Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Colm Howard-Lloyd

GET UPDATES FROM Colm Howard-Lloyd
 

Ken Livingstone: It's Not the Homophobia, Stupid!

Posted: 26/02/2012 23:00

Ken Livingstone, in a recent New Statesman article makes the offensive claim that "you just knew the Tory party was riddled with it [homosexuality] like everywhere else is."

Another gaffe, echoing the time he compared reporter Oliver Finegold to a "concentration camp guard". Livingstone's idiotic choice of words has led to howls of derision from all sides, and the accusation that he is homophobic.

The man is many things that make him unfit for office, but homophobic isn't one of them; and to take this line of attack puts us in danger of missing the real opportunity to talk about his record.

Ken Livingstone can rightly be proud of his support of LGBT rights. As Mayor he launched the UK's first Partnership Register and he had TfL refuse homophobic advertising from holiday company Sandals. He has a lot of supporters in London's LGBT population, many of whom he will be hoping will take a £2500 table at his LGBT London For Ken fundraising dinner on 12 March. These, and others, are the people we need to remind of Ken's record in City Hall.

Ken's biggest flaw, that should worry LGBT Londoners, is that he believes minorities should 'compete' for the patronage, funding and support of City Hall. Under Livingstone anything to do with LGBT issues, or with Black or Asian issues, or with women's issues was lumped into an Equalities department. Never mind that issues around safe housing might be better dealt with by a specialist in the housing team, this was about creating a power base.

Under the leadership of Director for Policy and Equalities, Lee Jasper, many thrived. Indeed even companies Lee Jasper was himself a director of thrived - leading to a lengthy police investigation for corruption. All minorities were not equal, and whilst Jasper took a personal interest in the support and funding of organisations such as Notting Hill Carnival, equivalent events such as gay pride or Holocaust Memorial Day were left to junior officers.

Ken Livingstone himself considers some minorities more worthy of offending than others. In 2005 he literally embraced Yusuf al-Qaradawi, a Muslim cleric who said that "the Asian tsunami victims were punished by Allah because their countries are centres of perversion". In response to representation from the broadest coalition of Muslim, Hindu, Jewish, Christian and LGBT Londoners, Ken chose to attack his critics, accusing them of lies and Islamaphobia. His advisors went further and cancelled the short-lived LGBT Forum at City Hall after it twice dared to table motions questioning the role of the Mayor in endorsing such an extremist figure.

All of this demonstrates that while not homophobic, Ken Livingstone is no friend of LGBT Londoners. For him minorities are an opportunity to raise his profile, and where their interests conflict it will be the vote he needs most at that time that wins. His poor judgement, particularly in his senior team, and his propensity towards offensive remarks make him a friend of no Londoner.

Homophobia isn't the reason we shouldn't elect Ken Livingstone as Mayor on 3 May 2012; his complete unsuitability for office is.

 

Follow Colm Howard-Lloyd on Twitter: www.twitter.com/colmhowardlloyd

Ken Livingstone, in a recent New Statesman article makes the offensive claim that "you just knew the Tory party was riddled with it [homosexuality] like everywhere else is." Another gaffe, echoing ...
Ken Livingstone, in a recent New Statesman article makes the offensive claim that "you just knew the Tory party was riddled with it [homosexuality] like everywhere else is." Another gaffe, echoing ...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 21
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Paul Wagland
Resistance is fertile
21:18 on 04/03/2012
It's not the accusation of complete unsuitability for office which offends me, it's the persistent charge of homophobia that people like Colm Howard-Lloyd slap all over their invective.

Livingstone said nothing homophobic Colm, and you bl00dy well know it.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Colm Howard-Lloyd
09:09 on 07/03/2012
I've specifically said I don't believe him to be homophobic - indeed that's the point of the article! However his record of using LGBT Londoner's as just another voting block, to be offended when another voting block is more important, make him no friend.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Paul Wagland
Resistance is fertile
09:34 on 07/03/2012
And you know as well as I do that your readers will take much more from your headline than they will from your third paragraph. It's a textbook spin, and a deliberate attempt to colour peoples' opinions. If he's not homophobic, why have you brought it up at all?

I'm no particular fan of Livingstone, but his record of support for LGBT causes should earn him a little more credit. He doesn't deserve to have it used against him like this.
18:48 on 04/03/2012
Ken is right in other respects however. The UK is large enough to take the entire global population or at least half the Third World and most of the East European workforce.

If you disagree with the above it is only because you are a Nazi fascist thug and as such have no rights to live on this planet.
11:56 on 04/03/2012
Ken is boring. Boris is silly. Both are somewhat sleazy. And yet London is a vast city filled with interesting people. But these two are the main choices. This means one thing for sure. The political party system in London is on the rocks.

If you live in London, don't vote for them.
12:41 on 28/02/2012
It was completely clear decades ago that Ken was the symbol of the loony left, and he still is.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
13:49 on 27/02/2012
He did alright the last time he was mayor. London didn’t collapse nor descend into chaos. London was actually buzzing and growing in popularity all over the world.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Gunderan
Who let the Libertarians out without supervision?
11:57 on 07/03/2012
The author of this article is correct.Ken Livingston is an irrelevant symbol of a sleazy leftwing politician whose self interest and attention seeking which led to people labeling anyone left of Adolph Hitler a socialist and that became the new the commies are coming cry from Murdoch owned press.He was and is the perfect talking point and should retire.
London is a vibrant place but is filled with perfect examples of income inequality and provincialism(God forbid you dare come from north of the Watford gap lol).Is Boris perfect no is he much better than Ken oh yes.London has a unique voter base as lots of people dont vote or cant vote as they move around too much but dont let London lose its advantages keep Ken out
12:11 on 27/02/2012
One of the few people with the guts to call the Tory cretins as they are. more power to his elbow, I wish we hd him up here in far Caledonia
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Gunderan
Who let the Libertarians out without supervision?
10:51 on 27/02/2012
Ken Livingston has a record of using his job for personal gain(political power mostly) Boris may not be the best and if you think that then vote for someone else not some hasbeen who has not helped London or any of its residents ever. Find someone new who hasn't the baggage of red ken.People like him are responsible for new labour and the disaster that is the coalition.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Neil McNab
12:26 on 27/02/2012
Ken had nothing whatsoever to do with New Labour, you're factually incorrect. But I agree that he is a bad thing overall.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Gunderan
Who let the Libertarians out without supervision?
15:22 on 27/02/2012
Sorry my bad What i should have said is that the backlash against people like ken Livinston is what led to new labour.So yes Ken isnt to blame
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Thismortalcoil
Science is the poetry of reality
10:15 on 27/02/2012
Ken wasn't saying the Conservative party was riddled with homosexuality, he was saying it was riddled with hypocrisy. This is perfectly clear to anyone who reads the interview and isn't trying to twist his words to score an extremely tenuous political point.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jacksdad41
Quant Je Puis
21:31 on 27/02/2012
Copied directly from the New Statesman interview
"Well, the Labour ones have all come out . . . As soon as Blair got in, if you came out as lesbian or gay you immediately got a job. It was wonderful . . . you just knew the Tory party was riddled with it like everywhere else is"
Is there something missing from that quote or is that the actual text, it seems pretty clear and unambiguous to me and I dont see the word hypocracy anywhere.
.http://www.newstatesman.com/blogs/the-staggers/2012/02/khan-ken-livingstone-interview
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jacksdad41
Quant Je Puis
23:29 on 27/02/2012
excuse my typing before the typo cops pull me up - I meant hypocricy .-)
ThinkCreeps
Seriously, it's time.
03:20 on 27/02/2012
How unsuitable for office does Ken have to be to be more unsuitable than the current major?