:51 PM on 02/26/2012
George Osbourne may have said that there will be no further borrowing by the coalition government, but this does not apply to local councils who can borrow what they want. This will mean that further rises in council tax is on the cards.
northern git
fed up with all the political crap in life
04:21 PM on 02/28/2012
Do you think we could get a sub off him.

he is worth a bob or two
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
Mickey Mouse 1
There are no lies or deceit on a chess board.
09:01 PM on 02/28/2012
It's all from the bank of mum and dad.
08:49 PM on 02/26/2012
He's not bothered about us, he is only interested in the his own!
northern git
fed up with all the political crap in life
03:59 PM on 02/28/2012
Of course he is not

who wuld when you have a salry at others expense of £370 a DAY
08:09 PM on 02/26/2012
I think Osborne is living on cloud cuckoo land if he thinks he won't be borrowing next financial year.
northern git
fed up with all the political crap in life
04:03 PM on 02/28/2012
yes and we are keeping him there

paying him £370 a day 365 days a year

now that is anti business unless you are G Osborne inc

for the results we are getting that is daylight robbery
08:08 PM on 02/26/2012
we have paid enough... time to give us a break before your short term in governement ends
northern git
fed up with all the political crap in life
04:22 PM on 02/28/2012
yes we have paid him and got grief ever since
photo
Reality always bites
Sometimes just a bit peckish
08:06 PM on 02/26/2012
Interesting how easily people forget- The original threat to Britains' credit rating came in MAY 2009. When Labour had reached the crisis point of their borrowing.
So since the election in 2010 George Osbourne and the current government have done a remarkable job by retaining the triple A rating.
www.telegraph.co.uk/.../Britains-credit-rating.
So all those calling for a change of government now, should be able to predict what kudos Britains' currency and borrowing status will have if there is another change.
It was the people who voted in this government that saved the rating- Can we really afford to let the lunatics back in charge of the asylum?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
Mickey Mouse 1
There are no lies or deceit on a chess board.
08:55 PM on 02/26/2012
The lunatics rely on their loyal support in the public sector, those dependent on welfare benefits and immigrants they opened the floodgates to.
photo
Reality always bites
Sometimes just a bit peckish
09:03 PM on 02/26/2012
And there was I thinking they were just lunatics!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
05:41 PM on 02/28/2012
theyl be no help for Ed....from the public sector,,,he,ll be lucky if he gets is sponsorship money,this year...im afraid the tories are safe,while this muppetts in charge,,,and the tories know it...weree dooomed i say.
10:22 PM on 02/26/2012
while we all sink down the pan my friend???
photo
Reality always bites
Sometimes just a bit peckish
10:41 PM on 02/26/2012
Interesting how easy it is to think that sinking down the pan is an individual thing.
Have you really been that blinkered to the economy and political influence on the economy for long enough to make that comment?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
GingerlyColors
No will to change it, no right to criticize it
07:14 PM on 02/26/2012
My 2012 Budget will start with saving £100bn per annum by getting Britain out the the EU (£20bn), Slashing foreign aid (£7bn), Ending climate change spending (£12bn), abolishing the Barnet Formula which favours certain parts of the UK (£10bn), reinstating duty-free controls at our ports (£1bn) and slashing the grossly over-inflated Social Security bill (£50bn).
My spending policies will be: Repaying some of the huge deficit - £50bn per annum. Increasing Defence budget by £5bn as I will the NHS spend, £5bn. Farming will receive an extra £10bn in subsidies enabling them to hire local labour at a fair wage instead of importing workers. I will spend £10bn on the reinstatement of the Community Programme scheme which ended in 1988. It employed long-term unemployed people for up to a year at going union pay rates, plus other schemes to help the unemployed. Tax cuts to the tune of £10bn will be made including raising the start rate for income tax to £10,000 per year. I will reinstate tax relief on pension dividends, which Gordon Brown abolished and I will cut business rates for small high street and rural shops. I will load duty on tinned and bottled alcohol as served in shops to 40p per unit (10ml) of alcohol while slashing (and for some beers abolishing) duties on draught beers as served in the pub hopefully reversing the shocking trend of pub closures currently running at 30 a week.
08:18 PM on 02/26/2012
So, let me understand this correctly - you would eliminate the entire social security budget.

So, let's take (just as an example) a 20 year old person who works 37 hours per week at the minimum wage. They have left local authority care, but been fortunate enough to get a job. £4.98 x 37 = £184.26 per week, or £9,581.52 per year.

Even assuming this person doesn't have to pay any income tax, exactly how do you expect them to live, and save for a pension? They will have lost all their housing benefit and their income support and their working tax credits, because you haev eliminated the social security fund. Completely.

But you are payin the farmers a bigger whack, giving another whack to those who have money to save for pensions - (this person doesn't), and you have made tax cuts for lots of people who are getting more than this poor so and so. But you are making small businessmen better off.

Explain please?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
GingerlyColors
No will to change it, no right to criticize it
10:28 PM on 02/26/2012
Another idea I have is to replace the annual tax-free earning allowance with a universal credit of say £50 per week which will be payable to everybody between 18 and 65 years of age. Income tax and NI will be payable on all earnings (currently 32p in the £). At the moment anybody on £9581.52 per year will have a peronal allowance of £8105 during 2012-13 which will require you to pay £295.30 tax. You pay NI of 12p in the £ above £146 per week so you will pay £4.59pw or £238.68 per annum. This adds up to £533.98 per year. Now if you paid tax and national insurance on all your earning at 32p in the pound you will pay £3066.09 per year but you will receive a universal credit of £50 per week or £2600 per year so your net loss to the tax man will become £466.09 and not the £533.98 you currently lose. The big bonus from such a system is that your universal credit is increased annually and you will benefit where as anybody earning below the threshold for income tax and NI does not benefit. The introduction of universal credit will be financed through the extra income tax take and the replacement of some top-up benefits. You will probably find that anybody earning around the current tax threshold will be claiming housing and other supplementary benefits.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
chatnuptime1
The Wolf's Den.
06:13 AM on 02/27/2012
Smmmmmmmmmmmmmmmeeeeeeeeeeeeeeellllls a Tory.. afffoooot.
Richard Britton
British Socialist Global Realist
06:18 PM on 02/26/2012
The deficit is very convenient for a party with a track record of maintaining high unemployment, low wages, restricting collective bargaining and so on. Already we see calls for employers to have the right to sack employees more easily, next it will be "freezing the minimum wage" or even abolishing it altogether
06:13 PM on 02/26/2012
If 50% is anti business, then 20% is anti working class and 30%-40% is anti middle class. The message seems to always be: If you're rich we'll look after you, if you're not we'll take as much from you as we can, only stopping when it may mean we lose your majority vote. It's not anti business to introduce a 50% tax band, it could be argued it's anti rich, but the effects of a 40% to 50% increase on the super rich is far less meaningful than even a 1% point increase in taxes on the poorest of our nation.
Richard Britton
British Socialist Global Realist
06:21 PM on 02/26/2012
that's right, when you have a disposable income of several thousand a month losing a few hundred is irrelevant but when you are poor, like me, even 20 or 30 pounds a month is enormous
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
chatnuptime1
The Wolf's Den.
06:37 AM on 02/27/2012
Why do the wealthy need looking after? Don't they know how to use their money and invest? They should take care of their own skins.

Pay minimum wage to politiicians who already have a substantial pocket to begin with so that their service should be a Charity rather then making even more money then they did while in the private sector.

Limit there terms in office and pay zero exit salaries when they are out of their positions because again it should not be a carreer. Make one tax sales and tarrifs but not income of anyone below 35,000.

Tax, and toll bridges and that but make sure the money goes were it should. Say for schools. Tax businesses for hedge funds and market income and direct taxes don't kill business but actually does encourage competition and growth. Increase the minimum wage till the lowest income denominator is only 25% difference then the highest that way you should not have a poverty class.

As for a job saturated country that has little room to create industry. What do they do on farms when they run out of space? They burn a feild or two let it lay for a year and plant something different. Industry wise. Start infrustructure upgrades. Take down and start upgrading the oldest buildings and antiquated methods of doing things and start creating jobs by building it back up with new things and new ways of doing things.
northern git
fed up with all the political crap in life
08:39 PM on 02/28/2012
quite right

too many people are getting money they don't need

and it is a question of NEED

let MP's live on minimum wage for 6 months and see how they get on oh and without their american express or credit cards

like many have to