GCHQ Snooping Powers - A History Of The Big Brother State

The Huffington Post UK  |  By Posted: 2/04/2012 09:04 Updated: 2/04/2012 10:39

The news that ministers want to give the government's main listening centre GCHQ greater powers to intercept our phone calls and emails has caused a furore, with civil liberties campaigners seeing it as a "spies charter".

Some Tory MPs are annoyed at what they see as the kind of Big-Brother style encroachment that David Cameron had pledged to row back from when he stood for election.

And others look at the coalition agreement signed by Cameron and Clegg, which pledged to stop the surveillance state from increasing.

Ever since the terrorist attacks in New York and Washington just over a decade ago, the government has been attempting to introduce greater powers for the police and intelligence agencies, and the backlash has damaged prime ministers and trust in the police. Here is a history:

2002: Mass Surveillance
1  of  8
PLAY
FULLSCREEN
ZOOM
SHARE THIS SLIDE 
In early 2002 the government amended the Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act (RIPA) to allow much greater access to people's phone and email records.

The changes were the forerunner to what's being proposed now. Those changes a decade ago allowed governments to know who was emailing each other, or ringing or texting each other, but stopped short of routinely accessing the content of those communications.

Dropping that safeguard could be among the changes being proposed now.
FOLLOW UK POLITICS

The news that ministers want to give the government's main listening centre GCHQ greater powers to intercept our phone calls and emails has caused a furore, with civil liberties campaigners seeing it ...
The news that ministers want to give the government's main listening centre GCHQ greater powers to intercept our phone calls and emails has caused a furore, with civil liberties campaigners seeing it ...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 4
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Laatab
All The Worlds A Stage
01:00 PM on 04/02/2012
Their definition of who is a terrorist has changed. They wont tell you this but anybody who speaks against them in any way is a terrorist as far as they are concerned. They would love to have the structure to monitor people at the level they are proposing in place without anyone knowing about it. But too many would be involved with it's creation to keep it secret so they need the legislation to enable them to put the structure in place.

The legislation is coming. No wanted the changes to the NHS but we have it. No one wanted to bail out the banks and financial sector but they did it. And no one will want this legislation either, but that doesn't matter anymore. They dont consider a mandate from the people necessary.

As to why they want to monitor people at this sort of resolution when they have pretty much fended off the international terrorists is because they cant keep the lid on the fact that our lifestyle, at current population levels cannot be sustained much longer. And when the general population finally come out of denial they will be angry. They know the time is close which is why they are riding roughshod over our liberties. They dont care about the next election because there might not be one.
Richard Britton
British Socialist Global Realist
12:28 PM on 04/06/2012
combined with detention without charge, secret trials, trial without jury, cuts in legal aid this is all part of the same story

ends in a police state if you extrapolate to the logical conclusion
10:16 AM on 04/02/2012
the only people in our society that need this level of monitoring is our politicians.

I am in favour of this if this goes some way to prevent them from selling policy, starting illegal wars, supplying mercenaries in foreign countries with funding & weapons, fiddling their expenses(de-frauding the taxpayer), accepting bribes from their old school chums in big business, covering up institutionalised child abuse in Scotland, co-operating with foreign powers who would fly tortue victims through our airports or airspace. Bribing dictators from the ME to buy our multimillion pound weapon systems....now have I missed anything

I guess thats me on an MI6 watch list then
09:48 AM on 04/02/2012
The Government already has a perfectly adequate tool for monitoring electronic communications which it has had since the 60s. Obviously the system has gone through many upgrades since then but why are they asking for extra powers which are within the systems capabilities already?