THE BLOG

My Son Is Not a Terrorist But He Was Terrorised

05/12/2014 18:03 GMT | Updated 04/02/2015 10:59 GMT

This week marked the 11th anniversary of the day that changed our lives forever. On 2 December 2003, my son Babar Ahmad was accused by the Metropolitan Police of being an al-Qaeda terrorist, an allegation made after officers brutally assaulted him and mocked his religion. It took over five years before the Commissioner for the Metropolitan Police admitted in the High Court that his officers had abused Babar exactly as he claimed, although the officers were later acquitted of the assault. Babar was released without charge after six days when the CPS concluded there was insufficient evidence to prosecute him for any offence. Nevertheless, his ordeal continued, for to even be suspected of terrorism warrants a life sentence. In August 2004, Babar was arrested and detained under an extradition warrant from the US based on the same material that had been dismissed by the CPS.

That marked the beginning of an epic battle against extradition. Over eight years of tireless campaigning and litigation from his prison cell made Babar a household name, yet he was still extradited to the US on 5 October 2012. Many remember that dark, rainy night when the planes departed and he was taken away from his family, his home and his country. Upon arrival, Babar was almost immediately placed in almost 24 hour solitary confinement, conditions which he endured for the next 18 months.

On 19 July 2014, in the District Court of Connecticut, Judge Janet Hall sat to decide on Babar's sentence after he entered a guilty plea. My wife and I were present at an unusually packed courtroom. We were surprised to learn that Babar's supporters consisted of friends and families of Babar's legal team, some of whom had even taken days off work to come and be there for Babar on that critical day. When you go through a hardship, some friends become distant acquaintances and some acquaintances become family.

As the judge ploughed through the evidence, our anxiety turned to joy as she identified the core issues through the fog of hateful propaganda that had been spun for over a decade. Despite his guilty plea, Judge Hall made a number of remarkable findings that were glossed over and ignored by the media at the time. These included that:

  • Babar "never supported or believed in or associated with Al-Qaida or Osama bin Laden. He never fought in Afghanistan at a time when they were fighting the Americans or protecting Osama bin Laden. And he never engaged in operational planning or operations that could fall under the term "terrorism."
  • Babar did not have "an interest in operational terrorist activities." She stated clearly, "I believe the Government agrees that there were never any plots even discussed by these defendants. There was never any aid given by these defendants to effectuate a plot. By plot, I mean a terrorist plot. A plot to go out and purposely harm civilians."
  • Babar "had absolutely no interest in operational terrorist actions that would harm the United States."
  • Babar "was not interested in what is commonly known as terrorism."

On the contrary, the Judge found that Babar generously gave his time to other people to help them become better. "Indeed you succeeded because they did become better. They became very productive, successful members of British society."

  • Babar had empathy for others in difficult situations including someone who lost a relative in the 9/11 attacks: "The nature of the support that you gave to this family in -- both in helping them try to find out what happened to their sister and daughter and in supporting the mother... and your constant remembrance of the anniversary and letting them know that you are still thinking of and remembering this murdered sister or daughter --is evidence to me of what others have generally categorized as your caring, thoughtful and empathetic nature."
  • Babar "appears to have kept the characteristics that everyone speaks of him as having despite having been in prison for 10 years, including the last two under circumstances that I'm not sure I could keep whatever good I have in me over that period."
  • "People report that from prison he has, at least when allowed to in England in his custody, to correspond and to telephone others, to express his happiness for what they are going through, his concern for what they may be suffering or on enduring without, in any way, dwelling on or focusing on his own circumstances."
  • Babar is " a good person who does not and will not seek in the future to harm other people. Even people who are different than himself."

Despite such incredible findings, she nevertheless passed a sentence of 12.5 years on the basis that he had entered a guilty plea. The sentence was half of the 25 year sentence the US government were demanding. As soon as we understood the sentence which meant that Babar could be home within a year or so, we began to weep and made repeated thanks to God. Even the lawyers had tears in their eyes as the light at the end of the tunnel was shining a little brighter. The first rays of dawn were finally becoming visible to us after the long dark night.

Although Babar remains in prison, he will be home soon, much sooner than anyone ever expected. More importantly, despite the conviction, the accusations of terrorism for which he has suffered physically and psychologically for over a decade were rendered into dust by the judge who examined all the evidence in the case. I feel vindicated by her words for I know my son is not a terrorist. The same cannot be said for the officers who assaulted him on 2 December 2003. They may not be "terrorists" but they certainly terrorised an innocent man.