Chemical Castration: '100 Paedophiles' Volunteer For Treatment At HMP Whatton

Huffington Post UK  |  By Posted: 13/03/2012 11:59 Updated: 13/03/2012 16:51

Child sex offenders incarcerated in a Nottinghamshire prison are undergoing chemical castration, after volunteering for the controversial treatment.

According to the Daily Mirror, 100 paedophiles offered to undergo the scheme at HMP Whatton, operated in connection with the Ministry of Justice and Department of Health.

Forensic psychiatrist Professor Donald Grubin, who is running the pilot scheme at the prison, said inmates undergoing the treatment were doing so in order to "control their arousal and reduce their risk".

"The primary indications are where men have high levels of sexual arousal that they find difficult to control, or have intense sexual ruminations or fantasies that they find hard to resist," he told Huffington Post UK.

Professor Grubin said he had had around 100 patients referred to him over the last three years, but not all of them underwent the controversial treatment.

"There are two types of medication that can be prescribed: anti-androgens (sometimes referred to as 'chemical castration'), and selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (drugs like Prozac).

"The former can remove all sexual desire, but in some cases men can still maintain sexual relationships; the latter reduce the intensity of fantasies and urges, but do not remove sexual drive. In both cases psychological treatment should be provided alongside the medication."

HMP Whatton is a category C prison, which means that though the prisoners are considered dangerous to society, they are also thought to be unlikely to escape. It is the lowest security prison before an open facility.

Additionally all inmates housed at HMP Whatton are sex offenders that have signed up to the government's Sex Offender Treatment, which uses a number of educational schemes to rehabilitate prisoners.

However chemical castration is not without its risks. One of the psychological side effects of the anti-androgens, is that men can struggle to come to terms with being completely asexual.

For this reason Professor Grubin stressed that psychological treatment needs to be prescribed alongside the medication especially as depressed mood is another of the potential side-effects. Physical side effects of the anti-androgens can also be severe, with the drugs causing thinning of the bones, an increased risk of cardiovascular disease, fatigue, and breast growth.

Chemical castration is likely to be controversial method of rehabilitating sex offenders, especially as it is funded by the public purse.

Frances Crook of the Howard League for penal reform said that chemical castration will not necessarily reduce the risk to the public:

"Sex offending is often not about sex at all, but about violence and domination. The drugs used will not affect those attitudes. Some men may inflict other types of deviant behaviour on victims if they are unable to perform sexually due to the drugs."

"'Feminising' sex offenders may make it more difficult for these individuals to reintegrate into society, which in turn makes their reoffending more likely.

Wartime codebreaker Alan Turing was given the choice of jail or chemical castration after being convicted of homosexuality in the 1950s. After taking the drugs he killed himself. We would be concerned if similar choices were offered to individuals in the future."

However Professor Grubin said that because medication is being prescribed to reduce sex drive, rather than for 'social control' offenders are able to stop taking the medication whenever they want.

"The benefits of the pilot are that sex offenders for whom medication may be of benefit can get it, improving their quality of life and reducing their risk." he added.

"There is no real downfall, provided it is prescribed appropriately. The difficulty is in finding local psychiatrists willing to assess and prescribe, which can be hard work."

A Ministry of Justice spokesperson said:

"We continue to support the use of pharmaceutical interventions for some high risk sex offenders given the evidence that medication can be useful in reducing risk for some perpetrators of these crimes.

FOLLOW UK

 
 
  • Comments
  • 289
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (9 total)
03:59 AM on 02/16/2013
It used to be said that in an ideal world all the engineers would be German...all the cops would be British.

British law enforcement has turned 180 degrees since then. Omnipresent surveillance cameras, intrusive internet surveillance, severe restrictions on almost anything usable as a weapon, no limits on detention of "terrorists."

Consider:
"A Ministry of Justice spokesperson said:

"We continue to support the use of pharmaceutical interventions for some high risk sex offenders given the evidence that medication can be useful in reducing risk for some perpetrators of these crimes."

Who decides that a sex offender is high risk or that the evidence of medication safety is sufficient? Why, Her Majesty's Government does.

These HMG people have been watching too much of the crime drama with which the Beeb seems obsessed. Justice is not always cut, dried, and wrapped up in an hour or two.

If I'm ever in Britain again, I'll just be passing thru, and as quickly as possible.
09:27 PM on 05/21/2012
My attacker couldnt 'get it to perform' so he used 'objects' instead - I nearly died.. Victims get nothing - I lost my home, health, NHS counselling, etc....while he will get leisure facilities, 24/7 counselling, even a MEAL SERVED! I am sick to the back teeth of this country where the good people have to pay their hard earned taxes to pander to their every need. I know what I'd do if I was 'in charge'.
11:44 AM on 03/15/2012
I like this idea because it is supported by evidence that it works and if it helps these people to rehabilitate themselves then that's great. Also it really gets up liberals noses.
11:05 AM on 03/15/2012
A wounded lion comes to mind here,
they may become more dangerous.
iam no expert on the matter.
wes
10:47 AM on 03/14/2012
Any form of castration is pointless and of course paedophilles will opt for it. This won.t dampen desire or prevent them. Acts of this nature (and pleasure derived from them) take place predominantly in the mind. So don't waste tax payers money unless you are going to lobotomise themas well.
05:21 AM on 03/14/2012
Best place for all of them is by lethal injection or hanging , there nothing but scum of the earth
01:59 AM on 03/14/2012
I suppose the tax payers will be paying for all this medication, why don't they just hang the b*****ds it would be a lot cheaper and more effective, I've got some rope they can borrow.
09:36 AM on 03/14/2012
do the cutting first and let me do it with a soon
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Marina18
01:20 AM on 03/14/2012
Huffington, why were 2 of posts removed, they were in no way abusive and certainly not as angry as some of the other posts.
If this keeps happening, I won't bother posting any more
11:00 AM on 03/15/2012
Marina18.
We all get this from time to time, for no
obvious reasons, frustating though.
wes
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Marina18
01:16 PM on 03/15/2012
I know, all I said was that I had been a victim of child abuse and that these pervs should have their hands and bits chopped off then all of them dumped on a desert island. ok, because of what happened to me I probably came across as bitter. BUT, I certainly didn't say anything worse than a lot of the other posters said. This one will probably disappear as well!!!
photo
novelist2000
veritas non olet
12:35 AM on 03/14/2012
This is only a band aid, and not a very sticky one, either.

I remember a case where the man under treatment went doctor shopping and managed to get anti-dotes. He then molested and murdered a girl. The mother of the girl shot him dead in the courtroom of the town of Luebeck, if I remember correctly, maybe 30 years ago.

Not that I have a solution, but if homosexuality is something you are born with, wouldn't paedophilia be also? Sending them to AUS with half a tankful is a waste of a good pilot and airplane, and not environmentally friendly. If you want to tackle the problem at its roots, one should try to establish if there is a genetic marker or not.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
crjslick50
10:48 PM on 03/13/2012
why chemical castration? Why not actual castration? Remove the testicals, and you remove the aggression. why this wasn't implemented years ago is beyond me
04:17 AM on 03/14/2012
You are thinking of dogs, not men. Paedophilia is essentially about an inherent sexual desire (similar in ways to a birth defect or genetic disease) rather than an act of violence and aggression. The term "chemical castration" is misleading, the drugs help suppress sexual desires and the instinctive need to act on them. Intense therapy and teaching behavior modification techniques are also required.
04:48 AM on 03/14/2012
I should also have made the distinction between between paedophiles who act on unnatural sexual desires but rationalize away the psychological harm they may cause to children, and those who prey on children primarily to inflict violence and exert power and control. (BTW, I'm not making excuses for either of them.) However, physical castration will not necessarily prevent either from re-offending.

(Testicular castration can reduce the development and slow the growth of prostrate cancer, as my deaf but hearing aid hating grandfather was shocked to discover after agreeing to surgery for his cancer.)
09:28 PM on 03/13/2012
This was carried out quite regularly in the early Middle Ages. There are few detailed castrations except for the case of Thomas Elderflower who was castrated for violence and all violence was considerd .worthy of castration. In his case he was set up for not having sex by a frustrated woman. The also blinded him to make sure he was unable to do anything. He was taken in to a nunnery where now being an eunuch made him eligable he lived to fair age for those days looked after by the nuns. So blinding completes the punishment.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
nicholspongo
08:49 PM on 03/13/2012
The best way of dealing with them is to tie them naked to a chair in a room and let in all the family of the victim and leave them alone for an hour or two.
08:47 PM on 03/13/2012
I would buy all paedophiles a nice aeroplane trip to Australia-

With half a tank of fuel.
08:36 PM on 03/13/2012
CHEMICAL CASTRATION IS NO GUARANTEE .CUTTING OFF THEIR HEADS WORKS EVERY TIME..
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
rbearfield
09:00 PM on 03/13/2012
the death penalty is the best way to prevent repeat offenders, in the cases of child molestation, rape, and murder.
08:22 PM on 03/13/2012
The second I read the headline I knew it was chemical castration. We all know you could have fitted in the extra letters. Chemical castration is not new. It has been used on a voluntary basis previously. Rape is not a sex crime, it is a hate crime. Even if a man's penis and sexual urges have reduced function, he is still capable of committing rape and may well use various implements other than a penis to rape.

It is probably impossible to spot a rapist who has not yet been caught and sentenced. The most successful way of preventing future rapes committed by released prisoners is simple - don't release them.

Chemical castration can only be guaranteed to have been administered with an incarerated subject. Once released, there are many ways of avoiding the drug and I suspect many of these prisoners are volunteering to get out of prison and will avoid dosage when out.

As for Frances Crook being the spokesperson for penal reform - well you couldn't make it up could you?