Police Officer Sultan Alam Wins £800k Compensation For Malicious Prosecution

Posted: 16/04/2012 21:45 Updated: 16/04/2012 21:45   PA

Sultan Alam
Sultan Alamn spent nine months in prison

A police officer who was wrongfully sent to prison as a result of a malicious prosecution brought by colleagues is to receive a total compensation package of more than £800,000.

But ex-Pc Sultan Alam left Leeds County Court on Monday, saying: "It was never about the money."

Cleveland Police admitted liability after they were sued by Mr Alam, who has fought for 17 years after he was wrongly prosecuted and convicted.

He was jailed for handling stolen goods in 1996, two years after first being accused of "car ringing".

He served half of his 18-month sentence behind bars and, once free, began the long battle to clear his name while working as a taxi driver.

That culminated in 2007 with him being cleared by the Court of Appeal.

Mr Alam, 49, will receive a total of £841,430 from Cleveland Police, the court heard.

This figure includes various types of damages plus an amount to compensate for the earnings he would probably have made if he had remained as a police officer.

In the civil case Mr Alam brought against the force, the Chief Constable admitted malicious prosecution and misfeasance in public office.

Speaking outside court, Mr Alam said he was relieved the case was at an end.

Asked about the size of the payout, he said: "To me it's just a number. It was never about the money. It's about the principle. It's about what's right.

"All that it will do is ensure that my future financially is secure and my children's future is secure but that would have happened anyway if I had been allowed to continue with my career."

Mr Alam said: "Seventeen years that should have been spent with family and building a career serving the public have instead been spent fighting for my rights as an individual and fighting for justice against what, at times, appeared to be insurmountable odds."

He added: "I have had to endure years of shame and humiliation and a stain on my good name - a name which I can trace back through 12 generations.

"Not only did I lose my career - I lost my freedom, my family unit, my reputation and my health and much, much more."

The court heard how the former traffic officer was "stitched up" by fellow officers as a result of industrial tribunal proceedings he launched in 1993 complaining of racial discrimination.

In 2003, four fellow officers involved in Mr Alam's original prosecution were charged with conspiracy to pervert the course of justice and other offences, but were acquitted.

Mr Alam, the son of a Pakistani police officer and the father of two girls who were eight and six when he was convicted, separated from his wife in 2002 as a result of the turmoil the case brought to his family life.

He remarried but his second marriage failed under the pressure of what had happened and his resulting psychiatric illness.

After being cleared in 2007, he was reinstated to Cleveland Police but retired in 2009 on health grounds.

Mr Alam told the court he was concerned he was still under surveillance by Cleveland Police.

He told Judge Andrew Keyser QC how he confronted a photographer last week who later got into a marked police car.

He said: "If anyone wanted to dig up any dirt on me it will be fruitless unless, once again, they wanted to create it out of thin air."

Fiona Barton QC, for Cleveland Police, told the court she could neither confirm nor deny that Mr Alam was under surveillance but warned that this was a standard response in any case where this was alleged.

Outside court, Mr Alam said the worst aspect of his 17-year ordeal was the effect it had on his family and his personal life.

He said: "This was a sophisticated, deliberate and malicious act and all because I wanted to be treated as an equal. That's all."

Mr Alam said he believed nothing had really changed at Cleveland Police since his conviction but he said: "The majority of police officers out there are decent, honest, hard-working people."

And he said he would not discourage young Asian people from joining the police.

He said: "Do it. But do so with your eyes open.

"No-one should think they can't break the glass ceiling at any organisation. But you must do so in full knowledge there will be difficulties.

"But you must be prepared to deal with those difficulties. Only then will the climate change."

Mr Alam said the final compensation figure for his loss of earnings was worked out on the probability of him reaching various ranks, including superintendent.

He said he is now planning to take up a role as a public servant, but would not give any further details.

FOLLOW UK

A police officer who was wrongfully sent to prison as a result of a malicious prosecution brought by colleagues is to receive a total compensation package of more than £800,000. But ex-Pc Sultan A...
A police officer who was wrongfully sent to prison as a result of a malicious prosecution brought by colleagues is to receive a total compensation package of more than £800,000. But ex-Pc Sultan A...
Filed by David Hobbs  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 235
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (5 total)
12:00 PM on 03/13/2013
I cannot understand why the officers involved in the fabrication of the case had not perverted the course of public justice.
I had a case fabricated agaisnt me as they "felt" I was guilty, they fabricated admissions of the offence but there was no evidence to support any of the claims, there was no victim and as investigations stand, no admission. Clearly the police had actively fabricted the case and it is evidenced in detail.
I can understand why they fabricated the matter as they were manipulated, but when that mistake aids child abusers then surely they should come clean rather than dig a bigger hole for themselves!
I wonder if the case was made out under "in the public interest" to fail?
we have to consider that those officers were used to fabrications making all the cases they were involved with unsafe and most certainly questionable. ( AKA how many other cases were fabricated agaisnt innocent people?)
12:39 AM on 04/18/2012
This very similar to the Ali Dizaei case. I am willing to bet the same will happen in his case soon when it will be expose it was stitch up.
07:46 PM on 04/17/2012
Well done Sultan Alam. To be only a little fair to the Police a high percentage of British organisations are and shall be for the next fifty years Institutionally Racist, i.e. the BBC, Fire service, banks, politics, Newspaper companies, journalism, professional football managers, NHS, performing arts etc. It is for the fact that the Police have a tremendous amount of power and do generally abuse it hence why they get the crack of the whip when comes to raciallity. It should never of taken seventeen years to get justice and equality in so called democratic society, and the officers which caused the abuse get let off??? There usually is little if no smoke without fire. If you were to count the amount of black, Asian and ethnic officers at a very senior rank, inspector, or even the amount of black, Asian and ethnic officers leaving due to racial bullyment or glass ceiling discrimination then the results would prove that the British society have not moved very far from the McPherson report.
When you are of a minority colour it is good to give thanks to a country not of your origin that excepts you and educates you. England feels like an Uncle. Looked after you when you needed help but at the same time while growing up raped you as well.
10:33 AM on 04/18/2012
what a pathetic waste of time. some point of interest and may be true, you are lucky you live in a civilisided society will all the injustices that you memtion, it is in a civilised society that you can freely write any comments you think appropriate without the fear of a knock on the door like so many other countries . So while there is, no doubt, some way to go a constructive discussion is much more beneficial than your rumbling on. I am an immigrant as well and this country has served me well. There is always an alternative if you do not like it year then move on.
This comment has been removed.
01:53 PM on 04/17/2012
There are some aspects of this that really irk me:

1) Retrospective pay - the sum awarded has been based on 17 years of service, that he may, or may not have served.
2) Promotions - Various promotions and pay rises assumed. My Father was a policeman for 40 years and never progressed beyond DC, as he wished to remain on the front line, why is it assumed that he would have been promoted?
3) Deductions from pay - the amount awarded, doesn't take into account anything he has actually earned in the 17 years. Why not? The court should have taken into consideration what was actually earned in the 17 years and deducted it from the award. The difference, is how much he would have been better, or worse off.
4)Reinstatement and Ill Health - I doubt he performed a single day's duty. Why was somebody with documented mental health problems given a job? As expected, in 2009, he signed off on ill health and is now in receipt of a much larger pension (medical pension) than honest officer's, that have actually served all their life, will ever receive.
5) "Do it. But do so with your eyes open." - If you are ethnic and believe that you are entering a job that is full of racist's and prejudicial treatment, then why join the fu**ing job! Is it solely to benefit from possible court action's such as this in the future?

Another hard working, totally fed up, tax payer.
01:50 PM on 04/17/2012
MMM a bent copper who would belive it
01:46 PM on 04/17/2012
THEY ARE VERY GOOD AT GIVING OUR TAX MONEY AWAY.
01:49 PM on 04/17/2012
he was a Police Officer who are funded by the tax payer, who do you think should pay his rightful settlement? Santa Clause?

if your employer had done this to you, who would you expect to pay the settlement?
01:16 PM on 04/17/2012
Wow some of the posters on here begger belief.. Why are the taxpayer paying his compensation! because as a Police Office it is taxpayers who would pay his salary! if he hadn't been wrongfully convicted he would have earned that money as a public servant.

As Cleveland police have accepted liability he is entitled to it, plain and simple.

The questions you should be asking is why are those that concocted and then covered this up still being paid?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
janno000
06:06 PM on 04/17/2012
They don't really begger belief this is what people are like, some people get off on writing comments they wouldn't dare say out loud and others are just plain thick.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
wincanton man
01:11 PM on 04/17/2012
Bet his wife was quickly back on the scene when she saw that £8 and all those zeros.
03:12 PM on 04/17/2012
Probably could not get her drawers off quick enough!
12:56 PM on 04/17/2012
Wot about the total cost of all this it must be many millions taxpayers footing the bill
and we talk about cut backs .If he wasnt employed by the state he would have got nothing
a tax payer
This comment has been removed.
This comment has been removed.
12:22 PM on 04/17/2012
Maybe he shouldn't throw around accusations of racial discrimination at the drop of a hat,these are after all his work colleagues.He could have ended their career by blowing up innocent comments,it shouldn't have happened but i don't really have any sympathy for him.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
janno000
06:01 PM on 04/17/2012
What if his claims were true?
12:21 PM on 04/17/2012
This sounds like an upright, principled man who was very badly treated and suffered great injustice in the process.
Our police force despite its inevitable odd bad apples, is the best in the world ! At least here, with all that some habitual moaners complain about, HE WAS ALLOWED to clear his name. In some other countries he would have been shot by his own for wanting justice....
Unfortunately the treatment he received is not unusual, though it was somewhat drastic. I saw this sort of attitude at work, by people wanting to get rid of someone they disliked, or felt threatened by on account of their being perceived as better at the job than they were.... I know someone who went through a lot and only finally got justice by involving the unions. The best the boss could do, though, was forcing the perpretrators (a nice little clique, all supporting each other in their abuse of power !), to take volountary redundancy. But at least it cleared the workplace of a very nasty little group.
12:00 PM on 04/17/2012
I would have far more respect for people if they didn't say it was the principle and not the money. If you are due compensation take it with open arms and just say you deserve every penny of it. Yes the principle is part of it but the money is very important.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
janno000
06:02 PM on 04/17/2012
judging people by your own low standards?