Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Andrew Mitchell

GET UPDATES FROM Andrew Mitchell
 

The International Community Must Work Together to Prevent a Humanitarian Catastrophe

Posted: 17/07/11 01:00

My visit to the Dadaab refugee camp and a hospital for malnourished children in Wajir, Northern Kenya, today was both enormously upsetting and powerfully motivating. The women I met at Dadaab, their feet bloodied by weeks of walking to reach this refuge, told me harrowing stories of their journeys. Some had been robbed, others encountered violence. Some had even lost their children to hunger on the way.

But as terrible as their ordeal had been, those who reach the camp are in many ways more fortunate than those left behind. They are getting the health care, emergency feeding and water they so desperately need.

I am proud to say that many of those people are benefitting from the generosity of the British people. The funds raised by the DEC and other appeals show that when disaster strikes, Britain responds. The Government's package of assistance, on behalf of the British taxpayer, will also save thousands of lives. And after seeing the scale of suffering here, I am more determined than ever to ensure that every pound of our assistance delivers 100 pence of value.

But even with the help announced by Britain, there is a grave danger that thousands of children will die here in East Africa over the coming months. So where Britain leads, others must follow. Over the coming days and weeks, I expect many more pledges of support from countries around the world - and I will be actively urging them to put their shoulders to the wheel.

The international community - countries, UN agencies and non-governmental organisations - must now work together to prevent what is already a terrible crisis becoming a humanitarian catastrophe which engulfs this whole region of Africa.

 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 8
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
photo
intellectualTradition
corruptisima re publica plurimae leges
05:23 on 18/07/2011
and when you care of them you will ensure they have more babies, thereby making sure you keep creating starving people. brilliant
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Itsbeenalongday
Eliminating poverty is smart business
03:35 on 18/07/2011
I am wondering if the Secretary of State will read these comments and listen to what people have to say?

First, the problem has been a long time in coming. All the predictive powers of NASA have been able to tell us that yet we have done nothing about it. Drought is as regular feature in this part of the world as floods are in Pakistan where I am now and Afghanistan where I have been.

But we do nothing to prevent or mitigate against it. We invest in food aid as the emergency unfolds but not in preventing it before it happens. Unlike the measures they have taken in China and India, there are no water conservation programs of note that could have stored the water that fell last winter or diverted some from other sources.

Second, there is nothing of the usual trade back if they are given the funds which means they will have to be loaned it with that prospect in mind.

Yes Mr Secretary, you can solve the problem and it really comes back to you and your government and whether you want to or not.
02:55 on 18/07/2011
How do we exist if preventing heartbreak is our reason? There is so much and it is everywhere. How do all humans on the planet evolve to a connection with all others when we demand that everyone feel the way that we do? You are in the middle of evoution. Not the end. Thousands of years ago women left their babies in the face of danger, so that they, themselves, could survive. It was what was necessary. If they'd all perished there would be no 'you' now. I weep as I type this because I'm like you--a human with feelings and all that goes with that. But, we have not reached the point where everyone can survive. We just haven't and to think what you think is actually selfish. Cause it soothes you. Cause it's your belief and the way your brain works and the way that you sleep. We aren't there yet: where you are, and we can't do it. Let us be and we can get there. I visit a grave every few day--yesterday my son would have been 25. But, it wasn't meant to be. I know pain on a close basis and my job is to live for my twelve week old fetus of a grandchild. That's nature, that's life and I will fail if I lie on that grave everyday or never think of that grave at all.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
NJP1
17:49 on 17/07/2011
While everyone wants to help, it is impossible not to recognize the cause of the recurring mess in East Africa. The region is a desert country, and there’s a physical limit to the numbers it can support. There are now too many people, and those with means to do so are fighting over diminishing resources, land water and food. This wrecks the country still more, and displaces thousands into refugee camps. It’s a tribal society, and while we might look on such horror with European eyes, those doing the fighting care about nothing but their own survival. This is mankind in extremis, driven to desperate measures by overpopulation. Yes, we can help, this time. But there are now 85,000,000 people in Ethiopia, and let’s fast forward another 30 years: with a growth rate of 2.6% that means there will be double that number. While we focus on charity, this is the brutal reality of overpopulation; trying to fill a desert with people and expecting it to provide food and water into infinity. Is anyone seriously suggesting that mankind can avoid catastrophe on a scale as yet unimagined? Just to add a little more chaos to the mix, the world will also have an extra 2 billion to feed by then. I just offer the facts, I think we’re too far down the line to come up with solutions. Nature is going to do that for us. http://www.yourmedievalfuture.com/
darcy
I'm the one on the left
17:44 on 17/07/2011
This is heartbreaking, but there's always a heartbreaking crisis in Africa. We have our own crises here.
17:02 on 17/07/2011
Some of these women were interviewed for radio programming. It's heartbreaking. We are faced with the same if we don't address this U.S. financial situation fairly. Why can't those with a lot pay more taxes and those with so little pay less or nothing? What kind of resourced people would refuse to pay their fair share of bounty for the government that made it possible? Blast these representatives who don't represent us! What is it that they are getting or afraid of losing that keeps them from making the only logical decision? Taxes should have never been dropped in the first place! Workers have paid with hard labor while portions were taken out to apply toward retirement and Social Security. That was the deal: a contract with the people. Who are these representatives who want to dissolve the program? If wealthy heirs, corporate execs and board members won't pay taxes, then they should be made to pay for the medical care and relief of the Dadaab refugees, because they, only, have the resources to do it. They could afford going and spending a month helping those people. No higher taxes, then they should do world work, bodily -- not pay someone else to do it for them, and help fix these problems. They can afford the airfare, take off the pompous clothing and get a taste of humanity. If African diamonds that lay in their vaults, then they should go to work and improve Africa. There might be politicians among
12:29 on 17/07/2011
Does the '' international community '' include the wealthy of Africa and Asia?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mombabytiger
Looking into the heart of an artichoke.
19:51 on 17/07/2011
No. It means us. It always means us.