There’s probably not a person left on the planet who hasn’t yet seen Prince Harry’s privates, yet if a top shelf women’s magazine and a male stripping troupe have their way, we’ll be seeing them again and again and again.
Playgirl and The Chippendales were so impressed with the crown jewels they want a second look – and they’re prepared to pay big bucks for the privilege.
Playgirl publisher Vincent Stevens told E!: “There’s no way in the world that he would ever consider this, but you’re talking about numbers in the six figures right off the bat.
Scroll down for more pictures of Prince Harry
Bumping and a-grinding: How Harry would look as a Chippendale
Meanwhile The Chippendales are also trying to recruit the naked prince, with a Las Vegas spokesman telling TMZ: "Chippendales at the Rio All-Suite Hotel and Casino are reaching out to the royalty to gauge his interest in being our next guest host.
Hope he wore sunscreen: Prince Harry bares his pasty torso in Vegas...before baring everything else
Even if the prince refuses legitimate offers to disrobe, oil up and gyrate in public - there could be more leaked nudity on the way. TMZ reports there were "several" girls taking pictures on their mobile phones during the night in question.
Of the pictures already doing the rounds, a friend of Harry's has described the girl who sold them as "despicable".
Landon believes the culprit was "one of the bikini-clad girls who attended the party" and insisted the prince's friends were "really careful" not to betray him.
Until now no papers in the UK had used them following a request from St James's Palace, made via the press watchdog, to respect Harry's privacy.
Share your vote on Facebook so your friends can take this poll
The Rupert Murdoch-owned tabloid said it was carrying the pictures in Friday's edition so the millions of people who get their news in print or have no internet access could "take a full part in that national conversation".
The Sun managing editor David Dinsmore said the paper had "thought long and hard" about whether to use the pictures and said it was an issue of freedom of the press rather than because it was moralising about Harry's actions.
There’s probably not a person left on the planet who hasn’t yet seen Prince Harry’s privates, yet if a top shelf women’s magazine and a male stripping troupe have their way, we’ll be seeing ...
There’s probably not a person left on the planet who hasn’t yet seen Prince Harry’s privates, yet if a top shelf women’s magazine and a male stripping troupe have their way, we’ll be seeing ...
"Bring it on" and "I'd rather go blind" are hardly sufficient choices for this above-mentioned "Quick Poll." Where was the option, "Only If He Wants To"?
The Prince is not going to be the next King, or even the one after that. Cut him some slack. He's had to live in a goldfish bowl his whole life. Are these the slow news days of August?
I bet anything he'll "live and learn."
RapidEye55: "Bring it on" and "I'd rather go blind" are hardly
Sara's item begins: "There’s probably not a person left on the planet who hasn’t yet seen Prince Harry’s privates...."
Actually there are probably a few of us. I am gay, I am not a Christian and I am no prude. But I do recognize a failure to respect someone's privacy.
In these situations it is best to apply personal ethics. If it wasn't meant to be seen with the permission of the owner then I'll respect their privacy. Over the past few days I've been passing up on dozens of "click to see Harry dick" links. I'll pass, thank you. But I don't mind commenting on the issue.
I am sure there are others who feel equally annoyed when these private matters are exposed in the media, especially when the fodder has nothing to do with their political or publicly presented position. In Harry's case? He is a young man with a right to privacy. I'm sure this will be an unpopular comment.
Mark_D_Webster: Sara's item begins: "There’s probably not a person left on
Loading comments… 
Huffington Post UK | By Sara C Nelson Posted: 24/08/2012 10:06 Updated: 24/08/2012 16:21