FOI Act Should Be Rewritten To Protect Government Secrets, Says Jack Straw

PA/The Huffington Post UK  |  Posted: 17/04/2012 16:40 Updated: 17/04/2012 16:40

Straw
Jack Straw says the FOI act was not "well constructed"

The former Labour Minister who introduced the Freedom of Information Act told MPs it should be rewritten to protect secrecy in government decision-making.

Jack Straw said the Act, which he helped create as Home Secretary in 2000, has hampered ministers and civil servants' ability to put their thoughts on paper for fear of seeing them published later.

Controversial documents like the NHS risk register, which the FOI Tribunal forced the Government to disclose, should be protected from exposure so ministers can think through the dangers of legislation, he declared.

He insisted, speaking to members of the Justice Committee, that "it has to be possible for officials to say to ministers `There are these risks' without them going public... That sort of information must be, in my view, protected."

The act, he said, contained "ridiculous" drafting errors and needed to be tightened up.

Straw argued that sections 35 and 36 of the Act should be "clarified" to exempt from disclosure information on the formulation of government policy, ministerial communications and law officers' advice and to avoid inhibiting the free and frank exchange of views within government.

Ministers who framed the Act believed they had given a "class exemption" to internal Government policy discussions, but this had been undermined by a series of "rather extraordinary decisions" by the FOI Tribunal, which appeared to believe that the protection should be lifted as soon as a policy was in place, he said, adding: "That is crazy and it is not remotely what was intended."

The Act has "at some levels of government - particularly at high levels - led to a reluctance to commit the process of decisions to records, so in one sense it has made it more difficult to secure accountability, rather than less," Straw told MPs.

"There has to be a space in which decision-makers can think thoughts without the risk of disclosure, not just at the time but the risk of disclosure afterwards" he added.

Former Prime Minister Tony Blair has famously said that he now regrets passing the FOI Act, writing in his memoir: "I quake at the imbecility of it."

Straw today said that, when Blair handed him responsibility for FOI in 1998, he made clear that he wanted him to row back from earlier proposals drawn up in the first months of the Labour administration, which the former Home Secretary said were "unreal" in the extent of the openness which they envisaged.

He admitted that the reframed Act which he eventually passed in 2000 was "not particularly well-constructed" and said sections 35 and 36 in particular had caused "very significant problems". Despite featuring in the 1992 and 1997 manifestos, freedom of information had not been thoroughly thought-through before Labour took office, he said.
"The error that we made was not so much having it in the manifesto, but not thinking clearly enough about how it would operate, because we have ended up with an Act that leads to greater access to documents than in any other comparable jurisdiction," said Straw. "In government, we should have taken more time to think this through."

But he added: "My answer is not to repeal the whole Act. It has produced many benefits as well as some disadvantages."

FOLLOW UK POLITICS

The former Labour Minister who introduced the Freedom of Information Act told MPs it should be rewritten to protect secrecy in government decision-making. Jack Straw said the Act, which he helped ...
The former Labour Minister who introduced the Freedom of Information Act told MPs it should be rewritten to protect secrecy in government decision-making. Jack Straw said the Act, which he helped ...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 19
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
04:00 PM on 04/20/2012
He has certainly changed since he was president of the N.U.S.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Lord Justice Wolf
04:13 PM on 04/19/2012
Jackie Boy face the music like a man, "some FOI Laws are greta but the one that I want changed is the one that will protect me" He is such an a/hole
photo
carneliancrystal
Do I believe all the propaganda of course I do
10:12 AM on 04/19/2012
Jack Straw could be caught out by legislation he introduced now wants it changed, flapping like a buggie 20,000 feet and still rising what a shame.
12:07 PM on 04/18/2012
Now you know what happens when the so called 'Do-Gooders' foul up, they all want to U-turn.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Roger Cottrell
10:47 AM on 04/18/2012
Piss off Jack and face your charges in court like a man. I'd also like to see more, in the public domain, about the rise of SANDLINES and other mercenary armies on your watch.
photo
tc-byrne
Victoria Concordia Crescit
09:10 AM on 04/18/2012
What we need is a codified constitution to stop these politicitians changing or issuing laws to suit there own agenda.
You have the FIA and now you dont.
07:35 AM on 04/18/2012
To hide the shoddy and illegal practices of the Tony Liar more like.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Michaelxx
06:35 AM on 04/18/2012
MPs so obviously crooked. and we cant stop them.......
05:30 AM on 04/18/2012
It should all be out there where we can read just what them in Westminster are up to, we pay them so we want to know what they are up to. If he wants to re-wright any laws... start with the EU.
KenInd
We too shall get through this.....
10:27 PM on 04/17/2012
Jack...Jack...

The FOI law was passed to allow exactly what you want to hide.
photo
tc-byrne
Victoria Concordia Crescit
09:15 AM on 04/18/2012
This might have something to do with him being sued by the lybian.
09:52 PM on 04/17/2012
Bit cheeky when they want the right to monitor anyone's email and internet use - just because.....errrr......they want to
05:30 PM on 04/17/2012
It should be amended to include the monarchy, which is currently exempt from the FOI.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Matthew Harrold
Huzzah!
05:09 PM on 04/17/2012
Why on earth should governments have secrecy from it's own people? I, for one, would love to have my government accountable for ALL the decisions it makes on my behalf.
04:55 PM on 04/17/2012
Now why do you think Jack Straw wants the FOI re-drafted, my default question is - What does he want to hide...?

I am sure it is purely coincidence that from documents recovered from the rubble of Libya, it appears that when he was Home Secretary our security services may have been involved in the rendition of British nationals to the Gaddafi regime for 'interrogation' (nudge, nudge).

Yes - purely coincidence....
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
uksnapper
04:48 PM on 04/17/2012
Most laws seem to be made in haste and often require sharp legal minds to interpret them after the lawmakers made them .
I would say that all documents considered sensitive at top level should have perhaps a protected time limit of say 5 years before being made public.The civil servants and MPs are,after all,our employees and need to remember that.
07:58 PM on 04/17/2012
5 days would be too long.

Why should the people acting on MY behalf have the right to withhold information from me, their paymaster?
KenInd
We too shall get through this.....
10:30 PM on 04/17/2012
No. Let FOI prevail. Any sensitive words can be redacted.